Meta

Steward requests/Permissions/2008-07

< Steward requests‎ | Permissions
Warning! Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in July 2008, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Administrator access

Chrisportelli@mt.wikipedia

The following discussion is closed.

Please grant administrator access to Chrisportelli@mt.wikipedia due to successful RFA.

Thanks --Giangian15 12:27, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Only 1 support vote, sorry, but that is not enough to gain permanent adminship, he might be able to ask for a temporary status. If he wants that he should do so in the section below. thanks,--Nick1915 - all you want 12:35, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
please ask to a local 'crat: two of them are active--Nick1915 - all you want 12:39, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
you think that if they were active, i would have submitted a request here? i tried contacting them before i came here but to no avail. Anyway that RFA was there for a whole week. It's not our fault that it collected just one vote, no? so what we're we gonna do?--Giangian15 12:45, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
this one is active, have you tried to send an email to him? if he doesn't answer, please consider to ask a temporary sysopship below--Nick1915 - all you want 12:53, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Of course i tried, Joe is not so active, he comes online only when he's at work, and does only one or 2 actions and never replies to anything. Besides that admin/bureucrat access was granted to him without the consensus of the community from SRL (and you're making a fuss because chris got only 1 support vote). SRL the other bureacrat/admin, doesn't know how to spk in proper maltese and he wasn't granted access from the community but from the stewards here. That's why he's inactive and never contributes anything.

Now the only thing i'm asking you, to grant chris the tools cause he's very active and did over 7000 edits. Me and chris are the only two "active" users atm. Thanks --Giangian15 13:08, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

I am sorry, but I agree with Nick, one vote is no enough for a fair voting. Please apply for temp adminship, it is technically the same, so don't worry. We can do it right here in this request, we can offer him 3 months to start, he can leave a short message a few days before expiration here, to prolong it easily or if the community grows make a voting. Thanks for Your understanding, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 13:16, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Oh, well, I see the local crat was only notyfied today, so we will wait for his answer, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 13:21, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
I have left him a note, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 13:24, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

no, he wasn't .. he was notified the day before yesterday. that's because you can't read maltese ;) --Giangian15 13:25, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

2 days or one day are to short time for giving him the chance to respond. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 13:31, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
  Not done, I am sorry, but the local crats have responded and thus are active, they will promote locally or not however the outcome of votings in mt.wiki are, thanks, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 05:39, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Alex Smotrov@ruwikibooks, Ilya Voyager@ruwikibooks, VasilievVV(ВасильевВВ)@ruwikibooks

Please, restore adminship for the first user and permanentize it for the rest of them. They were legally elected as admins, but was appointed as temporary because of past controversity that happend on ruwikibooks. Thanks — vvv 14:07, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 10:36, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Hm, but why do they need adminship there? Users are not active there. For example: Smotrov has only one edit there since January.--Ahonc 11:35, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
They had been elected, we don't care if they are not active afterwards, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 11:40, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Just to clarify that, activity level and the resulting policy implications, if any, is a local wiki matter, not a steward matter... if a wiki enacts an activity policy that requires more or less automatic removal based on activity levels for various actions, then of course we would care (because we'd go check before turning the bit off...). :) ++Lar: t/c 15:32, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Hintha@my.wikipedia

I request sysop access.

Thank you. Hintha 20:04, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Election 5/0, all contributors have multiple edits other than the election page. No local bureaucrats. Kylu 10:19, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
  Done ++Lar: t/c 17:18, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

sithu015@my.wikipedia

I request sysop access.

Thank you. sithu015 4:43, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but this votation seems to be arranged. It looks like a sort of meatpuppeting--Nick1915 - all you want 11:09, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
  Not done, all voters have either only the voting as contribution or the usernames do not exist. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 11:02, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Evertype@my.wikipedia

I request Administrator access. I am one of the authors of the Unicode Standard and was responsible for developing the Unicode 5.1 revision of Myanmar script encoding, which replaced the Unicode 4.1 version. This has massive ramifications for fonts, encodings, articles, links, redirects, and so on. There has been an enormous amount of kerfluffle about this activity over the past week, evidently stemming from turf wars from some font designers in Burma. This has led to two requests for Adminship from people with fewer than ten edits on the Wiki, and a splendid campaign of supporters of those and opposers of others from people who have one or two edits, only on the request for Adminship page. It has been a bit exhausting. Jimbo Wales has offered his support; he took notice of my interest in Burma in October 2007.

Thank you. Evertype 10:17, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

I would decline it. 5:4 votes is not really a good support. Additionally, You don't speak the language and You don't contribute to the wiki (except for creating articles in English, which can't be counted since they are in the wrong language and should be deleted anyway). Other opinions? --Thogo (talk) 17:20, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
I have offered the user a temp-status when he requested it the first time [1], the vote was 3:1 back then. Now this has changed to 5:4... he seems to want to help in changing the font in my.wiki and seems to need the status for technical support (if I understood it correctly). However he seems to decline the temporary status for some reason I don't understand but insists of being permanent sysop, even though the community seems too small for a regular voting and 56% favour is not the best outcome... I would decline it too, other views are welcomed, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 17:40, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Why apply for an temporary access when you can have a permanent access? I too, don't understand it. I was given temporary access twice (I guess). --Filipinayzd 22:15, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Thogo, would you mind, please, looking at the nature of the votes Against? One user had three edits 2007-11-07, and twelve edits 2008-07-07. One user has had only 8 edits, all from 2008-07-07, all on the request page (he now has more, mostly attacks on the other existing Admin, MyMyanmar). The third user voting against my request had four edits as of 2006-07 and no further edits until 2008-07-07, on this page. I didn't work out how many edits the fourth one had; it was doubtless few. And both Okisan and Sithu015 now want to be Admins, having no experience editing ANY Wikipedia. The articles I created are all from the Simple English Wikipedia and MyMyanmar's father is going to be translating them into Burmese. There are only 10 of them, the Sun and the eight planets and Pluto. They are there because the articles are good and the plan is to let them serve as a model for other good articles. Translation on Saturn has already begun.
The Myanmar Wikipedia is in a shambles. The character encoding model is broken, half the articles are in one encoding and half in another. For a week now there've been turf wars going on regarding personalities and dragging in sockpuppets from non-Wiki forums and none of that is getting anything done. MyMyanmar and I are trying to work together on this; he knows Burmese and programming, I have a lot more Wikipedia experience than he has. We both applied for Adminship last year; he was given permanent access and I was given three-month access which expired. I have been talking with Jimbo Wales about the problems on the Wiki and will have a call in to the Deputy Director of the Wikimedia Foundation after 23 July about my participation in trying to sort out the problems here. And on top of all of this I am a very busy person who does not want to have to come begging here every six months when my access expires. I've wasted a great deal of time this week alone negotiating with you about this whole situation. (I've no specific complaint about you.) Two of the current Admins on the Myanmar Wikipedia want me to be given permanent status. So does Hintha, a frequent contributor So does Wales. The negative votes against my request are without merit. Please, gentlemen. Nobody else seems to be volunteering to sort out the problems this Wiki has. Burma has enough troubles without us getting bogged down in "temp-status" or counting the votes of people who are not voting in good faith. Evertype 22:24, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Evertype is proposing another costly wrong direction. Previous Font for Myanmar Wikpedia has already been an outcry. After Unicode 5.1, there is no urgent need for a font, since three FOSS Unicode 5.1 fonts are available. Translation is not the way to go. Evertype really need to understand Myanmar community dividend and think why they are not contributing. If the translation has specific wording and voice, Myanmar Wikipedia could be vandalized by blogger mass. Okisan 23:10, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Birdy, the first time I asked for Admin access was 2007-05-17; it was granted on a temp basis and expired. I'm back. Evertype 22:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Are we going to request over and over again? --Filipinayzd 22:42, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Do, say, six month terms until there's a big enough community that can have at least 5-6 regulars elect you as a permanent administrator. Once that happens, you won't need to come here and ask anymore. Even at three months, is coming here four times a year that much of a hassle? Kylu 02:24, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
You know, I'm a really busy person. Please see the wikipedia article about me and this list of my activities. Adding in "remember to ask for admin extensions again" to my schedule is hassle, frankly. If you're satisfied to grant it to me for three months and to re-activate it four times a year if I ask for it, it seems that you ought to be satisfied to grant it to me on an ongoing basis. Evertype 18:30, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
How can be proceed or adjust his administrator role. He truly expressed that very busy person. So. Please skip that post to other Burmese native speaker. And We are getting more advance technique for conversion from/to Myanmar Unicode. We do not need much to make conversion by human being. Prince Kanaung help conversion process among Myanmar Unicode Fonts and legacy fonts.Parabaik 19:57, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
I would like Birdy and Thogo to address my point. The support that I have for Adminship is not 5:4 because none of the Oppose votes are from people with any expertise or even many edits on the Wikipedia. On the other and, the founder of the Wikipedia is one of the people who has given his Support. What is the problem here? All that's happening is that a co-ordinated effort is not getting underway. Have you grounds or policy for denying this request? Evertype 22:35, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Where is the local policy that requires voting requirements. Sorry, but I would mark this as not done, I will ask other stewards for their opinion, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 19:13, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Evertype: I still wonder how you could help that wiki not being able to communicate properly in Burmese. The articles you created are in English, you should not do that. This doesn't help the community at all. The Burmese community certainly should have their own sysops, but they should at least be able to read and write Burmese, otherwise it doesn't make sense. Thus I would also decline the request. --Thogo (talk) 19:20, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
I would be working with the other administrators on aspects of the encoding problems that need to be solved. Do you understand the scope of the problem? Not only are there myriad non-Unicode fonts out there, but there are semi-Unicode and pseudo-Unicode fonts, and on top of that there is Unicode 4.1 encoding which was changed by Unicode 5.1. None of this is trivial. It is technical and it pervades the whole wiki. I can't help the other Admins unless I have appropriate access privileges, and the ones I already had expired and here we are again. PLEASE. Regarding the ten articles in English, taken from the Simple English Wikipedia, these were put there in consultation with MyMyanmar and one of the other active participants. They are good articles and they will be translated in to Burmese. So I don't see what the problem is with granting this request. This wiki cannot grow unless its encoding is robust and tools for users to work on it are available. I will once again say that I have been talking with Jimbo Wales about the problems on the Wiki and will have a call in to the Deputy Director of the Wikimedia Foundation after 23 July about my participation in trying to sort out the problems here. Evertype 02:55, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Frankly, Evertype and his parters have no attempt for the conversion of Unicode 4.1 to Unicode 5.1. The only thing they are trying is Anawrahta project, which is based on Unicode 5.2 and our open source community has been shocked to discover it. Translation is the last resolve after virtually no contributor. The translation, if it has certain wording, Myanmar Wikipedia could be very bad public face. I wish Evertype be not in the dark side. In any case, he can help from behind without being adminship. Okisan 08:12, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
  Not done you've not enough supports (4 pro and 2 opposes after striking invalid votes) --Nick1915 - all you want 11:02, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Then you've got no credible solution for the encoding problems on the Myanmar Wikipedia. There are things I cannot do without Admin access, so now that Wiki will just slimper along getting nowhere. Well done, stewards. Evertype 12:50, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Followup: Nick1915, I'd like you to indicate which of the opposing votes you consider to be valid. Evertype 12:59, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
No one. Neither supports, nor opposes. Nobody has contributions before july 2008, anyway this doesn't matter: the local community is too small for a permanent sysopship --Nick1915 - all you want 20:52, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Then it wasn't 4 pro and 2 opposes, but rather 4 pros and no opposes. The local community already has permanent sysops. MyMyanmar is one, and he has supported my request because he and I want to work together on this. Evertype 22:16, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
"he and I" is not a community decision. No way. Now this request should be closed--Nick1915 - all you want 22:23, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm going to archive this soon. Evertype, please understand that community didn't vote, and a sysop opinion can't change that. You've state that you will involve Jimbo and Deputy Director, so at least from us stewards case is closed. es:Drini 22:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Filipinayzd@bcl.wikipedia

The following discussion is closed.

I request permanent administrator, bureaucrat or sysop access.

Thank you. --Filipinayzd 16:11, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Well, you can get temporary sysop rights for 3 months. This voting is just nonsense, since all people who voted there have 0 edits except for the voting page and their user pages and were only registered to vote. Since you are one of two active people on this wiki, you should maybe have sysop rights (as well as Ringer), but permanent rights are not necessary in such a small community of two people. --Thogo (talk) 17:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. --Filipinayzd 22:06, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
On what grounds are permanent rights not necessary in a small community? It seems to me that the Bikol Wiki shouldn't just lose its Admin(s) every three months. Evertype 22:55, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
They don't lose the rights if they just drop by and leave a message shortly before the status expires, the community is obviously too small to hold a regular voting, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 23:08, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Look!
№ Language Language Wiki Articles Total Edits <Admins> Users Images Depth
159 Central_Bicolano Bikol bcl 765 1 261 6 189 <0> 306 34 2
256 Afar Afar aa 8 1 357 2 406 <3> 544 0 -- --Filipinayzd 23:42, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
I've requested a six month temp adminship for you below. Generally, until there's enough of a community that you can get ten regular contributors to vote in favor of you, it's considered too small for a permanent adminship. Visiting every three months or so isn't too bad, and it gives you an excuse to keep up on inter-project issues that may have bearing on your project. Kylu 03:15, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

This is closed as   Not done, temp sysopship was granted. --Thogo (talk) 15:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Aldo Cazzulino 555@es-wikiquote

I request sysop access.

Thank you. Javierm 22:09, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 22:37, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

알밤한대@ko.wikisource

I request formality sysop access.

Thank you. Albamhandae 09:06, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done--Shizhao 02:52, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

sithu015@my.wikipedia

I request sysop access.

Sithu015 11:57, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

  Not done, no local voting, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 12:02, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Evertype@my.wikipedia

I request Administrator access for User:Evertype (a.k.a. Michael Everson) on Burmese Wikipedia.

Thankyou. --Jose77 04:17, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

  Not done:3+ : 1- one of the supporters has only that vote as contribution. sorry, but that is not enough to gain permanent adminship, he might be able to ask for a temporary status. If he wants that he should do so in the section below. thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 12:07, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Filipinayzd and Ringer @bcl.wikipedia

I request Administrator access for User:Filipinayzd and User:Ringer on Bikol Wikipedia, perhaps the only project with more than 700 articles that has no Admin.

Thankyou. --Filipinayzd 13:16, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

No community to vote -> please apply for temporary adminship below. Also, does Ringer know he is actually proposed as admin? Thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 15:39, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Gonzo fan2007@az.wikipedia

The following discussion is closed.

I request sysop access.

  • Language Code: az
  • Local Request Link:
  • Automatic List of local bureaucrats:
  • Local User Page: az:User:Gonzo fan2007

Emergency access requested, Grawp vandalism. I would only need access for like 10 minutes. If its easier, someone could just block this IP, but I would rather do it myself, per my crazy talk page stuff. Thank you. – Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 01:20, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

NO, A steward will do it when they come online, sadly none around, leave it as it is and don't taunt him please..--Cometstyles 01:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Not taunting at all, every time he replies to me, he isnt vandalizing a main page. – Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 01:33, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
blocked, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 01:37, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!! – Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 01:39, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Gman124@pa.wikipedia

I request Administrator access.

Thank you. Gman124 17:58, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

  On hold. You just started a local request recently. Please wait at least one week and we will reconsider then. I have also changed the link to automatic list of local bureaucrats as your provided one was not automatic. Thanks.--Jusjih 02:34, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
  Done. Congratulation with 5 local supports for your request. Best wishes.--Jusjih 01:33, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks :) --Gman124 14:29, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Please invite users You promote, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 14:37, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Chrisportelli@mt.wiktionary

I request Administrator access.

Thank you. Chrisportelli 14:33, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

  Not done no community to vote, so please apply for temporary adminship below.--Nick1915 - all you want 10:41, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Andrijko Z.@bxr Wikipedia

I request sysop access.

  • Language Code: bxr
  • Local Request Link: didn't do there
  • Automatic List of local bureaucrats: [5]
  • Local User Page: bxr:User:Andrijko Z.

Thank you. --Andrijko Z. 15:26, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

  Not done no local voting, thanks.--Nick1915 - all you want 10:41, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Alex Smotrov@ruwikibooks

Please, promote Alex Smotrov sysop and bureaucrat flags. There's a vote about his bureaucratship, and everybody (including former bureaucrat, Ramir) supported him — VasilievV 2 11:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Your request is only recent, I know that it's a little urgent, but please wait at least a week for your community to approve him.--Nick1915 - all you want 12:10, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
I understand that it is too recent, but I think 2-3 days would be enough since we don't have big community — VasilievV 2 12:24, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
There's 1 more vote after your first req, I suggest to wait...--Nick1915 - all you want 14:35, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
  Not done@bureaucratship: bureaucratship will not be granted to such small communities (to this one especially because of the recent problems), thanks for Your understanding, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 15:55, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
  On hold@sysophood: Lots of voters there have only few contributions and/or registered very recently. Therefore I suggest to grant only temporary - sysop. The voting time (if locally not longer set) is usually 1 week, please wait a bit (voting started on 17.01.2008), thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 21:38, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Update: See, please b:ru:Викиучебник:Заявки на статус администратора; Now has voted 5 users. — t-toktalk 04:53, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
    Голосование должно продолжаться не меньше недели. Накорившийся мусор я поудалял, так что спешить некуда. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 07:04, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
    Максим, спасибо. Там накопилось столько мусора, что даже и представить невозможно. Твоя помощь оказалась очень кстати. — t-toktalk 07:54, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
@sysop:   Done, status granted for 6 months, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 14:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Removed--Shizhao 12:52, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Ahonc@ukwikibooks

I request temporary sysop access.

  • Language Code: uk
  • List of local sysops: b:uk:Special:Listadmins
  • List of local bureaucrats: b:uk:Special:Listusers/bureaucrat
  • Local Request Link: project has no active users now
  • Local User Page: b:uk:User:Ahonc
  • Preferred duration and reason: for some cleanup. Admin of this project hid Copyrightwarning [6] in editing window. He is inactive since November 2007. And I want to revert this edit.--Ahonc 21:17, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. Ahonc 21:17, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

  Done fine for me. Good for 3 months. --Walter 16:41, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Expires: 2008-07-25 --Walter 16:45, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Removed --.anaconda 02:02, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Ilya Voyager@ruwikibooks

— VasilievV 2 04:28, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

  Done and please use the full form next time. Thanks --FiLiP ¤ 08:00, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm terribly sorry for this, but it seems to me that I've overlooked some things. Namely, it's best not to give permanent sysop status on ru.wikibooks, since all the recent commotion over there. So, I have to limit this status to temporary only. The period is six months, which can be extended, if the user wishes (when the time comes). So, this adminship expires on July 26, 2008. Again, I apologize for this inconvenience. --FiLiP ¤ 10:35, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Was made permanent, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 10:35, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

urdutext@ur wikibooks

I request sysop access.

Thank you. Urdutext 14:18, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, given the fact that there are no votes for You, the community there is quite small, we cannot grant permanent sysopship. I can offer You a temporary period of 3 months. Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 14:46, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
OK, that will do for now. Thanks. --Urdutext 18:02, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
  Done, granted for 3 months, expires 26-07-2008, please remember to
  • translate the interface only at betawiki: (if You want to help translating just create an account there and leave a message at betawiki:Betawiki:Translator and You will be granted translatorstatus immediately),
  • upload images preferably at commons:
Many thanks, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 18:06, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Removed --.anaconda 20:38, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

ВасильевВВ@ruwikibooks

I request sysop access.

Thank you. VasilievV 2 18:46, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

  Done, granted for 6 months, expires: 28.07.2008, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 14:48, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Was made permanent, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 10:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Mardetanha@wikibooks

I request temporary sysop access.

Thank you. --Mardetanha talk 17:16, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

  Done for 2 months, ends on july 1st. es:Drini 17:54, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks indeed--Mardetanha talk 17:56, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
It will finish within this 2 days would any steward extend it for another 3 or 6 month --Mardetanha talk 20:56, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
  Done Extended until july 31. es:Drini 13:08, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
removed--Nick1915 - all you want 08:52, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access

Feens@lv.wiki, Yyy@lv.wiki

Vote was held due to Tail (the only current bureaucrat) being absent and that made us unable to grant bot status to the bots.

Thank you. --SpeedKing 16:57, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Why do you need two new crats? (Tail was even this month active.) What's the difference between Yyy (4 votes) and Juristiltins (3 votes)? Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:02, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
I don't see any request on his talkpage --Nick1915 - all you want 17:10, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Eh,   Done because I started looking at that matter before others commented, and didn't notice their comments. No big deal I guess, since having only one crat is really frowned upon these days. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 17:21, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Should you still care, we had lenghtly discussion in comunity portal [7], which resulted in decison that we need new bureaucrats. Tail hadn't been active in Latvian Wikipedia since march and was notified about this discussion trough e-mail, she turned up and explained that she had been busy in work and that she will grant bot status to bots waiting for it, but we should take care about the bureaucrat on or own. We decided we need two in case one gets missing like Tail did Xil...(talk) 18:24, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Esbardu@ast.wiktionary

I request bureaucrat access.

Thank you. Esbardu 14:09, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

  Not done. I'm sorry, but after 3 weeks, 2 votes are not enough: the community is too small for a local 'crat.--Nick1915 - all you want 11:15, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Ahonc@uk.wiktionary

I request bureaucrat access.

Please contact the local crat, he seems to be not totally inactive, last edit 30.june. Consider mailing him, which is mostly fastest. Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 12:16, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
He makes one edit per month. He did not provide email address in preferences.--Ahonc 18:41, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Well, that makes him not inactive :S ... I believe I mailed him once, when I needed something, on wikipedia he has an email in his settings, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 19:20, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
I sent email him but he didn't answer and didn't grant status.--Ahonc 18:31, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
  Done. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 21:09, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Kandy Talbot@sk wiktionary

I request bureaucrat access.

I count on I would have to wait a few days, but our community is not that active and there's no problem with support and we currently don't have a bureaucrat. Thank you. —Kandy Talbot 14:01, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Well, we can't grant you b'crat status after less than one day of voting. Besides, if 4 votes is all you'll get, then there is no need for a bureaucrat, because the community is too small. --FiliP × 14:03, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
OK, my reasons was only the waiting bot requests. Thanks. —Kandy Talbot 14:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
I do not work on the domain, but I know the user and I would personally like to support him, if it does matter. -jkb- (cs.source) 15:06, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
You may want to consider implementing the Bot policy on the wiki, which would automatically allow stewards to grant the bot flag to certain classes of bots (see Bot_policy#Automatic_approval). It's opt-in, but quite handy for letting smaller communities focus on important things such as article-building. I hope that helps out! :) Kylu 19:46, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for help! I made those steps. :) —Kandy Talbot 21:03, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Accurimbono@la Wikisource

I request that Accurimbono be given the 'crat flag.

Thank you. John Vandenberg 09:57, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

1 bureaucrat (Personne, no activity since 09:07, 26 March 2008. Quod vide s:la:Vicifons:Magistratus#Personne. ~Kylu (u|t) 16:04, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
  Done --.anaconda 17:30, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

CheckUser access

Annabel@nl.wikipedia, Gpvos@nl.wikipedia

Please grant checkuser access to Annabel & Gpvos per their appointment by nl.wiki Arbcom.

Thanks, Niels 13:42, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

On hold, please provide identification to the foundation per CheckUser_policy#Access_to_CheckUser. Thanks. ++Lar: t/c 13:45, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
emails sent--Nick1915 - all you want 14:05, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Annabel@nl.wikipedia
  Done
--M/ 19:34, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Gpvos@nl.wikipedia   Done
--FiliP × 20:16, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Request For CheckUser Status In Azerbaijani Wikipedia

The following discussion is closed.

Following users have gained the on-wiki approval of our local community in az Wikipedia:

Please grant them local checkuser status in Azerbaijani WIkipedia.--Mehrdad 17:19, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm afraid that's not enough votes. You need to have at least 30 votes. --FiliP × 05:16, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Altough it might seem logical, I could see no such requirement here. Neither it existed when the vote was started. There is a genuine need for local checkusers to prevent periodic disruptions to the Azerbaijani wikipedia's work and going to meta each time is not effective. Therefore, the community has decided to elect local checkusers. Thank you. --TimBits 07:11, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
I am surprised by this voting too, never seen such for a cu. I wonder if the "change" of the policy here is official. I would say lets see what cary has to say about it. It is   On hold anyway as these persons have to identify to the foundation. Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 13:28, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the link. When I looked for the info at that page, I was surprised I couldn't find it because I swear I saw it a while ago. I still believe that the number of voters in this election is very low and I suggest not doing this. But yes, let's wait for Cary. --FiliP × 09:53, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
The change was the result of a long discussion on the checkuser-L mailing list. The problem, essentially, is that there is no single system, and no simple way to describe the current systems. For example, enwiki has an Arbcom, which appoints checkusers. dewiki has an arbcom, but checkusers are elected. eswiki (if I recall correctly) has one CU elected by the community before the creation of their arbcom and one CU appointed by the arbcom, with no clear decision (and some controversy) about whether future CUs will be elected or appointed. There was also concern on the list about the recent attempts to establish an arbcom in order to appoint some people as CUs who had failed to be elected (I think it was en wikiquote but I would have to look it up to make sure). I think the requirement of having a minimum number of votes and 75-80% consensus is a good idea, especially if it has been established as a precedent. But that language was being used by some people on enwiki to justify creating an election mechanism that would be independent of Arbcom. There was also some confusion about whether this policy describes the appointment of checkusers for meta-wiki or for all wikis. So that's the problem. Perhaps the confusion could be addressed by saying, "If a wiki currently has a mechanism to appoint or elect checkusers, future checkusers must be selected using the same mechanism. If a wiki does not have checkusers, the 30 vote/80% consensus rule applies." I confess I have not given this much thought recently but does that seem reasonable? For what its worth, during these discussions, the Foundation was silent and did not offer firm direction, or indeed any direction. Thatcher 17:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Well, changes of the CU policy are not duty of people on mailing lists, but have to be first approved by the global community (which wasn't asked so far) and second approved by the foundation. So this change is not valid. --Thogo (talk) 17:45, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
This was discussed on the list and I posted my changes there, and you are all on the list, so you've had at least 3 months to object. Do as you like. I've lost most of my interest in wiki-governance anyway. Thatcher 17:54, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Thatcher, please don't take it personal, Thogos argument is not destructive criticism. I am sorry, but I must say it was impossible for me to follow and read that monsterthread for me and You might agree that such an interpretation as we see it here can't be what was intented, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 17:58, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
I agree that 7 votes is unreasonable. But it was also unreasonable for the text of the prior version ("On a wiki with no Arbitration Committee or where the community prefers independent elections) to try and bypass enwiki's arbcom, and Jdforrester's version about "approved arbcoms" does not reflect the situation with eswiki or dewiki. I posted my suggestion to the policy talk page, suggest further discussion there. Thatcher 18:05, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm not offended, just tired. Thatcher 18:07, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank You for Your input, it is very appreciated, never give up too easily :) if You are tired just take some rest but only to come back with renewed strenght ;) kind regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 18:09, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Additionally it would be good, if it is changed (and these changes seem to be a proposal which have to be approved still by the foundation), that there is some clause so votings with 7:1 like [8] can not happen, that is simply ridiculous for a cu, who has access to sensitive private data, sorry, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 17:48, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Private list is not the place for talking about the policy. I reverted edits and talk may start at the talk page. --Millosh 18:59, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

In all fairness, we in the Azerbaijani wikipedia have hold the voting, being under the impression that the latest version of the policy was official and the results are valid according to that version. I don't see anything ridiculous in that. It is inconsequential whether the person making those changes had different things in his/her mind or has erred in making the said changes. I don't see how we can be blamed for that. Therefore I'd like someone to clarify it to us- what is the current official, valid policy, so that we can hold a new vote if necessary and make our request accordingly? Thank you.--TimBits 20:06, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
You have our apologies for the mixup, but at the moment the current version of the checkuser policy is at Checkuser policy#Access to CheckUser. It states 25-30 users minimum and 70-80% approval, as determined by the local community. Thanks for your understanding. Kylu 22:05, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
That 25-30 members mark is quite important, given the sensitive nature of the access. I'm unsure why it was removed; but it certainly needs to remain in place. That goes for any arbcom elections as well (25-30 in support for each arbcom member) before we should permit a project arbcom the ability to appoint its own checkusers. This demonstrates that the community is mature enough to abide by the foundation's policies. It also demonstrates that the community is big enough where asking the stewards to step when a checkuser is needed can become a drain on the stewards' time. Cary Bass demandez 20:01, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you, if that is the case, then we need to hold the election again. Getting 25 votes shouldn't be a problem, all one needs to do is to advertise it better and and set the duration for a long time, unlike the last time, when we were seeking to get checkusers appointed as soon as possible, thereby had set the minimum time limit. In any case we need checkusers in our wikipedia and the community is mature enough for that. Thanks to all for clarification. --TimBits 21:12, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Please note that the voting has also to be separate for each candidate, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 11:39, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

  Not done, missunderstanding in the voting process, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 11:40, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Pap3rinik@it.wikipedia

Please grant checkuser access to Pap3rinik@it.wikipedia due to successful poll

Thanks. --Brownout(msg) 10:13, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

  On hold please provide to send your identification to the Foundation--Nick1915 - all you want 12:23, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
  Done per Cary's edit. --FiliP × 12:57, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Oversight access

Drini@metawiki

Please grant User:Drini oversight per consensus here. He is already identified to the foundation as a steward and checkuser. Majorly talk 18:28, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done--Nick1915 - all you want 19:02, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Kv75@ruwikipedia

Thank you. Ptr ru 15:08, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Please, note that Kv75 has already identified to the Foundation: [9] — VasilievV 2 15:10, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
  Done please advise of any questions or concerns. ++Lar: t/c 03:31, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Александр Сигачёв@ruwikipedia

  Done--FiliP × 22:30, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Mike.lifeguard@Meta Lar@Meta

I request oversight access for both Mike.lifeguard and Lar.

Both users have previously identified to the Foundation: Lar is (of course) a Steward, while Mike.lifeguard is a checkuser on en.wikibooks.

Thank you. Kylu 20:04, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done --Thogo (talk) 20:26, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you to all who supported me, or commented, and to Kylu and Thogo. As I noted during the request process, I intend to relinquish this right as soon as Drini's been switched on. There is a proposal before the Meta community to address the concern that some commenters had, that stewards now, with elected oversighters, would be reluctant to act except in dire emergency. It is called Meta:Meta-Steward relationship and I commend everyone to give it a look and discuss it. It's a very good idea in my view. ++Lar: t/c 20:54, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Removal of access

김종국@ko.wikipedia

I want to remove my sysop access.

  • Language Code: ko
  • Local User Page: [10]

-- JongGuk 06:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

please provide the difflink of your local confirmation for your request--Mardetanha talk 06:42, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Here. --Albamhandae 08:08, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Diff
and CU result
  Done
--M/ 09:04, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Amd628@azwikipedia

I request removal of my bureaucrat access.

Thank you. 80.69.50.54 06:52, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Dear steward just be informed sysop flag should remain--Mardetanha talk 07:05, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
  Done
--M/ 09:00, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Jarke@es.wikipedia

I request removal of my sysop and bureaucrat access.

  • Language Code: es
  • Local Confirmation/Request Link: [11]
  • Local User Page: es:User:Jarke

Thank you. Jarke 18:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done

("thank you" on the relevant user page!)

--M/ 18:19, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Removal of administrator access at the Swedish Wikpedia

I request removal of sysop access on sv.wikipedia for 2 users (after midnight UTC).

The following 2 users have not been reelected and should lose their administrator access by the end of July:

sv:User:Ezeu, sv:User:Mnemo

References (in Swedish):

Thank you. Boivie 20:47, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done Jon Harald Søby 20:50, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Mardetanha@fawikisourse

I request removal of my temp sysop access.

please remove my temp sysop access because of i had successful RFA so as i talked to local crat he told he prefers to give my sysop right locally Thank you. Mardetanha talk 05:55, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 06:29, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks MaxSem --Mardetanha talk 10:37, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Olve_Utne@nn wikipedia

I request removal of my bureaucrat and sysop access.

Thank you. Olve 11:25, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done and thanks for all your work. --FiliP × 11:44, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. :-) I’ll enjoy being able to just write/edit articles without that extra responsibility (and occasional necessary, dirty and often unappreciated work)... :] Olve 12:27, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Donatus@hr wikipedia

I request removal of my sysop access.

Thank you. Donatus 15:26, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 15:29, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Srl@mt Wikipedia

Removal of sysop + bureaucrat rights. Reason: Inactivity, for circa 6 months + he does not know how to speak in maltese, so he can't exercise his tools on our wikipedia.

Thanks in advance. --Giangian15 16:57, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

  On hold
Please show a consensus about removing sysop bit
At least, the user should be notified prior to request.
--M/ 17:01, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Also it seems that you have just made this page some hours age.such policies need community consensus--Mardetanha talk 17:14, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
  Not done
There was no clarification from the user, nor there is a consensus on the wiki.
--M/ 10:39, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

AnyFile@it wikinews

I request removal of access for AnyFile: less than 50 edits and/or 10 sysoperations in the last eight months, according project policy.

Thanks. --Olando 19:29, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Some notes: this shows that you moved AnyFile from "Amministratori inattivi" (or inattentive admins) to "Amministratori non più in carica" (or admins no longer in office). This is his special log: [13] and this is his contribs: [14] The project requirements are (machine translated) -
When an admin makes no more than fifty edits or ten interventions with the administrative functions (rollback with the specific button included) in two months, he is reported as inactive in a special section "Se entro sei mesi non uscirà dalla sezione Amministratori inattivi, egli verrà desysoppato immediatamente". If within six months he is not released from section directors inactive, he will be desysopped immediately.
The administrator revoked in this way can stand for reelection at any time.
A request for additional information from me: Has the proper time elapsed? There been any discussion of this or notification of the user? What is your own role on the project? Thanks. ++Lar: t/c 23:23, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
I've had a quick look, the request is from one of the sysops and the user has been notified that he is no longer eligible to keep admin bit according to the project's policies. --M/ 09:46, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
The policy and the req are OK.   Done--Nick1915 - all you want 10:22, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Mateus Hidalgo@ptwiki

I request removal of my sysop access.

Thank you. Mateus Hidalgo 01:00, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Done. —{admin} Pathoschild 01:51:38, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Roby@fr Wikipedia

Removal of sysop rights. Reason: More than 6 months of inactivity. Same reason as some previous requests A few months ago.

Thanks in advance. Poppy 09:01, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done--Nick1915 - all you want 10:07, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Lar@metawiki

Please remove my oversight access at Meta, per my commitment to only be a backup oversighter. It was a short backup, Drini's on the job! Thanks. PS, everyone please go comment on Meta:Meta-Steward_relationship!!!! ++Lar: t/c 22:26, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done ++Lar: t/c 22:29, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Soulkeeper@no wikipedia

I request removal of my sysop access.

Thank you. - Soulkeeper 14:56, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done
Thank you for your work
--M/ 15:55, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
I will continue to work on no.wikipedia. Thank you for making it less stressful for me to do so. :) - Soulkeeper 18:58, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Drork@he wikipedia

The following discussion is closed.

I request removal of sysop access.

  • Language Code: he
  • Local Confirmation/Request Link: link, retirement notice in the user page
  • Local User Page: he:משתמש:Drork
  • This sysop decided to retire from he.wikipedia after a rough argument yesterday, as mentioned in his user talk and user page. I'm not sure what exactly must be done, but it seems that the sysop access should be removed as well since he stated that he will not come back. Furthermore, he is not very active user, and he did only 60 sysop actions (i.e block, protect, delete etc.) since he was appointed by the local 'crat in 2006.

Thank you. 87.70.117.156 15:52, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry the page is in Hebrew and i think it is better that user confirm it by English and better is to himself request for deysosping--Mardetanha talk 15:58, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
  Not done
Not urgent and not directly requested from user, who might rethink about that!
--M/ 16:00, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
I am happy to see this bogus request was not done, especially since the requesting user is anonymous. I assume DrorK will return, and if he will want his sysop right to be removed, he can ask himself. If he won't return in the next six months, his sysop rights will by removed via a vote, as regulated in the Hebrew Wikipedia. Yonidebest 19:22, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
The user most certainly did not relinquish his sysop rights. True, a local procedure to remove his rights has indeed been started in the hebrew wikipedia, but we won't be able to call the outcome ,which depends on local vote, until two weeks from now. The Relativity of The Truth 19:24, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi, please don't use this site for discussions, the request had been closed, thanks, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 19:28, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Malafaya@ka Wikipedia

I request removal of sysop access.

Thank you. Malafaya 20:03, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Done. I have left your bureaucrat rights intact: would you like those removed too? — Dan | talk 19:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. Bureaucrat rights are to be kept for now as I'm the only one there. Malafaya 11:02, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Xmlizer@fr Wikipedia

I request removal of sysop access for this user, that has been inactive for more than 6 months.

Thanks in advance. Clem23 16:12, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done--Nick1915 - all you want 17:12, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Kantor.JH@dewiki + RobbyBer@dewiki

I request removal of their sysop access.

Thank you. --Thogo (talk) 17:16, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done
--M/ 17:17, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Ladypine@he Wikipedia and A&D@he Wikipedia

Please remove sysop access from above two users.

  • Language Code: he
  • Local Confirmation/Request Link: [16]: "I closed this vote as Ladypine has voted for the removal, and since A&D has lost/forgot his password. I will notify the stewards."
  • Local User Page: he:User:Ladypine and he:User:A&D

Thanks, Yonidebest 19:14, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

    •   Done both. — Dan | talk 19:26, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
    •   Done ++Lar: t/c 19:26, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
      • Er, I did them :) ++Lar: t/c 19:29, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Bryan@commonswiki

I request removal of my checkuser access.

I will unfortunately not have enough free time to serve as checkuser anymore. -- Bryan (talk|commons) 19:40, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done and thank you for your service. sysop bit left set. ++Lar: t/c 20:06, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Can't sleep, clown will eat me@en.wikipedia

I request removal of Can't sleep, clown will eat me sysop access.

Can't sleep, clown will eat me performed a number of controversial blocks since April 1, 2008. The issue was brought before the Arbitration Committee, and they decided by a 8–0 vote to desysop him. Thank you. Nishkid64 (talk) 00:00, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done ++Lar: t/c 00:01, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Vulture@dewikipedia

I request removal of access.

Thank you. —YourEyesOnly

  Done, please thank them for their work as admin, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 09:00, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Kiker99@dewikipedia

I request removal of access.

Thank you. —YourEyesOnly

  Done, please thank them for their work as admin, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 09:00, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Armagedon@ptwikipedia

I request sysop access removal.

Thank you. ArmagedonDiscussão 13:44, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done, thank you for your work. --.anaconda 15:21, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

MiPe@fi wikipedia

I request removal of access.

  • Language Code: fi
  • Local Confirmation/Request Link: [18]
  • Local User Page: fi:User:MiPe

Thank you. MiPe 13:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done, thanks for your work!--Nick1915 - all you want 14:04, 16 July 2008 (UTC)


User:Jurema Oliveira@pt-wikipedia

I request removal of access.

Thank you. Jurema Oliveira 23:05, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done, thank you for your work. --.anaconda 00:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Tbo_157@en wikipedia

I request removal of access.

Thank you. Tbo 157 23:11, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done, thank you for your work. --.anaconda 00:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Marcelobbr@pt wikipedia

I request removal of sysop status.

  • Language Code: pt
  • Local Confirmation/Request Link: [21]

Thank you. Marcelobbr 13:21, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done, thank you for your work. --.anaconda 13:36, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Paintman@es wikipedia

I request removal of sysop access.

Thank you. Paintman 20:38, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done thanks for your work--Nick1915 - all you want 20:48, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

R'n'B@testwiki

I request removal of sysop access of user.

Thank you. Sir Lestaty discuţie 02:29, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done --FiliP × 07:46, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Several@fi.wikiquote

According to recently approved inactivity policy of the Finnish Wikiquote, sysop status will be removed after one year of total inactivity (i.e. no edits or log actions in the last 12 months).

Therefore I request removal of sysop access from the following users.

Thank you. –Ejs-80 09:31, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done--Nick1915 - all you want 10:18, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Sed@az-wikipedia

I request removal of my own sysop access.

Thank you. --Sed 16:13, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done Thank you for working as administrator. --Thogo (talk) 16:23, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

GuteMiiene@de.wikiquote

I request removal of access.

Thank you. WIKImaniac 20:19, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done --Thogo (talk) 20:23, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Chriss@de wikiquote

I request removal of access.

User Chriss is currently sysop at de.wikiquote. This user hasn't been active for nearly four years. Please remove sysop status of this account due to the discussion in community.

Thank you. WIKImaniac 15:04, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done.--Jusjih 02:40, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

habj@sv Wikipedia

I request removal of bureaucrat access.

Thank you. habj 18:53, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done --FiliP × 18:56, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Delete.Bot@pt.wikisource

I request removal of access.

Thank you. 555 03:49, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done --FiliP × 21:13, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Personne@lawikisource

I request the removal of all access from our old crat, who has not been active for months. A new crat has being elected, and no objections raised during a separate discussion to remove access from the old crat.

Thank you. John Vandenberg 14:10, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done
--M/ 12:54, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
This was not completed. The user is no longer active, and the community all agreed that the user should stand for re-election if they return. John Vandenberg 08:55, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
This has been archived twice, yet it hasnt been completed. John Vandenberg 03:53, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
  Done
Oops, the linked page says: I propose that the 'crat flag be removed, didn't notice that you were also asking for the admin bit removal.
Thank you. --M/ 08:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
No worries; thank you. John Vandenberg 09:34, 10 July 2008 (UTC)


Gardowmir@plwiki

Access to be removed per private local ArbCom decision.

  • Language Code:pl
  • Local Confirmation/Request Link: None, this was discussed privately.
  • Local User Page: pl:Wikipedysta:Grotesque

This is per private discussion, his adminship was to be suspended for now. Kabeldemanns 20:44, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

  Not done
Until and unless there's a confirmation link on the relevant Arbcom page.
--M/ 20:45, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Kelovy@skwiki

Hello, I request removal my sysop status due to community decision

Thank You... --Kelovy 11:44, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done --FiliP × 11:48, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

WODUP@en.wikipedia

I request removal of access.

  • Language Code: en
  • Local Confirmation/Request Link: [26]
  • Local User Page: en:User:WODUP

Thank you. WODUP 07:10, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done, thank you for your work--Nick1915 - all you want 10:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Obarskyr@nl wikipedia

I request removal of access.

  Done --Thogo (talk) 07:58, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

João_Sousa@pt wikipedia

I request removal of sysop access.

Thank you. João Sousa 19:27, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done
And thank you for your work. --M/ 19:34, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Vinograd19@ru wikipedia

I request removal of access.

Thank you. Vinograd19 19:29, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done
And thank you for your work. --M/ 19:34, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Fredxavier@pt wikipedia

I request removal of access.

Thank you. Fred Xavier 21:58, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done, thank you for your work. --.anaconda 22:16, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Hebster@da Wikipedia

I request removal of admin rights.

Thank you. Hebster 06:11, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

  DoneWojciech Pędzich Talk 06:21, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Personne@lawikisource

I request the removal of all access from our old crat, who has not been active for months. A new crat has being elected, and no objections raised during a separate discussion to remove access from the old crat.

Thank you. John Vandenberg 14:10, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done
--M/ 12:54, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
This was not completed. The user is no longer active, and the community all agreed that the user should stand for re-election if they return. John Vandenberg 08:55, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Hei_ber@foo

Ombudsman commission – for clarity reasons:
As Special:GlobalUsers/Ombudsmen is live now (includes global checkuser, browsearchive and deletedhistory access, see [29]), please remove the previously granted local rights from User:Hei_ber (confirm). Rebecca and Mackensen currently don't have any additional CU status other than on en.wp, so there's nothing to change in their cases afaik (their local CU access is based on the 'former arbitrators' role, cf. en.wikipedia).

Complete list of removals, cf. SULutil:

  • Hei ber@dewiki – remove CU and admin status (the later was only granted for deletedhistory access, see [30] and [31])
  • Hei ber@enwiki – remove CU status
  • Hei ber@frwiki – remove CU status
  • Hei ber@jawiki – remove CU status
  • Hei ber@metawiki – remove CU status
  • Hei ber@ruwiki – remove CU status

Note: Do not touch Hei ber@dewikiquote, it's his home wiki and he's regularly sysop there :-)

Many thanks --:bdk: 12:49, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Working on this
--M/ 12:54, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Too late. ;)   Done. --Thogo (talk) 12:55, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Snowdog@itwiki

I request removal of checkuser access from Snowdog@itwiki, since his term (6 months) is expired.

Thank you. Brownout(msg) 10:18, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done by Wpedzich--Nick1915 - all you want 12:20, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Philippe@meta

I request removal of my temporary sysop access.

  • Language Codes: meta
  • Local Confirmation/Request Link: I'm signed in while I post this, but I'm happy to post a difflink on my meta page if necessary
  • Local User Page: me:User:Philippe
  • This temporary adminship was granted for the purposes of Election Committee work, which I no longer need. This should not be an indication that others may not still need theirs, but my involvement w/protected pages, etc, seems to be through.

Thank you. Philippe 22:43, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done and thank you for your work.
Please feel free to apply for perm bit setting!
--M/ 22:46, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Panther@ruwiki & Panther@commonswiki

I request removal of my sysop access.

Thank you. Ptr ru (Panther) 06:53, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done, thank you for your work--Nick1915 - all you want 10:53, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Valepert@it.wikinews

This user was flagged temporary sysop on 26 feb 2007 (http://it.wikinews.org/wiki/Wikinotizie:Progetto_archiviazione#Richiesta_dell.27attribuzione_temporanea_delle_funzioni_di_sysop). The end of his adminship was planned for 26 mar 2007. Please deflag him.

Thank you. --Stef Mec 14:48, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Actually the local bureaucrats weren't even asked about this deflag; the user is still active in the archival activity. Please wait for confirmation. --Brownout(msg) 15:34, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
He's only temporary and the deadline has already expired. The adminship was renewable, but the community, AFAIK, didn't renew it. of course, he could regualrly candidate himself for adminship; but remember, this is only a temporary adminship. --Pietrodn · talk with me 16:06, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
He's not active. He didn't make any protections in the last 5 months --Stef Mec 16:12, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Is there an emergency I'm not aware of? Those flags were granted at bureaucrats discretion and can be renewed, as stated in the archival project, I still don't get why their opinion in this matter shouldn't be heard. --Brownout(msg) 16:17, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
No, there isn't any emergency. Simply his adminship was temporary and it expired, so we can proceed for deflag. It is the normal procedure for temporary adminship, isn't it? --Pietrodn · talk with me 16:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
As requested by Brownout, I'm bureaucrat of it.wikinews. Valepert resigned, so he can be deflagged. --Tooby 16:32, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Done
Many thanks to Valepert for his confirmed and precious helpfulness.
--M/ 16:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Temporary permissions (rejected and expired requests only)

Approved, ongoing requests should be moved to Requests for permissions/Approved temporary.

Snakesteuben@fy and Sonne@fy Wiktionary

We request sysop access.

Why an appointment is needed: Currently our project has no real admin. (The only admin is DerHexer, one of you guys, who is obviously very busy, so has not been particularly active on our project. I believe this has been the case for about a year now. Our user interface is shabby, and Sonne has theorised that the difficulty of making entries may be one reason other users (we have 104 registered) are, or have become, reluctant to contribute. I would like to attend to updating/creating our common.css and .js, as well as the editing tools and buttons available, as soon as possible.

Also routine tasks have gone unattended for some time. E.g., needless to say, candidates for speedy deletion--aren't.

Community Approval: I have checked with sysop DerHexer, who suggested making this request.

There was no substantive response to the entry linked above. The entry was posted only one week ago. However, Sonne and I are the only two users who have created or edited pages since the third of this month (during the entire past month, one registered user made three edits, and contacts of mine, unregistered on our project, left me messages in a couple places.) So I think it's safe to say we have a consensus. ;-) Additionally, in the near future, I may be taking on some rather complex work that would limit time I can devote to the project. So time may be somewhat more of the essence than in the normal case.

Qualifications: Sonne and I are making this request jointly. Neither of us is comfortable taking on the job alone. Sonne is a native speaker of the project's language, while I have been self-teaching for a month now. On the other side, I have a handle on the tech. I'm currently running a bot, and have become familiar with complex templates and parser functions. I have some knowledge of css and js, and have made good contacts on the English Wikt who have pointed me to their code and explained some of the workings to me.

Sonne and I would both prefer to have an admin who has already served on another project. A diligent effort to find one has been made. I put messages on the discussion pages of prior admins I could locate, both on the wikt project and the sister wp project. Then the general appeal linked above was posted. Another user (one of you guys, perhaps?) posted that he had made an appeal at the village pump on our sister wikipedia site.

Sonne is not registered here, so is not seconding this request on this page. We did not think that would be necessary. Please see the bottom of my local talk page for evidence of our agreement.

Finally, if, for any reason, permanent appointment is deemed inappropriate, please consider this a request in the alternative for other appropriate relief, including but not limited to temporary appointment, or any other remedy as you may see fit.

Thank you. Snakesteuben 10:51, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Please note that translation of the user interface should *not* be done in the wiki itself, but on Beta-Wiki. Create an account there and ask some bureaucrat there for translator status. These translations are then used in all Wikimedia wikis. --Thogo (talk) 10:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Wow. That was fast. You actually read my user page! Understood, good to know, and will do. So, if the wp people had done it that way, the stuff I was going to copy from them would have magically appeared for us, too? Snakesteuben 11:00, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
If the WP people had done it on Beta Wiki, you would be able to use these translations on all Wikimedia Wikis, by setting your preference to Frisian. But anyway, I guess the wiki is yet too small to get permanent sysops, so I granted you both temp sysopship for 3 months for any kind of .js and .css maintenance and deleting/blocking and all this kind of stuff. Expiring 29 Jul 2008 Just come here some days before that and drop a note that you want to have it extended (if you want that). So this is   Done. :) --Thogo (talk) 11:08, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Giangian15@mt.wikipedia

Please grant me temporary admin on the maltese wikipedia.

  • Language Code: mt
  • List of local sysops: w:mt:Special:Listadmins
  • List of local bureaucrats: w:mt:Listusers/bureaucrat
  • Local User Page: Giangian15
  • Preferred duration and reason: clean up of maltese wikipedia, which will include a new front page. Statistics arranged, and many more. The reason is explained in the section of granting admin (under Chrisportelli@mt.wikipedia).

Thank you. --Giangian15 13:22, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

  On hold, please allow the local crats to respond to the querry first, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 13:40, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
  Not done, I am sorry, but the local crats have responded and thus are active, they will promote locally or not however the outcome of votings in mt.wiki are, thanks, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 05:39, 30 July 2008 (UTC)


Jack Merridew@id.wikipedia

I request temporary sysop access.

See;

I made edits a few days ago to protected templates (request is on Borgx's talk page here) and broke better than 20,000 pages (on a 90,000 page wiki). The fixes are described in detail on Borgx's talk page. See the screen shots. I would be fine with someone knowledgeable about templates and css chipping in on the talk there or performing the edits.

Thank you. Jack Merridew 11:00, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

For what it is worth, I lend my support here. Jack has shown a lot of interest in the technical setup of id:wp, jv:wp (and also starting to help with en:ws), he has worked very closely with the community on this, and is very unlikely to do anything inappropriate there. I have checked all of the sysops, and there are a few that are active, but not very active, and there are language barriers here as well. I recommend temporary sysop; he should only need half an hour. John Vandenberg 11:42, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, John. I just left a note with w:id:Pembicaraan Pengguna:Jagawana#Margin issue (an id:admin who seems to be on now). There are time zone issues here; I'll be on for a few more hours today and then things will have to go as they may. And I can do this in 2 minutes! And yes, I'm on very good terms with all these 'crats and admins. Cheers, Jack Merridew 11:51, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
sorry but there're 4 'crats and all very active, we can't overrule them. Please wait some time for their answers--Nick1915 - all you want 11:58, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Understood. I asked because things are moving slowly and I feel bad about breaking stuff. Cheers, Jack Merridew 12:02, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
  • This is all fixed; Jagawana unprotected the pages for me and I've fixed them. Some server will have to re-gen all the pages. Cheers, Jack Merridew 12:21, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
good :)--Nick1915 - all you want 14:10, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
The problem only occurred on Firefox < v3.0 (and SeaMonkey, old Mozilla Suite, and probably Netscape v6); most of Indonesia is still on IE6 and unlicensed copies of XP. Cheers, Jack Merridew 14:27, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

.snoopy.@tumwiki

The following discussion is closed.

I request temporary sysop access.

Thank you. .snoopy. 20:32, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done, please notify us when everything is done, thanks, (please don't archive yet), best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 21:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Done --.snoopy. 05:09, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
removed again, thanks for helping, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 06:12, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

mardetanha@fawiki

I request temporary bot access to my sysop account.

  • Preferred duration and reason: less than one our just for not flooding RC page

Thank you. Mardetanha talk 01:35, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Status: In progress. flag set. ++Lar: t/c 01:37, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Done thanks indeed--Mardetanha talk 02:20, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
NO, thank YOU for your help!   Done ++Lar: t/c 02:20, 29 July 2008 (UTC)


Meno25@arwikinews

I request temporary sysop access.

whose last edit was on 29 February 2008. I would like to request temp sysop access to delete the accumulated test pages and to make a few corrections in system messages. There is no local community in the wiki. I am a native Arabic speaker, sysop on Arabic and English Wikipedias (global rights) and I was granted temp sysop access in this very same wiki before (log). My accounts are migrated to SUL. This confirms my identity. Thank you. Meno25 12:47, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

  Done, expires 26 Jul 2008--Nick1915 - all you want 12:55, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Aurora@mswikibooks

I request for her temporary sysop access.

Thank you. Putera Luqman Tunku Andre 08:10, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Please provide more informatie.
  1. You are requesting temp sysop status for someone else; why can not she request it?
  2. For what does she need sysop status and for how long?
  3. the links above are (very) broken. That does not give a good impression.
--Walter 16:38, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
  1. Putera Luqman Tunku Andre asked me to cover for him, hence his request instead if mine.
  2. Reason is general upkeeping, date is until 05 Jan 2009 (same as Putera Luqman Tunku Andre). See here for context.
  3. Links repaired. Thanks. ...Aurora... 04:26, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
The main reason from me are
  1. I can't active in wiki because my exam is near. The exam is so important and i havo to study hard for it.
  2. I think my desysop access will after Aurora constitute to sysop (I don't know if u want or not, so i requst for u to temp. sysop:)
  3. I don't have any experiences
  4. I don't like to contribute in wiki that didnt have anyone there(aftr i invite them!:(
  5. And I only can use the internet for an hour only a day!(my mom rules) Arghhh

Putera Luqman Tunku Andre 08:53, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

  Done, expires 30-07-2008, please remember to translate the interface at betawiki: only and to upload images preferably at commons:, thank You, please come back a few days before Your status expires to prolong it or if the community has grown in the meantime, please feel free to hold a voting, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 09:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
No problem. Thanks. ...Aurora... 08:36, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

fa.wikisource

I request temp sysop access rights for wikisource:fa:user:mardetanha. for deleting unwanted pages and take care of new articls.and checking old artice for copyright problems.

note: i request for RFA but no oppeser and no supporter participate. thanks--Mardetanha 18:14, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Although local bureaucrat, Kaveh is pretty inactive, he left his email on his userpage and I suggest you to try contacting him first. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 18:20, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
i have sent him 4 emails! and waited enough--Mardetanha 18:21, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
  Done temporarily for 3 months. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 18:42, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks--Mardetanha 18:57, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
removed today (user did not want to prolong it, maybe locally), best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 12:00, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Prince Kassad@sawiki

The following discussion is closed.

I request temporary sysop access to clean up the backlog. Yann does not respond to my query, all other admins (and the bureaucrat) are inactive.

Thank you. -- Prince Kassad 17:56, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done temp for some days, please don't archive this section yet. Prince Kassad, please let us know when You are done there, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 20:59, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm done. -- Prince Kassad 22:12, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
  Done, thank You, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 22:16, 17 July 2008 (UTC)


Filipinayzd@bclwiki / Ringer@bclwiki (2)

I request temporary admin access for Filipinayzd once access expires on 13-10-2008

Thanks. -Filipinayzd 00:32, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Hiya, please request a bit closer (say, like, within a week) of expiration instead. Kylu 04:25, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Right, this is   Not done. We don't schedule userrights terms. --FiliP × 07:32, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Huji@fa Wikisource

I request temporary sysop access on Fa Wikisource to help this now big wiki with some technical issues (CSS, JS, etc). I already have sysop access on many wikis including Meta, Fa Wiktionary, Simple English Wikipedia, etc.

Thank you. Huji 13:42, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Three admins, one is a bureaucrat:
Kaveh, bureaucrat, active 6 July 2008. contribs
Mardetanha, admin, active 6 July 2008. contribs
Pedram.salehpoor, admin, active 6 July 2008. contribs
If the local community agrees to the temporary adminship, the local bureaucrat should perform the promotion and inform the stewards as to when the temporary adminship expires, here. Stewards do not grant rights where there is a local community able to grant that right, see Steward policies. Kylu 22:49, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
  Not done, local crat seems active, please contact him, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 12:10, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
My bad! I myself emailed Kaveh to see if he will still contribute to Fa Wikisource, but then I forgot to remove this request here, which wouldn't be valid upon his return. Huji 16:42, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Prince Kassad@ugwiki

The following discussion is closed.

I request temporary sysop access to clean up the backlog of mostly images which have been moved to Commons, and phase II remains which cannot be tagged for speedy deletion.

  • Language Code: ug
  • List of local sysops: ug:Special:Listadmins (only admin is inactive, last edit January '08)
  • List of local bureaucrats: ug:Special:Listusers/bureaucrat (zero)
  • Local Request Link: no community
  • Local User Page: ug:User:Prince Kassad (doesn't exist since my account is global, if that poses a problem call back)
  • Preferred duration and reason: two or three days are enough

Thank you. -- Prince Kassad 20:22, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

The userpage doesn't exist, but the user does (You have a user# there), so it shouldn't be a problem. Kylu 00:11, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Status set, please let us know when You don't need it anymore (don't archive this request yet). Thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 12:14, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm done. -- Prince Kassad 14:35, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
  Done, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 15:42, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Mww113@wuuwiki

I request temporary sysop access.

  • Language Code: wuu
  • List of local sysops: wuu:Special:Listadmins
  • List of local bureaucrats: wuu:Special:Listusers/bureaucrat
  • Preferred duration and reason: I hate to make a second request but all of the current sysops are inactive and there are oh so many copyvios in the image space. I would like access for 1 week to clean this up. Whilst I don't speak the language, with a translator and common sence, I can understand what I am doing.

Thank you. Mww113 13:13, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

  Not done, I can't find the inactive sysops, please contact them, they are by far not inacitve [34], [35], [36] (see also the log entries), thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 13:17, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Lycaon@tum.wikipedia.org

I request temporary sysop access.

If a steward could pass by on that wiki and delete all those Turkish language files, that would be a satisfactorily option too.
Thank you. Lycaon 14:44, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

tum:Category:Candidates_for_speedy_deletion Kylu 03:43, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
User:Dungodung passed by and fixed most (if not all) of the problems for now. Thanks for promptly acting. Lycaon 08:31, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Ohh, I don't know if I should be sorry or not, because I didn't see this request and I saw kylu asking for a steward that would cleanup the backlog. Oh well, maybe next time, you'll get it :) --FiliP × 08:33, 6 July 2008 (UTC)


XalD@ie Wikipedia

The following discussion is closed.

I request temporary sysop access.

Thank you. ~×~α~£~ đ 18:31, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

And why do you need the sysop tools? Do you have experiences as sysop? --Thogo (talk) 18:32, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
ie.wiki has not active admins. Not really, I only have experience as user. ~×~α~£~ đ 18:43, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Well, a wiki without an active sysop does not necessarily need one. And if you do not have experiences as sysop, you should not gather them on a wiki without help by other active sysops speaking the language in question... --Thogo (talk) 18:45, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
OK, thank you. ~×~α~£~ đ 18:54, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
  Not done Thanks for understanding. Probably best that you gain some experience sysopping first, but your efforts are appreciated. ++Lar: t/c 03:36, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Kylu@scowiki

I request temporary sysop access.

Thank you. Kylu 02:27, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

...and removed, thanks lar. Kylu 02:33, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Alison@gvwiki Manx Gaelic Wikipedia

I request temporary sysop and bureaucrat access.

  • Language Code: gv
  • List of local sysops: gv:Special:Listadmins - one temporary one, gv:User:MacTire02
  • List of local bureaucrats: gv:Special:Listusers/bureaucrat - none
  • Local Request Link: gv:User_talk:MacTire02#Bots_on_the_loose_:.29
  • Local User Page: gv:User:Alison
  • Preferred duration and reason: - one week only. I happened to stop by the wiki and noticed that the usual bots are flooding recentchanges with interwiki links to articles, etc. There are also a number of bogus/vandalism-only accounts which need rename. Also, I'd like to establish the Standard Bot Policy over there, so stewards can deal with this in future with minimum issues. MacTire02 - the only sysop - has given assent to my asking for a temp sysop/'crat bit to clean up the wiki[37], fix the bot issues and establish the usual cross-wiki policy, as he's not really sure what to do. I've done this before on gawiki/gawikti/gdwikti so it'll be no issue at all :) I can speak Irish Gaelic and can just about hack reading Manx Gaelic, so can work over there easy enough. Myself and MacTire02 both speak English and Irish so we're okay.

Thank you / Gura mie ayd / Go raibh maith agat - Alison ❤ 00:07, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

  Done Until 1 July. Jon Harald Søby 10:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Thank you! Working already ... :) - Alison ❤ 16:49, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
I'm all done now over there, and everything running great. I've also locked down the usual high-risk items, as well as done all the renames and bot bits. This wiki is up-to-date for 'cratwork. I also managed, in conjunction with the other sysop, to do some major overhauls on MediaWiki space. All done - desysop/decrat me whenever you like :) Thanks - Alison ❤ 20:35, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
removed--Nick1915 - all you want 23:22, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Teak@hy Wikisource

I request sysop access.

Thank you. Have had temporary access since the creation of the project till today. The local request is a month old with 2 for, 0 againsts. ― Teak 19:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

  Done --Thogo (talk) 19:10, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
changed due to misunderstanding (only 2 votes, community too small), Status granted for 6 months, expiring: 1 Jul 2008--Nick1915 - all you want 16:36, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
removed--Nick1915 - all you want 23:22, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Innv@ruwikinews

Two weeks temporary adminship due to recent serial vandalism and low number of local sysops. Expires July 1. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 10:09, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Update: Temp. rights confirmed by local voting. --~Innvs: 04:43, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

removed--Nick1915 - all you want 23:22, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Tuinui@lo.wiktionary

I request a temporary sysop status for lo.wiktionary. It took me longer that I though to localize the logo.

Thank you. (Tuinui 03:43, 9 April 2008 (UTC))

Granted until July 9 --FiLiP ¤ 07:40, 9 April 2008 (UTC).
Thanks FiLip.(Tuinui 08:13, 9 April 2008 (UTC))
removed--Shizhao 02:58, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

PhiLiP@zhwiktionary

Jorge W. Bush mass vandal in zh.wiktionary, temporary permissions fro help anti-vandal fight. expires: 12-07-2008   Done--Shizhao 08:54, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Removed. --FiliP × 22:16, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

MacTire02@gv wikipedia

I request sysop access.

Thank you. MacTire02 17:06, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, sorry but the announcement on the local request page is from today, please give the local community some time (a week at least) to respond to Your request, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 17:10, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Do you wish me to resubmit in a week's time or shall I leave it at that? I only applied today as there are no real active users on the project apart from myself and Norrin Strange who has only been active once in the last month. MacTire02 17:39, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
If You wish we could leave it open here and wait, but if You think there will be no votes, I could offer You a temporary sysop status, because in small communities we do not grant permanent status as the votings are not representative. Technically it is exactly the same, You just come back here shortly before the status expires and let us know everything is fine. If You agree to this offer I would make You temp-sysop for 3 months to start. Best regards (and thanks for joining betawiki for the interface-translations! gv can really need some help over there), --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 17:45, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Temp-sysop status would be fine. I really can't see there being any votes unfortunately. I'm just really hoping more people would join our community so we could make a proper go of it. I have been on the community only a few months and it is quite dead. I normally don't nominate myself for things but we do need an active sysop to keep things clean there. As regards the betawiki, no problem! Kind regards, --MacTire02 17:53, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
  Done, expires: 12-07-2008, ok, great, I agree, this project needs an active sysop. Please feel free to make a voting as soon as there are some other active users or if not please come back here just some days before Your status expires and we will prolong it then. Thanks, kind regards to You too, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 17:59, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
P.S. please keep in mind to translate the interface only on the betawiki although it can be alluring to just do it locally :)
The translations added on betawiki need some days to show up in the local wiki. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 18:02, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks a million Spacebirdy. --MacTire02 18:32, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Removed. --FiliP × 22:16, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Kanon6917@ay wikipedia

I request sysop access.

Thank you. Kanon6917 20:11, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

One vote does not represent consensus. We can give you temporary status (for example, 3 months), which can be prolonged later. --FiLiP ¤ 22:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
  Done for 3 months to expire on 2008-07-13. That site has only 280 registered users including only 2 admins.--Jusjih 23:38, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Removed. --FiliP × 22:16, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Mww113@wuuwiki

I request temporary sysop access. I was told by wpedzich to make a third rfp if after contacting the active local sysop, and receving no reply.

Thank you Mww113 11:48, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done for a week. No reply from one of 4 local sysops who have been elected on the project, very few edits of the only active sysop and Mww seems to know what there is to be done. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 11:50, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. Mww113 11:51, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello,
I'm a local sysop of wuu. I'm very surprised by this approval. There was no emergency (most of the copyvio were deleted by myself, an imports were quite old).
When there will be a new request for the wuu wikipedia permission, please leave the administrators a message and wait at least one day (of course not if it's a real emergency).
Also note that there is a local procedure to request sysop status.
Regards
--Hercule 13:54, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Removed, expiry date reached. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 19:34, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

AlefZet@kaa wikipedia

I request temporary sysop access.

Thank you. AlefZet 20:04, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

  Done, per request 1 month, please feel free to come back before Your status expires if You need to prolong it, expires 18-07-2008, please remember to translate the interface at betawiki: only and to upload images preferably at commons:, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 20:07, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Removed by Spacebirdy, in 23 June 2008--Shizhao 07:20, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

LordAnubisBOT@ar wikipedia

I request import access for this bot account. I am a bureaucrat on the Arabic Wikipedia and I am making this request on behalf of Arabic Wikipedia community. Community discussion

Thank you. Meno25 16:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done FiliP × 16:29, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Requests for global permissions

Global rollback for tj9991

Status:    Not done

I've done a vast amount of counter-vandalism work on the English Wikipedia, as you can see by looking through my contribs. I have amounted what I estimate to be nearly 4000 edits containing counter-vandalism work, and would like to extend my patrol. --Tj9991 11:15, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

  Oppose I oppose this request. You don't show any activity except on en.wikipedia, hence no use of a global tool. guillom 13:36, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Oppose, no cross-wiki activity, can ask for local rollbacker, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 14:09, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Oppose I do not think that the applicant has read the first two paragraphs of the relevant page. --M/ 14:15, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Not done. You do not have a global account, and you are not active in crosswiki countervandalism. Countervandalism on one wiki is also a valuable contribution, but you should request access at w:Wikipedia:Requests for permissions instead. —{admin} Pathoschild 16:55:43, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Global rollback for Cometstyles

Status:    Done

I'd like to request global rollback permissions as part of the SWMT to help me easily revert vandalism on smaller wikis, its a pain to revert big pages on dial-up :DD ..--Cometstyles 05:33, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm very active over the long term in crosswiki countervandalism: afwiki, akwiki, astwiki, azwiki, bugwiki, enwikisource, et cetera. I was active in locking abusive global accounts until that access was removed from Meta bureaucrats. I'm a bureaucrat and admin on various wikis, and an active volunteer for the small wiki monitoring team.--Cometstyles 06:22, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support I endorse Comets, very active swmt member, ;) thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 14:09, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support A reliable user that has proved to be active on several projects. --M/ 14:15, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support sure--Nick1915 - all you want 14:24, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support Endorse this active and trustworthy user. Note that stewards are discussing how exactly to implement the grant/review process so please be patient if the right is not granted immediately. ++Lar: t/c 15:20, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support He is already doing a lot of tasks for which rollback may be very useful; reliable and active user. --Millosh 01:04, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - yes Oh, yes! :-) --Filnik 19:34, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - yes Respected/trusted user across multiple wikis. Cirt 19:43, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support —DerHexer (Talk) 10:44, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - Yes please; hard working and a good guy. —Giggy 11:07, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support --Thogo (talk) 13:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - Comets is one of the few people who I think should have these rights. They are extremely capable & I trust them completely. --Herby talk thyme 13:04, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - Not that he needs anymore endorsement, but he'll get great with global rollback. Majorly talk 13:50, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Note: I shifted some non steward comments to "comment" from "yes" but left the Yes-ness in place ++Lar: t/c 04:56, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

  Done, clear consense reached (plus we need it badly right now), --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 00:10, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Global rollback for Mardetanha

Status:    Done
same as Cometstyles i am part of SWMT and i hope by this access i could be more helpful to fight against vandals--Mardetanha talk 05:46, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Also i have had an active account on more 670 project and i have some sysop and bureaucrat flag among them.also i have done lots of vandalism revert in wikiwide projects and also i am willing to act more--Mardetanha talk 07:59, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support I endorse Mardetanha, active swmt member, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 14:09, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support A reliable user that has proved to be active on several projects. --M/ 14:15, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support sure--Nick1915 - all you want 14:24, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support Endorse this active and trustworthy user. Note that stewards are discussing how exactly to implement the grant/review process so please be patient if the right is not granted immediately. ++Lar: t/c 15:20, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support Reliable and active user. --Millosh 01:06, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - yes Agree with Lar. Cirt 19:44, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - yes :P --Filnik 19:55, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support —DerHexer (Talk) 10:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support --Thogo (talk) 13:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Done, clear consense reached (plus we need it badly right now), --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 00:10, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Global rollback for .snoopy.

Status:    Done
same as Cometstyles I am a member SWMT. It can be useful for me to have this rights, thanks all. Cheers --.snoopy. 06:20, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
some links are la.wikipedia, tr.wiki, sh.wiki, roa-rup.wiktictionary, pl.wikipedia, na.wikibooks, kv.wiki, all, wiki with .snoopy. user and flag. In the rights log there are some request of temporal permission. --.snoopy. 07:06, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support I endorse snoopy, active swmt member, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 14:09, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support A reliable user that has proved to be active on several projects. --M/ 14:15, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support sure--Nick1915 - all you want 14:24, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support Endorse this active and trustworthy user. Note that stewards are discussing how exactly to implement the grant/review process so please be patient if the right is not granted immediately. ++Lar: t/c 15:20, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support Reliable and active user. Per birdy, too. --Millosh 01:07, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - yes As above. When you talk about patrolling snoopy is the man (or the dog? :P) --Filnik 19:28, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment ROTFLOL ^___^ --.snoopy. 07:36, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - yes Respected/reliable/active on multiple projects. Cirt 19:45, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support —DerHexer (Talk) 10:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - Yes; does good work in vandal fighting and is a nice guy. —Giggy 11:07, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support --Thogo (talk) 13:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Done, clear consense reached (plus we need it badly right now), --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 00:10, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Global rollback for Az1568

Status:    Done

I'd like to request global rollback since it would allow me to easily revert spam and vandalism (ex: afwiki, wowiki, kgwiki, iewiki, jbowiki, rmowiki, global contrib list) that I may come across while monitoring small/inactive wikis as member of the SWMT. --Az1568 06:31, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

  Support I endorse Az1568's request; he's been a long time member of the SWMT and I fully trust he'll use this tool wisely. guillom 13:36, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support I endorse Az, active swmt member, thanks for all Your work, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 14:09, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support A specially reliable user that has proved to be active on several projects. --M/ 14:15, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support sure--Nick1915 - all you want 14:24, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - yes - Very useful, and an active member of the SWAT :P ..--Cometstyles 23:07, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support Per guillom and birdy. --Millosh 01:08, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - yes Trusted on multiple projects, will use it well. Cirt 19:46, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support —DerHexer (Talk) 10:45, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support --Thogo (talk) 13:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - I've known Az for a very long time now. They are extremely capable & I trust them completely. --Herby talk thyme 13:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - Not that he needs anymore endorsement, but he'll get great with global rollback. Majorly talk 13:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Done, clear consense reached (plus we need it badly right now), --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 00:10, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Global rollback for Herbythyme

Status:    Done

I won't be offended if this request is rejected :) I'd not be likely to make great use of this but I would use it to deal with cross wiki spam placed aggressively. For the most part I would prefer an informative narrative rather than simply rollback but it would help cleaning in some cases. I guess quite a few people know me and I am fairly active these days across wikis. It would be helpful. Wikimatrix is here.

Thanks --Herby talk thyme 07:24, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

  Support I endorse Herby, cross-wiki spam fighter, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 14:09, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support A reliable user that has proved to be active on several projects. --M/ 14:15, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support sure--Nick1915 - all you want 14:24, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Oppose to not granting. I do not think that not giving Rollback to Herby would be a good idea. :) ++Lar: t/c 15:20, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Make sure you count the negatives
So, you do not not agree that not not granting Herby rollback would not be a bad idea? Kylu 19:50, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Absolutely not. not. ++Lar: t/c 23:00, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - yes Playing with negation are we? O_O, well in any case, Herby's cross-wiki spam fighting contributions has been excellent, so yup..--Cometstyles 23:05, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support Per birdy. --Millosh 01:08, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - yes Trustworthy person, pretty kind, and yes, he's active :-) --Filnik 19:32, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - yes Per M7. Cirt 19:47, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support —DerHexer (Talk) 10:51, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - Yes. Per Lar, I'm not sure if Herby is trustworthy enough. ;-) —Giggy 11:07, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
That should be you're not sure he's not trustworthy enough. :) ++Lar: t/c 13:06, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Now I'm confused. —Giggy 13:24, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - yes per birdy.--Ahonc 12:32, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support --Thogo (talk) 13:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Done, clear consense reached (plus we need it badly right now), --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 00:10, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Global rollback for Werdan7

Status:    Done

I know that I won't use it as much as some of the people above me, but I do some cross wiki vandal fighting (dewiki, enbooks, shwiki, simplebooks, simplequote, simplewikt, siwiki, wikispecies) and this would be helpful.--Werdan7T @ 08:11, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

  Support I endorse Werdan7, active swmt member, thanks for helping, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 14:10, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support A reliable user that has proved to be active on several projects. --M/ 14:15, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support sure--Nick1915 - all you want 14:24, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support Reliable and active user. Per birdy, too. --Millosh 01:09, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - yes Per M7. Cirt 19:48, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support —DerHexer (Talk) 10:47, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - Yes; hard working, and very helpful in recent interactions. —Giggy 11:07, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support --Thogo (talk) 13:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Done, clear consense reached (plus we need it badly right now), --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 00:10, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Global rollback for Mike.lifeguard

Status:    Done

Admin at enwb (+crat +CU), commons, meta (+oversight) & generally active cross-wiki doing anti-vandalism/anti-spam.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 13:05, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

  Support I endorse Mike, active swmt member, thanks for helping, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 14:09, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support A reliable user that has proved to be active on several projects. --M/ 14:15, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support sure--Nick1915 - all you want 14:24, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support Endorse this active and trustworthy user. Note that stewards are discussing how exactly to implement the grant/review process so please be patient if the right is not granted immediately. ++Lar: t/c 15:20, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support Well known, reliable and active user. Per birdy, too. --Millosh 01:10, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - yes Another Trustworthy person :-) --Filnik 19:33, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - yes Per M7 and Lar. Cirt 19:48, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support —DerHexer (Talk) 10:46, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - Yes, definitely a good guy. —Giggy 11:07, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support --Thogo (talk) 13:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - Mike is extremely capable & I trust him completely. --Herby talk thyme 13:05, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Done, clear consense reached (plus we need it badly right now), --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 00:10, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Global rollback for MF-Warburg

Status:    Done

Like those above, I do vandalfighting on SWMT (e.g. [38], [39], [40], [41], [42]) and I think global rollback will be helpful for this. MF-W 19:22, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

  Support, definitly, active swmt member, thanks for helping, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 19:23, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - yes Per birdy. Cirt 19:49, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support Birdy's rarely wrong in her judgements of people, plus, I've seen MF around and MF is an active helper. ++Lar: t/c 04:50, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support Definitely. guillom 08:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support Active and trusted user. --M/ 09:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support —DerHexer (Talk) 10:45, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support --Thogo (talk) 13:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support Active and trusted user. --Millosh 07:19, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Global rollback for Fabexplosive

Status:    Done

Same as other I'm a generally active member of SWMT (some contrib here: ar.wiki, gu.books, fi.quote, it.quote). I could be more helpful with global rb right for speedly rollback vandalism. Thanks --Fabexplosive The archive man 18:57, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

  Support My impression is that this user does a bang up job Fab-ulous good work. ++Lar: t/c 19:54, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - yes I think that he can use the botton [rollback] :P So, no reasons to say no. --Filnik 20:45, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment are there other rollbacks outside his home wiki besides those four linked in the request? I can't find them. IMHO this user is not an active member of SWMT, are userpage creations across projects considered vandal fighting? Does he really need it? Instead of asking why we shouldn't grant him global rollback let's see why we should.--208.97.167.7 21:12, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment I have make other contrib, ex. this: [43], please check this list for my other contrib: ts. --Fabexplosive The archive man 07:22, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support Fine for me. es:Drini 02:21, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - yes good user --Stef Mec 07:39, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support --FiliP × 07:53, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support The user is reliable and has proved to be active on several projects. --M/ 08:27, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment trusted user! --.snoopy. 08:59, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support sure--Nick1915 - all you want 09:54, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support Active and trusted user. --Millosh 07:20, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support'support' —DerHexer (Talk) 08:06, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - A trustworthy and active SWMT member...--Cometstyles 10:10, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
  •   Done ++Lar: t/c 20:22, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Global rollback for VasilievVV

Status:    Done

I am one of the SWMT members and this flag will help me with reverting vandalism across the wikis (I'm also on dial-up sometimes...) — vvv 20:52, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

  Comment - yes VasilievVV is valuable asset for wiki --Mardetanha talk 21:42, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support yes please. Jon Harald Søby 21:59, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support Drni vouches. es:Drini 02:20, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support --FiliP × 07:53, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support, wise and active "global" contributor. --M/ 08:27, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment trusted user! --.snoopy. 08:59, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support sure--Nick1915 - all you want 09:55, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - yes really trusted user :-) --Filnik 18:10, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support Active and trusted wunderkind :) --Millosh 07:20, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support'support' Rollback is no big deal. —DerHexer (Talk) 08:08, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - yes: trusted user.--Ahonc 08:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
  •   Done ++Lar: t/c 20:41, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions/2008-07&oldid=5738171"