Wikiversity/Logo/archive-vote-4

Logo discussions & votes


  • Logo (current logos, guidelines, localisation)

Welcome to the process for finding a logo for Wikiversity!

Phase 1 of the logo contest has been finished (archive); we have our three finalists! The finalists were determined by taking the logo group with the most votes and eliminating all logo groups which didn't have more than half of that amount. I arranged the various designs from the winning logo groups by similarity; if you disagree with my classification, please say so on the talk page.

In phase 2, which lasted from 22 September until 30 September, there was an opportunity to refine the existing designs and propose new ones which had to be based on the basic design of the finalist logos.

Phase 3 (1 October until 15 October) determined which logo was deemed the best of its group of similar logos.

In phase 4, which lasts from 16 October until 31 October, you can now determine the winning logo! Vote for ONE logo only. Please note that if the winning logo should happen to use Wikimedia colours or have blue as its most prominent colour, those colours will have to be changed afterwards to something which is okay with the Wikimedia Marketing Department.

If you have any questions, suggestions or complaints, please contact me on this page's or my own talk page. Thanks for participating!

Nightstallion (?) 09:31, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Overview (35px Thumbnails):


#A (Learning together) -- colours will have to be changed to non-Wikimedia colours

  1. 16 Strchoumpf 21:15, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Nightstallion (?) 09:31, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Risk 17:21, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Leftmostcat 18:27, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Pepetps 18:57, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. #18 -- Reswik 20:13, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --WarX 20:37, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. #13 Donarreiskoffer 07:48, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. #18--Jorgechp 14:11, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. 朝彦 (Asahiko) 14:31, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. #13 Aldenis 16:51, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Schüler 19:19, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  13.   Support (no 16) --Alfakim 21:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Taichi - (あ!) 03:30, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Dante, the Wicked 06:04, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Hartz 09:03, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. #18 --84.58.189.85 10:44, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Conti 17:57, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --Delta Tango 18:26, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Mailer Diablo 19:52, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Quiddity 21:39, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Tone 22:28, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. the wub 23:48, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Erik Zachte 00:39, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. #17 is the most effective imo 87.82.10.23 15:16, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26.   Support esp. 17 & 18 -- Alarob 20:55, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Preferably #18. Cormaggio @ 21:03, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28.   Support I like the first one. JohannesBuchner
  29. Indech 22:35, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30.   Support #13. Youngvalter 23:33, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. No 18 hopefullyShushruth 06:01, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. mostly the first or #17 --Habakuk 11:15, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33.   Support — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Amire80 (talk) 04:35, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Preferably 17 or 18 --Javier Carro 12:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Londenp 12:59, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. #17 represents the world wide diverse and spontaneous reach of WU. 207.174.249.2 15:05, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37.   Support - #18! - Jeroenvrp 15:19, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. #17   <STyx 17:00, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. #13 --Nampelkafe 17:15, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. --Storkk 17:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Lijealso 19:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42.   Support Much more stylistic and creative than #B. #B is too formal.--Exir Kamalabadi 23:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43.   Support #16 --JB82 00:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44.   Support FlipDarius 01:05, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45.   Support SARAzyn diSK 20:57, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46.   Support EyOne 21:12, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47.   Support --Olli 21:48, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48.   Support Kerowyn 05:39, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49.   Support Prefer #13, #17 and #18. -- Mithent 01:14, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50.   Support Prefer #13, #17 and #18 --Malene Thyssen 14:58, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51.   Support #15, 16, 17, or 18 (except remove "beta") Pcu123456789 17:00, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52.   Support Smurrayinchester 18:05, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53.   Support Works well with the three things motto.--Rayd 19:54, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54.   Support --71.231.203.169 06:28, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55.   Support #18 --BeJotHaDe 87.122.53.84 18:30, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56.   Support #13 Yuval Y 19:53, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57.   SupportDuccio 21:35, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58.   Support I really do not like the others, although if the colors are changed, this logo could end up looking awful. -- Kjkolb 01:42, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59.   Support I like most especially #17, and I share Kjkolb's concern that the logos of this set are such that certain color schemes would be particularly, well, awful. Jahiegel 06:03, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60.   Support #16 -- 217.91.99.93 12:04, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61.   Support #15 --Neo139 18:43, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62.   Support #13 --Nico Düsing (Diskussion) 17:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
  63.   Support --Kwekubo 17:59, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64.   Support --220.254.0.4 Ninomy 14:52, 26 October 2006 (UTC) I've forgot that I hadn't logged in. I'm sorry...--Ninomy 15:00, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65.   Support #15 71.161.9.206 01:37, 27 October 2006 (UTC) (mirwin@wikiversity)[reply]
  66.   Support #16 Er Komandante 03:31, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67.   Support Petr K 23:32, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  68.   Support #16, 17 Mion 18:47, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  69.   Support #18 --LBMixPro 02:52, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  70.   Support #17 --JonathanLivingston 11:40, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Möchtegern

#B (University) -- colours will have to be changed to non-Wikimedia colours

  1. TZM talk at de.wp 12:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Timichal 18:09, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. #3 --Snorky 18:17, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Eyu100 18:30, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. #3 Rholton 01:42, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. (!) Looks too much like MIT.Hillgentleman 02:15, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I presume this is a comment - certainly not a vote for - I've moved it down here from originally being within the votes section. Cormaggio @ 21:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I think the exclamation mark in front meant Hillgentleman was expressing enthusiasm about the logo, not disapproval – I read it as "This is too much like MIT's dome to not vote it." I'm moving it back for now and I've contacted Hillgentleman about this vote. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 02:32, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    (+)(#3) I admit that I prefer number three. Thank you, folks.Hillgentleman 04:30, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Oops - sorry - looks like I completely misinterpreted. Thanks for your vigilance, Minh. Cormaggio @ 17:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I am sorry to have confused.--Hillgentleman 09:36, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. #3 Metoc 14:28, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. #3 --Dewatts 15:38, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. #4 Kyle_the_hacker 16:04, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Amalas 16:35, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. #3 --Bertrand GRONDIN 07:23, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. #3 Lcarsdata 17:16, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Shogun 18:13, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. #3 Dav 59 18:53, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  15. #3 Grandmasterka 10:43, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Frank Schulenburg 12:34, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. #3 --84.56.150.123 18:01, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. #3 --Marbot 18:04, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. #3. Titoxd(?!?) 18:21, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. #3 Tarret 19:56, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. #3 --Gray Porpoise 20:24, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. #3  — MrDolomite | Talk 20:30, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Trodel 21:15, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. #3 Gurch 22:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. #3 --Sasa Stefanovic 22:25, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. #3 --Valley2city 22:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. #3 --Kaldari 22:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. #3 Badbilltucker 23:44, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. #3 Flcelloguy (A note?) 00:33, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. #3 Chlewey 03:55, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. -- MichaelFrey 05:47, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. #3 --Jacopo86 09:07, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. #3 --TOR 12:37, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. definitely #3 --Hardern 14:14, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. #3 --Schildwaechter 19:26, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  36. --alexscho 20:31, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37.   Support #3 --Rbraunwa 22:29, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38.   Support #3 Axxgreazz (talk?) 03:23, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. EBOLA rulez 06:01, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. #3 -- BlueRbt 08:29, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41.   Support #3, no text or translated to each language. --Sanbec 11:57, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Of course, there will be a version without text. But will it be necessary to translate the name to other languages? (In german, it's also "Wikiversity" e.g.) --80.171.127.26 15:17, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, it'll probably be ウィキバーシティ in Japanese and 维基学院 in Chinese, just to name a few possibilities ;-) --朝彦 (Asahiko) 15:19, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42.   Support #3 - It's the closest Wikiversity will get to becoming a brick-and-mortar institution - 87.82.30.157 12:35, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Achates 15:14, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44.   Support #4 69.251.20.244 16:52, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45.   Support Laurent Bouvier 20:29, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. #3, but what the heck's wrong with that color? LtPowers 22:51, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. un logo qui reflete bien l'esprit 'versity --80.8.34.116 04:14, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48.   Support --Dijan 08:37, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49.   Support -- marilyn.hanson 13:01, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
  50. #3 --Mipago 12:56, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51.   Support -- IvanLanin 14:57, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52.   Support -moyogo 15:00, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. I like #3 better, but either one would be ok. Philbert2.71828 23:16, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54.   Support #3 Greudin 11:30, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. #3 --Pill δ 12:12, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56.   Support the combination.--HereToHelp (talk) 19:49, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57.   Support SatyrTN 03:43, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. #3 Marcos 16:09, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. #3 Nortonthe1st
  60. #3 Tryggvia 07:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. #3 Derbeth 17:33, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. #3 Meithal 19:21, 23 October 2006 (UTC) clear and tidy[reply]
  63. #3   Support Lincher 00:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. #3   Support Jgrullon88 10:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Erwin85 15:46, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. #3 --Erkan Yilmaz 22:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67.   Support Dilaudid 02:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  68. #4   Support Szumyk 06:59, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  69. #3-- bs (talk) 19:17, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  70. #3 --66.30.106.141 19:46, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  71.   Support #3 looks the best of all Bastique 19:36, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  72. #3 --Nessie 11:54, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  73. #4 FoX 14:57, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  74. #3 Simple and elegant.66.71.42.128 02:51, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  75. #3   Support Suto 02:54, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  76. #3   Support - Airridi 03:57, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  77. #3   Support - RT 02:41, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  78.   Support #3 -- Micha2564 14:49, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  79.   Support #3 -- CharlieCLC
  80. #3 --Rory096 19:10, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  81. #3  Support Grimlock 09:42, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  82. #3   Support--Hanlong 11:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  83. #3   Support Wolvenraider 11:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  84. #3   Support Karimarie 16:12, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  85.   Support #3, though I suggest changing the pillars to a different shade/color and reducing their relative size somewhat. —Lifeisunfair (David Levy at the English Wikipedia) 02:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  86. #4   Support PDD 12:00, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  87. #3   Support Davodd | Talk 21:11, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  88. #3   Support Rakela 22:06, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  89. #3 Support. BenduKiwi - 23:04, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  90. #4   Support --romanm (talk) 12:57, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  91. #3   Support --Fbi429 13:51, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

#C (Child, Earth & Question mark)

  1. Imoeng 13:29, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. 555 19:42, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Support Supporting "Zaniumum blues" again. Is anyone still in favor of this original "inverted land/sea" version? – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 03:19, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. This works best in all sizes! Awolf002 22:59, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Zanimum blues ---Californiacondor 01:29, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Support Enni84 14:43, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  7.   Support Zanimum blues - Sdorrance 19:04, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Support AdamWalker 20:54, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  9.   Support Stefan Majewsky 14:52, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10.   Support CaseInPoint 00:07, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11.   Support Zanimum blues --Paginazero - Ø 07:17, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12.   Support -- Zanimum 17:08, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13.   Support Zanimum blues --PabloBD 17:25, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14.   Support Daniel () Check out Wikiscope! 11:29, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15.   Support Zanimum blues--Wikiphilia
  16.   Support --ExpImp 20:15, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17.   Support --Tosca 18:36, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18.   Support --Leighblackall 08:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19.   Support -- The only one that is somehow feasible. The others have a lot of visual noice. Teemul 10:56, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20.   Support -- This is the cleanest, most 'worldwide education' focused logo of those presented.
  21.   Support-- --Walter 11:21, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22.   Support -- WindRunner 01:54, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23.   Support 'Zanimum blues' looks great. -- Yarin Kaul 21:59, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24.   Support Zanimum blues looks briliant! Mindofzoo999 03:28, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25.   Support IlyaHaykinson 03:34, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26.   Support I love colorings ... --Aphaia 15:43, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Related Wikiversity Projects

  • Motto and slogan contest for English Wikiversity - Please help select a motto and a slogan.
  • Wikiversity mission - We can use ideas from the motto, slogan and logo contests to help refine the mission statement. Feel free to post English Wikiversity mission statement revisions.