Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Meta:Requests for checkuser/Hasley

< Meta:Requests for checkuser
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Hasley

edit

Not ending before 13 October 2021 05:45 (UTC)

Bureaucrat note: extended for one additional week. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:46, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone, I am Hasley, and after a note of encouragement, I present myself as a candidate for checkusership.

Over more than 19 months of being elected sysop here, I have been one of the most active administrators, making up more than 18,000 edits, and logged over 9,000 admin actions.

As part of my duties, I deal with cross-wiki abusers, spambots, and sockpuppeters fairly often, and in many situations CU tools would benefit - see for example this case, in which I blocked 7 accounts until a steward had to do a local check, this one, and this another. I am applying for CheckUser in order to stop serial vandals, rather than playing an endless Whac-A-Mole game when blocking them. I expect to get involved at RFCU as well.

I do not hold CU rights elsewhere as I have no wish to become one there, and am not running on the basis that “we need more CheckUsers”, especially considering that Meta has a fairly small queue. However, I think I am qualified enough to fill the gap that sometimes exists, and would be a net-positive to the project.

I am over the age of 18, legal age in my place of residence, and already signed the confidentiality agreement. I am willing to answer any questions, if raised. Thank you for your consideration. Sgd. —Hasley 05:45, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support
  1. Support Support Active and competent user. Thanks for all the work you do in combating disruption. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 06:03, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Support Almost all of our Meta checkusers are active, but I have no reason to oppose an active and capable admin who is volunteer for this task. --Uncitoyentalk 07:14, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Strong support Strong support Of course, without a doubt. Thanks for volunteering. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 08:14, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Support wait, Hasley not a CU? Let's fix that. SHB2000 (talk | contibs) 09:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Support yes! --mirinano (talk) 11:50, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Support Thanks for volunteering --MdsShakil (talk) 12:43, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support Support No concerns. ~~~~
    User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)     14:41, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support Support --Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 23:04, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support Support -- without doubt. --Daniuu (talk) 19:43, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support Support --Hulged (talk) 03:06, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:02, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support Support of course. JavaHurricane 14:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support Support -- 94rain Talk 20:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support Support -sasha- (talk) 13:51, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support Support Sargento de Hierro (talk) 15:53, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support Support, a very helpful administrator here already. Will be able to help more with CU. --Ferien (talk) 14:11, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support Support MONUMENTA (talk) 19:58, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support Support a competent and active sysop. stanglavine msg 22:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support Support tkm — Lukecody (talk) 02:07, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support Support --Defender (talk) 02:21, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support Support --NoonIcarus (talk) 12:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support Support, sure. -- CptViraj (talk) 13:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 15:18, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Strong support Absolutamente sí --LuchoCR (talk) 21:21, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support Support. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 01:46, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support Support —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 10:12, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support Support Vermont (talk) 20:47, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Support Support — xaosflux Talk 13:09, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support Support --Mykola7 (talk) 13:38, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support Support Easy endorsement. Hasley does terrific work and I'm sure the extra tools could be put to good use. --TheSandDoctor Talk 14:26, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support Support You have what it takes. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 14:33, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Support Support Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:29, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Support Support --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:13, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Support Support Ruy (talk) 18:43, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Support Support Clear need for the tools. Best, —Nnadigoodluck███ 20:04, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Support Support --Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:48, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Support Support It looks like I am late, but it's an easy support from me. Active and very reliable user.-BRP ever 09:00, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Support Support --Novak Watchmen (talk) 18:34, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Strong support Strong support, because I have heard and seen a lot of good about Hasley. I believe that Hasley would be a good checkuser! --Koreanovsky (Ča–Kaj–Što?!) 19:45, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose
Neutral

Successful. RfCU meets the requirements of the policy (>25 votes + >70-80% support) to be considered successful. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:39, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above request page is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Comments about this page should be made in Meta:Babel or Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat.
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meta:Requests_for_checkuser/Hasley&oldid=22183269"