Stewards/Confirm/2013/Thogo

The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

Thogo

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: en
Personal info: First of all, an explanation as to why I'm listed here: due to a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation (see Foundation mailinglist) that members of the Ombudsmen commission not longer have to return their CU/OS/stewards rights as the commission has now enough (7) members which could take over cases with potentially COIs. I'm now officially a steward again, which is what I've been from late-2007 to early-2011 although I am still serving another term in the Ombudsmen Commission. The last evaluation of my steward activity took place in early-2011 (when I first became an OC member) and since then I haven't been allowed to use my steward rights. Since some stewards expressed a wish that I should let my unused steward rights be evaluated, I hereby do that … Back on topic: I would be happy to work again as a steward. Of course, I will not take over OC cases that deal with steward activities — just give advice. With some certainty I can say that I haven't made any mistakes with my steward rights since my last evaluation. ;) I will of course try to make sure that this won't change. --თოგო ^(D) 00:36, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

español:

Idiomas: en
Información personal: translation needed

русский:

Языки: en
Личная информация: translation needed

Deutsch:

Sprachen: de, en, und ein paar mit Grundkenntnissen
Informationen zur Person: Zunächst zur Erklärung, warum ich überhaupt hier auftauche: Aufgrund einer Entscheidung der Wikimedia Foundation (siehe Foundation-Emailliste), dass Mitglieder der Ombudsmannkommission (OK) ihre CU/OS/Steward-Rechte nicht mehr abgeben müssen, da die Kommission nun genug Mitglieder (7) hat, dass bei etwaigen Interessenskonflikten andere OK-Mitglieder den Fall übernehmen können, bin ich, obwohl ich für ein weiteres Jahr in der OK sitze, jetzt wieder offiziell Steward, was ich bereits von Ende 2007 bis Anfang 2011 war. Die letzte Evaluation meiner Stewardtätigkeit fand Anfang 2011 statt (nachdem ich OK-Mitglied wurde), und seither habe ich aus vorgenanntem Grunde die Stewardrechte nicht ausüben können. Da einzelne Stewards den Wunsch geäußert haben, dass ich trotzdem durch die Evaluation meiner nicht ausgeübten Stewardrechte gehen sollte, tu ich das hiermit mal... Nun zum eigentlichen Punkt: Ich würde mich sehr freuen, wieder als Steward tätig sein zu dürfen! Natürlich werde ich im Rahmen meiner OK-Tätigkeit keine Fälle bearbeiten, wo es um Stewardaktivitäten geht - außer in beratender Funktion. Mit ziemlicher Sicherheit kann ich sagen, dass mir seit der letzten Evaluation keine Fehler im Rahmen meiner Stewardtätigkeiten unterlaufen sind. ;) Ich werde mich natürlich sehr bemühen, dass das auch so bleibt. --თოგო ^(D) 00:36, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Thogo

I love you so much! :-D —DerHexer (Talk) 00:09, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Iste (D) 00:34, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is good news! Jafeluv (talk) 09:23, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:46, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 11:00, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I see no issues here, and I very much like Thogo's statement. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:57, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome back! -Barras talk 14:23, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep :-) --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:42, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jyothis (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Seems a bit unfair considering you've only been a steward four days, but welcome back! PeterSymonds (talk) 20:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 21:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because Thogo is awesome and the most polyglottous person I know (well, maybe except Evertype and Rolf Theil, but still). Jon Harald Søby (talk) 22:04, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Snowolf. Welcome back. :) Trijnstel_talk 22:51, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 22:52, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:00, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:38, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A reliable and trusted user, whom I had a chance to observe at work at ombudsmen commission, doing great work. Pundit (talk) 17:54, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 13:46, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Millosh (talk) 14:10, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Harlock81 (talk) 00:41, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - In my capacity as a volunteer. --Philippe (talk) 03:58, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I've been waiting for eight months a resolution from the Ombudsman Commission about an alleged abuse in the handling of checkuser information. No news yet. It definitely means that the members of the commission are overloaded and not able to cope with their duties as members of said commission. I wonder how the overloaded members of the commission will be also able to cope with their duties as stewards. --Ecemaml (talk) 14:53, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Please email me about this. --Deskana (talk) 15:29, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Redlinux (talk) 22:57, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 23:23, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think it's a good idea. --►Safir yüzüklü Cekli^mesaj 05:44, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wnme (talk) 08:56, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep welcome back — billinghurst sDrewth 15:08, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - Since the user hasn't been a steward in a year (and IMO should have gone through election rather than confirmation, but I know why it went this way), I can really only judge by his actions on the OC. When discussion around mishandling of cases and people by the OC was happening earlier this year, Thogo's responses seemed more based along sweeping it under the rug rather than providing any useful information or ways forward. This isn't an oppose, but I do hope that Thogo tries to keep a more open mind to critisicm this year in his role as a steward. Regards, Ajraddatz (Talk) 17:44, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Some of your questions may be answered on this archived discussion and User talk:Thogo#Steward. πr² (t • c) 17:51, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
--Jan eissfeldt (talk) 18:55, 14 February 2013 (UTC) sure[reply]
Keep Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 17:05, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hurricanefan24 (talk) 18:15, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --ThiagoRuiz ^talk 18:46, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bsadowski1 (talk) 11:18, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Still chance to be more active.--Jusjih (talk) 14:07, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep es:Magister Mathematicae 17:05, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, although this procedure looks strange for a person who has not been a steward for two years. Ruslik (talk) 19:20, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Zyephyrus (talk) 19:26, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 17:47, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep-- Bertrand GRONDIN → ^(Talk) 17:49, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 21:03, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Nice to see you :) LeinaD (t) 21:23, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure, but I'm not sure why you need to be confirmed (see User_talk:MarcoAurelio/Archives/2013#Theoretical_confirmation_for_Thogo). πr² (t • c) 21:27, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral (Neuwahl) I don't like the Foundation's decision very much that OK members can also be active stewards (that could lead to less OK members that can work at specific cases). On the other side, I'm sure Thogo won't get into any conflicts between the OK and the steward role, and I'm sure he will work at OK cases first, cause that's more important. And also stewards with less time are needed. But I don't share his main opinions about the requirements for user blocks or unblocks on de: at all, which say that the whole community should nearly never have an opportunity to overrule a block decision of just one sysop (which means, that the decision of just one sysop shall be of more weight than the opinion of 74 %(!!) of the community) and that a sysop can block a user for a much longer time just because the user himself wants to get a block checked, and that this longer block can not be checked again. So, in the end, i'm voting neutral, because this is all against what I think a sysop should do or be, and so, I'm not convinced. Perhaps he's better as just a OK member. --– Geitost ^diskusjon 22:59, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. OMG Thogo is back!—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{@ L C S}˲» 23:58, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]