Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat/Archives/2018-06

Userpage spam

User: MarinaGaby2490 It's in spanish. Cæs tc 04:42, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

It is arguably not Spanish. Please, appreciate that I completely abstained from personal attacks. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 05:14, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Category:Deleteme is regularly patrolled by admins already who will get to this report, no need to report here unless there is something extremely urgent or unusual. — xaosflux Talk 13:00, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Gadget-renameQueueReason.js needs hotfix

Per phab:T196268 - a UI change was made in CentralAuth extension. Now global rename interface doesn't populate reason field automatically. Please replace the content of MediaWiki:Gadget-renameQueueReason.js with this hotfix :

if ((mw.config.get('wgCanonicalSpecialPageName') === "GlobalRenameQueue") && document.getElementById('mw-renamequeue-reason')) $('input[name="reason"]')[0].value = 'per [[m:'+mw.config.get('wgPageName')+'|request]]';

Thanks --Framawiki (talk) 13:28, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

  Done @Framawiki: please confirm that it is functioning as expected  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:26, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Hotfix confirmed. Thanks! — regards, Revi 14:44, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by:  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:05, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Please delete page

Can someone delete the page User:Jeblad/external-articles/style.css, it seems like some overly fancy magic makes life hard… ;) The page is copied, so nothing will (or should) be broken. — Jeblad 23:26, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Done. Matiia (talk) 23:27, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
:This section was archived on a request by: --Alaa  :)..! 23:28, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Please protect this page

Please protect this page for a long period because of constant vandalism from IP and the page needs not be edited at all actually. It is an archive. –Ammarpad (talk) 23:39, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

  Done  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:00, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by:  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:05, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Report concerning (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA) Persistently vandalizing Tegel talk page. SA 13 Bro (talk) 11:59, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

  managed by someone  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:45, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: SA 13 Bro (talk) 14:10, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Report concerning (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA) Proxies vandal. SA 13 Bro (talk) 13:41, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: SA 13 Bro (talk) 14:09, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Request for patroller permissions on Meta for Krassotkin

If it does not contradict anything, I can join the group of patrollers on Meta to rollback vandalism (by the proposal, my contributions, and SUL). --sasha (krassotkin) 11:55, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Sure, a very experienced vandal fighter. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:09, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
  Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:18, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: SA 13 Bro (talk) 19:38, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Autopatrolled rights and patrolled rights

Hello. Remove my autopatrolled rights and keep my patroller rights — reduant groups. Marshmallych 19:23, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Done. Patroller includes autopatrol. --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:07, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 20:07, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Request for Rollback rights on Meta-Wiki


Growing in the WM movement, I've had so many encounters with vandalism and used my little undo capability to fix such issue. This usually happens on Meta and Sometimes, I face multiple vandalism so it's difficult to undo and I see the need for a rollback right. In this regard, I request for a rollback right so as to facilitate my helping the community to combat vandalism. Thanks

--Alangi Derick (talk) 17:23, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

  Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:25, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:25, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Thank you very much Steinsplitter, much appreciated :) --Alangi Derick (talk) 17:45, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Delete pages

Some of my user pages should be deleted

Hope this is all! ;) — Jeblad 09:08, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

  Done --Az1568 (talk) 09:11, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Bugger, it had crept in a ".js" that shouldn't be there! Seems like it become almost right anyhow, but delete User:Jeblad/external-articles-dev-v0.0/script.css. Sorry for my mixup. — Jeblad 09:22, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
  Not done Please label with {{delete}} so you identify the right pages rather than others.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:54, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: — regards, Revi 08:51, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Notice to administrators — consideration of application of autopatrol right

Special:Abusefilter/161 has been implemented in a rather strict means to stop the editing of another person's user page. This has come about due to local abuse and the consequential impact upon global user pages. For the history please see the archives of this page, and reviewing the filter itself.

Consequences of the filter as written is that it restricts the ability of general users without administrator- or bureaucrat-allocated rights from reporting spambots or direct abuse by new users. With this filter, the means to allow trusted users to mark problematic pages is to allocate the autopatrol right.

If the administration of this filter is problematic, then we can look to changing the filter to manage the acceptable users by other means; or let us restart the conversation and look to the manner and amount of abuse that we will accept, the process to removal, and our tolerance for abused user pages to show globally.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:29, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

This is a very sensible measure. – Ajraddatz (talk) 22:39, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
It is new, but most of the stops are legitimate, for a few false positives (namely the tagging of pages for speedy deletion) the quick fixes are the give the taggers autopatrol if they warrant it - that way they are able to proceed in the future. — xaosflux Talk 11:16, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Agree with Ajraddatz & Xaosflux. I suggest to use user_rights-->autopatrol instead of contains_any->user_groups-->array --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:10, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
@Steinsplitter: agree, optimized to that. — xaosflux Talk 13:57, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Note, we are stopping bot operators from editing their bot user pages, though they can resolve this.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:49, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Good. Sorry to miss the feast, I was mostly offline on May 4–7. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:26, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

What do you mean by feast? Matiia (talk) 17:09, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
I mean setting the filter up and observing a rapidly growing log. But I fortunately returned soon enough to help mitigate some adverse effects of it. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:41, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
I think we are still being a bit aggressive on this one (though it IS catching lots of nonconstructve edits), perhaps exempting users that are (autoconfirmed + 20edits) or the like would be sufficient. Any thoughts? — xaosflux Talk 19:52, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
I don't think that we are at that point. Looking deeper at the interactions, I think that 20 is too low, especially looking at who is prowling around, and the assessment of their behaviour at other sites.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:44, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
As a comment, this is stopping amounts of IP edits on user pages, and vandalism of user pages. It is also stopping some users editing bot pages, and some labelling spam pages, and where appropriate patrolling rights are allocated. [Personally checking filter daily, and responding daily].  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:10, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

My old friend from en.wp?

This guy, possibly, seem to be active on my talk page on, and on he.wp. (Earlier tonight they were active on my commons page.) I'm not sure if it is "my old friend", or not; it might be an impersonator. In any case, please protect my user pages, Thanks, --Huldra (talk) 02:23, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Root user pages are protected by abuse from irregular editors.  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:35, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Nope. The text is still visible on he.wp, and in the history on, --Huldra (talk) 02:42, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
@Huldra: this page is only for help with issues here on the metawiki. hewiki has 39 admins, and enwikiquote has 25 that could help you there. If you are requesting a global block, you will need to post at: Steward_requests/Global. — xaosflux Talk 02:55, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
A global block is of virtually zero he gets a new IP in no time. What I need is a global protect on my user pages, --Huldra (talk) 02:59, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
You are at Meta asking about user pages, so my replace needs to be meta root pages are protected. Pages at other wikis need to be requested at local wikis, as not under meta admin management.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:07, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Well, I have been asking for a global protect (of my user page) forever...that doesn't seem to be going anywhere. So while I'm no longer harassed on en.wp (it is permanently semi protected), I am harassed at commons, wikiquote, de.wp, he.wp, and here. And there are what, a hundred or two more wikiprojects where I can expect his harassment. To ask for protection on each and every one of those wikis is simply not feasible (I don't even speak/understand Hebrew). A global semi protect of user pages is much needed. --Huldra (talk) 20:52, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

@Huldra:. There is no easy global protection available—well not one that I am willing to apply without clear instruction from the community, and without horrid precedent.

I am asking the following for good governance reasons, not through doubt. Can you please point to examples of where you have had your user pages abused outside of home wikis, and wikis where you do not edit. Pointing to the respective deletion logs would be most convenient.

It should be possible for us to write a global filter that will be limiting people creating user pages on those wikis that are covered by global abusefilters (noting that global != universal, as global filters do not run on most big wikis). I would not want to write a filter that limits any actions by those with advanced rights at a local wiki, nor limit editing to any existing pages, as they are controlled by local wikis, so should be outside the terms of this discussion.

Noting that this is not a usual practice to write filters for an individual's protection. It should also be seen as not setting a precedent for how these matters should be handled, and this sort of intervention should be as light as possible at a global level. So prior to implementing such a measure I would expect a level of consensus by stewards/global admins/meta admins that this is a reasonable and practical action; and it is without an outcry from the community. (I am not certain that this is the ideal page to have this conversation, and suggest that Stewards' noticeboard or SRM may be more appropriate if we are looking to utilise global abusefilters in this way.)  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:23, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

@Billinghurst: Here is the log from Hebrew wikipedia (which I dont edit, as I dont speak Hebrew), Here is the history (still not oversighted) on, another wiki which I have never edited. And here is my deleted page on de.wp (another wiki which I dont edit), deleted due to "Vandalismus". (You can also see the lots of deleted edits on my home wiki, that is en.wp, but that has ..thankfully... been semi protected for years. My commons logs, my meta log, Meta talk logs).
All of this really started about 3 years ago, when I got a SUL account...--Huldra (talk) 23:40, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
(outdenting) I don't think creating global abuse filter rules for protecting userspace pages with one title (one user) is a good idea at all. — xaosflux Talk 15:36, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Why not? --Huldra (talk) 22:04, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
As billinghurst said, global abusefilter does not apply on all wikis despite the name, and it consumes limited server resources that should be (IMO) better spent with more generic rules. — regards, Revi 10:02, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
If there is any compelling reason to do so, (technically) stewards/meta admins can prevent that specific pagename from being created with Titleblacklist - but I'm not sure if this is a good idea. I think we are setting a bad precedent. (And I agree if we want to do something @ global level this should be moved to SRM or SN.) — regards, Revi 10:02, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

I need help reviewing a Global RFC

Dear admins, I am preparing a Global Request for Comments about financial support for admins that might be relevant for you .

Can you please review the draft and give me some feedback about how to improve it? Thank you.

MassMessage sent by Micru on 18:00, 7 June 2018 (UTC)


Please add me to patroller group to enable me use rollback feature. –Ammarpad (talk) 09:08, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

  Done --Base (talk) 17:58, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Base (talk) 17:58, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Report concerning Різати животи вікіпедисти б л я д ь

Різати животи вікіпедисти б л я д ь (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA)Reasons: Vandalism.   — Jeff G. ツ 13:20, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

  managed by stewards  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:30, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
@Billinghurst: My understanding is that global locks and blocks do not affect Meta, to allow for appeals.   — Jeff G. ツ 13:34, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Account locks affect on Meta, but global IP blocks are exempted. Stryn (talk) 13:36, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
@Stryn: Thank you, sorry for misunderstanding.   — Jeff G. ツ 13:38, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
and conversely we cannot lock IP addresses, and cannot globally block accounts; note the different functionalities.  — billinghurst sDrewth 16:55, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Stryn (talk) 13:39, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Report concerning Rollerhurst

Rollerhurst (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA)Reasons: Vandalism.   — Jeff G. ツ 13:31, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

As above, nothing to do here because account is already locked. Stryn (talk) 13:39, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Stryn (talk) 13:39, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Mark for translation

The content of Wikimedia User Group Hong Kong was updated quite a lot. Please help checking the translation markup and mark this revision for translation. Thank you. BTW. If I got the wrong place to request, please direct me. --J.Wong 02:29, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Did it. — regards, Revi 14:37, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: — regards, Revi 14:37, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Change content model

Hello, I think that you can safely set the content type of Meta:AddMe/Config to JSON. It'll avoid this stranger render. Thanks --Framawiki (talk) 18:27, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

I am not sure extension translate would like it. Have you tried this anywhere? --Base (talk) 19:38, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
It does not work well with translate extension. Showing <translate><!-- T01 --></translate> tags. If you are fine with this... — regards, Revi 13:56, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Report concerning (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA)Reasons: I was trying to fix broken wiki-markup but some one disallowed me....Error message: Error: This action has been automatically identified as harmful, and therefore disallowed. If you believe your action was constructive, please inform an administrator of what you were trying to do. A brief description of the abuse rule which your action matched is: Antivandalism 11:12, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Help with announcing a consultation


Hi, I'd like to call Creation of separate user group for editing sitewide CSS/JS to the communities' attention. That involves getting it translated, and sending out messages to the village pumps (see plan here). I'd like to request either a translationadmin's / massmessager's help, or the required permissions for a couple weeks. I'm a translation admin on and occasionally send messages via the command-line version of MassMessage (which I can use as a developer with shell access; it is however not as useful for large-scale notifications like this) so I know how to use them.

Thanks! -- Tgr (talk) 17:51, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

I feel that page should be a subpage of Requests for comments (but CSS/JS should be changed to CSS & JS or something else to avoid creating another subpage). Thanks. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 18:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
I think there's an expectation that an RfC is a decisionmaking process while a consultation is not, which is why I tried to avoid calling it an RfC. --Tgr (talk) 16:41, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Community Consultation seems to be a doublespeak way of inviting an RfC. Killiondude (talk) 06:44, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

@Tgr and me have talked about this on #wikimedia-dev today. This is not really a consultation but a notification that the changes are going to be implemented, but with the communities also able to post feedback on the changes. In my opinion, this should be clearly said in the introduction of the page to avoid people thinking this is a proposed technical decision.

About rights: Tgr asked me if I could grant him massmessage-sender and translationadmin permissions temporary for a month or so. I have no issues. I am filing Meta:Requests for translation adminship/Tgr. Ideally the permissions could be granted together to expire both at the same time. He requests two months.

Regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:13, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

@Matiia: Do you think we can speedy-grant Tgr both massmessage-sender and translationadmin at this point? Thanks. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 18:58, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Yeah, it should be fine. Matiia (talk) 23:00, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
  Done both for two months (@Tgr). —MarcoAurelio (talk) 09:58, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: — regards, Revi 10:04, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

User page needs deleting, user probably needs to be blocked

See User:Derpy world, pretty clearly vandalism.

Also, could I get some user rights? I don't expect to become an admin (like I am on en.wikipedia), but I had to come here because I was not allowed to tag the page with the delete template. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:36, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Your edits was triggered by the abuse filter #161, which was last modified by Billinghurst, I have tagged the user page to request for deletion. SA 13 Bro (talk) 06:19, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Earlier this day there was the exact same vandalism, so this is the person's second account. See Coedwig. XenrøsE 06:57, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

  Done existing, known, half-wit.  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:07, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: — regards, Revi 10:04, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

some troll or other

  Note: This is EnglishEfternamn/RJCola and should be locked on sight. - TNT 21:59, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Is harassing me today. Most of it is on en.wp, but they used the email function here under the name “ForresterMax” to send me like 20 blank emails. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:26, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

I locked the account. – Ajraddatz (talk) 00:34, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
thank you! Beeblebrox (talk) 08:24, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

They are back as User:WikiHate, doing the same thing right now. They had a whole sockfarm stacked up at en.wp, it might be a good idea to cross check with CUs there, but it looks like this account was created just to send blank emails to me. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:47, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Now global locked by Rxy. SA 13 Bro (talk) 21:51, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
@Beeblebrox: Please check your email, I've sent you one in relation to this - TNT 21:55, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
  Done thanks. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:07, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: — regards, Revi 10:04, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

False Error Message

Recently editted and removed my own request for a name change from the Stewards page(Older Username: AaronL***** - New Username: Levi.Ethan), it resulted in a false warning "Automatically identified as harmful". This edit is document that it was not harmful, just a deletion of my own post now that it was rendered unnecessary. Is post removal something a user should wait for a Steward to do? — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Levi.Ethan (talk)

Filter does not like new users removing slabs of text. It is usually problematic. Don't fuss it. just close your task, or mark it not to be actioned.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:22, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: — regards, Revi 10:06, 3 July 2018 (UTC)


User:STEFANY CHAR STEFANY CHAR STEFANY CHAR seems to be a Vandalism-only account. Thanks, and sincerely, XenrøsE 05:21, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

  Locked globally as long term abuser. @Xenrose: most of this accounts (clear vandalism username/Vandalism only accounts) usually refer to long term abuse user, so you should but the request here. Best --Alaa :)..! 05:43, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: — regards, Revi 10:05, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Translations:Wikimedia movement affiliates/Page display title/km

The deletion template was unable link to CAT:DEL, the page created by the IP look like not a translations. SA 13 Bro (talk) 17:05, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Deleted instead the translation page Wikimedia movement affiliates/km (Translations:Wikimedia movement affiliates/Page display title/km was the only translation unit that existed). Stryn (talk) 17:09, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: — regards, Revi 10:05, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Commentaire bloqué

Mon commentaire sur la page s’est retrouvé bloqué automatiquement avec le commentaire suivant : « Warning: This action has been automatically identified as harmful. Unconstructive edits will be quickly reverted, and may result in your account or IP address being blocked from editing. If this action is constructive, you may submit it again, and report this error. We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience. »
Je ne sais pas ce que ça veut dire, mais ça bloque ! :-(( 11:00, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Yes, the filter does not like some part of your text. The debug tools are not very useful to tell which bit was a problem. All I can seay is that it is looking for English-language swear words.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:16, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
@Billinghurst: Do you think we can draft some Phabricator Task to request the feature of highlighting which part of a diff does match with a given filter? —MarcoAurelio (talk) 18:59, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
That sounds like a useful improvement to the tools. — xaosflux Talk 22:17, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
regex101 has a little tester that works pretty good for an online tool. — xaosflux Talk 22:19, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
@Billinghurst: / @MarcoAurelio: it matched on the phrase idiotxaosflux Talk 22:17, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Special:Abusefilter/57 and I don't think that use of the word idiot is a reasonable word to block an edit.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:18, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by:  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:47, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

User:ร้อยตรี โชคดี


What happen on User:ร้อยตรี โชคดี on Meta-Wiki ? He told me that account was blocked from Meta-Wiki and he do not anything.

Regard yours. --B20180 (talk) 09:09, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

  1. Your section link is wrong, seemingly th:คุยกับผู้ใช้:B20180 #สวัสดีครับ_2 is the correct one.
  2. The user is possibly not specific or has mistaken ideas about blocks. If his/her IP is under hard block on a specific site (Meta-wiki or else), then s/he can’t edit; it’s independent of status of his/her account.
Either exact MediaWiki message shown to the user or the user’s IP (note that publishing of the latter infringes privacy) can be helpful. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:24, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you sir. --B20180 (talk) 09:35, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by:  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:48, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Mark page for translation

Hello! I would need this page marked for translation: Basque_Wikimedians_User_Group/Reports/2017-2018_school_year. The page is currently in Basque, but I have the Spanish translation ready to be uploaded to /es. Can someone help me with this? thanks! -Theklan (talk) 16:35, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

I'm going to tweak the translation markers a bit and then I'll do it. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:52, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
  DoneMarcoAurelio (talk) 17:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
@MarcoAurelio: thanks for your work! Would it be possible to mark for translation also de images, as we have translations of all of them? -Theklan (talk) 10:03, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
@Theklan: I must confess that I am not sure if that'd work, and I'd hate to ruin your hard work. Please let me ask @Base and Kaganer to see if that can be done. Regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:58, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
I don't understood, about what images this question? --Kaganer (talk) 17:06, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
@Kaganer: <translate>[[File:2017-2018 ikasturtearen balorazioa.pdf|thumb|Irakurri hemen balorazio hau PDF formatoan]]</translate> instead of [[File:2017-2018 ikasturtearen balorazioa.pdf|thumb|<translate>Irakurri hemen balorazio hau PDF formatoan</translate>]]. They want to be able to use different files on the translation pages as they have translated versions of them. Would that work? —MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:09, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
No problem. If filenames is not standartized, may be used this way. Or maybe better next code:
[[File:<translate>2017-2018 ikasturtearen balorazioa.pdf</translate>|thumb|<translate>Irakurri hemen balorazio hau PDF formatoan</translate>]]
If filenames is standartized (as example, 2017-2018 ikasturtearen balorazioa.pdf, 2017-2018 ikasturtearen balorazioa de.pdf, 2017-2018 ikasturtearen balorazioa en.pdf etc.), may be used template {{lm}}. Example of code:
[[{{LM|2017-2018 ikasturtearen balorazioa|pdf}}|thumb|<translate>Irakurri hemen balorazio hau PDF formatoan</translate>]]
In this case translated version will be substituted automatically.
--Kaganer (talk) 17:21, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
I will upload them standarized.-Theklan (talk) 17:27, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
@Theklan: Good choice ;)   Done. --Kaganer (talk) 17:42, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
@Kaganer: Some images weren't marked for translation. Now they are, I think the page needs to be reloaded or something.-Theklan (talk) 07:51, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

EDIT: Seems   Done-Theklan (talk) 12:45, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by:  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:51, 5 July 2018 (UTC)