Stewards/Confirm/2013/Laaknor

The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

Laaknor

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: nb, en-3, nn-2, da-1, sv-1
Personal info: I've been a steward since 2009. I haven't been very active in the last year because of long-term sickness, but I'm still online on IRC several hours every day, and will hopefully be able to contribute with more in the future.

español:

Idiomas: en
Información personal: translation needed

русский:

Языки: en
Личная информация: translation needed

Deutsch:

Sprachen: en
Informationen zur Person: Ich bin seit 2009 Steward. Im letzten Jahr war ich wegen langandauernder Krankheit nicht sehr aktiv, aber ich bin immer noch mehrere Stunden täglich online im IRC und werde hoffentlich zukünftig mehr beitragen können.

Comments about Laaknor

I love you! :-D —DerHexer (Talk) 00:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I do not believe that 7-8 actions since the last reconfirmation are enough to keep the steward bit. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 00:23, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with Snowolf about the general idea that we should avoid keeping inactive stewards, but I'm not asking for the removal of his steward status yet. If Laaknor asks for reconfirmation, he certainly knows that he'll be more active on next year, and I trust him. I sincerely hope that he will be able to return soon ! ;-) -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 00:47, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Even though his activity has been low, Laaknor seeks confirmation and is aware of his low activity. I am inclined to Keep him as a steward, because of his expressed willingness to help. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Although Laaknor has low activity, he has stated that he'll be more active in the future, so I'm willing to Keep him this time too. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 10:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 12:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC) I hope Laaknor feels better and will be able to be more active this year. I trust him as steward and doesn´t think the lower activity is a problem, when there was a reason.[reply]
Not the most easiest decision here, however I'm inclined to say that we should keep you. I hope for some more activity within the next term. -Barras talk 13:46, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove 7-8 actions since the last reconfirmation--Steinsplitter (talk) 15:25, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - have minimum to meet the policy. --Jyothis (talk) 19:48, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 21:23, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Höstblomma. I know and trust Laaknor to do a good job when he has the energy for it, and have no problems with keeping him as a steward. :-) Jon Harald Søby (talk) 22:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Barras and Jon Harald Søby. Trijnstel_talk 22:35, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 02:56, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:24, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, per Snowolf but I agree with Barras. Érico Wouters ^msg 16:19, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Wojciech Pundit (talk) 17:19, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:51, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Has met policy minimum and has a history of good, solid steward work. -- Avi (talk) 13:38, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Millosh (talk) 14:02, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:27, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. Sorry. ✒ Bennylin 16:05, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please provide a reason for oppose as well. --Jyothis (talk) 13:01, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 23:29, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ja, sikkert det er en måte. --►Safir yüzüklü Cekli^mesaj 05:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep more activity is better; useful knowledge-base and skills; otherwise per Barras — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Billinghurst (talk) 13:56, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Real life takes precedence over time on WM wikis; however, I'd like to see a bit more activity Hurricanefan24 (talk) 18:06, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 18:56, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Still chance to be more active.--Jusjih (talk) 13:26, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ruslik (talk) 19:24, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 17:43, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Snowolf. --N KOzi^Talk 19:30, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 12:56, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP MoiraMoira (talk) 20:56, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Per Wojciech, I trust him. LeinaD (t) 21:09, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. He hasn't been the most active steward, but he has a good explanation (being sick). Certainly this is enough to remain a steward. If he wants to continue to be a steward, then I can only support. πr² (t • c) 23:49, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]