Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Wikibooks/Logo/Archive 4

< Wikibooks | Logo
Logo discussions & votes
  • Logo (current logos, guidelines, localisation)

Welcome to the process for finding a new logo for Wikibooks!

Phase 1 of the logo contest has been finished (archive); we have our two finalists! The finalists were determined by taking the logo group with the most votes and eliminating all logo groups which didn't have more than half of that amount. I arranged the various designs from the winning logo groups by similarity; if you disagree with my classification, please say so on the talk page.

In phase 2, which lasted from 22 September until 30 September, there was an opportunity to refine the existing designs and propose new ones which had to be based on the basic design of the finalist logos.

Phase 3 (1 October until 15 October) determined which logo was deemed the best of its group of similar logos.

In phase 4, which lasts from 16 October until 31 October, you can now determine the winning logo! Vote for ONE logo only. Please note that if the winning logo should happen to use Wikimedia colours or have blue as its most prominent colour, those colours will have to be changed afterwards to something which is okay with the Wikimedia Marketing Department.

If you have any questions, suggestions or complaints, please contact me on this page's or my own talk page. Thanks for participating!

—Nightstallion (?) 09:26, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Overview (35px Thumbnails):

#A (Abstract book-in-circle) -- colours will have to be changed to non-Wikimedia colours

edit
  •  
    #8 without "w"
  •  
    #8 with pure wikimedia colors
  1. -- MichaelFrey 13:04, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. —Risk 17:18, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. —Eyu100 18:28, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. —Pepetps 18:58, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Donarreiskoffer 07:49, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Markadet 12:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Metoc 14:26, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Support --Alfakim 21:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Taichi - (あ！) 03:31, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Dante, the Wicked 05:57, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Tonitrus 09:54, 17 October 2006 (UTC) Besides, the other finalist's stylized book shows an odd tapering spine which can never be seen on real books.[reply]
  12.   Support I like the second one. Grandmasterka 10:38, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Marbot 18:02, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Either one, although preferably, the first one. Titoxd(?!?) 18:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Grue3 19:08, 17 October 2006 (UTC) (User:Grue on Wikibooks).[reply]
  16.  — MrDolomite | Talk 20:29, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. the wub 23:44, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Flcelloguy (A note?) 00:32, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Very good. Tuf-Kat 02:34, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20.   Support Tigru 12:39, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21.   Support Stefan Majewsky 14:45, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Emc2 20:29, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23.   Support: It grows on you. -- Alarob 20:48, 18 October 2006 (UTC) (with the center dot, preferably)[reply]
  24.   Support. I prefer the second one. --Rbraunwa 22:18, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25.   Support Indech 22:32, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26.   Support Youngvalter 23:24, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27.   Support --Whiteknight 01:48, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28.   Support (without "W")-- SallesNeto BR 14:16, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29.   Support (the right one called "#8 with pure wikimedia colors") That is one is cool. Jeroenvrp 15:17, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30.   Support Lijealso 19:33, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31.   Support Neutrality 20:40, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32.   Support JB82 00:38, 20 October 2006 (UTC) (preference on #2)[reply]
  33.   Support EyOne 21:11, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34.   Support (preferably the first one). --Olli 21:54, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35.   Support Daniel (‽) Check out Wikiscope! 11:26, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36.   Support 1st Greudin 11:29, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37.   Support Preferably first. -- Mithent 01:17, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38.   Support The second one is really nicely coloured.
  39.   Support Smurrayinchester 18:05, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40.   Support --Giancy @ Meta 15:06, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41.   Support --ExpImp 20:15, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42.   Support Meithal 19:19, 23 October 2006 (UTC) second[reply]
  43.   Support Lincher 00:05, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44.   Support The other logo doesn't portray globality and participation as strongly as this one. Dilaudid 00:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45.   Support --Neo139 18:41, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46.   Support --Kwekubo 17:57, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47.   Support. I prefer the second one --DieBuche 17:43, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48.   Support --Ilario 23:18, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49.   Support --Airridi 03:56, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50.   Support I like this one, the more abstract of the two logos. 13:17, 29 October 2006
  51.   Support PDD 11:58, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

#B (Stylised book in circle) -- colours will have to be changed to non-Wikimedia colours

edit
  1. —Nightstallion (?) 09:26, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. TZM talk at de.wp 12:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Imoeng 13:27, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. HappyDog 14:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. WebBoy 14:28, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. XmaX 17:57, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. — Timichal 18:08, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. — Leftmostcat 18:27, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. 555 19:43, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --WarX 20:36, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Darkdadaah 21:51, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Rholton 01:40, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13.   Support I find it a bit harder to see a book in this variant, probably because the blue band underneath is too dark. B3, which didn't make the cut for Round 4, would be an easy way to distance this logo from the Wikimedia colors, and the lighter band below helps the book stand out as a book. As far as I can tell on my monitor, the main color used in B3 is a tint of the green used in the Wikimedia color scheme, so it shouldn't be a problem. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 03:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Jorgechp 14:10, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15.   Support Wouldn't the no-Foundation-color restriction make phase 3 voting come to nothing? --朝彦 (Asahiko) 14:29, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Nope, the logo will simply undergo refinement after the vote is over -- as did ALL logos up to now. Remember the ugly multicolour puzzle ball that the Wikipedia logo originally was? —Nightstallion (?) 10:42, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Moving to Talk:Wikibooks/logo. --朝彦 (Asahiko) 15:57, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. The last Kyle_the_hacker 16:05, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Amalas 16:37, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Lcarsdata 17:12, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --Shogun 18:11, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Feydey 18:20, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Hardern 18:27, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Dav 59 18:53, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  23. Not great but better than the other. --Hartz 09:04, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. I prefer the existing logo, but since change is inevitable I vote this logo since it represents Wikibooks better with the book icon (for obvious reasons) than the circle thing in logo A which really has nothing to do with books. Anthony cfc 17:30, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Simple yet powerful, like Wikimedia. Youngamerican 17:47, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Conti 17:54, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Kempm 18:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Sdorrance 19:05, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Mailer Diablo 19:51, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Gray Porpoise 20:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Trodel 21:14, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Quiddity 21:47, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Gurch 22:15, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. --Tone 22:28, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. This one is harder to misinterpret. Badbilltucker 23:42, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Cyberjunkie 04:57, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37.   Support --Melkor23 05:52, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. --Jacopo86 09:04, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Schildwaechter 19:29, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  40. --alexscho 20:27, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Simply brillant. --Huhsunqu 22:17, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Lightningspirit 22:18, 18 October 2006 (UTC) I love this logo[reply]
  43. Koos ... 22:20, 18 October 2006 (UTC) - B3 would have been better, but this one is best of the rest.[reply]
  44. Someoneinmyheadbutit'snotme 23:46, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Marcos Antônio Nunes de Moura 01:16, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Better of the two... but not the best of the last from the last round :( Shushruth 05:55, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. EBOLA rulez 06:01, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Best choice. --Mzlla 06:55, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. --Bertrand GRONDIN 07:18, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. BlueRbt 08:28, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. --Habakuk 11:18, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52.   Support --Amir E. Aharoni 11:34, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Londenp 12:58, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54.   Support Deadhoax
  55. Liesel 14:16, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Codex Liber 207.174.249.2 15:10, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Achates 15:12, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58.   <STyx 16:59, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. --Storkk 17:35, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Jomegat 18:02, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Roberth 21:54, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Clearly superior choice, though perspective needs to be fixed. LtPowers 22:48, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63.   Support FlipDarius 01:06, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64.   Support SteveMcCluskey 02:21, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Robin Stocker 12:28, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66.   Support -- marilyn.hanson 13:03, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
  67.   Support  IvanLanin ♫ 14:58, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  68.   Support -moyogo 14:59, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  69.   Support SARAzyn diSK 20:56, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  70.   Support Kerowyn 05:31, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  71.   Support Maybe someone can try replacing the ring in this logo with the stylised book one that looks like a gear? So you would have the book in this logo superimposed on the gear from the other one. jiahui 8:31, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
  72.   Support --Moolsan 14:55, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  73. –Pill δ 16:07, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  74.   Support the SVG.--HereToHelp (talk) 19:46, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  75.   Support DocPlenitude 19:59, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
  76.   Support SatyrTN 03:43, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  77.   Support --Malene Thyssen 15:16, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  78.   Support Marcos 15:54, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  79.   Support --Panic 03:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  80.   Support --Icepenguin 11:33, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  81.   Support --DavidL 18:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  82. Adnergje 18:24, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  83.   Support intuitive logo. Yuval Y 19:46, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Jahiegel 06:00, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  85. R. S. Shaw 06:35, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  86.   Support Szumyk 14:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Erwin85 15:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  88.   Support --Eyrian 19:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  89.   Support - but: We need this logo with a rounded spine! It doesn't look like a books spine like that... --Speck-Made 14:29, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  90. -- [[Bella Situazione|talk]] 19:12, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  91.   Support --B1mbo 01:58, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  92.   Support The #A logo looks like a gear.. --Ninomy 15:04, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  93.   Support 158.83.236.193 18:22, 26 October 2006 (UTC) Needs a rounded spine, but better than the gearlike option.[reply]
  94.   Support--Kuartas + 06:07, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  95. --Spongo 10:48, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  96.   Support-- Walter 11:07, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  97. FoX 14:53, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Spike 82 18:31, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  99.   Support Petr K 23:34, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  100.   Support -- Micha2564 14:52, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  101.   Support Mion 18:41, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  102.   Support LBMixPro 02:44, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  103.   Support Mindofzoo999 03:26, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  104.   Support Grimlock 09:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  105.   Support IlyaHaykinson 03:32, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  106.   Support Delta Tango 14:55, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  107.   Support --Möchtegern
  108.   Support Davodd | Talk 21:08, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  109.   Support Rakela 22:01, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  110.   Support. Bigtop 23:02, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Support. BenduKiwi - 23:07, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  112.   Support --Hanlong 06:22, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  113.   Support --romanm (talk) 12:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikibooks/Logo/Archive_4&oldid=19958069"