Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Wikipedia to the Moon/Voting/fr

< Wikipedia to the Moon
This page is a translated version of the page Wikipedia to the Moon/Voting and the translation is 72% complete.
Other languages:

Sur cette page est votée la meilleure manière possible de recueillir et d'organiser un contenu de Wikipédia à envoyer sur la Lune. Merci de lire Phase 1 : Scénarios pour connaître les discussions et les versions complètes des scénarios éligibles. Cette partie présente l'intégralité des scénarios ; une version résumée est disponible plus bas, dans la partie réservée au vote. Les votes sont ouverts jusqu'au 24 juin 2016 !

Accueil Phase 1: scénarios Phase 2: vote Phase 3: travail Phase 4: emballage À propos FAQ
  Terminé Terminé Terminé Terminé    

Comment voter

Chacun peut voter, sans tenir compte de ses droits d'accès. Enregistrez-vous avant de voter ou créez un compte. Les votes émis par des adresses IP ne seront pas comptabilisés.

  • Vous pouvez voter autant de fois qu'il y a de scénarios présentés ci-dessous, pas plus. Il est bien entendu possible de ne pas voter pour toutes les propositions.
  • Un seul vote par scénario.
  • Le mode de scrutin se fait par approbation (« Support »), ce qui signifie que les votes seront comptabilisés comme des approbations du scénario. Il n'y a pas de votes d'opposition (« Oppose »).

De quelle manière seront interprétés les résultats ?

  • Le scénario comptant le plus de votes (souvenez-vous qu'il n'y a que des votes d'approbation) l'emportera.
  • Il s'agit d'un vote à majorité relative. Cela signifie que le scénario comptant le plus de votes ne requiert pas d'atteindre un quelconque pourcentage (par exemple 50 %) pour l'emporter.
  • Dix scénarios sont éligibles, parmi lesquels neuf correspondent à des suggestions quant à la manière d'utiliser le disque de données en tant que communauté globale. Le dernier scénario, en revanche, est en fait un vote « non ». Il suggère de ne pas travailler en tant que communauté globale sur Wikipedia on the Moon. Ce dernier scénario serait retenu uniquement dans le cas où il remporte plus de suffrage qu'aucun autre scénario.

Votez ici

Let's work on: a Wikipedia canon

Un certain nombre de scénarios (voir par exemple « language agnostic » et « All TOP (and HIGH)importance articles on all Wikipedias ») semblent être des variantes du scénario « Canon », à des degrés divers ; ce scénario était l'une des trois suggestions initiales. L'idée de base est de sélectionner un ensemble d'articles représentatifs en fonction du sujet, au lieu d'une langue spécifique. Une fois qu'un consensus sera atteint sur un l'ensemble d'articles à choisir, il sera dès lors nécessaire de traduire ces articles en autant de langues que possible. Une question cruciale pour tous les scénarios de base est de savoir quels critères doivent être établis afin de sélectionner l'article.

Idée générale : « En littérature, un canon décrit un ensemble de travaux qui sont considérés comme représentant une sorte de standard ou de représentation officielle de quelque chose. Il n'y a pas de canon global des plus importants articles de Wikipédia ni rien de similaire. En revanche, dans de nombreuses version linguistiques, il existe des listes des articles que toutes les Wikipédias devraient comporter. Dans ce scénario toutes les communautés linguistiques seraient invitées à discuter et approuver un canon d'articles Wikipédia. » Lire ici toute la discussion concernant le canon, scenario language agnostic, Scénario « Top importance »­, Scénario « Space4all »

Votez ici

Votes: a Wikipedia canon

  1. --Lsanabria (talk) 19:42, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. —JerrySa1 (talk) 13:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Mysteriumen (talk) 23:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Teamihlehyn (talk) 12:12, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --AfroThundr3007730 (talk) 12:38, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Gerrit (talk) 12:40, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Blackhat999 (talk) 14:53, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --ONUnicorn (talk) 19:05, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Alvaro Vidal-Abarca (talk) 20:56, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --NaBUru38 (talk)
  11. --Eritain (talk) 00:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Eric.LEWIN (talk) 00:48, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Tonystewart14 (talk) 21:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Arussom (talk) 02:06, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Chickadee46 (talk) 20:47, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Sergey WereWolf (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let's work on: TOP30 lists

Ce scénario est une sorte d'« inversion » de l'idée de canon : elle ne comporterait pas d'ensemble d'articles représentant toutes les communautés Wikipedia. Au lieu de cela, chaque communauté linguistique pourrait présenter sa propre liste des 30 articles choisis.

idée de base : « Alors qu'un canon Wikipédia représenterait une décision d'une communauté mondiale, les presque trois cents versions linguistiques de Wikipédia représentent une grande variété de culture et de connaissance. Dans ce scénario, toutes les versions linguistiques de Wikipédia seraient invitées à discuter pour sélectionner leurs propres trente articles. Toutes les sélections de trente articles, provenant de toutes les versions linguistiques participantes seraient donc réunies et incluses dans la charge utile de Wikipédia. » Voir la discussion complète ici

Votez ici

Votes: TOP30 lists

  1. -- Andrew Dalby (talk) 18:47, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Maria.martelli (talk) 20:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)--[reply]
  3. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (talk) 23:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Stang 11:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --GunChleoc (talk) 12:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. José Luiz talk 21:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. ~Mable (chat) 07:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Postcrosser (talk) 12:37, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Breogan2008 (talk) 14:02, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --RookJameson (talk) 15:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Waters.Justin (talk) 15:36, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. AveroXY (talk) 16:11, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Zabia (talk) 18:00, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Franco3450 (talk) 18:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --ONUnicorn (talk) 19:06, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Alvaro Vidal-Abarca (talk) 20:55, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Moony22 (talk) 21:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Carnildo (talk) 21:54, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --Golan's mom (talk) 05:58, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --User:Trurle (talk) 23:03, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --Joalpe (talk) 01:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Sthelen.aqua (talk) 13:24, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Chiborg (talk) 14:35, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Dimi z (talk) 14:38, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. -- Chickadee46 (talk) 20:49, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. — Yerpo Eh? 17:26, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Filipinayzd (talk) 17:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. -- IKHazarika (talk) 05:07, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let's work on: a nominated items list

La troisième des suggestions initiales est une liste ouverte, qui peut être complétée par n'importe quel compte enregistré, sans tenir compte de la langue ou de tout autre barrière.

idée de base : « Un compte, un vote. Dans ce scénario, chaque wikipédien pourrait ajouter un élément à la liste puis signer. Cet élément pourrait être un article de Wikipédia, peu importe la langue, une image, ou un quelconque autre media. Aucune restriction, mais vous ne pouvez ajouter qu'un seul élément. Les éléments de la liste complète partiront dans l'espace. » Voir la discussion complète ici

Discussion_Scenario_.23List:

Votez ici

Votes: a nominated items list

  1. —DerHexer (Talk) 10:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Golan's mom (talk) 11:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Bastenbas (talk) 13:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Irn (talk) 15:12, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Halibutt (talk) 22:49, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Carlsrator (talk) 18:52, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --DS-fax 17:24, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. -- IKHazarika (talk) 05:09, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let's work on: Taking “Mond/Maan/Луна/Månen/Mjesec/Bulan/Hold/Luna/Księżyc/Lua/Mesiac/Ay/Moon” to the moon!

Ce nouveau scénario suggère de ne sélectionner qu'un seul article, par exemple l'article sur la Lune elle-même, dans toutes les langues dans lesquelles l'article est disponible.

idée de base :" القمر, آی, ചന്ദ്രൻ, चंद्र, Mặt Trăng, et les articles concernant la Lune dans de nombreuses autres langues sont labellisés. Envoyons-les là-haut. Cela peut constituer une partie d'un autre scénario. Voir la discussion complète ici

Votez ici

Votes: Taking “Mond/Maan/Луна/Månen/Mjesec/Bulan/Hold/Luna/Księżyc/Lua/Mesiac/Ay/Moon/ਚੰਦਰਮਾ” to the moon!

  1. Almafeta (talk) 16:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Liridon (talk) 16:31, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Seb az86556 (talk) 16:41, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Lsanabria (talk) 19:42, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:05, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 21:32, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --స్వరలాసిక (talk) 00:35, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Michaelpires (talk) 02:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Bhaskaranaidu (talk) 03:10, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Klaas `Z4␟` V:  05:33, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Mike Coppolano (talk) 08:20, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --valepert (talk) 10:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Barbaking (talk) 11:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Titou (talk) 11:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Golan's mom (talk) 11:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --GunChleoc (talk) 12:07, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. —JerrySa1 (talk) 13:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Winstonza (talk) 14:06, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --Mickey83 (talk) 14:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Teamihlehyn (talk) 12:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. — xaosflux Talk 05:28, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  TOW  talk  08:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 14:37, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Rupertsciamenna (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Vikas Hegde (talk) 09:22, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Palnatoke (talk) 09:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Postcrosser (talk) 12:38, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. -- HvW (talk) 12:48, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. -Nyiffi (talk) 14:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --RookJameson (talk) 15:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC) Though I dont like the part about "picking just one article". The Moon articles won't fill the disc, so this should be combined with other scenarios.[reply]
  31. --CristianCantoro (talk) 15:48, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --Zabia (talk) 17:59, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. -- ONUnicorn (talk) 19:07, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. --YjM (talk) 19:43, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. -- Jonathunder (talk) 19:49, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Moony22 (talk) 21:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. --Khutuck (talk) 22:29, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. -- Bora (talk) 22:46, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. -- YenilenebilirAdamMESAJ 16:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Litlok (talk) 20:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --User:Trurle (talk) 23:03, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Sir Shurf (talk) 11:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Popo le Chien (talk) 14:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Metrónomo-Goldwyn-Mayer   19:13, 18 June 2016 (UTC)It would be our Rosetta Stone[reply]
  45. Olsi (talk) 23:37, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. --Sergey WereWolf (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --e.c. 23:33, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let's work on: a global editathon on Astronomy

Ce scénario implique de lancer un éditathlon d'un mois sur le thème de l'astronomie. Il serait virtuel, ce qui signifie qu'il se déroulera en ligne et partout dans le monde. Les participants seraient invités à contribuer sur des articles liés à l'astronomie.

idée de base : « Organiser une semaine ou un mois d'éditathlon, durant lequel les contributeurs écrivent à propos d'astronomie. Chaque article correspond pour son auteur à un ticket. À la fin, un jury d'une douzaine de personnes pourra choisir un article qui ira dans l'espace. » Voir la discussion complète ici

Votez ici

Votes: a global editathon on Astronomy

  1. --GunChleoc (talk) 12:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --JerrySa1 (talk) 13:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Mickey83 (talk) 14:38, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Vikas Hegde (talk) 09:22, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Eric.LEWIN (talk) 00:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --কৌশিক বিশ্বাস (talk) 10:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. -- Tanweer (talk) 10:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Litlok (talk) 20:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. ~ Moheen (talk) 22:32, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Metrónomo-Goldwyn-Mayer   19:12, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Sergey WereWolf (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Les articles de qualité sont au cœur d'une autre idée de projet. Ce dernier propose d'effectuer une sélection parmi cette catégorie ou une catégorie similaire d'articles distingués dans les différentes langues.

idée de base : « Qu'on envoie le meilleur du meilleur. Tous les meilleurs articles et les meilleures listes sur toutes les Wikipédias. Cela créerait une forte motivation des contributeurs à apporter leurs sujets favoris. Imaginez l'impact, en termes de relations publiques, que cette initiative aurait : « Wikipédia envoie le meilleur de ce qu'elle a à offrir sur la Lune ». » Voir la discussion complète ici

Votez ici

  1. --AzorAhai (talk) 15:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --JTCEPB (talk) 16:05, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Liridon (talk) 16:34, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Arian Talk 17:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Andrew Dalby (talk) 18:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --MrBn (talk) 18:52, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Lsanabria (talk) 19:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. NMaia (talk) 20:16, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:37, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. -- Фред-Продавец звёзд (talk) 20:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:06, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 21:31, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. GrandCelinien (talk) 22:35, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (talk) 23:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Tetraktys (talk) 23:38, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Gts-tg (talk) 00:22, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Michaelpires (talk) 02:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Klaas `Z4␟` V:  05:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Like tears in rain (talk) 06:52, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Murbaut (talk) 07:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --Bspf (talk) 08:24, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Cavaliere grande (talk) 09:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Lotus 50 (talk) 10:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --g (talk) 10:23, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Coolland (talk) 10:27, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Stang 11:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Titou (talk 11:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Wintereu 11:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Marica Massaro (talk) 12:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --JerrySa1 (talk) 13:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC) Assuming that the number is ~40,000, the rest goes to the next place, third place, etc. I would like to see combinations of proposals.[reply]
  31. --Winstonza (talk) 14:05, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. -- Irn (talk) 15:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Mathanaharan (talk) 17:17, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. José Luiz talk 20:59, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Halibutt (talk) 22:49, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Yiyi (talk) 23:27, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Jopparn (talk) 03:47, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. — xaosflux Talk 05:28, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Sumita Roy Dutta (talk) 06:38, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. --Ανώνυμος Βικιπαιδιστής (talk) 14:45, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Rupertsciamenna (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. ~Mable (chat) 07:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. --Palnatoke (talk) 09:42, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. --Zamaster4536 (talk) 12:36, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Ghilt (talk) 12:36, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. --Gerrit (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Fanfwah (talk) 12:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. --Syced (talk) 12:49, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. --AfroThundr3007730 (talk) 12:56, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Braveheart (talk) 13:03, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. --Cruifer (talk) 13:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Nahum (talk) 13:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. --Breogan2008 (talk) 14:05, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. -Nyiffi (talk) 14:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. --RookJameson (talk) 15:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. -- CreativeC38 (talk) 16:03, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. --Zzyzx (talk) 17:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. -- Zabia (talk) 17:58, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. — Antimuonium U wanna talk? 18:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Shashwat986 (talk) 18:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Soul Train (talk) 20:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. --Alvaro Vidal-Abarca (talk) 20:54, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. --Moony22 (talk) 21:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. --Frettie (talk) 21:52, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. --Carnildo (talk) 21:53, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. -- Bora (talk) 23:00, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. --Eritain (talk) 00:48, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. --Golan's mom (talk) 05:59, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  70. --Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  71. --কৌশিক বিশ্বাস (talk) 10:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  72. --Tanweer (talk) 10:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. --Fano (talk) 14:04, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. --Omnilaika02 (talk) 14:57, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  75. --MRG90 (talk) 17:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  76. --White DemΩn (talk) 21:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  77. --Lucas (talk) 23:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  78. --Rodrigo Padula (talk) 23:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  79. --Pablo Darko (talk) 11:22, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  80. --Stepro (talk) 04:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  81. --Sir Shurf (talk) 11:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  82. --Chiborg (talk) 14:35, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  83. --Paolotacchi (talk) 03:58, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  84. --Samuele2002 (talk) 07:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  85. --wL<speak·check> 05:54, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Olsi (talk) 23:38, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  87. --Sergey WereWolf (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  88. --3Jo7 (talk) 11:48, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  89. --Florian838 (talk) 20:22, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  90. --Uğurkenttalk 22:06, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  91. --Galobtter (talk) 09:06, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  92. --Pakeha (talk) 14:20, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  93. -- IKHazarika (talk) 05:09, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let's work on: information about cutting-edge technology

The angle of this proposal is to look back at the content of other time capsules, which yield information about technology from the respective times.

idée de base : « (Cela ne suffira probablement pas pour remplir tout le disque, mais seulement une fraction de celui-ci.) Ce que nous trouvons aujourd'hui intéressant dans les capsules temporelles et les documents anciens sont les informations sur la « technologie de pointe » et la science : le gramophone, les biplans, le RADAR. Alors sûrement, nous devrions envoyer que cela : des pages montrant les plus récentes avancées dans les différentes sciences et branches de la technologie, et peut-être des informations sur ce à quoi la Terre ressemble aujourd'hui. » Voir la discussion complète ici

Votez ici

Votes: information about cutting-edge technology

  1. --MrBn (talk) 18:56, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. 21:15, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
  3. …Bhaskaranaidu (talk) 03:11, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. -- Irn (talk) 15:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --AfroThundr3007730 (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --RookJameson (talk) 15:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Shashwat986 (talk) 18:30, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Miguu (talk) 16:10, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Chickadee46 (talk) 20:44, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Sergey WereWolf (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let's work on: Decoding with DNA

Ce scénario va littéralement plus loin que l'humanité. Il faut mettre sur le disque tout ce qui pourrait être utile, au cas où par certains moyens il serait possible (pour quelqu'un ?) d'empêcher l'extinction de l'humanité.

idée de base : « Se concentrer sur l'assurance que les humains peuvent être ramenés de l'extinction et faire en sorte que celui qui le trouve peut y trouver un sens, même s'il n'est pas familiarisé avec les langages ou logiciels humains. Les deux objectifs seront mieux remplis en incluant des extraits de la langue maternelle de la biosphère de la Terre : l'ADN. Inclure les articles "Humain", "Résurrection d'une espèce éteinte", "Génome humain", le véritable génome humain, les bons articles et articles de qualité concernant l'ADN, le tableau périodique des éléments, les corps du système solaire, des articles concernant les engins spatiaux, et des articles sur toutes les lettres, des chiffres et des langues humaines. Remplir l'espace restant avec les éléments de la proposition qui arrivera deuxième ". Voir la discussion complète ici

Votez ici

Votes: Decoding with DNA

  1. --MrBn (talk) 18:55, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Aranae (talk) 20:56, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:10, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. #--Mickey83 (talk) 14:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Evolutionoftheuniverse (talk) 11:30, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --AfroThundr3007730 (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Blackhat999 (talk) 14:54, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Zzyzx (talk) 17:57, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Shashwat986 (talk) 18:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Anntinomy (talk) 07:59, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let's work on: Risk of Extinction

Avez-vous entendu parler des listes d'espèces en danger ? Ce scénario évoque la collecte de contenu concernant des choses qui auront probablement bientôt disparu.

idée de base : « Se concentrer sur la préservation de l'information concernant les choses qui ont une forte probabilité de disparition dans les prochaines décennies, les prochains siècles ou les prochains millénaires. Inclure tous les articles, dans toutes les langues, des catégories suivantes (ou équivalentes, je suis en cours de travail là-dessus sur la Wikipédia en anglais) : Catégorie:Statut UICN Éteint à l'état sauvage, Catégorie:Statut UICN En danger critique d'extinction, Catégorie:Statut UICN En danger, Catégorie:Statut UICN Vulnérable, Catégorie:Patrimoine mondial en péril, et catégorie:langue en danger ; ainsi que les articles de la liste suivante Patrimoine culturel immatériel#Liste représentative du patrimoine culturel immatériel de l'humanité. Inclure la totalité des articles de toute langue qui est dans la catégorie:langue en danger Voir la discussion complète ici

Votez ici

Votes: Risk of Extinction

  1. --MrBn (talk) 18:54, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Aranae (talk) 20:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:12, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. …Bhaskaranaidu (talk) 03:11, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --AzorAhai (talk) 09:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Titou (talk) 11:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Bastenbas (talk) 13:18, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. -- Irn (talk) 15:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Evolutionoftheuniverse (talk) 22:42, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Eric.LEWIN (talk) 00:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Miguu (talk) 16:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --MRG90 (talk) 17:48, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Sir Shurf (talk) 11:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Chiborg (talk) 14:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --PupyFaki (talk) 18:04, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. -- IKHazarika (talk) 05:11, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let's work on: … wait, no, let's not

Cette option correspond à un questionnement à propos de l'idée même de Wikipédia sur la Lune. La communauté mondiale devrait-elle s'engager et modifier du contenu en fonction de ce projet ? Pour tenir compte de cette opposition, nous avons ajouté cette option.

idée de base : « Ne faites pas de ceci une question mondiale, ne proposez pas d'action particulière ». Voir la discussion complète ici

Votez ici

Votes: … wait, no, let's not

  1. Natuur12 (talk) 18:42, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. AndyVolykhov (talk) 20:07, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. —MarcoAurelio 10:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC) I'd hope that we had so much enthusiasm on rather more important things such as fixing bugs and admin tools development. Apparently not this year either...[reply]
  4. BethNaught (talk) 08:29, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. pne (talk) 16:13, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. I don't like any of the options (including this one). Nemo 16:11, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Résultat

Félicitations à tous ! Grâce à tous ceux qui ont exprimé leurs votes, nous avons désormais un scénario gagnant, et il s'agit de ”All featured articles and lists on all Wikipedias”. Au total, 152 votants uniques ont pris part à cette decision.

What happens now? This result means that Wikipedians from every language community are warmly invited in the upcoming weeks and months to work on their best articles and lists, to be included on the data disc. Details about how to actually do things will follow in the next few days.

For now, thanks to everyone who voted! We put the proposal up on Meta-Wiki on 24 April. The pages were immediately translated by volunteers into more than 60 languages. Many people engaged in the 6-week-discussion about how (and if) to work on this together. Out of 17 scenarios, 10 were available to be voted on over the past 2 weeks. Now the working phase/editing will be open until 31 October, leaving much time to select and improve content, or solve challenges along the way.

The goal is to finish our “Wikipedia time capsule” by 5 December 2016, which is International Volunteers Day.

Notes

Nota bene : Deux des scénarios qui ont été proposés étendent leur champ compétence au-delà de celui de Wikipédia à proprement parler, l'un proposant de sélectionner du contenu de tous les projets Wikimédia, l'autre se concentrant sur Wikidata. Ces deux scénarios sont des suggestions valables, mais nous avons été explicitement contactés pour Wikipédia, et pas pour faire collaborer un autre projet à ce don. Voici toutes les propositions admissibles :

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_to_the_Moon/Voting/fr&oldid=27661521"