Meta:Requests for adminship/WikiBayer

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

WikiBayer

Ending 25 March 2020 07:50 (UTC)

WikiBayer (talk • contribs • deleted user contributions • logs • block log • abuse log • CentralAuth • stalktoy) Bureaucrats: user rights management.

Unfortunately there are a lot of LTAs in metawiki or crosswiki. Many crosswiki LTAs come to metawiki if they are blocked locally. I would like to use the admin tools on meta especially against LTAs and other vandals that I encounter daily due to my work in Metawiki. I'm global sysop and local sysop in the barWiki and have a lot of experience with the admin tools with several thousand uses of the tools in hundreds of projects.

Examples of my use of tools from other projects: I have block a Vandal, and Delete redirects and move many Pages in the roa-rup.Wikipedia and roa-rup.wiktionary, I have processed about 300 hundred delete requests in the kmWiki, and delete other test pages/vandalism.--𐐎ℹ𝕜ⅈ𝕭𝒂𝕪ⅇ𝕣 👤💬 07:50, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Minorax (talk) 08:13, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good cross wiki work however I see very little evidence the admin tools would be of any great use on Meta --Herby ^{talk thyme} 08:24, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose same as Herbythyme. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:53, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I can see this user can be trusted with this access as this user already a GS. His crosswiki works also satisfy my criteria.--Aldnonymous^Bicara? 10:00, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support a few speedy deletion requests per month, and a few reverts per week seem like a good enough justification for sysop access from a trusted user to me. We're volunteers, and more helping hands is not a bad thing. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:06, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ajraddatz. Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 15:19, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, I also share Ajraddatz's opinion. No concerns for me. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 16:30, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ajraddatz. Thanks for volunteering.Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 17:17, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ajraddatz. -- CptViraj (📧) 03:18, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support can be trusted, valid use case --DannyS712 (talk) 04:40, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Well they do good crosswiki work, but after this request in December last year, I am concerned about their understanding of how global policies work along with local policies. And meta being a project which have global impacts, I am hesitant to support. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 05:43, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@1997kB:I don't understand your vote.The linked request was about fixing technical errors and removing / fixing tests that affect all users. In projects that have no users, such things do users with global rights. As for example in the example projects of this request, in which stewards have fixed the errors. Local guidelines are not violated by fixing such technical problems.--𐐎ℹ𝕜ⅈ𝕭𝒂𝕪ⅇ𝕣 👤💬 07:04, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On both of those wikis you intended to fix technical problems, have local functionaries who can deal with them. So if it's not the example of bypassing local restriction then I don't know what will be and what concerns me is that you still think that fixing technical problems by gaining global right doesn't bypass local process that deals with it. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 16:56, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Users with global rights used when a user group does not exist locally or the users with the authorizations are inactive, as with the projects mentionedThe request said because there are bureaucrats that can be done locally. However, this is wrong, bureaucrats may gives rights to do so, but not have the right themselves. Furthermore, the project needs users with a basic understanding to fix technical errors.--𐐎ℹ𝕜ⅈ𝕭𝒂𝕪ⅇ𝕣 👤💬 10:11, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support I meet WikiBayer frequently at cross wiki avenues. As a GS, they should be trustworthy enough to grant this bit. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:54, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Supportper Ajraddatz--Turkmen ^talk 19:56, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -FASTILY 01:32, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support mostly per Ajraddatz. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:11, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support No concerns, Meta admin goes hand-in-hand with GS. ~riley (talk) 05:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, Active and trusted.--BRP^ever 04:27, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sotiale (talk) 13:56, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support CentralTime301 (Discussion/Contributions) 19:13, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trusted. --Wright Streetdeck 15:31, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 19:41, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above request page is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Comments about this page should be made in Meta:Babel or Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat.