Stewards/Confirm/2015/Mentifisto

Mentifisto

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: en, mt, it-2
Personal info: Hi there. I'm usually 'passively' around (handling the more background tasks, and responding to requests particularly when no one is around - being a lover of the night helps). Besides watching the stream of unifications on IRC, I typically handle SRG, SRP, VR, and less often SRUC and SR/SUL. Ultimately, I'd be unable to objectively judge whether my level of activity is sufficient, or whether my actions are adequate - so I'll leave this for you to decide! :-) -- Menti fisto 05:15, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: just thought of adding here that, although I was aware that my activity levels had dropped off significantly, in comparison to previous years (although I thought I was around as active as last year, which was still not very active), the fact that I ended up being practically (though not completely) inactive passed me by, kind of... but there really isn't a reason I couldn't become active again the coming year, especially as I'm online constantly anyway (a matter of reserving time)... -- Menti fisto 19:41, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

italiano:

Lingue: en, mt, it-2
Informazioni personali: Ciao a tutti. Di sono solito presente 'passivamente' (gestisco maggiormente le attività in background, e rispondo alle richieste in particolare quando non c'è nessuno in giro - essere un amante della notte aiuta). Oltre a guardare il flusso delle unificazioni su IRC, io di solito riesco a gestire SRG, SRP, VR, e meno spesso SRUC e SR/SUL. In ultima analisi, non sarei in grado di giudicare obiettivamente se il mio livello di attività sia sufficiente, o se le mie azioni sono adeguate - così lascio a voi la decisione! :-) -- Menti fisto

español:

Idiomas:
Información personal: translation needed

русский:

Языки:
Личная информация: translation needed

Deutsch:

Sprachen:
Informationen zur Person: Übersetzung nötig

Comments about Mentifisto

Remove Very limited activity, only a single steward action this year and also not many more in the last year, does not make me feel very comfortable supporting another term of stewardship, Anyhow, I'd like to thank Mentifisto for his service during the past couple of years. Vogone (talk) 18:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mentifisto's always been active and does great work as a steward, and I can't think of any reason why they shouldn't continue to be trusted as a steward. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Very limited activity --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Too limited activity. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, per Vogone. Keep, per this comment. Érico Wouters (msg) 02:14, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sufficient activity for me. --Vituzzu (talk) 19:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Unfortunately, I don't see enough activity to keep the steward rights, with barely any actions for over 75% of the year (and especially only one action in January, when people usually realize their low activity in their statements and perform more actions). --Rs chen 7754 19:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(With regards to the latter, well, normally people dislike when it seems like something is done for a specific reason... but otherwise, one action is indeed little, but that's just this one month, when I had external problems... 75% would be about right, though, which baffles even me, as I virtually spend my life online... although, I guess, subjective activities do change.) -- Menti fisto 22:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I am a bit concerned that less active stewards currently have more support for retaining their rights, and may revisit this before the end of confirmations. --Rs chen 7754 19:38, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Uğurkent^talk 19:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Eurodyne (talk) 19:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - sorry, stewards should have some activity so one is able to evaluate their contribs. --Rax (talk) 20:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove not enough activity for this. --Enst38 (talk) 20:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove due to the very limited activity. Armbrust (talk) 22:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Alan ^(talk) 22:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Snowolf. Green Giant (talk) 22:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove--DangSunM (talk) 23:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, reasonable activity in my view — NickK (talk) 23:28, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not very active, but I don't want he run a new steward election to get the bit back. He can not get steward flag immediately once he is active... I don't think semi-active steward is useless.--GZWDer (talk) 01:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 03:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 07:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove due to inactivity sadly --Herby ^{talk thyme} 09:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral inactive. Ajraddatz (talk) 09:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Change to neutral; has returned to activity, but I fear that it will just be during these confirmations. Hopefully you decide to stay around :) Ajraddatz (talk) 08:02, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Please be more active. Matanya (talk) 11:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I know of more inactive stewards and Mentifisto has been active throughout the whole year. Trijnstel_talk 13:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, not active enough, unfortunately. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 14:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep IW 16:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - Thanks for your service. Southparkfan 19:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC) [reply]
Keep - since you said you'll be more active, and people always deserve a second chance - changed my vote from remove to keep. Southparkfan 20:37, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I'd really like to see an increase in steward and cross-wiki actions. --Az1568 (talk) 06:44, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—with my respect and admiration. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 13:35, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 05:26, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 13:53, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Matiia (talk) 23:56, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not very active, but does it actually matter? He keeps himself updated with the latest developments of the Wikimedia projects and is still around to give his input. Elfix 14:29, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral JoshuaKGarner (talk) 19:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't think steward activity can be measured by the number of steward actions. --თოგო ^(D) 16:05, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Berlin-George (talk) 22:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep hopefully would be more active this year Mardetanha ^talk 12:52, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Nowhere near active enough. -Djsasso (talk) 16:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 22:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep - Does a good work and is experienced, however, it would be nice if you'd show some constant activity during the year. You don't have to be the most active steward, but some continuos activity would be great and not just around the time of the confirmations. As you say that you are online constantly, you should be able to show up constantly. Please use the chance! :) -Barras talk 12:42, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Tremonist (talk) 16:51, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep. What Barras said. A bit concerned with low activity. I also dislike the practice of being more active on confirmations for some reason.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 17:06, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(I won't just be active in the confirmations... I just upped my levels and will remain consistent in the future...) -- Menti fisto 07:12, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep StudiesWorld (talk) 11:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 08:10, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 11:40, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, trusted member. - Mailer Diablo (talk) 18:21, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ///EuroCarGT 01:41, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems to be active now and says he'll be more active this year. I don't see any harm in that. All contributions are welcome. Glaisher (talk) 16:40, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Defender (talk) 15:06, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Sidelight12 03:40, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thehelpfulone 00:34, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hope Mentifisto will keep his word--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 08:05, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active now and I believe he'll be more active this year. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 12:27, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Ruy Pugliesi^◥ 17:48, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]