2021年社群願望清單調查

This page is a translated version of the page Community Wishlist Survey 2021 and the translation is 20% complete.
Other languages:
Bahasa Indonesia • ‎Bahasa Melayu • ‎British English • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Esperanto • ‎Gaeilge • ‎Jawa • ‎Kapampangan • ‎Nederlands • ‎Tiếng Việt • ‎Türkçe • ‎Zazaki • ‎asturianu • ‎azərbaycanca • ‎català • ‎dansk • ‎eesti • ‎español • ‎euskara • ‎français • ‎galego • ‎hrvatski • ‎italiano • ‎kurdî • ‎lietuvių • ‎magyar • ‎norsk bokmål • ‎occitan • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎română • ‎suomi • ‎svenska • ‎Ænglisc • ‎čeština • ‎Ελληνικά • ‎беларуская (тарашкевіца) • ‎български • ‎македонски • ‎монгол • ‎русский • ‎српски / srpski • ‎українська • ‎עברית • ‎العربية • ‎سنڌي • ‎فارسی • ‎لۊری شومالی • ‎کوردی • ‎हिन्दी • ‎বাংলা • ‎ਪੰਜਾਬੀ • ‎தமிழ் • ‎മലയാളം • ‎ไทย • ‎မြန်မာဘာသာ • ‎ქართული • ‎中文 • ‎日本語 • ‎粵語 • ‎한국어
Magic Wand Icon 229981 Color Flipped.svg The Community Wishlist Survey 2021 is over... Magic Wand Icon 229981 Color Flipped.svg

Total: 268 proposals, 1773 個貢獻者, 8596 support votes

睇下隨機提案

 

All phases of the survey begin and end at 18:00 UTC.

  • 提交、討論同修訂提案: 11月16日 – 2020年11月30日
  • 社群技術審查同組織提案: 11月23日 – 2020年12月7日
  • 提案投票: 12月8日 – 2020年12月21日
  • 結果公佈: 2020年12月23日

 

您哋好啊!

We're excited to share an update on the Community Wishlist Survey 2021. This will be our sixth annual survey, and we've decided to update the process:

One backlog per year: The team will now have one backlog per year. This means that, each year, volunteers will vote on our new backlog. They can propose new wishes or re-propose old ones. Once the voting is complete, we'll have one new backlog. This is a change from our old format, which allowed us to work on multiple backlogs per year. With this change, we can simplify our work, ensure the most important wishes get addressed, and reassess old wishes each year.

Status of remaining 2019 and 2020 wishes: There are 3 remaining wishes from the 2019 and 2020 surveys that we have not worked on or addressed yet. Since they received a high number of votes, we will include them in our 2021 backlog. In the 2019 wishlist, there are 2 wishes that will be included: section name in diff and named references in VE. In the 2020 wishlist, there are 4 wishes that we have already begun or have been worked on. There is 1 wish from the 2020 wishlist that we have not worked on yet, so it will also be included in the 2021 backlog: insert attestation using Wikisource as a corpus. You can review our status report for the 2019 wishlist.

Research and regular updates to replace "top 10": We have decided to no longer commit to a number (such as "top 5" or "top 10") in advance. Here's why: Software development teams usually conduct extensive research before committing to a project. This way, they can determine if the project is feasible, understand how long the project may take, and identify potential risks. With the current wishlist process, we don't do that, which often leads to delays, stress, and confusion. We want to fix this.

With the new system, we'll research projects before committing to them. We will evaluate wishes in the order of popularity, going from the top down. During our research phase, we'll analyze the following criteria: popularity (i.e., number of votes), size and scope of the project, level of technical feasibility, risks and dependencies, and potential conflicts with other teams. Once our analysis is complete, we'll share our findings. This means that we'll still work on multiple projects per year. We'll just be more communicative about what we can or cannot take on (and why), and we'll share updates over the course of the year about our roadmap.

Separate leaderboards for categories: We will keep the normal structure of displaying all proposals, sorted by the number of votes, in the main leaderboard. In addition, we will now have separate leaderboards for each category. This way, we can work on proposals that are popular for large communities (from the main leaderboard) and underrepresented communities (from specific leaderboards). We’ll use the criteria described above to help select which proposals we work on.

Why these changes?: We knew that the wishlist process was ready for an upgrade. Wishes have grown bigger and more complex over the years, and we wanted to improve our communication with volunteers. Additionally, we wanted to continue to address the wishes of smaller communities (as we did in the 2020 wishlist) and the high-impact wishes of all Wikimedians (as we did in previous wishlists). This led to a series of conversations on how we could improve the process. From these conversations, we came up with these changes. Overall, we hope these changes make the wishlist process more transparent, sustainable, and impactful. This way, the survey is strengthened for years to come. Thank you, and we look forward to reading your proposals!

 

The Community Tech team is a Wikimedia Foundation team focused on the needs of active Wikimedia contributors for improved curation and moderation tools. The projects that we primarily work on are decided by the Wikimedia community, through the annual Community Wishlist Survey.

Once a year active Wikimedia contributors can submit proposals for features and fixes that you'd like our team to work on. After two weeks, you can vote on the ideas that you're most interested in.

Once the survey is closed, the Community Tech team will choose some proposals from the survey to work on. Proposals will be selected based on the following criteria: popularity (i.e., number of votes), size and scope of the project, level of technical feasibility, risks and dependencies, and potential conflicts with other teams. Some of the wishes may be addressed by volunteer developers or other development teams.

This survey process was developed by Wikimedia Deutschland's Technical Wishes team, who run a wishlist survey on German Wikipedia. The international wishlist process is supported by the Community Relations Specialists team.

 
The Community Tech mascot: a dog wearing a Santa hat.

The proposal phase is the first two weeks of the survey.

In the proposal phase, contributors from every project and language can submit proposals for features and fixes that you'd like to see in 2021. Proposals may be submitted in any language. If you submit a proposal in a language other than English, we will attempt to get it translated so everyone can read and vote on it more easily.

Proposals should be discrete, well-defined tasks that will directly benefit active Wikimedia contributors. Proposals should answer the following questions:

  • What is the problem that you want to solve?
  • Which users are affected? (editors, admins, Wikisource editors, etc.)
  • How is this problem being addressed now?
  • What are the proposed solutions? (if there are any ideas)

Your proposal should be as specific as possible, especially in the problem statement. Don't just say that "(x feature) is out of date", "needs to be improved" or "has a lot of bugs". That's not enough information to figure out what needs to be done. A good proposal explains exactly what the problem is, and who's affected by it. It's okay if you don't have a specific solution to propose, or if you have a few possible solutions and you don't know which is best.

Submitting a proposal is just the beginning of the process. The two-week proposal phase is a time that the community can collaboratively work on a proposal that presents the idea in a way that's most likely to succeed in the voting phase. When a proposal is submitted, everyone is invited to comment on that proposal, and help to make it better — asking questions, and suggesting changes. Similar proposals can be combined; very broad proposals should be split up into more specific ideas. The goal is to create the best possible proposal for the voting phase.

The person who submits a proposal should expect to be active in that discussion, and help to make changes along the way. Because of that, we're going to limit proposals to three per account. If you post more than three proposals, we'll ask you to narrow it down to three. Bring your best ideas!

Similarly, only registered users can make proposals to ensure they can watchlist the discussion and respond to questions. Just as with voting, you should be an active editor on at least one Wikimedia project. If you do not meet this criteria, or you have hit your proposal limit but have more ideas, you can seek other users to adopt your proposals.

One more note: Proposals that call for removing or disabling a feature that a WMF product team has worked on are outside of Community Tech's possible scope. They won't be in the voting phase.

 

Yes, you may submit some proposals that didn't get enough support votes in past years, and deserve a second try.

If you decide to copy a proposal from the old survey into the new survey, we expect you to "adopt" that proposal—meaning that you'll be actively participating in the discussion about that idea, and willing to make changes to the proposal in order to make it a stronger idea when it moves to the voting phase. As we said above, there's a limit of three proposals per person, and posting a proposal from last year counts.

It's helpful if you want to post a link to the previous discussion, but please don't copy over the votes and discussion from last year. If there are good points that people made in last year's discussions, include the suggestions or caveats in the new proposal.

 
Aldino per Natale.jpg

After the proposal phase, we take a break to review the proposals before the voting phase begins.

All active contributors can review and vote for the proposals that they want to support. You can vote for as many different proposals as you want. To ensure fair voting, only registered users can vote, and votes by very new accounts may be removed.

The only votes that are counted are Support votes. The final list of wishes will be ranked in order of the most Support votes. If you are the proposer, a support vote is automatically counted for your proposal.

However, lively discussion is encouraged during the voting phase. If you want to post an Oppose or Neutral vote with a comment, then feel free to do so. These discussions can help people to make up their mind about whether they want to vote for the proposals. The discussions also provide useful input to guide the work that will happen through the year.

A reasonable amount of canvassing is acceptable. You've got an opportunity to sell your idea to as many people as you can reach. Feel free to reach out to other people in your project, WikiProject or user group. Obviously, this shouldn't involve sockpuppets, or badgering people to vote or to change their vote. But a good-faith "get out the vote" campaign is absolutely okay.

 

社群技術團隊可能會以唔符合下面嘅標準為理由而拒絕某啲提案:

  • 提案應該同技術變更有關,而唔是同方針或者社群變更有關
  • 提案應該同問題有關,而唔一定係查詢某啲特定解決方案
  • 提案應該係要有充分定義嘅問題,而唔係堆砌各種毫無關聯嘅問題
  • 提案唔係系其他團隊嘅路線圖入面,或者冇俾其他團隊拒絕過
  • 提案冇俾社群技術團隊拒絕過
  • 提案應該要符合團隊的範圍

The Community Tech team may decline proposals that fail to meet the above criteria.

 

支持投票排名創建一个優先嘅愿望,社群技術團隊會去評估同解决頭5個愿望。要做到呢一點,我哋會睇下所有嘅愿望,並且會參考技術和社會/政策風險因素。

反對票同中立票非常有用於提高潛在嘅負面影響。對於有爭議既願望,我哋會通過更加有共識的審核黎平衡投票。用2015年的調查工作黎做個例子:希望“添加用戶觀察名單中”都收到咗好多嘅選票,但都有收到一啲反對嘅投票。我哋會聽各方嘅意見,決定會唔會繼續呢個項目。

 
每一隻戴住聖誕帽嘅狗都為社群技術團隊努力做野。

……而唔係著手去年嘅調查中,除了頭10以外的嘅每一個項目?

我哋每年做一次調查嘅原因你我哋希望更多嘅人加入!而家更多嘅人瞭解左呢個團隊同呢個調查,而且一年之後大部分排係前面嘅愿望已經完成,我哋希望每個人都更加對參與呢個調查更加感興趣同激動。我哋想俾每個人一個帶黎新想法嘅機會。

We also want to make sure that older ideas are still wanted. As software evolves, so do the user’s needs. Sometimes a really good wish from last year isn’t so important anymore, or the description has simply become outdated. Conducting the survey annually helps reconfirm what the community needs.

如果舊年的调查入面有您覺得好值得再次提出嘅話,請睇下上面嘅“[[Can I resubmit a proposal from previous surveys?|我可唔可以提交以往調查嘅提案?]]”。