Stewards/Confirm/2014/Wpedzich

The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

Wpedzich edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: pl, en, de-2
Personal info: As usual, repeating myself like an old record, I am not one of the most active stewards. In the past 12 months my activities mostly concerned an LTA case of a particularly stubborn character whose home edits were done at pl.wikipedia. I am also usually around on the IRC channel to help out in emergencies. If the Community wishes to maintain my steward status, I will be happy to serve yet another year as the second-liner of this great team.

español:

Idiomas: pl, en, de-2
Información personal: Como de costumbre, repitiéndome a mí mismo con un disco rayado, no soy uno de los stewards más activos. En los últimos doce meses la mayoría de mis actividades estuvieron relacionadas con un caso LTA (abuso a largo plazo) de un personaje particularmente terco cuya wiki de origen era pl.wikipedia. También me encuentro disponible usualmente en el canal de IRC para ayudar durante emergencias. Si la comunidad decide mantener mi estatus de steward, estaré feliz de servir por otro año más desde la segunda línea de este gran equipo.

русский:

Языки: en
Личная информация: translation needed

Deutsch:

Sprachen: en
Informationen zur Person: Übersetzung nötig

Comments about Wpedzich edit

Keep Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico Wouters ^msg 18:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ptjackyll (talk) 18:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep While I'd love to see Wpedzich more active, they have always been fairly active on a regular basis for years. No concerns. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep John F. Lewis (talk) 18:54, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep basically agree with what Snowolf said. Not the most active, but still quite an asset to the steward team. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 19:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Weak" keep --Alan ^(talk) 20:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK. I trust him. --►Cekli 829 20:32, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 20:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~~EBE123~~ ^talk_Contribs 21:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, and with a passion. The way you treated me on IRC last year is absolutely unacceptable for a steward. odder (talk) 23:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please elaborate? To oppose somebody's reconfirmation based on a single incident is pretty harsh, and so maybe a bit of background into this would be useful for us to understand this. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 23:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Snowolf: I'll try to dig some logs, but in the meantime, I'll let Wpedzich respond to this if he wants to. odder (talk) 23:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I do not recall the incident as especially harsh, so the passionate vote is a little exaggerated in my books. It was not the first time we disagreed on some principles either, as well as not the first time I removed you from the channel, the first case having ended up in plwiki's ArbCom. On the other hand, the previous ArbCom's decision was not very favourable to you, and the current decision to remove you from PLWikipedia's IRC channel has not - as far as I can remember - been objected to by any of the several channel ops who can see and alter the banlist. On the... what, third? hand - I am surprised that the passionate vote came up as a result of lack of communication on the matter and is severely limited in its range to an IRC channel of plwiki, which is not per se part of the wikimedia wikis. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 11:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Wojciech Pędzich: What a load of bollocks. Firstly, you know full well that you and I have never been part of the same ArbCom case; not to mention that that particular ArbCom case had nothing to do with your removing me from #wikipedia-pl. Secondly, you know full well that I am not currently banned from #wikipedia-pl, and thirdly — seeing that you were a member of the Polish Wikipedia ArbCom when it decided to extend its jurisdiction to IRC channels, I can only say that your last sentence is the biggest example of hypocrisy I have seen on a Wikimedia wiki in a long time. odder (talk) 14:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 23:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 03:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 03:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep :-D --Glaisher [talk] 05:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 11:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep wise, sensible and mature. Pundit (talk) 16:11, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral pending review of odder's objections. --Abd (talk) 19:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zerabat (talk) 01:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. LlamaAl (talk) 02:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Risker (talk) 03:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guycn2 (talk) 18:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AGK [•] 19:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK for me from what I've seen. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 17:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course Trijnstel_talk 22:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No concerns. Mathonius (talk) 12:43, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, reasonably active and friendly. Elfix 18:32, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 15:56, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Midnight Gambler (talk) 10:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, nothing to complain about. ;-) —DerHexer (Talk) 18:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 06:31, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:36, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~ DanielTom (talk) 18:45, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 20:46, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 01:25, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 09:24, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, no issues here. Jafeluv (talk) 13:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yeah.--Pratyya ^(Hello!) 07:28, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]