Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/Elections 2014/Votes/Techman224

< Stewards | Elections 2014 | Votes
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

Techman224

ContentsYes • No • Neutral

Techman224 talk • contribs • SULutil (accounts) / stalktoy • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:

  • Languages: en-N, fr-1
  • Personal info: Hello, my name is Techman224, and have been editing since May 2007. I started out on the English Wikipedia, where I first got introduced to counter-vandalism, and where I first got rollback. In late 2008 I started to get involved in CVN and SWMT. As time went on, I started to get involved in other projects. In February 2012 I became an administrator on Wikimedia Commons, and in early January 2013, I became an administrator on Wikidata. This brings me experience with multilingual projects. I also have done various other activities. I'm also an OTRS agent, working mostly in permissions. I have done some work with the Mediawiki software and even done a few commits in Gerrit. I also help deal with bugs on Bugzilla when I encounter one. If I become a steward I could help with cross wiki vandalism and spamming, which I currently report on Meta and in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect channel. Being able to globally block cross wiki spammers and vandals would help me greatly. I'm also comfortable with the Abuse Filter, which will come in handy when Global Abuse Filters are enabled on more wikis. I use it on both Commons and Wikidata, and it would help greatly against spambots. I also hang out on IRC, so I would be able to help with requests from there as well. I'm also open to doing other steward activities like Permissions and doing some Checkuser queries. I agree to follow all relevant policies that come with the tools, and I will be submitting my identification before the deadline. Thank you, Techman224Talk 18:40, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Withdraw: I withdraw my nomination. It looks like my nomination will not succeed. It's time to move on to other things. I'll be back. Techman224Talk 02:07, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2014/Questions#Techman224


  Yes

  2. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  (weak support) I trust Techman, but I'm not sure he is completely ready. I think he would do a good job if elected, however. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Why not? —DerHexer (Talk) 19:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    See the "No" section. Vogone talk 19:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 23:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. SamanthaPuckettIndo (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  No problem. SamanthaPuckettIndo (talk) 01:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Nirjal stha (Not eligible, checked by Alan) •  nShrestha (talk) 06:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Ivan Štambuk (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  Ivan Štambuk (talk) 08:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Conny (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Conny (talk) 09:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Давид Блрцян (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Давид Блрцян (talk) 16:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Work2win (Not eligible, checked by Igna) •  Work2win (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Abd (Eligible, checked by Alan)2012 •  Per PiRSquared17 Abd (talk) 00:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2012 •  --GZWDer (talk) 13:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. JurgenNL (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  JurgenNL (talk) 19:28, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Jusjih (talk) 21:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Lumos3 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Lumos3 (talk) 09:26, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Drzewianin (talk) 15:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Carlosandres2000 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Carlosandres2000 (talk) 03:25, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Aldnonymous (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  "My activity on here depends on what goes on in real life." yes life is unexpected, like I'm voting you now, cheers. --AldNonUcallin?☎ 19:25, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  He has much experience in many areas. Wpollard (talk) 07:38, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Rome2 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Rome2 (talk) 10:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Ivanaivanova (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  ок! Ivanaivanova (talk) 18:55, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  No

  2. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Alan (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Alan (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  I don't think Techman224 has enough experience dealing with relatively more complex issues than vandal-fighting. Also I must say that the temporary admin request on Meta (mentioned in the questions) was very off-putting to me. MF-W 18:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @MF-Warburg: Thanks for the comment, but do you mean by "more complex issues" exactly? Techman224Talk 03:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    I mean things like conflict resolution, "difficult" policy interpretation, making closures of hard-fought discussions, ... It's not possible to give a complete list of areas in which experience would be useful, and of course I also don't expect anyone to have it in all of them. Maybe my feeling is similar to Snowolf's in Ajraddatz' candidature (neutral vote no. 1). --MF-W 19:06, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  weak contributions. İncelemeelemani (talk) 18:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Per MF-W. Snowolf How can I help? 19:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Mh7kJ (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Also per MF-W. Mh7kJ (talk) 19:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Per MF-W DangSunM (talk) 19:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  He recently used an invalid revdelete reason on Wikidata, so I am not sure that oversight access would be a good idea. A "not now" rather than a "never". Jasper Deng (talk) 19:32, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    See d:Wikidata:AN#Spam_Revdel for the discussion. For the record I did revert the action and brought it up on AN when he objected. Techman224Talk 20:09, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  not now, but your time will come (if you want ofc.) Stryn (talk) 19:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Emin • message 19:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Rubin16 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  rubin16 (talk) 19:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Ebe123 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 21:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. D Eaketts (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  D Eaketts (talk) 21:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Sjoerddebruin (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Per MF-Warburg. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Daniel Mietchen (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Per MF-W. Daniel Mietchen (talk) 02:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  18. John Vandenberg (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  John Vandenberg (talk) 03:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  Armbrust (talk) 03:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Per MF-W, Jasper Deng, Stryn... etc. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:33, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  21. SleaY (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  SleaY (talk) 05:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  22. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  David1010 (talk) 05:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Byfserag (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  Byfserag (talk) 07:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Microchip08 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  — Microchip08 10:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Mehran (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 • Mehran Debate 11:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Goldenburg111 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  --Goldenburg111 18:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Cedalyon (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Cedalyon (talk) 20:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Chris Troutman (talk) 20:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Taichi (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Taichi - (あ！) 07:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Jafeluv (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Jafeluv (talk) 13:28, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Obelix (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Obelix (talk) 13:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Niesy74 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Niesy74 (talk) 20:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Courcelles 02:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Alberto568 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Alberto568 (talk) 11:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       فلورانس (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  Florence (talk) 13:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  Glaisher [talk] 17:32, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Rzuwig► 19:35, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Guerillero (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Guerillero 02:33, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:53, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 • --Hubertl (talk) 10:52, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  40. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  "It's very hard to predict how much time I will spend here." This statement does not bode well. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 21:02, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  Ronhjones (talk) 22:33, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Ul1-82-2 (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  Ul1-82-2 (talk) 19:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Steschke (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  ST ○ 22:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Maurice07 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Maurice07 (talk) 00:30, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Abaddon1337 (Verification pending) •  While good cross-wiki experience, he lacks of foreign languages knowledges to help him in this task. Abaddon1337 (talk) 11:28, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  46. George23820 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  George23820 (talk) 11:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

  2. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  I can't decide which option to choose here, so I chose neutral. I agree with both "sides". Wiki13 talk 18:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Brateevsky (talk) 18:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Guycn2 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Guycn2 (talk) 20:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Ralgis (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  --Allan Aguilar • /t/ 20:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014 •  Not sure yet. Trijnsteltalk 22:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014 •  Southparkfan 23:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. AGK (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  AGK [•] 23:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Bene* (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Bene* (talk) 11:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 13:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. GyaroMaguus (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Really difficult to judge this. Not enough for a yes, but not enough for no either. GyaroMaguus (talk) 02:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. LlamaAl (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  I agree with Gyaro. LlamaAl (talk) 04:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  No personal concerns about the candidate, though not enough internal ticks for a yes vote  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 11:50, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:12, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Zerabat (Eligible, checked by MF-Warburg)2014 •  Not ready. Zerabat (talk) 16:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Clockery (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Clockery Fairfeld (talk • enWS) 17:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Wikit 19:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Quentinv57 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  I don't have a concrete opinion about the candidate as of now. Quentinv57 (talk) 19:04, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Midnight Gambler (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Not sure. Midnight Gambler (talk) 20:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Pratyya Ghosh (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Per Wiki13 Pratyya (Hello!) 04:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Kapsuglan (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Kapsuglan (talk) 21:20, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Żyrafał (talk) 18:35, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Locke Cole (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  —Locke Cole • t • c 00:55, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Mr. Stradivarius (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 02:13, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Oursdesmontagnes (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Oursdesmontagnes (talk) 11:54, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2014/Votes/Techman224&oldid=19957746"