< Stewards‎ | Confirm‎ | 2016

RadiX (formerly known as Ruy Pugliesi)Edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

  • Languages: pt, en-3, es-2, fr-2, gl-1, it-1, sk-1, sq-1, ms-1, hi-1
  • Personal info: Dear all, this is my first confirmation as a steward. I was elected in 28 February 2015, and it has been a pleasure to be part of this awesome team. :) I've used the steward tools for various purposes, and my main efforts in the past months has continued in anti-vandalism, long-term abuse and spambot management (I joined the Small Wiki Monitoring Team in November 2010). I am usually reachable via CVN channels whenever I'm on my computer, from ~16:00 (UTC) until early in the morning. Due to real life commitments, I always tend to be less active (or almost inactive) in June, and from September to November. However, my cross-wiki or average activity level over the remaining months is either pretty high or acceptable. I would like to see any input that could help me to improve as a volunteer, and I would also love to continue carrying on as a Steward - if I have your support, of course. Thanks for participating. RadiX 18:50, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[]
  • Lingue:
  • Informazioni personali: translation needed
  • Idiomas:
  • Información personal: translation needed
  • Языки:
  • Личная информация: translation needed
  • Sprachen:
  • Informationen zur Person: translation needed
  • Línguas: pt, en-3, es-2, fr-2, gl-1, it-1, sk-1, sq-1, ms-1, hi-1
  • Informações pessoais: Olá a todos. Esta é a minha primeira confirmação como Steward. Fui aprovado em 28 de fevereiro de 2015, e tem sido um honra fazer parte dessa equipe maravilhosa. :) Tenho utilizado as ferramentas de Steward em várias atividades, e o meu foco continua sendo o combate ao vandalismo cross-wiki, aos casos de long-term abuse e aos spambots (ingressei no Small Wiki Monitoring Team em novembro de 2010). Geralmente sou contactável através dos canais CVN sempre que estou em meu computador, das 16:00 (UTC) até de madrugada. Devido a compromissos na vida real, sempre tendo a ser menos ativo (ou quase inativo) no mês de junho, e de setembro a novembro. Entretanto, minha atividade média e cross-wiki nos demais meses é relativamente alta ou aceitável. Gostaria de ler quaisquer comentários que me auxiliassem no sentido de aprimorar minhas ações enquanto voluntário, e também adoraria continuar como Steward - se contar com o apoio de vocês, é claro. Obrigado pela atenção. RadiX
  • Taalvaardigheid:
  • Persoonlijke informatie: translation needed

Comments about RadiXEdit

  •   Remove, I don't feel comfortable at all supporting another term. The issues raised during RadiX's election were activity issues, then after his election he even managed to sign the confidentiality agreement five days late (official deadline was December 15), despite a for months ongoing talk page spam, and now in this confirmation statement it's basically promised to be absent for half of the next year as well (5 of 12 months), and that on a regular basis. I cannot support a steward who might not reply to issues for months, and there are enough other persons who can show a higher availability and fulfil these duties. --Vogone (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Neutral, Trusted, helpful and friendly user but same concerns as Vogone. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
Dear colleagues, as I told before, I was moving house in November/December, and without regular internet access [my ISP took 53 days! in order to reactivate it] (Jalexander and GVarnum were emailed about this). This is the reason why I signed the confidentiality agreement some days later (I wouldn't sign it without reading the terms carefully). I plan to be quite active in this comming term (and to keep my current activity level); I am just telling you the months I would possibly have a lower availability according to my real life commitments (usually June, October and November). You can see from my logged actions page that my activity levels have basically remained the same during the other months. I'd like to continue carrying on as a Steward and handling LTA, spambots, cross-wiki abuses, and also responding to other stewards requests. I am always reacheable via irc, email or talk page though. Thanks, RadiX 14:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep the confidence in his proper use of steward tools during 7 years months a year is much more important than the activity in every single month, once this is a volunteer task and one is not supposed to be here all the way. CasteloBrancomsg 15:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Trusted and helpful.--Syum90 (talk) 15:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep I think he was active enough. --Rschen7754 15:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 16:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Remove Sorry, I can't support someone who had to be poked numerous times by WMF to sign the new confidentiality agreement, and then did so too late (and that in the first year as a steward, where activity is usually much higher). If WMF had cared for its own deadlines, the rights should have been removed back then. Also quite a contradiction to speak of being "less active (or almost inactive) in June, and from September to November" in the statement, and then to reduce that to "quite active" in the comment above. Also the comment of Castelobranco is misleading, Ruy wasn't a steward for 7 years. --MF-W 16:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
MF-W, my ISP let me 53 days without regular access during these weeks. I've said that I plan to be quite during this year, and that is true. The months you have mentioned above are the ones when I would possibly have a lower availability. I can not predict the future, but I'd rather mention this as a possibility than saying nothing at all. I find it much better from an ethical point of view. ;) I don't think that activity is the only thing that matters, but since you mentioned it, I performed almost 3,000 steward actions in the past 11 months. I think this activity level is in line with or even higher than what a lot of my colleagues have done. Thanks, RadiX 16:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
@MF-Warburg:, I meant to say "7 months a years". Sorry for my mistake. CasteloBrancomsg 20:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep--Mathanaharan (talk) 17:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep --Infinite0694 (Talk) 17:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep--BRP ever 17:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep--Sfic (talk) 17:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Ja --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep--White Master (es) 23:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep, with the expectation of more consistent activity. Miniapolis 23:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep --Az1568 (talk) 03:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Proactively stating that he might not be available from ... to ... is a plus in my book. Steward actions are ok AFAIK. --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Very well. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Reasonably active. His scheduled leave doesn't bother me. Anyone can have that from time to time. — T. 07:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep --Laurent Jerry (talk) 10:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep -- As someone who also changed ISPs this past year, I know what a pain it can be to get new service installed (mine was installed only a few days late, but service levels vary in different places). Editor still manages to make simple edits despite having the bit. Etamni | ✉  10:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep though concerns about activity, and has happened in other roles. If facing extended absence, I think that stewards should consider a leave of absence guideline.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep--Yeza (talk) 18:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 20:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Even with expected absence will meet the minimum activity guidelines, and when he is around, he is a valued contributor, so I believe he will continue to be a net benefit to steward corps, and should not be removed. -- Avi (talk) 22:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep, declaring leave of absence in advance is definitely a good idea, as scheduled leave is much better than an unexpected leave — NickK (talk) 02:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Very good.--Uğurkenttalk 17:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Widr (talk) 17:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Mvictor talk 18:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep, per Hedwig in Washington. In ten months, he did more than many stewards in five years. Érico (talk) 00:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep --- Darwin Ahoy! 00:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[]
    Dude, I don't have a clue about what you are talking about, nor what the "harassing" thing is. Would you mind explaining it so maybe I can help you out? Thanks. RadiX 12:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[]
    E. g. RfC. What means "Dude"?? (please, don't use this word in conversation with me, thx) --Kusurija (talk) 11:47, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[]
    What is the problem with this word? Sorry, I didn't intend to offend you. RadiX 02:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep INeverCry 23:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep good cross-wiki record - has contributed to many wikis.--Snaevar (talk) 18:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   KeepALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 08:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep --Harlock81 (talk) 11:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep --Melos (talk) 12:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Support--AryanSogd 13:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Matanya (talk) 18:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:06, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Contributions to en.wikiversity within a year! Thanks! --Marshallsumter (talk) 18:23, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Not fully convinced, but it's not enough to vote otherwise than keep. Trijnsteltalk 22:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep--Nioger (talk) 10:58, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Remove The problens with this user, in this election, are the same in 2016. JSSX (talk) 20:31, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[]
Blatant deceitful statement. This user just revealed non-public personal information on a local election page; oversighting was handled by Teles a few hours ago, he got a warning message and thus voted against Teles (see full conversation here) and me. RadiX 02:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep-- Vanthorn (talk) 21:23, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep - Even if he is not around the whole year, he is highly active when he is around and more active than quite some other stewards (including myself), which is really appreciated. He is certainly needed as steward. -Barras talk 19:24, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 02:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep - Trusted, active, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Remove --DerekvG (talk) 18:38, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[]
    Could you kindly explain the reason? RadiX 19:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[]
Apologize, but i will not --DerekvG (talk) 22:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[]