Stewards/Confirm/2017/Pmlineditor

Pmlineditor

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: bn, en-4, hi-2
Personal info: Hi everyone. 2016 was my 2nd year as a steward, and unfortunately, I had significant periods of inactivity, especially in the 2nd half of the year. Last year, I had health issues in September-October, and once I'd gotten better, I was too busy with real life commitments that had been delayed. I was originally not planning to ask for confirmation (hence the late submission of the statement), but I think that I can be more useful this year, barring any exceptional circumstances. I don't expect to be the most active steward, but I will try to help out whenever I can, and definitely more than I did last year. At the moment, I only have admin rights in one project, so the majority of my time on Wikimedia projects can be dedicated to steward work. If I cannot maintain activity this year, I'll definitely not be asking for a further extension. I mainly work on handling spambots and LTAs, via global (b)locking and CU on login.wiki. I would like to continue helping in these areas if the community is willing to reconfirm me. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

বাংলা:

ভাষা: bn, en-4, hi-2
ব্যক্তিগত তথ্যাদি: translation needed

Deutsch:

Sprachen: bn, en-4, hi-2
Informationen zur Person: Hallo zusammen. 2016 war mein 2. Jahr als Steward und unglücklicherweise hatte ich erhebliche Zeitspannen von Inaktivität, besonders in der 2. Hälfte des Jahres. Letztes Jahr hatte ich Gesundheitsprobleme im September/Oktober, und als es mir besser ging, war ich zu viel mit Verpflichtungen im Realleben beschäftigt, die sich verzögert hatten. Ich hatte ursprünglich nicht geplant, mich bestätigen zu lassen (daher das später Ergänzen des Statements), aber ich denke, dass ich in diesem Jahr nützlicher sein kann, wenn nicht außergewöhnliche Umstände eintreten sollten. Ich erwarte nicht, der aktivste Steward zu sein, aber ich werde versuchen auszuhelfen, wo immer ich kann, und auf jeden Fall mehr als im letzten Jahr. Im Moment habe ich Adminrechte nur in einem Wiki, so dass die Mehrheit meiner Zeit in Wikimedia-Wikis der Steward-Tätigkeit gewidmet werden kann. Wenn ich in diesem Jahr nicht aktiv bleiben kann, werde ich definitiv nicht um eine weitere Verlängerung bitten. Ich arbeite hauptsächlich daran, Spambots und Langzeitmissbrauch zu handhaben, via globale (Zugriffs-)Sperren und CU im Login-Wiki. Ich würde gerne weiterhin in diesen Bereichen helfen, wenn die Community damit einverstanden ist, mich wieder zu bestätigen. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

español:

Idiomas: bn, en-4, hi-2
Información personal: Hola a todos. 2016 fue mi segundo año como steward, y desafortunadamente tuve períodos significativos de inactividad, especialmente en la segunda mitad del año. El año pasado, tuve problemas de salud en septiembre-octubre, y una vez que había mejorado, estaba demasiado ocupado con los compromisos de la vida real que se habían retrasado. Originalmente no estaba planeando pedir confirmación (de ahí la presentación tardía de la declaración), pero creo que puedo ser más útil este año, salvo circunstancias excepcionales. No espero ser el steward más activo, pero intentaré ayudar siempre que pueda, y definitivamente más que lo que hice el año pasado. Por el momento, sólo tengo derechos de administrador en un proyecto, por lo que la mayoría de mi tiempo en los proyectos de Wikimedia puede dedicarse al trabajo de steward. Si no puedo mantener la actividad este año, definitivamente no voy a pedir una prórroga. Trabajo principalmente en la manipulación de spambots y LTAs, a través de bloqueo global y CU en login.wiki. Me gustaría continuar ayudando en estas áreas si la comunidad está dispuesta a reconfirmarme. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

italiano:

Lingue: bn, en-4, hi-2
Informazioni personali: translation needed

Nederlands:

Taalvaardigheid: bn, en-4, hi-2
Persoonlijke informatie: translation needed

русский:

Языки: bn, en-4, hi-2
Личная информация: translation needed

Comments about Pmlineditor

Neutral While I can't vote to remove given his statement and this being the first such confirmation, and that I've never had a problem with their actions, I can't vote to keep given some of his lengthy inactivity in the past, one such incident resulting in the removal of GS. So neutral. --Rs chen 7754 14:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove 8/12 months with less than 5 steward actions, 6/12 months with 0 steward actions. I understand that real-life commitments can hinder Wikimedia activity, but perhaps it's better to take a break from steward activities until these issues are fixed. Best luck, --Vogone (talk) 14:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
{{neutral}} You are a good steward, but your activity levels are a bit concerning. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Decided to change to a weak keep per Juliancolton. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 09:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep IMO, he has sufficiently activity to keep his steward rights. I see no evidence of abuse by Pmlineditor. --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove inactivity...If a steward is not active in their first two years as a steward then they should not have the rights.--Ste moc 14:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral He has not been active in the last few months, but I think he can continue to serve as steward after all. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove inactivity --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:52, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, still trusted and has enough of a cross-wiki presence to be reasonably useful. I agree that we shouldn't keep inactive stewards around, but I respect Pmlineditor's pledge to not seek confirmation in 2018 if unable to increase activity over the next year. Given his long-term dedication to the project and continued willingness to help out, I think it's fair to approve one more term and see what happens. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Inactivity is an issue but still has my trust, and if he resumes activity would be a net positive to the team. Given the circumstances I would like giving him a chance.—Ah3kal (talk) 17:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mahir256 (talk) 18:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral great user, but concerns with inactivity. -FASTILY 19:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I can't say no, but wonder if you're using your time wisely for yourself. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Circumstances seem to have improved, and there are good explanations for the inactivity. Miniapolis 20:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Vogone --DCB (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- MechQuester (talk) 22:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove No. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Too inactive. Iazyges (talk) 00:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - Not active on Wikiversity since 2015! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 04:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 13:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per his honest statement. Hope he will be able to increase activity this year — NickK (talk) 14:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 14:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, while not one of the most active stewards, he's a very competent and trusted one.--Syum90 (talk) 19:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Rschen. I can't blame anyone for being inactive for health issues as I myself suffered them and Barras above is leaving because of them. I'd like to see you confirmed if you think you are strong enough to devote more time to stewardrying. —Marco Aurelio 22:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Krd 11:50, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 21:28, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:34, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:57, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep competent; reasonable explanation for low activity — would always be best to inform fellow-stewards if out of action for a time — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Billinghurst (talk)
Keep per MarcoAurelio. Luke 081515 12:41, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Archenzo (talk) 16:37, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Gridditsch (talk) 09:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 09:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Plagiat (talk) 19:46, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —An Macanese 15:19, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 22:19, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pmlineditor has never really been active in the steward role outside of mindlessly locking spam accounts. A good breakdown of his activity can be found using this tool. He rarely (and perhaps has never) participates in our internal discussions. That said, I'm not seeing any major errors looking through your actions, so I am not explicitly opposed to you continuing in this role. But since you are volunteering to do this, it would be nice to see some actual participation. – Ajraddatz (talk) 01:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Elmie (talk) 17:28, 15 February 2017 (UTC) maybe you get some more time in the futre[reply]
Keep Lepricavark (talk) 19:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:28, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove -- We need stewards actively working. If you're not using your flag then do the right thing and turn it in. Chris Troutman (talk) 12:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:54, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minoo (talk) 18:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Ajraddatz. Quiddity (talk) 22:08, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Not active. --Uğurkent^talk 19:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --masti <talk> 22:18, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It seems he became active again, and when he is around, he is a valued and helpful steward. However, if facing such extended absence again, he would better not seeking another confirmation in the role. RadiX ∞ 01:01, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I have no issues nor do I find the activity level concerning. Pmlineditor has a solid understanding of policy and their service to the project as a whole is valuable. Mifter (talk) 02:00, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns for me. Activity levels have been lower than ideal in second portion of last year but life gets in the way sometimes and the explanations make plenty of sense. Hope you'll be able to be more active next year! Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:49, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Encouraging a volunteer to work more cannot be done by kicking him. My best wishes for your health! --.js^{[democracy needed]} 13:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]