Community Wishlist Survey 2019/Admins and patrollers/Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements

Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements

  • Problem: New Page Review is a key process on Wikipedia, and the only firewall that prevents inappropriate new pages being added to the Encyclopedia. However, there are many longstanding issues with the Page Curation tools and the New Pages feed which inhibit efficiency and cause problems to be overlooked. Aside from a few additions made when the Growth Team added Articles for Creation (AfC) drafts to the New Page Feed last year, the tools haven't been supported for many years and the list of proposed developments is long. These include bugs, features never implemented, and suggested improvements which have been left unaddressed. While a few requests for improvement of the tools used by New Page Reviewers can be addressed by on-wiki customisation by volunteers, most others are part of the Mediawiki software and require the intervention of the WMF developers.

    We have been repeatedly informed that the Community Tech Team does not have the resources to provide ongoing support for the tools they developed (or even to fix bugs that have popped up) and that this wishlist is the only venue for us to come to for technical assistance. While some of the tasks below are almost trivially easy, others may require a significant time investment.

  • Who would benefit: While New Page Reviewers and admins are the only users with access to the Page Curation tools, ultimately the entire wiki benefits from the work that we do. AfC drafts were recently added to the New Page Feed, and many of the suggested improvements here would also benefit the AfC team. The English wiki is also not the only one that could benefit, as these tools are not only relegated to EN Wikipedia but were originally designed to be available for use on other wikis as well (There are currently some bugs stopping the rollout of the tools on other wikis, fixing these is part of this proposal as well; This would make the Page Curation tools and New Page Feed able to be enabled on other language wikis).
  • Proposed solution: The requested improvements come in a few categories:
    • Bugs that should have been fixed a long time ago,
    • Additional sorting options and additional 'potential issues' flagging in the PC tools and New Pages Feed, which would help to flag problems for reviewers to follow up on,
    • Resources dedicated to other suggested improvements supported by the New Page Reviewer community to make them more user-friendly and improve efficiency and to make them, enabling rollout on other language wikis.
  • More comments: While there were several dozen good suggested improvements, we have listed only the highest priority items below by their Phabricator tickets, in the hope that at least some of our most pressing concerns will be addressed.


Insertcleverphrasehere: Just a heads up, if you didn't notice -- we've moved this proposal from "Miscellaneous" to "Admins and patrollers". -- DannyH (WMF) (talk) 18:52, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

  • T207452 in particular would be a really helpful bit. Hopefully the reduction in mooted ideas will help some focus without completely limiting where the benefit gets focused to. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:07, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Question: Apart from English Wikipedia, is there any other WMF project that uses NewPagesFeed? 4nn1l2 (talk) 05:02, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Possibly not at this moment in time, because it is still not perfect until the wished for upgrades are carried out. The English Wikipedia is however by far the most important project and being synonymous with the word Wikipedia is the source for all the undesirable pages masquerading as encyclopedia articles. As a MediaWiki extension, it could probably be ported to other WikiMedia projects (and even other non-Foundation projects who want to use it). It should be borne in mind however that without a well performing New Page vetting system, the English Wikipedia will cease to exist as we know it. Kudpung (talk) 06:16, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Excuse me, I must ask you to say that again. What a nice and vivid statement concerning the status of English Wikipedia. "English Wikipedia is by far the most important project"? "English Wikipedia is the synonym for Wikipedia"? What's the proof? --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 12:04, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Super Wang on zhwiki I think that Kudpung is referring to en.wikipedia being the hardest hit by spam and promotion pages. Therefore it is more necessary to have a robust system in place to deal with these additions on the English Wikipedia than anywhere else (elsewhere a lower volume can generally be dealt with by a small dedicated team, this is difficult on *is* synonymous with the word Wikipedia, and it is the first project that companies and individuals come to when looking to advertise or promote themselves; specific countries have in-country promotional issues to deal with, has global promotion to deal with. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 13:38, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
@Insertcleverphrasehere:Thank you for explanation, but sorry, that doesn't make much sense to me. You know, due to Taiwan's int'l status and the large population using Chinese language, zhwiki has also been always a target of vandalism. I acknowledge that enwiki is the first project ever, but if you think enwiki is the only source and bulletin board for companies and celebrities, I must say that thought reflects "English language-priority". --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 00:17, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Besides, enwiki has a "global" promotion doesn't mean other wikis don't. Chinese is the language used by the most people (1.5 billion, 2015 consensus) on this planet. There aren't less issues than those on enwiki here on zhwiki. It's some kind of bias that someone thinks "English Wikipedia has 'global' issues to deal with". --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 00:24, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
@Super Wang on zhwiki: Fair enough, and fair enough. As I've said in comments below, I'm keen to push to fix remaining issues that are keeping the Page curation tools from being, so that they can be used on other wikis as well; the phab task is phab:T50552. If we do this right, then the work done for these improvements can be ported to other wikis such as Keen to chat more about this. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 00:49, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
just a note I moved the discussion below to the discussion page. --Cohaf (talk) 00:51, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
You could listen a bit more carefully to your fellow intl Wikipedians. I also wondered why this is the top wish for „a key process on Wikipedia“ but it's about the US/GB Wikipedia only. Sargoth (talk) 10:09, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
@Sargoth, Once again, we were forced to come here as a last resort by community tech, which refused to maintain or update the tools that they built many years ago unless we came here and got in the top 10. Not sure how much more carefully you want me to listen; I've added the ticket to make the tools to the list above, and I'm going to push for this if I can so that these tools can be made available elsewhere on other language wikis as well. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 13:29, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
„as a last resort“, this sounds disillusioned. I hope you get your supports (I didn't vote here and will propably not but am quite disapointed about the oppose-votes at the gender options proposal. Best of luck :) Sargoth (talk) 14:07, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Sargoth Somewhat disillusioned, yes. As for the gender options one, note that oppose votes don't count. Still, the premise of a voting free-for-all and top ten as a good system for identifying all the stuff that needs developing is a bit ridiculous. It tends to lead to no development for proposals that are fairly trivial to fix, but only impact a relatively small segment of the user base. A good man once said that "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch". We had the same problem here, in that NPP isn't particularly sexy; this proposal is going to take a fair amount of effort, and while essential, it doesn't directly help all wikipedians (you can see some people complaining about it below). Note that you can canvass to your heart's content per the wishlist rules (which is really dumb, but it is how we managed to get a decent number of votes here). I'd suggest heading over to various wikiprojects and canvassing for votes if you want that particular proposal to pass in the top 10. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 16:01, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Oppose per Jo-Jo Eumerus, this is a Fascistism to IP users, things that is suitable for English are not necessarily suitable for other languages. -- 03:21, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
    Note that each language wiki would be able to use their own tags and deletion processes by specifiying what is in each section of the toolbar via on-wiki .js pages. As for 'Fascistism' to IP users; there is a simple solution to that problem. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 08:58, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment I would really love to see a wiki-agnostic page curation tool. I wish there was a way to vote for that specifically - right now it's just one of a big bag of feature requests, a significant part of which I imagine would have to be dropped to make the scope reasonable. --Tgr (talk) 04:47, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
      Comment @Tgr Most of the other feature requests are things that the other language wikis will want as well. In any case, from the looks of things making the tools specific only consists of a few key things that need fixing, so not hard to tack on to this proposal; value for effort, it is one of the best tasks on this list. Making the tools Wiki-agnostic ( was tried as a separate request a few years ago in the community wishlist, but failed to garner enough support (40-somethingth); honestly getting tacked on to this proposal is the best chance it has to be completed. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 09:04, 25 November 2018 (UTC)


  •   SupportInsertcleverphrasehere (or here) 18:10, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support - Atsme📞📧 18:17, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support - Wholeheartedly. Onel5969 TT me 18:34, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support James Martindale (talk) 18:34, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Rosguill (talk) 18:38, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Alucard 16 (talk) 18:39, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support definitely.--SkyGazer 512 (talk) 18:40, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Regards, — Moe Epsilon 18:40, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Strong support I have been using this tool for some time now and the required updates will make it easier to contribute. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 18:40, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support.Flooded with them hundreds (talk) 18:41, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Kb03 (talk) 18:41, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Kges1901 (talk) 18:42, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Drm310 (talk) 18:44, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Galobtter (talk) 18:45, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Strong support — Would only better the—in my opinion—already good new page reviewing process at the English Wikipedia. SshibumXZ (talk) 18:47, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Theroadislong (talk) 18:47, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:48, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Saederup92 (talk) 18:49, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Shellwood (talk) 18:52, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Wumbolo (talk) 18:54, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Mark the train (talk) 18:55, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support MER-C (talk) 18:57, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Anaxial (talk) 18:58, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Pichpich (talk) 19:00, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Redalert2fan (talk) 19:01, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support — Newslinger talk 19:02, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support MrX (talk) 19:08, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Staszek Lem (talk) 19:10, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support SEMMENDINGER (talk) 19:12, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support StudiesWorld (talk) 19:21, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Seacactus 13 (talk) 19:22, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Agtx (talk) 19:23, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Zchrykng (talk) 19:24, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Argento Surfer (talk) 19:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Kosack (talk) 19:28, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Ive done some Page curation, and will do more if the function gets developed Dan Koehl (talk) 19:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support strongly, this is a vital tool Atlantic306 (talk) 19:41, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support please also try to bring it to other language Wikipedias. Thanks much Cohaf (talk) 19:42, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
    • Note:Moved to discussion page to declutter here.--Cohaf (talk) 00:32, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support - very strongly, particularly with the increasing merging of NPP and AfC Nosebagbear (talk) 19:45, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support The WMF needs to commit to ongoing support for the page curation tools. If they cannot do that, they should instead create and limit themselves to supporting an API that enables community development. It is an outrage that this ticket, by necessity, includes request for bug fixes. Until then, this wish list is, apparently, the only way that new page reviewers can get the development support they need. Vexations (talk) 19:46, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support = paul2520 (talk) 19:50, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support FitIndia Talk 19:55, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support L293D ( • ) 19:57, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support CoolSkittle (talk) 20:07, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Bradv (talk) 20:10, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support My name is not dave (talk) 20:19, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support with the hope for continued and/or increased development and maintenance effort in this regard. --Elmidae (talk) 20:21, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support as a specific item, it would be good if the New Pages Tool could spot check for already existing tags and checkmarks; as I've been burned for doing regular tagging that was redundant with some somewhat hidden tags. AngusWOOF (talk) 20:22, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Geoff Who, me? 20:30, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Dodger67 (talk) 20:35, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Vermont (talk) 21:31, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Strong support (disclosure: I get the NPP newsletter) — pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 22:08, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support NPP is an important safeguard to retaining Wikipedia's reputation. Hopefully its tools could also be brought to other projects. Barkeep49 (talk) 22:13, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:29, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Araratic (talk) 22:32, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support John Broughton (talk) 23:27, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support A well-thought-through set of requests which would improve the effectiveness of the dedicated volunteers who defend the encyclopedia from an oncoming tide of rubbish. PamD (talk) 23:47, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support ToThAc (talk) 23:51, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support — JJMC89(T·C) 00:15, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Gehenna1510 (talk) 00:20, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Supportnumbermaniac 00:37, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Anarchyte (work | talk) 00:41, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support- Dcheagle (talk) 01:17, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support-CASSIOPEIA (talk) 01:26, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support AmericanAir88 (talk) 01:29, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   SupportAkhiljaxxn (talk) 01:35, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Natureium (talk) 02:16, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support MRD2014 (talk) 03:09, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:35, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Winged Blades of Godric (talk) 04:37, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support JTP (talkcontribs) 04:46, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Abzeronow (talk) 04:52, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Ehime«» 05:46, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support about time Kudpung (talk) 07:17, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Kpgjhpjm (talk) 07:33, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Domdeparis (talk) 07:37, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support this is essential for maintaining the integrity of wikipedia. Polyamorph (talk) 08:56, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support good. 333-blue 09:49, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Strong oppose I know there are no Opposes but this would not benefit most of the users. --FF-11 (talk) 09:56, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I am minded to agree that this would not help most users, and in general I find the heavy proceduralization of new page patrol to be a problem. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:03, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
      Comment: FF-11 & Jo-Jo Eumerus, We were not that keen to take up a slot in the community wishlist either (although the wishlist is not just for proposals that help 'all users', this is the 'Admins and Patrollers' section after all). We have been forced to come here as a last resort as we have been told in no-uncertain-terms that they won't even do bug fixes to the existing tools unless we come here. It's a crappy situation, but we don't have an alternative. As for a potential for over-proceduralization of NPP, I'd be keen to discuss in more detail elsewhere (please contact me on my talk page). Cheers, — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 16:28, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
      Comment, FF-11 & Jo-Jo Eumerus, as can be seen, many of the various wish list requests do not address all users. However, the impact of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing affects all new users who wish to create new articles. The current level of 'proceduralization' has never changed since NPP was introduced at the very beginning of the Wikipedia. These requsts do not over-proceduralize the process, nor do they even add any more layers of bureaucracy to it. They simply improve the work flow for the users who do this thankless task and who are unable to keep up with the flood of junk that will fill the encyclopedia if they don't. Kudpung (talk) 06:38, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
      Comment: I agree with Jo-Jo. Just because it's "thankless" doesn't mean new page patrolling should be easy. Some of these "improvements" are just to make it easier and more automated, with the end result people don't have to think about what they're doing. Jacknstock (talk) 12:57, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support PratyushSinha101 (talk) 10:13, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Patriccck (talk) 10:35, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Jc86035 (talk) 10:56, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support ‐‐1997kB (talk) 11:03, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support AlexLeeCN (talk) 11:44, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Much needed for the project Cahk (talk) 11:46, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Jcc (talk) 12:12, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Like tears in rain (talk) 12:23, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support This seems reasonable. I have seen canvassing.GreyGreenWhy (talk) 15:07, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
      Comment GreyGreenWhy, Note that canvassing is allowed (and even encouraged) by the rules of the Community Wishlist. See talk page for more info. I don't want anyone to think we have done anything untoward by spreading the word about this proposal. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 16:32, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Though bug fixes such as T169441 should really not be having to come through this Wishlist route AllyD (talk) 20:20, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Mmitchell10 (talk) 20:51, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Far and away the most important proposal on the Community Wishlist Survey this year. Kind of absurd that we have to vote in bug fixes for what is essentially core functionality at this point. Snuge purveyor (talk) 22:30, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support support completely! :) Megalibrarygirl (talk) 02:26, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Catrìona (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:49, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Sdkb (talk) 11:01, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk) 11:59, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Eddie891 (talk) 12:26, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 13:13, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support enL3X1 ¡‹delayed reaction›¡ 14:41, 18 November 2018 (UTC) #94
  •   Support SilverTiger12 (talk) 15:20, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --AntanO 15:58, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Schwede66 (talk) 17:40, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 18:09, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support ProgrammingGeek talktome 19:57, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Ajpolino (talk) 20:42, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 20:44, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Esquivalience (talk) 23:58, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Barbara (WVS) (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Titore (talk) 02:13, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Shizhao (talk) 02:34, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Handling new pages efficiently is essential. Johnuniq (talk) 04:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support I find it absurd that this process is the only way that these tools may even be fixed. The Foundation claims to want to help new editors, and spends much on outreach and the like, but when it comes to actual action to help new editors get their content into search engines via NPP, it's "just another feature on the wishlist". Without a working NPP process, all work on outreach is essentially wasted. Psiĥedelisto (talk) 05:08, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Give NPP the tools they need (in proper condition) to succeed. — AfroThundr (u · t · c) 05:52, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   SupportTeratix 06:28, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support This is something that is long helps the English Wikipedia and can be deployed in other wikis when they will gain a bit more of the hell not ? FR30799386 (talk) 07:06, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Waddie96 (talk) 07:33, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support We have to work towards making NPR as effective as AfC , and automation is the only way to go ! Devopam (talk) 07:45, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Chandan Guha (talk) 08:56, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support - This will certainly enhance the work output at NPP. HitroMilanese (talk) 09:01, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Remagoxer (talk) 10:30, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   SupportTheLongTone (talk) 11:33, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Courcelles 14:54, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Strikerforce (talk) 15:03, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Randomeditor1000 (talk) 15:04, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support ONUnicorn (talk) 16:02, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Much needed JackTracker (talk) 18:41, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Chris Troutman (talk) 18:54, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support - unclear how much weight the argument "it won't help most users" can be given. If anything, this only means that more people will find NPP accessible and decide to undertake a role in it. El cid, el campeador (talk) 20:04, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Weegaweek (talk) 20:55, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support JHCaufield (talk) 00:04, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support 331dot (talk) 01:08, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Agree curation tools are important... Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:40, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:06, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Famousdog (talk) 11:01, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose as this seems to be a single-wiki-purpose thing. → «« Man77 »» [de] 12:55, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
      Comment Man77, the Page Curation tools were made to be used on any wiki when first developed (at least they were supposed to). There is a Phab task that requests making the tools (phab:T50552), which doesn't look like too much trouble. In fact, the New Page feed stuff that was recently woorked on was done with a future spread to other wikis in mind, so this is already partly done. I haven't added that task above because so far no other wikis have come forward asking for these tools as of yet and I'm not aware of how the processes on other wikis would work with the toolset as it currently stands and how this would exist with current processes on other wikis. If new page patrol analogues on other wikis are interested in activating the New Page feed and/or Page Curation tools on their wiki, it's something we could push for as it is in line with Community Tech's goal of doing work to help all Wikis. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 13:47, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
    Man77 Note, see talk page comments and comments on the Phab task indicating that both (chinese) and the persian wiki have both espressed serious interest in these tools. Making these tools is something I'll be pushing for when the tech team starts work on this task. If anyone from other wikis wants to come forward and join the discussion about this, it would be helpful as I must profess my ignorance of New Page Review processes and teams on other wikis. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 00:58, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Willsome429 (talk) 15:48, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support And.martire (talk) 16:35, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Mcampany (talk) 22:10, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:24, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Novak Watchmen (talk) 23:03, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Arian Talk 18:28, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support I've found NPP too frustrating with the current setup, and these changes look like they might fix that. EEng (talk) 19:12, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Vulphere 01:17, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support ~Cybularny Speak? 15:46, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support JøhP (talk) 16:24, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support FlyingAce (talk) 01:07, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Pf1127 (talk) 06:24, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Hydronium Hydroxide (talk) 09:10, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support sounnds nooice JonathanLa (talk) 02:15, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support DannyS712 (talk) 08:11, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support these fixes are really badly needed. New Page Patrol is currently a failing process with the backlog of unpatrolled pages growing faster than we can handle. The tool fixes and enhancements will help us actually patrol rather than fighting with the tools and process. Please prioritize this. Legacypac (talk) 19:10, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Ranjithsiji (talk) 22:36, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Slashme (talk) 08:08, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Dreamy Jazz (talk) 08:48, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Whispering (talk) 14:27, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Amanda (aka DQ) 22:42, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:23, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support These improvements are well overdue Noyster (talk) 13:04, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support By looking at the tickets, one gets the impression that they will benefit and a lot. In future it'd be best to have these votes for less tools so that we can decide one at a time, as opposed to such big block of changes. --1l2l3k (talk) 16:04, 29 November 2018 (UTC)