Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/elections 2011/votes/PeterSymonds

< Stewards | elections 2011
Warning
English: The 2011 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.
Suomi: Vuoden 2011 ylivalvojien vaalit on loppu. Uusia ääniä ei hyväksytä enää.
العربية: انتخابات المضيفين لعام 2011 انتهت. لا أصوات أخرى سيتم قبولها.
Deutsch: Die Stewardwahlen 2011 sind beendet. Weitere Stimmen können nicht mehr berücksichtigt werden.
Español : Las elecciones a Steward del año 2011 han concluído. No se aceptan más votos.
فارسی: .رای‌گیری در مورد انتخابات ویکیبدهای جدید پایان یافته است.رای‌های جدید مورد قبول واقع نخواهد شد. [update needed: en]
Français : Les élections Steward de 2011 sont terminées. Il n'est plus possible de voter.
Gaeilge: Tá na toghcháin Maoir 2011 dúnta anois. Ní féidir aon vótaí eile a glacadh as an am seo amach.
Galego: Xa remataron as eleccións a steward do ano 2011. Non se aceptarán máis votos.
Alemannisch : D Stewardwahle 2011 sin umme. Du chasch nimmi abstimme.
עברית: בחירות הדיילים לשנת 2011 הסתיימו. הצבעות נוספות לא תתקבלנה. [update needed: en]
Magyar: A választás lezárult, további szavazatokat nem fogadunk el. [update needed: en]
Italiano: Le elezioni del 2011 a Steward sono terminate. Nessun voto ricevuto dopo questa data sarà preso in considerazione.
日本語： 2011年のスチュワード選挙は終わりました。今後の投票は受け付けられません。
Nederlands: De stewardsverkiezingen van 2011 zijn gesloten. U kunt niet meer stemmen.
Polski: Wybory stewardów w 2011 roku zakończyły się. Nowe głosy nie będą akceptowane.
Português : As eleições para Steward de 2011 estão encerradas. Nenhum voto lançado a partir desta data será computado.
Русский: Выборы стюардов — 2011 завершены. Дальнейшие голоса не будут приняты.
Svenska: 2011 års val av stewarder är avslutat. Ingen ytterligare röstning kommer att accepteras.
中文： 2011年监管员选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废 [update needed： en]
中文（简体）： 2011年监管員选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废 [update needed： en]
中文（繁體）: 2011年監管員選舉已經結束。逾期投票將會作廢 [update needed: en]
Tiếng Việt: Cuộc bầu cử tiếp viên năm 2011 đã kết thúc. Không có phiếu bầu nào tiếp tục được chấp nhận.
Ελληνικά: Οι εκλογές επιτρόπων για το 2011 έχουν τελειώσει. Δεν γίνονται δεκτές άλλες ψήφοι. [update needed: en]
Türkçe: 2011 kâhya seçimleri tamamlanmıştır. Daha fazla oy kabul edilmeyecektir.
Azərbaycanca: 2011 stüard seçkiləri tamamlanmışdır. Daha səslər qəbul olunmur.

PeterSymonds (Peter Symonds)

edit

PeterSymonds talk · contribs · SULutil (accounts) / stalktoy · globalcontribs · crosswiki-ness · confirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:
  • Languages: en, de-1
  • Personal info: Hi. I'm Peter, and I've been an active user on the Wikimedia Foundation for several years. Originally a sole contributor to the English Wikipedia, I became gradually active on Wikimedia Commons, Meta, and a few other sites where I help out with various routine actions, including vandal-fighting and spam prevention. I'm also active on the volunteer response team, with some of my cross-wiki edits being related to my involvement there. I can assist with the various routine steward tasks that arise, including Steward requests, and assisting with preventing cross-wiki abuse.

    I have a fairly fluent understanding of the steward policy, including the privacy policy, as well as knowledge of the technical aspects of the tools involved. The sovereignty of individual projects is a principle I strongly believe in, and the need to observe local community policies and practices is something I have and will continue to observe. Furthermore, the need to work patiently to amicably resolve any disagreements which may arise is important. Patient discourse is something I have experience in, both in real life and through my work with OTRS.

    I am also an active user, and often idle in a number of Wikimedia IRC channels, including #wikimedia-stewards and #wikimedia-admin, so I can be available for emergencies. My user name is fully unified, with the exception of the Wikimedia Foundation website which is separate.
bosanski:
  • Jezici: en, de-1
  • Lične informacije: Pozdrav. Ja sam Peter i aktivan sam korisnik projekata Wikimedija fondacije već nekoliko godina. Na početku sam doprinosio samo na Wikipediji na engleskom jeziku, da bih kasnije postao aktivan na Commonsu, Meti i na nekoliko drugih projekata gdje odrađujem rutinske poslove, uključujući borbu protiv vandala i prevenciju spama. Također sam aktivan na OTRSu. Mislim da mogu pomoći oko rutinskih stjuardskih poslova, uključujući zahtjeve i spriječavanje zloupotrebe.

    Prilično dobro poznam pravila rada Stjuarda, uključujući i pravila o zaštiti privatnih podataka i tehničke aspekte alatki koje su u pitanju. Suverenitet pojedinačnih projekata je princip u koji sam ubjeđen, a praćenje poštivanja lokalnih pravila i praksi je nešto što sam do sada radio i što ću nastaviti i u budućnosti. Osim toga, važno je i da se strpljivo radi na prijateljskom rješavanju svih nesporazuma koji mogu nastati. Strpljiv diskurs je nešto u čemu imam iskustvo, bilo kroz stvarni život ili rad na OTRSu.

    Također sam aktivan korisnik i često sam prisutan na brojnim wikimedijinim IRC kanalima, uključujući #wikimedia-stewards i #wikimedia-admin, tako da sam dostupan u slučaju potrebe. Moje korisničko ime je potpuno jedinstveno, osim stranice fondacije na kojoj koristim drugi račun.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: en, de-1
  • Informationen zur Person: Hi. Ich bin Peter und bin schon seit einigen Jahren in den verschiedenen Wikimedia-Projekten aktiv. Ursprünglich habe ich nur in der englischen Wikipedia editiert, aber wurde allmählich auch auf Wikimedia Commons, Meta und einigen anderen Projekten aktiv, wo ich bei verschiedenen Routinearbeiten helfe, wie zum Beispiel Vandalismusbekämpfung und Spamprävention. Außerdem bin ich auch beim OTRS aktiv, worauf einige meiner globalen Beiträge zurückzuführen sind. Ich kann bei den verschiedenen aufkommenden Stewardaktionen helfen, wie zum Beispiel auf Stewardanfragen reagieren oder dabei helfen, globalen Vandalismus zu verhindern.

    Ich verstehe die Inhalte der steward policy, ebenso der privacy policy, sehr gut, genauso, wie ich die technischen Aspekte der involvierten Tools verstehe. Die Souveränität der individuellen Projekte ist ein Prinzip, an das ich sehr stark glaube. Ich habe bislang die lokalen Regeln und Prinzipien beobachtet und werde dies auch weiterhin tun. Darüber hinaus ist es für mich wichtig, Meinungsverschiedenheiten geduldig und freundschaftlich zu lösen. Geduldig zu sein ist etwas, mit dem ich schon meine Erfahrungen habe, sowohl im realen Leben als auch durch meine Arbeit im ORTS-Team.

    Ich bin ein aktiver Benutzer und stehe oft in einer Vielzahl von Wikimedia-IRC-Kanälen, wie zum Beispiel in #wikimedia-stewards und #wikimedia-admins, für Notfälle zur Verfügung. Mein Benutzername ist komplett zusammengeführt, mit einer Ausnahme, der Website der Wikimediastiftung, wo der Name eigenständig geführt wird.
suomi:
  • Kielet: en, de-1
  • Henkilökohtaiset tiedot: Moi. Olen Peter, ja olen ollut Wikimedia Foundationin aktiivinen käyttäjä jo useiden vuosien ajan. Alun perin muokkasin yksinomaan englanninkielistä Wikipediaa, mutta vähitellen tulin aktiiviseksi myös Wikimedia Commonsissa, Metassa ja muutamassa muussa sivustossa joissa autan erilaisissa rutiinitoimissa kuten vandalismin- ja spammintorjunnassa. Olen myös aktiivinen OTRS-ryhmässä, ja osa wikienvälisistä muokkauksistani liittyy työhöni siellä. Voin auttaa monissa ylivalvojien rutiinitoimenpiteissä, mukaanlukien ylivalvojien toimintapyynnöt, ja wikienvälisen väärinkäytön torjumisessa.

    Minulla on suhteellisen sujuva käsitys ylivalvojien käytännöistä, mukaanlukien yksityisyyden suoja, sekä tietämystä työkalujen teknisistä puolista. Yksittäisten projektien itsenäisyys on periaate johon uskon vahvasti, ja tarve seurata paikallisten yhteisöjen käytäntöjä ja toimintatapoja on jotain mitä olen pitänyt tärkeänä ja tulen pitämään myös jatkossa. Lisäksi mielestäni on tärkeää työskennellä kärsivällisesti ja ystävällisesti syntyvien kiistojen ratkaisemiseksi. Kärsivällinen keskustelu on jotain, mistä minulla on kokemusta sekä tosielämästä että OTRS-työni kautta.

    Olen myös aktiivinen käyttäjä ja olen usein monilla Wikimedian IRC-kanavilla, mukaan lukien #wikimedia-stewards ja #wikimedia-admin, joten olen tavoitettavissa hätätilanteissa. Käyttäjätunnukseni on täysin yhdistetty, ainoana poikkeuksena Wikimedia Foundationin erillinen verkkosivu.
עברית:
  • שפות: en, de-1
  • מידע אישי: דיבור כאן
Bahasa Indonesia:
  • Bahasa yang dikuasai: en, de-1
  • Informasi pribadi: tuliskan pernyataan Anda di sini
日本語:
  • 言語: en, de-1
  • 候補者の情報: 所信はこちら
Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: en, de-1
  • Persoonlijke informatie: Hallo. Ik ben Peter, en ik ben al verscheidene jaren een actieve gebruiker bij de Wikimedia Foundation. Aanvankelijk alleen de Engelstalige Wikipedia bewerkend werd ik langzamerhand actief op Wikimedia Commons, Meta en enkele andere sites, waar ik behulpzaam ben bij verschillende routinewerkzaamheden, waaronder vandalisme bestrijden en spam tegengaan. Ik ben ook betrokken bij OTRS en sommige van mijn cross wiki-bewerkingen houden daarmee verband. Ik kan assisteren bij de verschillende stewards-routinetaken, waaronder verzoeken aan stewards en het tegengaan van cross wiki-misbruik.

    Ik ben redelijk goed bekend met de stewards policy, inclusief de privacy policy, en heb ook kennis van de technische aspecten van de tools die daarbij betrokken zijn. Ik ben een grote aanhanger van het principe dat projecten autonoom zijn en de noodzaak om lokale policies en gebruiken te respecteren is iets dat ik onderschrijf en zal blijven onderschrijven. Daarnaast is het belangrijk om geduldig en vriendelijk meningsverschillen te helpen oplossen. Geduldig overleggen is iets waarin ik ervaring heb, zowel in het echte leven als door mijn werkzaamheden voor OTRS.

    Ik ben ook een actieve gebruiker en ben vaak te vinden in verschillende Wikimedia-irc-kanalen, waaronder #wikimedia-stewards en #wikimedia-admin, dus ik ben beschikbaar voor noodgevallen. Mijn gebruikersnaam is volledig gesuld, met uitzondering van de website van de Wikimedia Foundation, die zelfstandig is.
русский:
  • Языки: en, de-1
  • Личная информация: Привет. Я Peter, и я активно участвую в проектах Фонда Викимедиа уже несколько лет. Изначально участвуя лишь в английской Википедии, я постепенно становился активным на Викискладе, Мете и некоторых других сайтах, где я помогал с рутинными задачами, включая борьбу с вандалами и спамом. Я также активен в OTRS, с которой связана часть моих кросс-вики правок. Я могу заниматься решением рутинных задач стюардов, в том числе запросами к стюардам и борьбой с кросс-вики нарушениями.

    Я довольно хорошо понимаю правила стюардов, в том числе политику конфиденциальности, так же как и технические особенности задействованных инструментов. Я безоговорочно верю в принцип независимости отдельных проектов, и необходимость соблюдения локальных правил и принципов - это то, за чем я слежу и буду следить. Более того, в работе очень важно терпение для решения всех разногласий, которые могут возникнуть. Терпеливый подход - это то, в чем я имею опыт как в реальной жизни, так и в работе, связанной с OTRS.

    Я также часто присутствую на IRC-каналах Викимедиа, в том числе #wikimedia-stewards и #wikimedia-admin, поэтому я доступен в чрезвычайных ситуациях. Моя учетная запись полностью объединена, за исключением сайта Фонда Викимедиа, который отделен от остальных проектов.
српски / srpski:
  • Језици: en, de-1
  • Лични подаци: Здраво. Ја сам Peter и активан сам корисник пројеката Задужбине Викимедија неколико година. Првобитно сам доприносио само на Википедији на енглеском, да бих касније постао активан највише на Остави, Мети и на неколико других пројеката где помажем око рутинских активности, укључујући борбу против вандала и превенцију спема. Такође сам активан на ОТРС-у. Могу да помогнем око различитих рутинских стјуардских задатака који искрсну, укључујући захтеве, као и у спречавању злоупотреба.

    Прилично добро разумем политику стјуарда, укључујући и политику приватности, а такође добро познајем техничке аспекте алатки које су у питању. Суверенитет појединачних пројеката је принцип у који снажно верујем, а поштовање локалних политика и пракси је нешто што сам радио до сада и што ћу наставити да радим и убудуће. Поред тога, важно је и да се стрпљиво ради како би се пријатељски решили сви неспоразуми који могу да настану. Стрпљив дискурс је нешто у чему ја имам искуства, како у стварном животу тако и кроз мој рад на ОТРС-у.

    Такође сам активан корисник и често сам присутан на бројним Викимедијиним IRC каналима, укључујући #wikimedia-stewards и #wikimedia-admin, тако да могу бити доступан у случају нужде. Моје корисничко име је потпуно јединствено, са изузетком сајта Задужбине на којем користим други налог.

Questions: See Stewards/elections 2011/Questions#PeterSymonds

Accounts checked till now, see result here. For the ElectCom, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:55, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes

edit
  1. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:00, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Hoo man (talk) 00:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Support Mardetanha talk 00:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  4. — μ 00:05, February 7 2011 (UTC)
  5. No reason why not. Excellent and trustworthy user. Ruy Pugliesi◥ 00:11, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Totally.  fetchcomms☛ 00:12, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --თოგო (D) 00:13, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Logan Talk Contributions 00:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Saibo (Δ) 00:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  10. -- Marcus Cyron 00:26, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Lara 00:27, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  12. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:29, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Good candidate![reply]
  13. --Gordonrox24 | Talk 00:29, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  14. -- A pleasure to work with, strong Support. Theo10011 00:30, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Jafeluv 00:32, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  16. - @lestaty discuţie 00:41, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Nixón 00:47, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  18. –SJ · talk | translate 00:53, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  19. -- Dferg ☎ talk 00:59, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Grunny (talk) 01:04, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Nanami Kamimura 01:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  22.   Support מתניה 01:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  23. —   Nohçi 01:19, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  24.   Support - Tinucherian 01:39, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  ℳono  01:41, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support - Great candidate, helpful, and hardworking! Reaper Eternal 01:48, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Oh yeah. -FASTILY (TALK) 01:53, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  28. MBisanz talk 01:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  29. — Tanvir • 01:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support. I have had nothing but positive interactions with this user, and have no doubt that he'd do a great job as a steward. Ajraddatz (Talk) 02:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  31.   Support rolls eyes Fine, fine, I'll admit you're a good candidate. Sven Manguard 02:32, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  32.   Support Definitely James (T C) 02:35, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Gƒoley-Four 02:58, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Support - Another Associate at ACC Mlpearc powwow 03:04, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Chick Bowen 03:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  36. -- Maximillion Pegasus 03:42, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  37. —La Pianista ♫ ♪ 03:47, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Support this is most helpfull person I ever seen around. Petrb 04:05, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Ineligible, user does not have 600 edits before 01 November 2010, vote struck. Wutsje 00:34, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  38.   Support Bejinhan talks 04:19, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  39.   Support Spencer 04:40, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Killiondude 04:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  41.   Support --Cekli829 05:15, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Support – GorillaWarfare talk 05:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  43. unleash the symonds :) fr33kman 05:24, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  44. GerardM 05:40, 7 February 2011 (UTC) I think Peter to do well $[reply]
  45.   Support --Torin 05:42, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  46. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 06:26, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  47.   Support Saloca 06:45, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  48.   Strong support The Thing That Should Not Be 06:45, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  49.   Support--Wikiwind 06:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  50. MoiraMoira 07:58, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  51. definitely. sonia 08:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Jan eissfeldt 08:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC) peter for presi ste[reply]
    Yes, Peter has my trust. :) Clementina talk 08:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Ineligible, no SUL account; user pages links from meta to simple but not vice versa, vote struck. Wutsje 00:34, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  53.   Support - ZooPro 08:58, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Yes, Zapyon 09:00, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  55. --Church of emacs talk · contrib 09:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  56. --BG7 09:13, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  57. --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 09:22, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  58.   Support –BruTe talk 09:49, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    A lot of supports in not a lot of time. This user seems well-qualified. 1ForTheMoney 10:00, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Ineligible, no SUL account, links from meta to enwiki but not vice versa, vote struck. Wutsje 00:34, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  59. ⇒SWATJester Son of the Defender 10:27, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  60.   Strong support Promethean 10:58, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  61.   Support – David in DC 11:32, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  62.   Support mickit 11:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  63. fer sure -- OlEnglish (Talk) 11:45, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Jc iindyysgvxc 12:04, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  65.   Support Objectivesea 12:47, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  66. JenVan (talk) 12:50, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Won't break the wiki. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 13:51, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Yep. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 14:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  69.   Support
    ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 15:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Savhñ 16:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  71. --Túrelio 16:27, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Rock drum (talk·contribs) 16:34, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Cenarium 16:41, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  74.   Support Definitely. VR-Land 16:55, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Because of The sovereignty of individual projects is a principle I strongly believe in, and the need to observe local community policies and practices is something I have and will continue to observe. My only (small) objection is that he is not multilingual. --Flopy 16:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  76. --FlügelRad 17:15, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Terence 17:17, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  78. --Kazvorpal 17:19, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Terence 17:21, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  80. RafaAzevedo 17:22, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  81. The only issue of which I could even imagine is the incident where he shared his account with another user, and that was simply a lapse in judgment which occurred years ago and he's learned from it. He is a fantastic administrator, and I can't imagine any argument that would convince me he would be unsuited for stewardship Master&Expert 17:55, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  82. –Diego Grez return fire 18:21, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  83. yes!--Nick1915 - all you want 18:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  84. --M/ 19:00, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  85.   Support --WizardOfOz talk 19:12, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  86.   Support – Definitely. —mc10 (t/c) 19:39, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  87. -- Ulanwp 19:46, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  88. ChristianH 19:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Of course. NW (Talk) 20:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  90.   Support - Experienced and trustworthy user. Ottava Rima (talk) 20:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Davecrosby uk 20:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Yes please. Trijnstel 20:40, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  93.   Support - Excellent candidate. Oh, and I completely disagree with Joe Gazz84 in the oppose section. Tiptoety talk 21:06, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Definitely. Thingg⊕⊗ 21:27, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Lolsimon 00:13, 8 February 2011 (UTC) Good luck![reply]
  96. Yes please. Kingturtle 01:01, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Eddylandzaat 01:32, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Of course. Roberto de Lyra 02:07, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  99. ;) Jack Merridew 03:14, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Jujutacular 03:33, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  101.   Support -- බිඟුවා සාකච්ඡාව 04:43, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  102.   Support Cherurbino 10:36, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  103. {{yesplease}} Kwiki 10:48, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  104.   Support -- Peter would be ideal for this job. BarkingFish 12:59, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  105.   Support SoWhy 13:30, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  106.   Support Willking1979 13:55, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Timotheus Canens 14:32, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Carolmooredc 14:46, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Mikołka (talk) 16:40, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  110. NickK 17:18, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  111. --Neo139 17:32, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  112.   Support -- Avi 19:05, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  113. I like your experience as a clerk at SPI and OTRS and other areas that touch upon steward responsibilities. Zachlipton 19:07, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 19:24, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  115.   Support Strong Support is very helpful with answering any type of question a user may have even my own silly questions at times. Would make a awsome Steward.Staffwaterboy 21:24, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  116.   За--Anatoliy (talk) 21:42, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  117.   Support of course. From my experience, he is a very level-headed and intelligent person. J.delanoygabsadds 22:09, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Allmightyduck 22:16, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  119.   Support - Romaine 23:55, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  120. ” Teles (Talk @ C G) 00:32, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  121.   Support--Shizhao 00:35, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Very trustworthy user. ThiagoRuiz 00:47, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  123.   Support Junius 03:16, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  124. --Nolispanmo 09:57, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  125.   Support...Modernist 13:01, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  126. rubin16 13:43, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  127.   Support --Kiran Gopi 19:39, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  128.   Support An excellent admin with a track record of upholding policy over nose counting, something all too rare on a project that is - theoretically, anyway - not about voting.  RGTraynor  15:00, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  129.   Support -- Neelix 17:27, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  130.   Support --Neozoon 21:46, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  131.   Support --Versageek 22:52, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  132.   Support At this moment of time, we badly need new stewards, no matter if they are monolingual. --Millosh 23:14, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  133.   Support--Yopie 23:23, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  134.   Support Alchimista 00:31, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Support Arctic Night 01:41, 10 February 2011 (UTC) Note: Arctic Night has no global account and the user don't have an account on Meta with userpage linked to his/her homewiki, follow all instructions at Stewards/elections_2011/Guidelines#Voters please.[reply]
  135.   Support "sovereignty of individual projects" stood out for me. --Abd 03:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  136.   Support - has my support and confidence. His work during the fundraiser was instrumental to our success. This vote is in my personal capacity and not as official statement of the Foundation...--Philippe 05:41, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  137.   Support —Ancient Apparition 06:57, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  138.   Support - someone I know very well, and therefore - inevitably - we have minor disagreements; however, I am confident Peter is net+, has the best intentions of the projects at heart, and I trust him to use this specific role appropriately. I can absolutely confirm that Peter is frequently readily-available on IRC, and always willing to help when he can. He is technically adept, and even when we have had our minor disagreements, he has remained calm and cordial in discussions. Chzz 09:45, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Support - I have known him for a few years now, came just to support him, he is very friendly, trustworthy and always ready to help those either it be on IRC or any other wiki he is on....the only candidate from the evil wiki worth voting for...Cometstyles 09:57, 10 February 2011 (UTC) (i'm ineligible to vote :'()[reply]
  139.   Support Adam Cuerden 10:34, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Support. Tiderolls 12:03, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  141.   Support --Lucas Nunes 12:10, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  142. --Closedmouth 12:18, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  143. --MartinThoma 12:20, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  144.   Support - Fransvannes 12:43, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  145.   Support QU TalkQu 13:56, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Christian Giersing 21:47, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  147.   Support Antandrus 02:48, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  148. --Holder 08:45, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  149.   Support Crowsnest 10:23, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Sebleouf 12:24, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  151.   Support --Vssun 15:06, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  152. -- Resolute 15:14, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Pedro :  Chat  15:20, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Marauder09   Long live the thrash Marauder09 17:44, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  155.   Support with an encouragement to learn a second language. -- DQ (t) (e) 18:53, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Well, I guess so. Tofutwitch11 20:12, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  157. MZMcBride 20:57, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  158.   Support Comte0 00:39, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  159.   Support --Gamma127 00:50, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Blurpeace 02:42, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  161.   Support Ruhrfisch 12:42, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  162.   Support Good understanding of policies. --Brandon5485 22:04, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  163.   Support Trusthworthy. I see him on en.wiki or Commons doing good things.--chaser - t 22:30, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  164.   Support Steven Walling (talk) 22:40, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  165.   Support seems better than most candidates I've reviewed so far, worth being given a chance IMHO. Nahum 23:01, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  166.   Support --Martin H. 00:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  167.   Support --Zeljko 03:14, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  168.   Support Banaticus 09:55, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Quentinv57 (talk) 10:34, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  170.   Support --Guerillero 20:10, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  171.   Support Angrense 22:46, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  172. --Vituzzu 23:35, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  173.   Support Thesavagenorwegian 15:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)~[reply]
  174. Foxie001 17:58, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  175.   Support Alpha Quadrant talk 18:33, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  176.   Support Apparently nothing bad with this contributor. --Floflo 22:23, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  177.   Support --Geitost diskusjon 02:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC) helpful person and <prayer wheel>we just need more trustful and good stewards</prayer wheel>, more multilingualism and experiences across other language wikis would even be better.[reply]
  178. Njaelkies Lea 18:32, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  179.   Support SV1XV 21:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  180.   Support Bearian 23:17, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Support --12:55, 16 February 2011 (UTC) User:Perseus8235 [1] Ineligible, user does not have 600 edits before 01 November 2010, vote struck. Wutsje 00:34, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Support Stewartadcock 14:16, 16 February 2011 (UTC) Ineligible, user does not have 50 edits between 01 August 2010 and 31 January 2011, vote struck. Wutsje 00:34, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  181.   Support - Spoladore 16:38, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  182.   Support - Mifter 22:56, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Support Thewiikione 23:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC) Ineligible, user does not have 50 edits between 01 August 2010 and 31 January 2011, vote struck. Wutsje 00:34, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  183.   Support Inka 888 05:27, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  184.   Support --Bullenwächter 14:16, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  185. Support. AGK 20:22, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Support -- Linksfuss 21:50, 17 February 2011 (UTC) Ineligible, no SUL account; user page links to dewiki but not vice versa, vote struck. Wutsje 00:34, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  186.   Support I sincerely hope that you have indeed learned from your previous lapses of judgement. Your actions since seem, to me, to have shown that you have. Woody 23:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  187.   Support --Ragesoss 01:12, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  188.   Support Trustworthy and experienced. jæs (talk) 02:11, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  189.   Support -- Zara-arush (talk) 04:41, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  190. Keegan 06:00, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  191.   Support, though I suggest you take a few hols in Germany and brush up your skills WormTT 10:28, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  192.   Support--KTo288 18:49, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  193.   Support Snowolf How can I help? 20:26, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  194.   Support Udufruduhu 21:04, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  195.   Support Ronhjones 22:51, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  196.   Support  f o x  22:53, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  197. --Sergey Semenovtalk 03:03, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  198.   Support --Slon02 06:00, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  199.   Support -- --Sachinvenga 07:27, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  200.   Support --Soenke Rahn 10:57, 19 February 2011 (UTC) (Because seems to be right)[reply]
  201.   Support An admitted-to lack of judgement long ago, but learned from the mistake and has shown excellent judgement since. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:35, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  202.   Support Elen of the Roads 13:02, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  203.   Support Capital fellow, absolutely tip-top. And he can borrow my de:Linguaphone 78s. Rich Farmbrough 16:30 19 February 2011 (GMT).
  204.   Support AroundTheGlobe 16:34, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  205.   Support --Poco a poco 16:58, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  206. --Jkü 17:41, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  207. Support Absolutely My76Strat 20:01, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  208.   Support Cbrown1023 talk 00:08, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  209. Elvaube 09:56, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  210.   Support I think he's well-fit for the job. - Dwayne was here! ♫ 22:14, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  211. Gonçalo Veiga 04:35, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  212.   Support --Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 06:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  213.   Support Nifky? 06:21, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  214.   Support Zyephyrus 20:03, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  215.   Support Acather96 (talk) 14:26, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  216.   Support Can't think in someone who fits the job so well as Peter. Béria Lima msg 17:18, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  217.   Support -- Alexf 17:24, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  218.   Support -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 04:55, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Support Flightx52 23:03, 24 February 2011 (UTC) Ineligible, user does not have 600 edits before 01 November 2010, vote struck. Wutsje 00:34, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Support --Pyromg 06:48, 25 February 2011 (UTC) Ineligible, user does not have 50 edits between 01 August 2010 and 31 January 2011, vote struck. Wutsje 00:34, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  219.   Support vvvt 08:33, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  220.   Support --Nillerdk 08:42, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  221.   Support Seddon 13:06, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  222.   Support --Kmw2700 17:35, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  223. Blanket   Support for all candidates as opposition to the blanket opposition by User:Riffic, in support of open balloting. --Yair rand 21:41, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  224.   Support — str4nd ⇌ 23:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  225.   Support Kubek15T C 14:55, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  226.   Support Very knowledgeable about Wikimedia; would make an excellent steward. --Jsayre64 17:03, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  227. 32X 18:30, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  228.   Support Anne-theater 00:44, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  229.   Support I have never personally worked with this user but I think his user pages demonstrate his openness to answering questions and giving help. I like that he has experience building featured article status. I would generally support a less able non-English speaking steward in favor of one who spoke only English, but as I understand this election system voters should support anyone who appears to meet their minimum expectations. PeterSymonds certainly does. Blue Rasberry (talk) 03:19, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  230.   Support - The "only-speaks-English" argument doesn't hold water with me, as this is a trustworthy Wikipedian who will assist the project. Jusdafax 03:24, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  231.   Support I've worked with Peter at en:WP:ACC, and he always is in control. He'd make an ideal steward! Manishearth 04:25, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  232.   Support--Jayantanth 07:46, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  233.   Support Graeme Bartlett 11:58, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  234.   Support ---gildemax 14:51, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  235.   Support Andreas Werle 17:27, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  236. Yes --Dalibor Bosits © 17:53, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  237. LeinaD (t) 19:19, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  238.   Support, since this user seems well-qualified in every way that matters. –Tommy Kronkvist, 21:12, 27 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]

  No

edit
  1. I am sorry, sometimes you over react to somethings and aren't the best with handling users. You seem to take a while to respond on IRC too sometimes which contradicts the above statement about you being active on it. You generally idle.Joe Gazz84 00:13, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Are you sure that this isn't just you misunderstanding most of what he (and about everyone else) says? Granted, even so effective communication is something he might want to work on, but I feel that he does that well. Also, looking at the requirements for being a steward I don't see anything about having no life being required, so why is the fact that he isn't on 24/7 a problem? Ajraddatz (Talk) 02:30, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    I have never had that problem with this user. Mind you I have rarely seen you on while he's talking, so I would not be surprised to find that he leaves the account on all the time and just is away when you're on. Passing ships in the night, I suppose. Sven Manguard 02:34, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    He's often active on IRC when I am. Perhaps you're just in a different timezone. Lara 05:18, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Peter's is in the IRC for the most part of the day in several channels at once, I haven't seen him not respond to a question directed towards him yet. I have no idea what you mean by when he over reacts to somethings, he generally offers great advice. Theo10011 11:51, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Alright to the above, I still have a vote and I still do not think IRC needs to my main oppose, I still get a vote and I still can have other reasons not required to post. I am actually on and do talk with Peter on IRC, generally in other sub channels. You usually aren't on when I am though... Joe Gazz84 21:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Fine, you don't have to say why your opposing, but why can't you?, If it is a valid reason than posting it can do no harm, hm? Tofutwitch11 20:11, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Skydrinker 12:48, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3. We don't need more "only-speak-English" stewards. Sorry. CasteloBrancomsg 16:15, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    We need every helping hand esp. on IRC, independently from language skill which are less needed for fighting crosswiki vandalism. —DerHexer (Talk) 09:25, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    We have a lot of steward that can help on IRC in English. The question is: how can he help in requests made in another languages? CasteloBrancomsg 20:10, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Unluckily, that will always be a problem; we do not have stewards of all >250 languages. ;o) But it's of course very sad that not even native speakers from some larger wikis join these elections. But should we punish those who do that and helped out before, too? I wouldn't that, but that's of course just my decision. :-) Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:23, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not punishing anyone, since to be a steward isn't an award and to not be isn't a punishment. I'm just choosing some stewards, and giving my opinions. And I think we should really consider in the future to have stewards covering all languages. And why we don't have this? Maybe because all of these discussions on Meta are too "English" for many people, when it should be multilingual. Just maybe. Finally, this doesn't have to be a problem forever, if we don't want to. Regards, CasteloBrancomsg 21:58, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Oppose Guido den Broeder 18:51, 9 February 2011 (UTC) No SUL, No link between projects and blocked in the active project --Jyothis 00:40, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Naive; see DrKiernan below for one example. Glad to see him on the volunteer response team though. Guido den Broeder 16:12, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Ziko 20:01, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  5. You knowingly allowed other editors to access your account on more than one occasion. DrKiernan 20:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Correction (not that I'm justifying it): It was one editor, not "other editors". However, it was a single lapse of judgement that was forgiven four months later. I remain truly sorry for the incident, details of which can be found at the 2nd RfA. Such an incident has never reoccurred. PeterSymonds 20:11, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    For how long did Steve Crossin have access to your account? DrKiernan 20:34, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    I can't remember exactly; it was two and a half years ago. But it wasn't very long (a few days? It can't have been much longer, if it was even that long). This was partly the reason for the community's forgiveness. PeterSymonds 20:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    That is exactly what I understood from the events of August 2008 too. However, I knew, well before that, that others or another had access to your account. I kept quiet before, at and after the RfA because of the extremely high quality of your content work and because being an admin is not a big deal. But being a steward is a different ball game. I'm sorry, but I cannot support. DrKiernan 20:50, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, but that statement is simply untrue. Nobody had access to my account before that. I don't know what you're talking about, sorry. PeterSymonds 20:51, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    You claimed in October 2007 that an image uploaded to the english wikipedia en:File:Queen Alexandra.jpg through your account in May that year was not uploaded by you but by another and that this was not the first instance that that had happened[2]. DrKiernan 21:00, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh, I see what you mean. Well, yeah, it was unfortunate but it was long before I was aware of security implications involving Wikipedia accounts. I was still a very inexperienced and irregular user. It's hardly on the same level; I'm sure such things have happened to others who don't edit frequently. Once I became a bit more active, I realised that account security was important, but it's hardly on the same level as the 2008 incident. PeterSymonds 21:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Is two years not enough? Honestly, I think that he has been grilled enough over this... Ajraddatz (Talk) 03:31, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Oppose strongly He did not address the detail of Steve Crossin issue here. Disclosing account password is a serious matter. Stewards serves for the entire wikimedia project. Please remember that being forgiven in your homewiki does not mean that it would be the same in other communities. If he get elected, it may raise serious security risks. As a preventative measure, I strongly oppose to his election, until he address the issue.--Tomo suzuki 15:47, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not really sure what you're wanting me to address. The issue happened two and a half years ago; all the details are disclosed at my enwiki 2nd RfA, above, and on my Commons RfA. It was a silly, one-off error of judgment that is a dark stain on my reputation. I've never made any secret of this incident, so I'll happily explain any outstanding concerns on my talk page. PeterSymonds 17:33, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Good to hear from you. As for the "what to address" part, you gave us a link to Rfa log, but it's not focused on what you call mistake. If you think you are a good communicator, you should have at least given a summary of the incident. Secondly, and more to the point, the amount of time elapsed and your re-adminship at enwp do not necessarily justify your past mistake, because sysop at local projects and steward are really different things. I want to know exactly what you have done and will do in order to prevent the similar problem to occur in the future. As you should know, if someone else use your Steward account, it would cause catastrophe. I am still in doubt that this will happen to you. In Japan, we say "There is no need of the police if a word of sorry makes everything right (ごめんで済んだら警察は要らない)." Not all the cultures are generous to mistakes, even if it was an honest one. Based on the dialogue above, I do not think you are ready to exercise steward privileges over the cross-wiki and cross-cultural projects. --Tomo suzuki 20:49, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Not sure why people enjoy digging up old graves. I'm very familiar with what happened then and believe me, Peter was very remorseful for what had happened. He has learned his lesson and he moved on, as you can see his admin privileges were restored after his very successful 2nd RfA and no one has doubted his abilities since then. I for one do not agree with people being judged on their past actions for which they have already expressed remorse and have paid duly for...--Stemoc 14:48, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Blanket 'NO' votes for all candidates as a form of protest against open balloting. riffic 18:06, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      Oppose Only english ... Sympatico 15:39, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Sympatico ineligible to vote. –Juliancolton | Talk 17:41, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Oppose Rubicon 12:10, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  9. The sovereignty of individual projects? I would not be glad if Wikimedia F-n become a United Nations-like body. Nothing personal, but   Oppose in principle. Incnis Mrsi 21:40, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    That wasn't quite what I meant. :-) I meant that projects which are in a position to run themselves, with local administrators/bureaucrats/checkusers, etc., should not have to be interfered with unless the matter is an emergency. For example, if a project has local active bureaucrats, it wouldn't be appropriate to rename a user using steward tools, but instead rely on the local community. I just wanted to clarify that point, so it is made clear. PeterSymonds 22:16, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1. Jusjih 10:14, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Good work, but english only. That's why here. --Emaus 02:34, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Neutral. Not very convinced... VonTasha 11:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/elections_2011/votes/PeterSymonds&oldid=19242825"