logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement
English:
- Languages: es, en-2
- Personal info: Hello. I can't believe I've been a steward for 3 years. I've not been as active as in the past due to University, but I'm still around both here and on IRC, and I'd like to continue for another year, if you let me to do so :). I'm mainly active dealing with LTA's and spammer, but I try to help out in other areas when I can. Feel free to make any comment that you think would be appropriate. Regards. Matiia (talk) 00:49, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
italiano:
- Lingue:
- Informazioni personali: translation needed
español:
- Idiomas: es, en-2
- Información personal: Hola. No puedo creer que he sido un steward por 3 años. No he estado tan activo como en el pasado debido a la universidad, pero sigo teniendo un buen nivel de actividad tanto aquí como en IRC, y me gustaría poder continuar por otro año, si me lo permiten :). Estoy activo principalmente lidiando con LTA's y spammers, pero también intento ayudar en otras áreas cuando puedo. Siéntanse libre de hacer cualquier comentario que piensen sería apropiado. Saludos. Matiia (talk) 13:36, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
русский:
- Языки:
- Личная информация: translation needed
Deutsch:
- Sprachen:
- Informationen zur Person: translation needed
Nederlands:
- Taalvaardigheid:
- Persoonlijke informatie: translation needed
বাংলা:
- ভাষা:
- ব্যক্তিগত তথ্যাদি: translation needed
- Keep -- CptViraj (📧) 14:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Sure!--MrJaroslavik (talk) 14:09, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Sure, thanks for your help in all areas.--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep --Rschen7754 14:21, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- Remove basically as per my weak keep last year, but I’ll change it to remove this year for the reason that steward activity has been down, and culturally we don’t need someone who looks for every reason to say no to taking action rather than looking for reasons to help. Matiia is also extremely biased against large wikis and removing them from the team would help the culture in that regard. With the recent state of SRG, something needs to change, and if you had to pick a steward who was least likely to offer you help it’d be Matiia, so this seems like a good place to start with change. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- Matiia is also extremely biased against large wikis and removing them from the team would help the culture in that regard. Could you give me some examples? this doesn't make sense to me, specially as I come from a large wiki (Spanish Wikipedia) and I've worked with lots of admins from multiples large wikis during my time as a steward and a GS/GR. Matiia (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- See our dust up at SRG last year over global renamer and your complaints that too many en.wiki admins were requesting it. You also give off an impression of actively trying to be unhelpful when people from large projects ask you questions to the point where I’ve told multiple large projects users who are trying to become active cross-wiki to ignore anything you say and just ask another steward in a few hours. Most of this is on IRC so can’t be diffed, but your hostility towards anyone from a large project is striking, and while I don’t expect you to be removed, my advice to anyone is still going to be to ignore what you say and just ask another steward because you can’t be trusted to put aside your biases against people’s home projects. To be fair, it might be that you’re just hostile to any new user trying to become active cross-wiki and it just appears to be anti-large project since that’s where most of them are. That’s still an issue and in my view is a big enough one that you shouldn’t be a steward. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:46, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- I'd have done the same comment about any wiki, as I think it's a bit inefficient to handle it in that way (and can you can see on the comments, I was not the only user who thought that way. It wouldn't be the first time that when a user come when a need, we look for other ways to handle it, although I agree it's not the best place). I can have reasons not to do something, but I've not had any issue when someone else do it, and when I'm asked why, I always give my reason and I've had not issue doing it, if they prove me I'm wrong. After all, we all have our criteria based on our experience. There are not too much I can say about your comment about me being hostile to new users, we would have to ask every new user I've talked with, not just your impressions. Matiia (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- Sure; the issue is that from the start you look for every reason not to do something rather than for reasons to provide help. There’s not much of a reason to have a steward who acts like that when you can just email or PM someone else and they’ll take action without a second thought. We need stewards who want to collaborate and help all Wikimedia projects and who have experience with the issues that sysops on projects with active communities face. Unfortunately, I don’t think that you meet that, and I’ve reached the point where I think Wikimedia is better with you not being a steward. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:24, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- I'd have done the same comment about any wiki, as I think it's a bit inefficient to handle it in that way (and can you can see on the comments, I was not the only user who thought that way. It wouldn't be the first time that when a user come when a need, we look for other ways to handle it, although I agree it's not the best place). I can have reasons not to do something, but I've not had any issue when someone else do it, and when I'm asked why, I always give my reason and I've had not issue doing it, if they prove me I'm wrong. After all, we all have our criteria based on our experience. There are not too much I can say about your comment about me being hostile to new users, we would have to ask every new user I've talked with, not just your impressions. Matiia (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- See our dust up at SRG last year over global renamer and your complaints that too many en.wiki admins were requesting it. You also give off an impression of actively trying to be unhelpful when people from large projects ask you questions to the point where I’ve told multiple large projects users who are trying to become active cross-wiki to ignore anything you say and just ask another steward in a few hours. Most of this is on IRC so can’t be diffed, but your hostility towards anyone from a large project is striking, and while I don’t expect you to be removed, my advice to anyone is still going to be to ignore what you say and just ask another steward because you can’t be trusted to put aside your biases against people’s home projects. To be fair, it might be that you’re just hostile to any new user trying to become active cross-wiki and it just appears to be anti-large project since that’s where most of them are. That’s still an issue and in my view is a big enough one that you shouldn’t be a steward. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:46, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- Matiia is also extremely biased against large wikis and removing them from the team would help the culture in that regard. Could you give me some examples? this doesn't make sense to me, specially as I come from a large wiki (Spanish Wikipedia) and I've worked with lots of admins from multiples large wikis during my time as a steward and a GS/GR. Matiia (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Reasonably active, competent and helpful. – Ammarpad (talk) 14:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Matiia is still net positive to the stewards team.--AldnonymousBicara? 15:27, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep JackPotte (talk) 16:38, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Continúa con el buen trabajo. --Stïnger (会話) 18:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC).
- Remove I consider that his work as a steward has been good over the years, but his profile consists of a meta-only user. He comes from eswiki (and may still consider that his homewiki), but barely has content experience, besides very low activity. I am against of using Wikimedia as a sort of countervandalism network. The purpose of Wikimedia is to produce free content, and the "janitorial part" is necessary too, but it shouldn't be the main aim of volunteers. There has been concerns about users with a profile similar to Matiia's requesting global rights, and if that wants to be solved, I think stewards with this kind of profile should be removed. Esteban16 (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. —Sgd. Hasley 20:32, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep tufor (talk) 21:59, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep --*Youngjin (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep — KPFC 💬 01:27, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep --Minorax (talk) 04:07, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep -- Eatcha (talk) 11:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep --Thibaut (talk) 11:39, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Armbrust (talk) 16:20, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Miniapolis 18:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Linedwell [talk] 19:17, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Hiàn (talk) 22:49, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep.--HakanIST (talk) 05:59, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep --Udo T. (talk) 11:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 13:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Taichi - (あ!) 15:05, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- Remove La coince (talk) 19:59, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep.The Living love (talk) 19:44, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 18:40, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep --Geonuch (talk) 12:52, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep --Garam talk 21:28, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep No major upsets or concerns to note. OhKayeSierra (talk) 04:44, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per TonyBallioni and Esteban16. Let's give Matiia a chance to serve another year to take down that concerns. I personally don't have any concern, and I feel he is still a perfect candidate for Stewardship. Thank you for your service! Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 07:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Ontzak (Bilbo ta Bizkai guztia) 13:26, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep.--Jusjih (talk) 20:40, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep masti <talk> 19:14, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 04:23, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Taivo (talk) 15:42, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Darkhan 17:02, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep --Uğurkenttalk 12:55, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. --Coffins (talk) 13:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep --Leon saudanha (talk) 15:44, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 19:53, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 22:26, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep -- Несмир Кудилович (разговор) 00:34, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep --jdx Re: 07:57, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep --Schniggendiller (talk) 13:31, 28 February 2020 (UTC)