Stewards/Confirm/2013/MarcoAurelio

The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

MarcoAurelio edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: es, en-2, fr-2 (and passive understanding of other romanic languages)
Personal info: Hello. This is my third steward confirmation since my appointment in 2010. During this term I have continued to perform the tasks I used to do in the previous terms, being management and execution of steward requests here at Meta-Wiki, general cross-wiki maintenance, SWMT surveillance and intervention activities and antispam activities too. This year I have been less active than in the previous term, mainly due to health and personal issues I am not yet fully recovered. Notwithstanding I have performed 954 logged steward actions at Meta-Wiki, with a total of 6337 actions performed since my appointment. My activity by sectors can be seen in this graph. Additionaly, during this year we have seen how the Wikimedia family increased with the creation of two new projects, Wikidata —which I helped in their first stages with permissions granting— and Wikivoyage. If the community pleases and is happy with the management I did during the past year I would be delighted to serve for another term as steward. Comments on my work as steward are welcome. Thank you for your time. Best regards.
-- MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:07, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

español:

Idiomas: es, en-2, fr-2 (Puedo llegar a comprender bastante bien (aunque no escribir mucho): an, ast, ca, gl, ext y pt; y demás lenguas romances)
Información personal: Hola a todos. Esta es mi tercera confirmación como steward desde que fui elegido en 2010. Durante todo este tiempo he continuado con las tareas a las que he venido dedicándome durante todo este tiempo: gestión y ejecución de peticiones, mantenimiento, supervisión de pequeños proyectos y anti spam, entre otras. También he seguido activo en nuestras listas de correo internas y en nuestra cola de OTRS. Durante este año mi actividad se ha visto reducida respecto a la del año anterior por circunstancias personales y de salud. Aún así he realizado 954 acciones con un total de 6337 acciones desde mi elección. La distribución por sectores de actividad puede ser vista en este gráfico. Adicionalmente durante este año hemos visto cómo la familia de proyectos de Wikimedia aumentaba con la apertura de dos proyectos hermanos: Wikidata —a la que he asistido de manera especial en su primera fase con la asignación de permisos— y Wikiviajes, proyecto con el que estoy colaborando actualmente. Si la comunidad está conforme con el uso de los permisos y la gestión que he realizado durante el año pasado; si lo estima conveniente me gustaría continuar por otro periodo adicional. Comentarios relacionados con mi gestión como steward son bienvenidos. Muchas gracias por su tiempo. Reciba un saludo muy cordial.
-- MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:07, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

italiano:

Lingue: es, en-2, fr-2 (comprendo abbastanza bene anche alcune lingue romanze)
Informazioni personali: Ciao. Questa è la mia terza riconferma come steward da quando fui eletto nel 2010. Durante tutto questo tempo ho continuato a compiere le attività che già facevo gli anni scorsi, dedicandomi alla gestione e allo svolgimento delle richieste qui su Meta-Wiki, alla manutenzione generale, alla sorveglienza delle wiki minori e anche alle attività di antispam. Quest'anno sono stato meno attivo rispetto alla sessione precedente, principalmente per motivi di salute e problemi personali, e non mi sono ancora del tutto ripreso. Ciò nonostante, ho fatto 954 operazioni da steward su Meta-Wiki, con un totale di 6337 azioni compiute dalla mia elezione. La distribuzione per settori della mia attività può essere vista in questo grafico. Per di più, in questo anno abbiamo potuto vedere come è aumentata la famiglia dei progetti Wikimedia, con l'apertura di due nuovi progetti, Wikidata —dove ho aiutato nella prima fase assegnando i permessi— e Wikivoyage. Se la comunità è soddisfatta e felice di ciò che ho fatto l'anno passato, sarei lieto di servire per un altro anno come steward. Commenti sul mio lavoro come steward sono ben graditi. Grazie per il tuo tempo. Cordiali saluti.
-- MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:07, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

русский:

Языки: es, en-2, fr-2
Личная информация: translation needed

Deutsch:

Sprachen: es, en-2, fr-2 Ich kann zudem ganz gut verstehen (wenn auch nicht gut schreiben): an, ast, ca, gl, ext, pt und die anderen romanischen Sprachen
Informationen zur Person: Hallo an alle. Dies ist meine dritte Bestätigung als Steward seit ich 2010 gewählt wurde. Während der letzten Amtszeit habe ich in denselben Bereichen gearbeitet, denen ich mich auch in den davorliegenden Amtszeiten gewidmet habe, namentlich die Bearbeitung und Ausführung von Stewardanfragen hier auf Meta-Wiki, allgemeine Wartungsarbeiten, Betreuung kleinerer Projekte, Antispam und Weiteres. Zudem bin ich häufig aktiv auf unserer internen Mailingliste und unserer Warteschlange auf ORTS. In diesem Jahr war meine Aktivität aus persönlichen und gesundheitlichen Gründen geringer als im Jahr davor. Trotzdem habe ich 954 Steward-Aktionen getätigt, insgesamt seit meiner Wahl 6337 Steward-Aktionen. Die Verteilung meiner Aktivität auf verschiedene Bereiche kan man in dieser Graphik sehen. Zudem haben wir während des vergangenen Jahres gesehen, wie die Familie der Wikimedia-Projekte sich mit der Gründung zweier Schwesterprojekte vergrößert hat: Wikidata — wo ich in der Anfangsphase besonders geholfen habe durch Erteilung von Rechten— und Wikivoyage, ein Projekt, an dem ich aktuell mitwirke. Sofern die Community zufrieden ist mit meinem Einsatz der Rechte und meiner Amtsführung im vergangenen Jahr, würde ich gerne eine weitere Amtszeit lang weitermachen. Kommentare bezüglich meiner Amtsführung als Steward sind willkommen. Vielen Dank für Ihre Zeit. Seien Sie herzlich gegrüßt.
-- MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:07, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about MarcoAurelio edit

Keep Thehelpfulone 00:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, claro :) --Ignacio (talk) 00:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I love you so much! :-D —DerHexer (Talk) 00:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - MarcoAurelio does a wonderful job and I look forward to working with him in the future. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 00:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vogone (talk) 00:25, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Iste (D) 00:27, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 01:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 01:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Make cat 03:23, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep White Master (e s) 06:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure ! :-) -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 06:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. Sin duda alguna. Always nice to have him around. Sa vh ^ñ 06:34, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure--Ymblanter (talk) 09:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per last year. Jafeluv (talk) 09:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 10:13, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep mi cki 10:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, of course. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:25, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 10:56, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 11:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm, of course! -Barras talk 13:57, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep :-) --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep every steward I've collaborated with this year. Elfix 18:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep hola. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jyothis (talk) 20:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep! Jon Harald Søby (talk) 22:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trijnstel_talk 22:40, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 22:47, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Absolutely Theo10011 (talk) 02:46, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 02:56, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep :D Sotiale (talk) 03:11, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:26, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Érico Wouters ^msg 16:15, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course --Poco a poco (talk) 16:35, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 16:36, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep who else? Pundit (talk) 17:32, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Tegel _(Talk) 17:49, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Mar del Sur (talk) 19:37, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Obviously --Vito Genovese 21:42, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the best stewards. Thanks for your work at SRP. This, that and the other (talk) 02:49, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:52, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 13:42, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Millosh (talk) 14:07, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 17:39, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Wikisilki (talk) 21:48, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - In my capacity as a volunteer. --Philippe (talk) 03:53, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Sure --Ecemaml (talk) 17:10, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 23:26, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep usuario de confianza --►Safir yüzüklü Cekli^mesaj 05:23, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active, responsive, helpful QuiteUnusual ^TalkQu 09:05, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Technically an oppose See below. MarcoAurelio is certainly qualified to retain the role, however when I look at the list of users that are, at the current time, being unanimously reconfirmed, I don't really think that he's at that level. Good? Yes. Unanimous? No. Congrats on the reconfirmation though! I don't fully expect everyone to understand (or respect) my decision here, but since this isn't going to have any meaningful impact on the results, and because I try and stay the hell away from Meta and it's penchant for explosive dysfunction as much as possible, I won't be answering any inquiries about this. Sven Manguard (talk) 23:30, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for your comments. I don't usually go questioning comments however since I don't fully understand the meaning of yours and in regards to better serve the communities I'd be interested to know in which areas do you think I might improve in case I am confirmed for the next year. If I understand your comments correctly, you're opposing me because nobody has done so yet, right? In that case I must point out that you've just supported some fellow stewards that are being also "unanimously reconfirmed" hence my confusion (again, sorry if I misunderstood the meaning of your comment, but that's what my poor en-2 level says me...). If not, another possibility is that you might be concerned of something I did? Of course that you're free to comment in the way you prefer and I respect that (how could be otherwise?), but if you have concerns about some of my actions, I'd be interested to know so I can improve because blanket opposing does not really help as this is not a vote. I'm not perfect. The question is not if your comment will or will not have any meaningful impact on the confirmations which I don't know (that's an ElectCom task). If, in spite of your explicit refusal, you want to answer me; you may do so here, at my talk or via email as you wish. Regards. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 00:40, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - A couple of times I've seen you speak in a way that feels... how do I explain it... a tad too 'high and mighty' for my taste. Take your reconfirmation statement for example, where you say "Comments on my work as steward are welcome" (your italics). That seems... well I don't like the way it reads. Now I'm most certainly not one to talk about the virtues of not being unnecessarily abrasive, as I can be unnecessarily abrasive from time to time, but you're a Steward and I'm not. So I guess what I'm saying is that I want you to be reconfirmed, but I don't want you to be able to say that you were unanimously confirmed. Does that make a bit more sense? Sven Manguard (talk) 04:29, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - He will be able to say that he was unanimously reconfirmed tho, as you have stated that you want him reconfirmed and hence your comment here is a support. Note that the reconfirmation process is not some sort of RfA, but a chance for the community to comment on a steward's work for the past year and said comments are then taken into consideration by the stewards and the Election Committee. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 05:35, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - Well, the last part of my statement is just a short version of the rules the governs the confirmation process «please mention if you are comfortable or unhappy with the use of steward tools of any of the people listed below and why». I really don't have any kind of interest in saying that I was or I was not unanimously reconfirmed —this is not a hall of fame— but I do have interest in knowing in which ways I can better serve the communities with the tools they granted to me. Thanks for clarifying that there was not any issues on that side. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:48, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wnme (talk) 08:54, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good communicator to fellow stewards, good environmental scanner — billinghurst sDrewth 14:19, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
--Jan eissfeldt (talk) 18:57, 14 February 2013 (UTC) goes without saying[reply]
Keep Hurricanefan24 (talk) 18:09, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — ΛΧΣ²¹ 17:51, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:22, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hazard-SJ ✈ 23:54, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 13:36, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep es:Magister Mathematicae 17:07, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ruslik (talk) 06:52, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 17:23, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Roy 06:10, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Bertrand GRONDIN → ^(Talk) 17:50, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Keep. As Manguard says, certainly qualified for the job. Solid participation and care for our rules and procedures.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{@ L C S}˲» 08:10, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jaontiveros (talk) 15:07, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 20:51, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. LeinaD (t) 21:11, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]