Gts-tg
Welcome to Meta! edit
Hello, Gts-tg. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum if you need help with something (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!
Formatting at Requests for new languages/Wikipedia Ancient Greek 4 edit
The request page is not a "voting" procedure (see header); it's supposed to be strutured by argument topics, not by people count. There is nothing "misleading" about starting a new outdented paragraph on a new topic of debate (incidentally, Giorno2 did the same just yesterday, even with a bolded "vote"-like statement at the top). Now, stop your ridiculous edit-warring and leave my posting alone; you have no right to mess with it and I'm not going to accept you messing with it. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- I did not say it is a voting procedure or a people count. But appearing to have arguments placed as coming from different people is misleading, wouldn't you agree? I didn't see the Giorno one, I'll place it in his original thread. For a long time sys-op I think that you maintain a rather aggressive communication style that I do not appreciate and I am not going to accept either. Gts-tg (talk) 11:16, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- On a page that is not a voting page, there is no such thing as a posting "placed as coming from different people", because nowhere except on a voting page is there any expectation to the effect that one person can start only a single paragraph. If you disagree with this, ask an independent administrator to decide. Failing that, insisting on your formatting of my posting against my wishes is a hostile act; you have no right to do that, so stop it. The only person that gets to decide where I place my postings is me. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- I gave you an alternative that you do not want to follow. The most natural thing is to have your new argument below the initial in fav argument. If you want to do whatever you want however you want it without taking into account other editors, sorry, I am not going to agree with this. Again, I did not say it's a voting process, why do you keep going back to it? Gts-tg (talk) 11:22, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- On a page that is not a voting page, there is no such thing as a posting "placed as coming from different people", because nowhere except on a voting page is there any expectation to the effect that one person can start only a single paragraph. If you disagree with this, ask an independent administrator to decide. Failing that, insisting on your formatting of my posting against my wishes is a hostile act; you have no right to do that, so stop it. The only person that gets to decide where I place my postings is me. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- I did not say it is a voting procedure or a people count. But appearing to have arguments placed as coming from different people is misleading, wouldn't you agree? I didn't see the Giorno one, I'll place it in his original thread. For a long time sys-op I think that you maintain a rather aggressive communication style that I do not appreciate and I am not going to accept either. Gts-tg (talk) 11:16, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
2016 Community Wishlist Survey edit
Hi,
You’re getting this message because you participated in the 2015 Community Wishlist Survey and we want to make sure you don't miss it this year – or at least can make the conscious choice to ignore if it you want to. The 2015 survey decided what the Community Tech team should work on during 2016. It was also the focus of Wikimedia hackathons and work by other developers. You can see the status of wishes from the 2015 wishlist at 2015 Community Wishlist Survey/Results.
The 2016 Community Wishlist Survey is now open for wishes. You can create proposals until November 20. You will be able to vote on which wishes you think are best or most important between November 28 and December 12. /Johan (WMF) (talk) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
ΑLexander III edit
Γιατί αφαίρεσες την επιστολή του Μ.Αλεξάνδρου προς τον Δαρείο ,ενώ είναι πασίγνωστη?Δες αυτή τη πηγή που θα αρέσει και στον Τζερρυ. http://mignatiou.com/2017/01/i-epistoli-tou-m-alexandrou-pros-ton-dario-i-techni-sti-lipsi-apofaseon-ke-diapragmatefsis/
Όταν παίρνεις μια απόφαση να μην διστάζεις και να μην αφήνεις κανένα παράθυρο ανοικτό.Γιατί δεν ακολουθείς τα δρόμο που σας δείχνω?Ό άνθρωπος είναι βλάκας και κακός.Τελειώστε τον το συντομότερο.--178.128.92.200 09:19, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
.
Thank you for being a light in the life of the Wikimedia youth - from the WikiVibrance Team! edit
|
The Youth Barnstar | |
| Hey Gts-tg ! Someone nominated you for this barnstar! The WikiVibrance Project is awarding you the Youth Barnstar as a token of appreciation for your wholehearted help towards the youth community in the movement. Your contributions have truly made our space safe, welcoming, and full of valuable insights for the young champs driving the movement forward. We're super excited that your involvement in shaping youthful Wikimedian minds will continue to shine in the times ahead. Hope your participation in the development of youth Wikimedian will remain the same in the future. You are a Wikimedia treasure. Please keep up the good work!) – Romeo (talk) 02:22, 24 August 2023 (UTC) |