Meta:Requests for adminship/Mike.lifeguard
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.
(ends 03:18 3rd May 2008 (UTC))
I've been working on the spam blacklist recently, and was urged on more than one occasion to "get the sysopbit already!" The impetus for doing it right now was I was going to edit a (very long) protected archive page, and it took forever to load, and then I hit edit and it took forever again, only to not be able to edit the page (grrrrr!) So here I am.
Now the info you really care about: I am already sysop & CU at en.wikibooks, where I am highly active. I'm also sysop at Commons. I had OTRS access granted only last week. I am active on many wikis dealing with spam/vandalism. I am reasonable, unlikely to go on a rampage, etc. I think I've shown that I can put the buttons to good use, and I hope I'm trusted enough to welcome to the team.
– Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 03:18, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Mike is more than capable. Without wanting to sound hypocritical, just take it easy with all the new accesses you've been getting lately. Otherwise, you should be fine. =] --Anonymous DissidentTalk 04:29, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I wouldn't ask if I thought it'd be too much, and I would relinquish any additional tools I might stop using. I strongly believe that the tools are meant to be used, so I would expect to not have them if I stopped using them (and would request as much myself). – Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 16:47, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I suppose that's fair enough. --Anonymous DissidentTalk 17:00, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I wouldn't ask if I thought it'd be too much, and I would relinquish any additional tools I might stop using. I strongly believe that the tools are meant to be used, so I would expect to not have them if I stopped using them (and would request as much myself). – Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 16:47, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Seen Mike around tons of places, and I agree he's unlikely to go on a rampage. :) EVula // talk // ☯ // 06:56, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Capable cross wiki admin. Mike does have things to learn (as we all do) however he has learnt much in the time I have known him. I missed supporting him on en wb some time back because I didn't know him well enough - I know him better now. Mike is hard working & helpful - equally he is prepared to actually do work on the blacklist - I for one appreciate that. Thanks for being prepared to help --Herby talk thyme 06:59, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Kiensvay 07:15, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support yesyesyesyesyes Patrícia msg 10:37, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support :) --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 10:53, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support--Nick1915 - all you want 11:13, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support-- Valued contributor/admin cross-projects. Cirt 12:08, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support an excellent candidate for adminship. --Meno25 12:19, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support involved and proactive. --FiLiP ¤ 12:23, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Certainly. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 12:38, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support will be a very helpful addition. Majorly (talk) 13:50, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Cross wiki spam fighter --Erwin(85) 16:37, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I am surprised he hasn't been an admin yet. :-) Bináris 19:41, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --.snoopy. 21:30, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Cbrown1023 talk 22:35, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- support —DerHexer (Talk) 22:36, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Az1568 16:37, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Nishkid64 (talk) 00:49, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, candidate seems to be very sane, because he avoided editing Wikipedia with its conflicts and trolls :) — VasilievVV 15:43, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Huji 16:34, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes. Korg 01:27, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Captain panda 02:18, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Daniel 04:23, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support +sj | help with translation |+ 08:01, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. --Thogo (talk) 10:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Brownout(msg) 11:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support per all. Alex Pereira falaê 14:21, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Him? Of course Support OhanaUnitedTalk page 20:14, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
SupportSupport based on his excellent contributions. Anonymous101 20:15, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Support I see that the Canadian Cabal has struck... Cary Bass demandez 20:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Of course, great work on Commons and all over. giggy (:O) 23:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support →Christian.И 11:00, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support--Mardetanha talk 16:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Promoted --Anonymous DissidentTalk 02:37, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you all. – Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 16:19, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]