Meta:Requests for adminship/Az1568 2

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Az1568 edit

Az1568 (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)

Ending 11:32, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi all! Today it's my pleasure to nominate someone for adminship on meta whom most of the people who are around little longer will remember. I'm happy to introduce Az1568 (talk · contribs) to you. He used to be an admin on this project quite some years ago and was also one of our bureaucrats. In April 2012, he has been removed for inactivity while he was working for the WMF.

Now that Az1568 is back and actively tagging pages for deletion (admin only), I think we would really benefit from making him an admin here again. His contributions to this project certainly show some need for the few extra tools. He's a lot of experiences here on Meta-Wiki and his knowledge of the project would surely be helpful to all of us. Furthermore, he is one of the longest serving (senior) staff members of the countervandalism project helping on IRC and also helping to maintain and keep the project active. As an active user here at Meta, I have no doubt his use of the tools will be for the benefit of the project, and hope you will all agree. -Barras talk 10:29, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Barras! I'm thrilled to be back again and I accept this nomination. :-) --Az1568 (talk) 10:36, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - As nominator! -Barras talk 10:29, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Welcome back old friend :) ..--Ste moc 10:49, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 10:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Without any hesitation at all. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:39, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 13:30, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per barras --Grind24 (talk) 13:37, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uğurkent^talk 13:41, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Glad to have you back. Trijnstel_talk 14:08, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good work at Wikibooks! --Atcovi (talk) 14:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Obviously. PiRSquared17 (talk) 19:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure. Eurodyne (talk) 20:30, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? -FASTILY 01:55, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support quite nice addition from CVN people.--AldNonymous^Bicara? 02:15, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support definitely. Welcome back! Ajraddatz (talk) 02:21, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 02:26, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Welcome back ;) Ruy Pugliesi^◥ 17:43, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool beans. Theo10011 (talk) 18:53, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
support —DerHexer (Talk) 00:36, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Experienced and seems like a nice person. :-) --Glaisher (talk) 15:30, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cbrown1023 talk 20:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support with pleasure. ~ Nahid ^Talk 20:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course Mardetanha ^talk 20:53, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 08:54, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Courcelles 15:40, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. –BruTe ^talk 20:10, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support experienced--Alexmar983 (talk) 23:43, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm glad to see Az1568 active again and I'm sure Meta will benefit from them having access to the sysop tools once mome. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 16:23, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support, QuiteUnusual (talk) 14:34, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Matiia (talk) 15:38, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Closed as successful, unanimous support.: --M/ (talk) 11:31, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]