Meta:Requests for adminship/Snowolf

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Promoted - Tiptoety ^talk 01:18, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Snowolf edit

Ending 01:16, 13 March 2012 UTC

Snowolf (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)

Hello, I'm an administrator on the English Wikipedia and one of the recently elected Stewards. As a great deal of the Steward's work is done on meta, I've been fairly active here and I feel I could put a local sysop flag here on meta to good use, mainly to deal with local vandalism which has been on the raise recently and crosswiki vandals dropping by on meta after global blocks without having to poke an admin for a block or a deletion :) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 01:16, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support The persuasion eventually worked! Good user and will be active on meta due to his role as a newly elected steward. The Helpful One 01:23, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Has experience.Érico Júnior Wouters (talk) 01:38, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Ruy Pugliesi^◥ 02:28, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trusted user. Americophile 03:48, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - While your contributions here show no sign of needing the sysop flag, automatic support for any stewards requesting local adminship. Ajraddatz (Talk) 04:43, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support default position for any steward billinghurst sDrewth 07:17, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mercy (talk) 08:38, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support no question - active and would benefit from the tools - thanks for the work --Herby ^{talk thyme} 08:56, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not. --Aphaia (talk) 09:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - No reason to oppose. -Barras talk 09:12, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Of course, no problem--Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:24, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Theo10011 (talk) 10:52, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support, can be useful. Sa vh ^ñ 11:02, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Herby micki t 11:33, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree that all stewards should have admin rights here. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 11:47, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support: agreeing with Ajraddatz. Mathonius (talk) 12:58, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
support, but you'll see that there's nothing to do on meta for sysops. :-P —DerHexer (Talk) 13:30, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Avi (talk) 13:32, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --M/ (talk) 14:18, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Ajraddatz, but no reason to oppose you either. Good luck in advance! Trijnstel_talk 15:12, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Meno25 (talk) 16:22, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Luckas ^msg 16:37, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Boring.” T_ele^s (T _{@ L C S}) 22:33, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support with a yawn. Couldn't this be automatic for newly elected stewards? Courcelles (talk) 01:16, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ajraddatz. --WizardOfOz ^talk 05:30, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Courcelles. - UnbelievableError (talk) 06:04, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Jafeluv (talk) 13:28, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes --Katarighe (Talk) 14:33, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~{{oppose}} No need for the tools as Ajr mentioned above. Sorry but the 'autosysopsteward' does not work for me. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 16:02, 7 March 2012 (UTC)~~ Struck this. While I'm still thinking that autosysopsteward does not work for me, it's certainly not his fault but ours [Meta community] to keep so outdated and unclear policies regarding Meta-Steward actions. I'm trying to remedy this now to avoid further conflicts. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 22:49, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- But with the Steward tools you have at this time the sysop has exceeded the usual tools here. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 17:21, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support MBisanz ^talk 02:43, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - But I agree with MarcoAurelio --FalconL ^?! 15:55, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support silly question ;-) a×p_de ^Hello! 18:34, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:54, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 15:28, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]