Merchandise giveaways/Nominations/Archive 4

Nominated by: dimi_z (talk) 16:26, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? Tireless work on the incubator, the language committee. He made me feel more at home in Belgium when I moved to the country and it working on starting a local Wikimedia chapter.

Support


Nominated by: David1217 What I've done 05:29, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? MBisanz is our most prolific bureaucrats, nearly single-handedly keeping our changing username process going. In addition, he serves on the Audit Subcommittee of ArbCom. With over 100,000 edits, he is a tireless worker.

Support


Nominated by: Joefromrandb (talk) 04:53, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
Like him or hate him, Jack and his many socks have improved Wikipedia vastly over the years. Wikipedia is a better place for our readers because of his efforts. If, as it seems, he has actually stopped editing for the moment, the least we can do is hook him up with a nice parting gift.


Support

ps: Jack Merridew (talk · contribs), Alarbus (talk · contribs), Br'er Rabbit (talk · contribs)
two times Precious --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:39, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated by: Bence (talk) 21:56, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
This user is awesome because he not only helped organize WLM, but has been a very valuable new member of the Affiliations Committee, with his rational level-headedness keeping us on track and helping volunteers, while we were busy evolving from Chapcom into Affcom. Much of his work happens behind the scenes, but those who know him, know that he deserves our gratitude. –Bence (talk) 21:56, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Support

  1. Bence would know. Anthonyhcole (talk) 23:45, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Actually, I owe him a T-Shirt. Literally, as he gave me his private one when someone grabbed mine in Haifa. :) This is the wiki spirit, I daresay. aegis maelstrom δ 14:15, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated by: Lova Falk talk 08:52, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? Gives himself fully to the articles he has chosen to work on and doesn't stop until they have high quality.

Support


Nominated by: Jackson Peebles (talk) 04:47, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? Go Phigtins! adopts multiple users each month and instantly provides feedback and assistance without anything in return; he/she is simply kind. Furthermore, he/she isn't even an administrator nor has any desire to be! This, alone, is admirable, as it indicates a dedicated editor with a good heart, policy knowledge, but no "power hunger," though I am not implying that the administrators are so; most of them are anonymous, anyhow.
Support


The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Nominated by: 72.130.182.27 (talk) 19:08, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?

Note

Support


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.


The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Nominated by: 209.203.82.22 (talk) 20:37, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? She is the editor of our local paper, The News Mirror, and she does a fabulous job!

Comment

Support


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.


The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Nominated by: 66.229.246.12 (talk) 13:11, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?

Support

  1. Check username no account --Tito Dutta (contact) 06:46, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.


The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Nominated by: 207.75.185.107 (talk) 19:53, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?

Support


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.


The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Nominated by: 207.81.230.86 (talk) 03:13, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?

Support


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.


Nominated by: — Yash [talk] 03:54, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? I don't think if anyone is unaware of all the technical work that Scotty has been doing around. He operates User:Snotbot and has created numerous helpful tools on toolserver. His work on the technical side of pedia' has been exceptional with a bucket full of tools that absolutely awesome. Undoubtedly, he deserves some recognition for this and is an awesome pedian' in my view. — Yash [talk] 03:54, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support


Nominated by: Anthonyhcole (talk) 08:53, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? Colin is one of the major contributors to our medical sourcing guideline, and so jointly responsible for the reliability of our medical content. He has contributed large amounts of high quality medical content and is an active upholder of the quality of our featured pictures.

Support


Nominated by: WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 22:29, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? I will list two reasons why Slp1 is awesome:

  1. Her sustained, calm and adroit management of abusive POV editors on contentious pages; and
  2. The neutral, well-sourced pages that result from these situations.

There are more, but I don't want to make her blush. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 22:29, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Nominated by: Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 00:28, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
Tito has been helping new editors at WikiProject India, Adopt-a-user and WP:CVUA for almost two years now (an example). He could use a token of appreciation. Besides, he desperately needs a new T-shirt. :)
Support


Nominated by: Lova Falk talk 11:12, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? How is it possible this user is not yet nominated??? Such a dilligent, steady, reliable, good editor. Lova Falk talk 11:12, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support


Nominated by: Lova Falk talk 09:46, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? Such a good and tireless editor! Also helping many by answering lots of questions at the WP:Reference desk/Science.


Nominated by: Truthkeeper (talk) 09:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? For her significant contributions to FAC, FAR, DYK and generally across the encyclopedia.


An excellent admin, patient and calm. Totally deserves a t-shirt. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 01:41, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support


Nominated by: AutomaticStrikeout (TC) 19:12, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? Goes about its business quietly and never says a mean word to anyone even though it has racked up over 500,000 edits during almost six years of service! Of course, it does have the bad habit of removing content from other people's talk pages, but I think we can overlook it.

Support


Nominated by: Pine 22:47, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? Dcoetzee is a generous person, highly intelligent and knowledgeable, and has high level of technical skill. I'm also aware of his contributions to the Wikimedia Commons community including the donation of camera equipment.


Nominated by: Djembayz (talk) 14:02, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? In addition to being a gracious host at Wiki Loves Libraries 2012, George Washington University and responding to a call for remote editathon participation, this longstanding contributor is as prolific as Andy Warhol when it comes to creating high quality articles. Not sure how he does it, but hats off to him!

Support


Bishonen and her tribe of little monsters edit

Nominated by: Anthonyhcole (talk) 08:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? This formidable gang adds high-quality research and prose as well as grace, wit, sense and sensibility in bucket-loads.

Support


Nominated by: Anthonyhcole (talk) 09:00, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? MastCell is capable of sound argument. That's his most awesome quality, in my opinion, simply because of its relative rarity in this population. I'm sure others will fill out the rest.

Support

Wisdom is the judicious application of knowledge. It is a deep understanding and realization of people, things, events or situations, resulting in the ability to apply perceptions, judgments and actions in keeping with this understanding. It often requires control of one's emotional reactions (the "passions") so that universal principles, reason and knowledge prevail to determine one's actions.
Yup, that's what he's got! Gandydancer (talk) 22:29, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Just kidding, everybody (no worries, you don't have to subject yourself to that... if you don't want to). ;-)
But seriously, this one's a no-brainer. MastCell is among our absolute best, a very sensible editor who shoots from the hip and knows what he's talking about. I have always held his perspective in very high regard, and I truly wish we had more like him. Kurtis (talk) 00:43, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated by: --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:27, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? Prolific content contributor with over 18,000 edits to article space, over four thousand articles created including vital topics such as cheek pouch. Thine Antique Pen has also brought dozens of articles to Good status, and several lists to Featured status. When not improving articles, he also takes a leading role in protecting Wikipedia and its content from different sorts of fuckwittery, by dealing with the activities of serial sockpuppeteers, vandals, copyright infringers, hoaxers, and other disruptive editors.

Support


Nominated by: Green Cardamom

Why is this user awesome?
Northamerica1000 is a tireless and gracious contributor to Wikipedia
Support
Submitted by a previously nominated user who chose to re-gift their shirt to another deserving Wikimedian Jmatthews --JMatthews (WMF) (talk) 07:09, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
User:Green Cardamom: I truly appreciate the nomination, and thanks very much to User:JMatthews (WMF) for supporting above, but I respectfully decline because I prefer to keep my personal information private (e.g. mailing address). Sincerely, NorthAmerica1000 09:12, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated by: AutomaticStrikeout (TC) 00:30, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? Eric does fabulous work in many areas. He has helped quite a bit with improvement of Joe West (umpire) and other umpire articles. He also done good work with persondata, typo fixes and vandalism fighting using STiki. Eric was recently recognized as the Editor of the Week for his efforts.

Support I haven't been here for a while, but I would be foolish not to put in a good word for Eric, who is truly one of WikiProject Baseball and most definitely the Umpire Taskforce's biggest assets. Go Phightins! 03:36, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In RL, he is sometimes the only fan in the entire stadium that cheers for the umpires. ```Buster Seven Talk 22:43, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated by: Go Phightins! 21:17, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? A winner of Editor of the Week, she has shown a constant dedication to improvement of Wikipedia and deserves a shirt as a material token of appreciation for her efforts.

Support


Nominated by: ```Buster Seven Talk 06:40, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?

  • benzband pretty much saved Project punk. He injected much needed life into the project creating a Renaissance of sorts. The project may have died on the vine without his editing and monitoring it.

Support


Nominated by: --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:32, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? Huon has been active for years and years now, but what has particularly come to my attention has been his massive, constant, and comprehensive efforts to help new users. He's involved just about everywhere that helping new users can happen, and so far in 2013 he has been the editor who has done most in each and all of those different places. A lot of other people have been involved, many of them have put in huge numbers of hours and made a huge difference, but Huon is absolutely outstanding in this respect. I do have concerns that he may be spending far too much time online in order to deal with the many many requests for help on Wikipedia, and I feel that providing him with an elegant piece of apparel from this programme would assist by reminding him to go outside into the fresh air occasionally in order to show it off. (And would also mark our gratitude for his splendid contributions.)

Support


Nominated by: ```Buster Seven Talk 00:08, 16 April 2013

Why is this user awesome? Creates some truly amazing high-quality graphics. A true genius with all types of quite unbelievable results.


Nominated by: Erik91☆☆☆ 13:53, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? He did more than 100.000 edits :O --Erik91☆☆☆ 13:55, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support


Nominated by: 149.254.56.192 (talk) 14:44, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? Although Badmachine is banned, it doesn't mean he was never a great help towards the project. If Jack Merridew can be nominated, I don't see why not Badmachine.

Support

Absolutely not. Badmachine and GreenCKE are both GNAA trolls. The IP probably is too. Ban the IP and GreenCKE because they're trolls. 2605:EA00:1:1:0:0:AFDB:F2BF (talk) 21:36, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated by: 172.249.162.252 (talk) 20:06, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?

Support


Nominated by: Tito Dutta (talk) 08:38, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User details

WhisperToMe (talk contribs count logs page moves block log CA email)

Why is this user awesome? Admin since 2003, 325,900+ edits. Excellent contributor. Very friendly. One of the best editors I have ever seen in Wikipedia. --Tito Dutta (talk) 08:38, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support


Nominated by: JohnCD (talk) 21:35, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? Fram's dogged insistence that accuracy matters makes few friends but significantly improves the encyclopedia.

Support


Nominated by: Wer900talk 16:53, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? Viriditas is a prolific contributor of content to our encyclopedia, and has helped monumentally to build it up into what it is today. For these reasons, I think he deserves a t-shirt. Comment

Support


Nominated by: Dennis Brown - © Join WER 17:08, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?

She has over 44k edits, putting her in the top 1000 Wikipedians of all time, and a habit of sneaking onto new pages and quietly cleaning them up. She has a firm yet gentle way of dealing with problems as an admin. She still manages to keep her article edits over half of her contribs here as well, showing she has her eye on what is really important: content for the reader. That, and from my experience, she is really a kind person that manages to bring a little joy wherever she goes. She has unknowingly been a positive influence for me over the last year.


Nominated by: JohnCD (talk) 19:28, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?

For weeks he has been trawling through the AfC archives and flagging for deletion attack pages which have been lurking there for months, or sometimes for years. This is the sort of painstaking behind-the-scenes work necessary to keep an anyone-can-edit site running, but it is not appreciated as it should be.


Nominated by: Buster Seven Talk 12:49, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? She deserves a shirt so WP can reward her for her continuing efforts. Her name says it all. She is always learning, always gracious, always busy improving the Encyclopedia.

  • Support Almost 71,000 edits, 86.58% of which are to articles. That is a lot of dedication and hard work. I also noticed they spend over 10 edits per page, which tells me they are doing more than hit and run fixes and sticking it out to finish the job. Dennis Brown - © Join WER 14:56, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated by: Buster Seven Talk 13:02, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? An awesome contributor and participant in many phases of WP.

Support


Nominated by: ```Buster Seven Talk 20:54, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? Diiscool is a tireless editor that has co-edited all the Presidential Timelines since 2009. A pleasure to work with. Has created over 50 articles.

Support

  1. Excellent work: User:Diiscool#Selected_articles_created --Tito Dutta (contact) 08:53, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated by: Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 10:12, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? Mkdw not only puts a lot of time and effort into his edits, but he's taken on many of the responsibilities of an admin without even being an admin! (But we're trying to fix that...) He absolutely deserves a shirt! (Edit: We've fixed that!)

Support


Nominated by:Buster Seven Talk 13:17, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? A silent hard-working contributor. Works on towns and ghost towns.

Support


Nominated by: Geraldshields11 (talk) 14:44, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? Slowking4 is awesome in the real world because the editor takes care of newbies at edit-a-thons, online, and gives encouragement to others. Slowking4 worked on getting non-English speakers to edit at the festival on the DC Mall. Geraldshields11 (talk) 14:44, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support


Nominated by: ragesoss (talk) 20:52, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? Moogsi is a very friendly and helpful Commons admin, and is often around giving good advice about Commons on IRC.--ragesoss (talk) 20:52, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated by: 69.120.244.158 (talk) 23:31, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? This user constantly monitors Wikipedia for people who make obscene changes and keeps this site clean and accurate. He works a lot outside of the website advocating for Wikipedia to be made a reliable source. He constantly encourages great editors and is willing to take newbies under his wing. A fantastic editor who really deserves recognition for his outstanding work on the site, but mainly his personal encouraging relationship with people, and his work outside the site.

Support

Nominated by: Buster Seven Talk 13:20, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? A decade of high quality contributions

Support Buster Seven Talk 13:20, 26 April 2013 (UTC) as nominator[reply]


Nominated by: Nikkimaria (talk) 13:56, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? Great work in addressing systemic bias through her work with Women Scientists. Also dedicated work with the Education Program.

Support


Nominated by ```Buster Seven Talk 14:22, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? Great work and participation at WP:DYK Project and the Glee Project.


Support

  1. Strong support: Yes, excellent work at WP:DYK --Tito Dutta (contact) 12:27, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Yes, definitely. One of the people who keep DYK running.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 20:44, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]