Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/elections 2009/statements/Mike.lifeguard

< Stewards | elections 2009 | statements
Warning The 2009 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Mike.lifeguard (Mike Ingram)

edit

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:
  • Languages: en, fr-2, ase-1
  • Personal info: Over the course of my involvement with Wikimedia projects since early 2006, I have come to be quite active in countering various kinds of disruption, especially spam and vandalism. To do that work, I have been entrusted with some privileged access:

    If the community sees fit to grant me access to the steward tools, I would be better able to stop cross-wiki spam and vandalism, though I do intend to attend to the request pages as well. I'm very reachable by email, or in many IRC channels, such as #wikimedia-stewards.

    Thanks for your time
العربية:
  • اللغات: en, fr-2, ase-1
  • المعلومات الشخصية: طوال مسار التحاقي بمشاريع ويكيميديا منذ أوائل 2006، وصلت إلى أن أكون نشطا جدا في مقاومة أنواع مختلفة من العرقلة، خصوصا السخام والتخريب. لأقوم بذلك، أؤتنمت بوصول خاص:

    إذا رأى المجتمع ملائمة منحي وصولا إلى أدوات المضيف، سأكون أكثر قابلية لإيقاف السخام والتخريب عبر الويكيات، مع أنني أعتزم الانضمام إلى صفحات الطلبات أيضا. يمكن الوصول إلي دائما بالبريد الإلكتروني، أو في العديد من قنوات آي آر سي، كما هو الحال في #wikimedia-stewards.

    شكرا لوقتك
Deutsch:
español:
français:
magyar:
italiano:
  • Lingue: en, fr-2, ase-1
  • Informazioni personali: Durante il mio impegno nei progetti Wikimedia dagli inizi del 2006, sono diventato via via piuttosto attivo nel contrasto alle varie forme di disturbo, speciamente spam e vandalismo. Per svolgere questo lavoro, mi sono stati concessi alcuni accessi privilegiati:

    Se la comunità ritiene opportuno concedermi l'accesso agli strumenti degli steward, sarò maggiormente in grado di fermare lo spam e il vandalismo su più wiki, sebbene intenda aiutare anche con le pagine delle richieste. Sono molto facilmente reperibile via email, o su molti canali IRC, quale ad esempio #wikimedia-stewards.

    Grazie del vostro tempo
日本語:
Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: en, fr-2, ase-1
  • Persoonlijke informatie: Gedurende mijn betrokkenheid met Wikimediaprojecten, sinds begin 2006, ben ik mij vrij actief bezig gaan houden met het tegengaan van verstorend gedrag, met name spam en vandalisme. Om mij daarbij te helpen, zijn mij een aantal functies toevertrouwd:

    Als de gemeenschap mij het stewardschap toevertrouwt, zal ik ik beter in staat zijn cross-wiki spam en vandalisme tegen te gaan. Al ben ik ook van plan om me bezig te houden met de verzoekpagina's. Ik ben makkelijk bereikbaar via e-mail en een groot aantal IRC-kanalen, zoals #wikimedia-stewards.

    Bedankt voor je tijd
polski:
português:
  • Línguas: en, fr-2, ase-1
  • Informações pessoais: Ao longo da minha participação nos projectos Wikimedia desde o início de 2006, vim a ser bastante activo na luta contra vários tipos de comportamentos disruptivos, especialmente spam e vandalismos. Para fazer este trabalho, me foram confiados alguns acessos:

    Se a comunidade entender que deva me dar as ferramentas de steward, eu gostaria de me dedicar a combater os vandalismos e spams cross-wiki, e a atender os pedidos. Eu posso ser contactado por e-mail, ou em vários canais do IRC, como o #wikimedia-stewards.

    Obrigado pelo seu tempo.
русский:
Türkçe:
  • Diller: en, fr-2, ase-1
  • Kişisel bilgiler: 2006 yılının başından beri sürmekte olan Wikimedia'ya katkı yapma yolculuğumda , çeşitli bozma girişimlerini engelleme ve de özellikle spam ve vandalism konusunda oldukça aktif bir katılım sağladım. Bunları yapabilmek için, tarafıma aşağıdaki ayrıcalıklar verildi:

    Eğer topluluk bana steward haklarına sahip olma imkanını bahşederse , cross-wiki spam ve vandalizmi durdurmak konusunda daha iyi olacağım, bu nedenledir ki bu sayfaya katılmaya karar verdim. Bana mail yoluyla ulaşabilirsiniz , ayrıca #wikimedia-stewards gibi bir çok IRC kanalında da bulabilirsiniz , .

    Zaman ayırdığınız için teşekkürler
українська:


  Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

  Yes

edit
  1. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Lvova 00:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Very helpful and full knowledge of all tools, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Meno25 00:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Kanonkas 00:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. miranda 00:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support. Active Wikimedia contributor, brilliant Meta sysop, granting him stewardship will make spammers cry (let's hope their puppets won't come and cause vote fraud) — vvv 00:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Iceflow 00:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Thogo (talk) 00:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Strong support. PeterSymonds 00:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Strikeout Sister 00:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12.   Support Yes. Definitely will use the rights for the benefit of the Wikipedias. Razorflame 00:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. V85 00:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. ОйЛ (OiL) 00:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Frank Schulenburg 00:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Aleksandrit 00:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17.   Support, very active user. --Joku Janne 00:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Szwedzki 00:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC). Cheers.[reply]
  19.   Support The Helpful One 00:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Cbrown1023 talk 00:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Mr.Z-man 00:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22.   Support Willking1979 00:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23.   Support Based on his work at wikiversity I have full confidence in him. --mikeu talk 00:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. sure. Micha L. Rieser 00:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Az1568 (talk) 00:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Seha 00:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Ivan Štambuk 00:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Herr Kriss 00:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Vituzzu 00:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Al Lemos 01:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Strong support, definitely. — Kalan ? 01:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --Yaroslav Blanter 01:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Sí/Yes/はい. --Taichi - (あ！) 01:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34.   Support Nishkid64 (talk) 01:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. normally too much jobs - but one of the less persons here I know and know, he' trustworthy and do his jobs and not only collect them. Marcus Cyron 01:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Most certainly ! Alphos [bother me] 01:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Yes. Seems ro know what stewardship is about. Hopes he stays as active as he is. Romaine 01:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. McMonster 01:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39.   Support — neuro(talk) 01:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. --Wcam 01:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Matt (Talk) 01:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Shizhao 02:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Of course. Mike was an amazing help during his stay at Wikiversity and gave us some valuable information and advice during that time. Ottava Rima 02:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. --Luxo 02:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Love his work. macy 02:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Support, Woody 03:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47.   Support Helped me lots of times and answered my questions. He will make a good steward. Techman224Talk 03:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48.   Support—『Skjackey tse』 03:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  49. --Revolus Echo der Stille 04:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Giggy 04:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. One of the best candidates. --Millosh 04:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. One of the few I support. Prodego talk 04:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53.   Support Clearly. MBisanz talk 04:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Helps against vandalism at Tagalog wikipedia too. - AnakngAraw 04:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. — YourEyesOnly 05:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Support. Superm401 | Talk 05:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Yes. bastique demandez! 06:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. --Sir James 06:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Avjoska 06:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Yes. --Shipmaster 07:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 07:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Rubin16 08:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 08:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Sebleouf 08:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Yes. Arjun G. Menon 08:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66. --CERminator 08:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Kameraad Pjotr 09:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  68. We haven't always seen eye to eye, but he does fine work. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Daniel (talk) 09:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  70. − Elfix × talk (fr) 09:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  71. yeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Mike go :)) --.snoopy. ✉ 09:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Strong support --Gothika 09:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  73. --DR 09:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  74.   Support --Mopza   Talk 09:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  75.   Support, sure.--OsamaK 10:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  76. --Brownout(msg) 10:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  77.   Support --Filnik 10:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  78.   Support --Lucien leGrey ( m | es ) 10:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Willemo 10:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  80. --Wing 10:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  81.   Support--Konsnos 10:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Ja. Jon Harald Søby 10:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Yes. Alefbe 10:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Efbé   10:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Njaelkies Lea 10:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  86. →Na·gy 11:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Béria Lima Msg 11:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Has the broad experience and ability in other languages required. Rudget (talk) 11:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  89.   Support Vyk 11:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  90. ~ putnik 11:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  91.   Support Ninomy 11:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  92.   Support M!cki talk 11:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  93.   Support Yann 11:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  94. --Ukko 12:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  95. oscar 12:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  96. --Florian Adler 12:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Good candidate. Jóna Þórunn 12:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Very Strong Support - Long time expereince with this user on Wikibooks and Wikiversity, and has the skills necessary to act as a responsible steward. --Roberth 12:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  99.   Support Cirt (talk) 12:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  100.   Support--Gökhan 13:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Strong support - Davemustaine 13:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  102.   Support -- John N. 13:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Cenarium (Talk) 14:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  104.   Support --Trixt 14:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Annabel 14:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Very strong support —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 14:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  107.   Support - Chrism 14:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Stifle 14:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Patio 14:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  110.   Support Go for Mike ;) --Acarpentier 14:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  111. --buecherwuermlein 14:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  112. --MF-W 14:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Obelix 15:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Dedicated and experienced user who I have no doubts about. - Rjd0060 15:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  115. trusted fellow. DarkoNeko 15:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  116. STRONG   Support --Garfieldairlines 15:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Support Zil 15:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  118. --Fabexplosive The archive man 15:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  119. --BokicaK 15:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  120. & strongly. One of a very small number of Wikimedians who I trust & respect greatly. I have complete confidence in Mike. --Herby talk thyme 16:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  121. EugeneZelenko 16:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  122.   Support iAlex 17:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  123. May the wiki be with you. ComputerGuy890100 17:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  124.   Support Diti (talk to the penguin) 18:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  125.   Support -jkb- 18:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  126. -- Bryan (talk|commons) 18:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Strong support, really good and useful cross-wki work — NickK 19:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  128.   Support Level headed, sensible, pragmatic, trustworthy. Unusual? Quite TalkQu 20:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  129.   Support --Ahonc 20:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  130. NonvocalScream 21:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  131. –Ejs-80 21:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  132. TheNeon 22:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Very efficient, strong support. Clem23 22:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  134. --Martin H. 23:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  135. John Reaves (talk) 00:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  136.   Support Athrion 00:48, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  137.   Support Mike helps to combat vandals in Cantonese Wikipedia, appears to have great commitment toward Wikipedia --WikiCantona 01:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Dekimasu 02:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  139. --Flamelai 02:38, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  140. FayssalF 02:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  141. faithless (speak) 05:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  142. --Saltinbas 05:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  143. -- Tawker 06:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Deadstar 08:55, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  145.   Support Mike doing a god job. --Marine-Blue [ talk contribs ] 09:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  146. --P@d@w@ne 09:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  147. They seek nothing but to help, so   Support it is.--Alnokta 09:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  148. sure!--Nick1915 - all you want 11:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Filipe RibeiroMsg 12:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  150. A no-brainer (decision, not the candidate). --FiliP × 12:33, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Uwe Gille 12:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  152. --Baiji --> (Opinión) 14:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Jaranda | wat's sup' 14:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Note: User is eligible to vote, enwiki account is User:Secret, which was checked with Pathos' tool and passed. The Helpful One 14:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]
  154.   Support--ZaDiak 14:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  155.   Support --OosWesThoesBes 14:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Why not!-- BlueDevil Talk 14:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  157. GlassCobra 15:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  158.   Support — MrDolomite • Talk 15:24, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  159.   Support -- Avi 15:33, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  160.   Support --Jomegat 17:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  161. --Pietrodn · talk with me 18:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      Support-- --201.209.168.188 19:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Please log in to vote, thanks. →Na·gy 19:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Balabiot 19:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  163. We have had our numerous disagreements, but Mike is highly active and hardworking, and will make an excellent steward. Majorly talk 20:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  164. --Isderion 20:55, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  165.   Pro. QuartierLatin1968 20:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Garden 21:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Mike is only person I can vote for. Other candidates I dont know. I had an experience with him on different issues and project and I think he can be a good steward. He was always helpfull to other people.--Juan de Vojníkov 22:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  168.   Support --Túrelio 22:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  169.   Support Pharaoh of the Wizards 23:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  170. --Davecrosby uk 00:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  171.   Support He's cute. --Mixwell 01:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  172. I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this candidate! - 04:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  173.   Support --Béotien lambda 12:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  174.   Support --Love Krittaya 12:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  175. Of course. Alex Pereira falaê 12:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  176. I do have some concerns that Mike may be a bit too red tape obsessed. But on balance I think he's going to be a fine steward. His opposers will give him something to think about, and the rest of us will keep his tendencies red-tape-wise in line. He has a large number of good qualities that way overbalance that issue... hard worker, highly trusted, calm demeanor, knows his way around a lot of wikis, good at CU... and apparently cute, per Mixwell but I really couldn't say about that part. Also I'm not sure that he's doing a "god" job like Marine-blue claims ... Some of this electioneering stuff you have to take with a large grain of salt! :) Sorry I overlooked this support earlier, although I don't think you will need it! ++Lar: t/c 13:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  177.   Support ---Zyephyrus 13:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  178. --Turgon the dark side of a normal user 14:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  179.   Support Juliancolton 16:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  180.   Support James F. (talk) 19:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Tiptoety talk 20:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  182. Whence I unto my Leader: "See thou find, Some one who may by deed or name be known, And thus in going move thine eye about." - The Divine Comedy (Inferno, Canto XXIII) by Dante Alighieri Synergy 21:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  183.   Support -- JAn Dudík 21:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  184.   Support --Omega933 21:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  185. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  186. -- Seems to be objective and not to be influenced even by mainstream. For this he got my voice مبتدئ 00:56, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  187.   Support--Yopie 01:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  188.   Support KveD (talk) 01:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  189. — Rlevse • Talk • 02:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  190.   Support Kbthompson 14:09, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  191.   Support ESanchez013 17:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  192.   Support Complex 19:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  193.   Support --Joshua Issac 19:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  194.   Support --Hei ber 21:00, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  195.   Support (after clarifying issues with candidate, shifting from Neutral to Support.) Proofreader77 02:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  196.   Support -- (cypsy) 10:15, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  197.   Support (not already steward ?) --Gdgourou 10:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  198.   Support--Cp111 12:01, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  199. Pjetter 12:14, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  200. ...Aurora... 12:18, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  201.   Support, our couse, very good admin im Meta and Wikibooks. ~Innvs: 12:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  202.   Support --Jorunn 12:53, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  203.   Support J.delanoygabsadds 14:03, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  204. Oui Adailton 14:04, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  205. The only one I've recognized. --Sargoth 14:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  206. --Church of emacs talk 16:29, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  207. John Vandenberg 19:01, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  208. Sirabder87 21:52, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  209. Strong   Support based on direct experience of his good work on Meta. --A. B. (talk) 22:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  210.   Support --Miya 02:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  211. Yes...Modernist 04:08, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  212.   Support - good egg. BD2412 T 05:07, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  213.   Support --‍‍‍‍Komeil 4life 06:24, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  214.   Support — hard working and trust-worthy. Huji 11:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  215.   Support --Jyothis 13:14, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  216.   Support OhanaUnitedTalk page 15:48, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  217.   Support Rosiestep 17:18, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  218.   Support --Roberta F. 18:25, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  219. --Sami Lab 22:29, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  220.   Support He's been a great admin and redtapeocrat on Wikibooks English for a long while. His language schools are good (but maybe you should learn a few more just for the sake of it) and he is virtually never absent from wiki projects. He is generally fair (but a little obsessed with red tape and policies) but there is nothing I can think of that means he wouldn't make a good steward. Good luck!--Xania 23:48, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  221. Ja! Finn Rindahl 01:15, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  222.   Support --Versageek 03:01, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  223.   Support despite his support for blocking Mutter Erde on commons; lots of other actions make up for that. /Pieter Kuiper 09:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  224.   Support -Bence  My Talk 10:45, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  225.   Support EdBever 18:30, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  226. Support - Wutsje 19:56, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  227.   Support (Pile on) - doesn't seem needed but this user is very well respected and has the experience to be a good steward fr33kman t - c 02:13, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  228.   Support a long history of "small-s stewardship" across many projects, and making that a "big S" can only help him continue to help the rest of us. --SB_Johnny|talk|books 13:17, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  229.   Support Kzhr 15:37, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  230. Malinaccier (talk) 00:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  231. Of course. — str4nd ⇌ 04:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  232.   Support -- PseudoOne 05:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  233.   Support --Liangent 10:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  234.   Support Better late than never. --MichaelMaggs 17:08, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  235.   Support. Although I dislike voting templates. Microchip08 @simpleWB 21:51, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  236.   Support Hubrid Noxx This guy sounds pretty good to me.
  237. Sounds good. --Capaci34 09:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  238.   Support : candidature naturelle et évidente. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 14:35, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  239.   Support--Bapti 19:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  240. ok --Rax 21:21, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  241. Pile-on   Support --Philosopher Let us reason together. 00:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  242. Nbarth 01:40, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  243.   Support - Kaare 19:52, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  244.   Support - Drboisclair 23:19, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      Support - has blocked me elswhere, but for goodish reasons. As a one-time vandal, feel free to roam around wikiland. --Agricoleur 23:55, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Not elegible to vote, per account elegibility —Dferg (meta-w:es.) 12:15, 14 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]
  245.   Support rootology (T) 04:34, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  246.   Support--Thesupermat 10:33, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  247.   Support --junafani 13:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  248. --Mayer Bruno 20:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  249.   Support -- Harrywad 23:51, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  250.   Support - A good person for the job. --Cspurrier 01:54, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  251.   Support --Elijah/אליהו (Eliyahu)/إلياس (Ilyas) (Me!) 15:59, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  252. Yerul (comlink) 18:22, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  253.   SupportNatanaeel83 20:59, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  254.   Support --Ante Perkovic 14:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  255.   Support - For what its worth, it was his hostility and stubborness that in my eyes made him a perfect candidate, unlike other candidates, he will have the balls to make the decision himself rather than waiting for a "more" experienced steward to do it..he will always jump at the chance to do more work unlike the other stewards who are just too lazy. He may not be the best candidate running (seriously, who is?) but he will get the job done..I thought i had already supported him before resigning, guess not...Good luck mikey..--Cometstyles 11:08, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  256.   Support but I have NO ide how can anyone handle this much of positions...? Do you have a job IRL? :) --OrsolyaVirág 18:11, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  257. Support. -AlexSm 15:47, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  258.   Support No doubts --Mardetanha talk 21:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1. — Aitias // discussion 00:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I like him one to one, but his sysop work on Commons has been uneven in my observation. Not enough trust in his judgment to grant stewardship. Durova 02:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. ACK Durova, ties everything up with red tape Achates 07:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Aqwis 11:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. -- Syrcro 16:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC) (ACK Durova & Achates)[reply]
  6. Ryan Postlethwaite 18:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Jusjih 01:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --ACK Durova. -- Cecil 07:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Mike is a good vandal fighter but he is rather stubborn when he thinks he is right and listening and understanding others is not his forte. Hillgentleman 13:12, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Mike has repeatedly deleted useful learning resources from Wikiversity and he ignored my request that he engage in a community discussion of standards for learning resources and their deletion. Mike violated Wikiversity policy by using his bot for an unauthorized purpose. A steward should respect projects. Mike's past behavior at Wikiversity indicates that he does not adequately respect Wikiversity and its community standards. --JWSurf 16:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --EvaK 19:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC) ack Durova and Achates, addiationally he shows a weird attitude towards personality rights on Commons.[reply]
    --ACK Durova, Achates and EvaK -- --KS aus F 19:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 20:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Ralf Roletschek 20:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Kaaveh Ahangar 21:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Raboe001 22:46, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15.   Oppose No. Tesi1700 18:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Oppose - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 21:40, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose-- --Zeljko 23:31, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Ozymandias 09:13, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18.   Oppose recent actions on commons make me unconfortable supporting him. I concidder his recent actions not fitting for the posizion of a steward. abf /talk to me/ 16:21, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      Oppose Isn't a Jobcolector? I think, Mike.lifeguard is a jobcolector. Bence  My Talk 13:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for your comments, however if I were a job collector then I wouldn't have given up my oversight rights here or sysop rights on enwikiversity, nor would I have withdrawn my first RFB at enwikibooks.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 18:47, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. -- Sozi 15:24, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20.   Oppose --Anthony Ivanoff 17:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21.   Oppose ACK Durova. Makes spammers cry, but also unfortunate newbies who try to improve the wikis, and legitimate, non-spamming webmasters; relies solely on evidence of multiple additions of links without regard to appropriateness of the links added, and appears to refuse reconsideration. --Abd 17:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22.   Oppose --B 20:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Martina Nolte 12:32, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --smial 12:59, 10 February 2009 (UTC) Seltsame Interpretation und teils völlige Unkenntnis von Persönlichkeitsrechten läßt mich Schlimmstes auch für andere Bereiche befürchten.[reply]
    Thanks for your comments. However, I don't think my interpretation of personality rights is at all strange or ignorant. Furthermore, I don't think it's relevant to being a steward.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 05:42, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    In deiner gleichlautenden Mail steht noch ein Satz mehr: "So, while I respect your opinion, I think it is nonsensical." -- smial 07:32, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --alexscho 15:59, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26.   Oppose -- On the same grounds stated on his RFB at enwikibooks --Panic 00:08, 11 February 2009 (UTC) [[1]][reply]
  27.   Oppose Denkbar ungeeignet. Und Mike, bitte keine Spam-Mails auf meine Adresse! --ST ○ 23:19, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28.   Oppose Maedin\talk 21:37, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Kwj2772 (論) 09:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30.   Oppose --Zeljko 13:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31.   Oppose--Vatrena ptica 14:19, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32.   Oppose --Lasta 15:14, 19 February 2009 (UTC) (User used to be --Armchoir 15:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC))[reply]
  33. Mike R 17:25, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. -- Ra'ike 21:17, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1. --FollowTheMedia 01:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Language knowledge (as per his statement) insufficient to merit my support. Otherwise an excellent candidate. -- Nahum 15:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    For what it's worth, I've been able to function reasonably well up to now with these language abilities. However, I thank you for your honest critique.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 16:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, I can only judge by what you yourself write on your statement. As I said, otherwise I think you'd make an excellent candidate. I certainly won't be sorry if you do get elected. Nahum 17:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Neutral I'd expect more language skills Poco a poco 12:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Neutral Incomplete experience and language skills, but not a bad candidate. O. Morand 11:00, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/elections_2009/statements/Mike.lifeguard&oldid=26366951"