CheckUser policy/pt-br

This page is a translated version of the page CheckUser policy and the translation is 30% complete.
Outdated translations are marked like this.
Other languages:
Bahasa Indonesia • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Esperanto • ‎Tiếng Việt • ‎Türkçe • ‎azərbaycanca • ‎català • ‎dansk • ‎español • ‎français • ‎hrvatski • ‎italiano • ‎kurdî • ‎magyar • ‎occitan • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎română • ‎shqip • ‎sicilianu • ‎slovenčina • ‎svenska • ‎čeština • ‎български • ‎русский • ‎српски / srpski • ‎українська • ‎العربية • ‎मराठी • ‎हिन्दी • ‎ગુજરાતી • ‎മലയാളം • ‎中文 • ‎日本語 • ‎한국어
Políticas e diretrizes CheckUser policy
Essa página fornece informações sobre o acesso à ferramenta CheckUser (verificação) e descreve a política sobre seu uso. Esta foi discutida em setembro e outubro de 2005, e foi lançada em novembro de 2005.
Meta-Wiki Checkuser-2000px.png

Status de verificador

CheckUser é uma interface para usuários com a permissão checkuser. Um usuário com status de CheckUser/verificador em uma wiki pode, em particular, verificar se um usuário é um fantoche de outro usuário naquela wiki (não em todas as wikis). Utilizando-a, os usuários podem:

  • Determinar de quais IPs um usuário editou ou efetuou uma ação registrada ou redefiniu sua senha na wiki da Wikimedia;
  • Determinar as edições, ações registradas e redefinições de senha na wiki da Wikimedia de um IP específico (mesmo quando logado em uma conta);
  • Determinar se o usuário sendo verificado enviou um email usando a interface MediaWiki para algum outro usuário. O horário do evento é registrado, o email de destino e ID de usuário são ocultados.

Essa informação é guardada somente por um período curto (atualmente 90 dias), então edições deitas anterior a esta data não serão mostradas via CheckUser. Um registro é guardado de quem efetuou consultas com a ferramenta. Esse registro está disponível para todos com a permissão checkuser-log:

Veja Help:CheckUser para o manual do usuário.

Uso da ferramenta

A ferramenta deve ser usada para coibir vandalismo, spam, para verificar abuso de fantoches, e para limitar a disrupção do projeto. Ela deve ser usada somente para prevenir danos a qualquer um dos projetos da Wikimedia.

A ferramenta não deve ser usada para controle político; para pressionar editores; ou como ameaça contra outro editor em uma disputa de conteúdo. Deve-se haver uma razão válida para verificar um usuário. Note que contas alternativas não são proibidas, desde que não sejam usadas de modo a violar as políticas (por exemplo, para votar mais de uma vez ou para aumentar o apoio aparente para qualquer posição).

Uma notificação para a conta que está sendo verificada é permitida mas não obrigatória. De modo similar, uma notificação da verificação para a comunidade não é obrigatória, mas pode ser feita, sujeita às provisões da política de privacidade.

Algumas wikis permitem que IPs de um editor sejam verificados a seu pedido se, por exemplo, há uma necessidade de fornecer evidência de inocência contra uma alegação de uso de fantoches; note, no entanto, que pedir uma verificação nestas circunstâncias é, algumas vezes, parte da tentativa de disrupção.

Política de privacidade

Nos projetos da Wikimedia, considerações sobre a política de privacidade são tremendamente importantes. A não ser que alguém esteja violando políticas com suas ações (por exemplo, vandalismo ou spam massivo com o uso de robôs) e revelar informações sobre este é necessário para parar a disrupção, é uma violação da política de privacidade revelar seu IP, paradeiro, ou outra informação suficiente para identificá-lo, a não ser que ele próprio já tenha revelado essa informação no projeto.

Information release

Even if the user is committing abuse, it's best not to reveal personal information if possible.

  • Generally, do not reveal IPs. Only give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If detailed information is provided, make sure the person you are giving it to is a trusted person and will not reveal it himself/herself.
  • If the user has said they're from somewhere and the IP confirms it, it's not releasing private information to confirm it if needed.
  • If you're in any doubt, give no detail.


Access to CheckUser


Only stewards, ombuds, some Wikimedia Foundation staff, and a very small number of other users are allowed to have CheckUser access. Users can only have CheckUser status locally (except for the ombuds and those staff members with access).

If local CheckUsers exist in a project, checks should generally be handled by those. In emergencies, or for multi-project CheckUser checks (as in the case of cross-wiki vandalism), stewards may perform local checks. Stewards should remove their own CheckUser access on the projects upon completion of the checks and notify the local CheckUsers or the CheckUser e-mail list.

If no local Checkusers exist for a project, requests will need to be made to the stewards to perform checks (such as "is UserX a sockpuppet of UserY"). To do so, simply add the request to Steward requests/Checkuser listing these users and explain the need for the check (with links). Depending on the nature of the request, the steward may deny it, may ask for more information, or may answer about the likelihood of the users in question having the same IP, same proxy, same network, same country, or being completely unrelated (see discussion for what the Steward should more precisely say to the editor).

Appointing local Checkusers

On any wiki, there must be at least two users with CheckUser status, or none at all. This is so that they can mutually control and confirm their actions. In the case where only one CheckUser is left on a wiki (when the only other one retires, or is removed), the community must appoint a new CheckUser immediately (so that the number of CheckUsers is at least two).

On wikis with an Arbitration Committee (ArbCom) whose members have been elected with the support of at least 25–30 members of the local community, CheckUsers may be directly appointed by the Arbitrators. After agreement, a member of the Committee should simply list the candidate on Steward requests/Permissions.

On a wiki without an Arbitration Committee that meets the criterion above, or in a project where there is a preference for independent elections, the community may approve local CheckUsers (stewards not counting as local CheckUsers) per consensus. The CheckUser candidate status must request it within the local community and advertise this request properly (village pump, mailing list when available, special request page, etc.). The candidate must be familiar with the privacy policy. After gaining consensus (at least 70%–80% in pro/con voting or the highest number of votes in multiple choice elections) in the local community, and with at least 25–30 editors' approval, the successful candidate should request access at Steward requests/Permissions with a link to the page with the community's decision. If there are an insufficient number of votes for at least two CheckUsers on a wiki, there will be no CheckUsers on that wiki.

Mailing list

There is a closed mailing list (CheckUser-l) to which all stewards and checkusers should have access. Email the list moderators to gain access. Use this mailing list to ask for help, ideas and second opinions if you're not sure what the data means.

IRC channel

There is a private IRC channel (#wikimedia-checkuserconectar) to which all stewards and checkusers who use IRC should have access. This channel serves the same purpose as the mailing list, but in real-time. Contact any channel member to gain access; a channel manager will grant permanent access. Ask a steward if you need help gaining access.

Removal of access

Any user account with CheckUser status that is inactive for more than one year will have their CheckUser access removed.

In case of abusive use of the tool, the Steward or the editor with the CheckUser privilege will immediately have their access removed. This will in particular happen if checks are done routinely on editors without a serious motive to do so (links and proofs of bad behavior should be provided).

Suspicion of abuses of CheckUser should be discussed by each local wiki. On wikis with an approved ArbCom, the ArbCom can decide on the removal of access. On wikis without an approved ArbCom, the community can vote removal of access.

Complaints of infringement of CheckUser, Access to Nonpublic Information Policy or Privacy Policy breaches are handled by the Ombuds commission for all Wikimedia projects.

Users with CheckUser access

  • Edit (last updated: 2020-10-24)


Everywhere

Arabic Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list

  1. Elph
  2. Meno25
  3. باسم
  4. جار الله
  5. علاء
  6. فيصل

Bengali Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list
Local policy mandates that only users who gain at least 25 votes in favor and 80% support can be appointed (application will open for no less than 30 days).

  1. আফতাবুজ্জামান
  2. NahidSultan

Catalan Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list

  1. Góngora
  2. KRLS

Czech Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list

  1. Jagro
  2. Martin Urbanec
  3. Mormegil

Danish Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list

  1. Kaare
  2. KnudW
  3. Sir48

Dutch Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list

Appointed by Arbcom
  1. Akoopal
  2. Ellywa
  3. Groucho NL
  4. Japiot
  5. Jcb

English Wikibooks

Automatically generated checkusers list

  1. QuiteUnusual
  2. Xania

English Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list

Appointed by ArbCom
  1. AGK
  2. Alison
  3. AmandaNP
  4. Beeblebrox
  5. Berean Hunter
  6. Bradv
  7. Callanecc
  8. Casliber
  9. David Fuchs
  10. DGG
  11. Doug Weller
  12. Drmies
  13. EdJohnston
  14. GorillaWarfare
  15. Guerillero
  16. Ivanvector
  17. Joe Roe
  18. Jpgordon
  19. KrakatoaKatie
  20. L235
  21. Mailer diablo
  22. Materialscientist
  23. Maxim
  24. Mkdw
  25. MusikAnimal
  26. Mz7
  27. Newyorkbrad
  28. NinjaRobotPirate
  29. Oshwah
  30. PhilKnight
  31. Ponyo
  32. Reaper Eternal
  33. Risker
  34. Salvio giuliano
  35. SoWhy
  36. SQL
  37. ST47
  38. Stwalkerster
  39. TonyBallioni
  40. Versageek
  41. Worm That Turned
  42. Xeno
  43. Yamla
  44. Zzuuzz
Founder
  1. Jimbo Wales

English Wiktionary

Automatically generated checkusers list

  1. Chuck Entz
  2. TheDaveRoss

Finnish Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list

  1. Ejs-80
  2. Harriv
  3. Stryn

French Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list

Appointed by ArbCom
  1. 0x010C
  2. Hexasoft
  3. Jean-Christophe BENOIST
  4. Linedwell
  5. Marc Mongenet

German Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list
Under the local policy, CheckUsers are elected for a two year term.

  1. Alraunenstern
  2. Hephaion
  3. Karsten11
  4. Perrak
  5. Rax

Hebrew Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list

  1. Deror avi
  2. Matanya
  3. בריאן
  4. יונה בנדלאק
  5. עוזי ו.

Hungarian Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list (requests and policy)

  1. Bináris
  2. Csigabi
  3. Grin
  4. Pallerti
  5. Tgr

Indonesian Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list

  1. Aldnonymous
  2. Bennylin
  3. Meursault2004
  4. Nohirara

Italian Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list

  1. Ask21
  2. Elwood
  3. Gac
  4. L736E
  5. Melos
  6. Ruthven
  7. Sakretsu
  8. Shivanarayana
  9. Vituzzu

Japanese Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list (policy)

  1. Bellcricket
  2. Infinite0694
  3. Penn Station
  4. Y-dash
  5. さかおり

Korean Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list (policy and request)

  1. Dmthoth
  2. IRTC1015
  3. Sotiale
  4. 이강철

Malayalam Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list (Policy and Requests)

  1. Kiran Gopi
  2. Razimantv

Persian Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list

  1. Huji
  2. Ladsgroup
  3. Sahehco

Polish Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list
Due to a new policy on the Polish Wikipedia, users who gain 85% of votes in favor may become CheckUsers

  1. Masti
  2. Nedops
  3. Ptjackyll
  4. Saper
  5. Wojciech Pędzich

Portuguese Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list

Under the local policy, CheckUsers are elected with two year term.

  1. Conde Edmond Dantès
  2. Érico until 19:59, 27 November 2020
  3. EVinente
  4. SEPRodrigues
  5. Stanglavine
  6. Tks4Fish until 21:43, 11 January 2021

Russian Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list

Appointed by ArbCom
  1. DR
  2. OneLittleMouse
  3. Q-bit array
  4. Wulfson
  5. Ле Лой

Serbian Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list

  1. Djordjes
  2. Dungodung
  3. Обрадовић Горан

Simple English Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list

  1. Bsadowski1
  2. Djsasso
  3. Eptalon
  4. Lofty abyss
  5. Operator873
  6. Peterdownunder
  7. Vermont

Slovene Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list

  1. MZaplotnik
  2. Romanm

Spanish Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list
Local policy mandates that only users who gain at least 30 votes in favor and 80% support can be appointed.

  1. Alhen
  2. Bernard
  3. Montgomery
  4. Rastrojo

Swedish Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list

  1. Fluff
  2. Julle
  3. Tegel


Turkish Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list

  1. Eldarion
  2. Elmacenderesi
  3. Uncitoyen

Ukrainian Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list

Appointed by ArbCom
  1. NickK
  2. VictorAnyakin
  3. Стефанко1982

Vietnamese Wikipedia

Automatically generated checkusers list

  1. DHN
  2. Mxn

Wikimedia Commons

Automatically generated checkusers list

  1. Elcobbola
  2. Jameslwoodward
  3. Krd
  4. Magog the Ogre
  5. Trijnstel

Wikispecies

Automatically generated checkusers list

  1. Dan Koehl
  2. Faendalimas
  3. Koavf

Meta

Automatically generated checkusers list · (information page and requests page)

  1. Ajraddatz
  2. MarcoAurelio
  3. Trijnstel

Wikidata

Automatically generated checkusers list · (information page and requests page)

  1. BRPever
  2. Jasper Deng
  3. Sotiale
  4. علاء


See also