Merchandise giveaways/Nominations/Archive 2

Nominated by: jc37 20:47, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?

Another editor who I think is very humble about the many things they do to help out At Wikipedia.

And is a clueful, discerning voice in project discussions.


Support


Nominated by: jc37 20:49, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?

J Greb has been the "go to guy" concerning images and templates/infoboxes/navboxes for the comics wikiproject among many other things. Very patient and helpful.


Support


Nominated by: Anonymous User

Why is this user awesome?
Ryan's Wiki-story is truly terrific, from a blocked editor to one of the most respected editors we've got. On a wiki-break now, so you can surprise him when he comes back.


Support
Submitted through the google doc by a user who wishes to remain anonymous! Jalexander--WMF 01:31, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated by: Anonymous User


Why is this user awesome?
Muboshgu does simply amazing work in creation creation/expansion. Look at his userpage, it's basically mind-blowing.


Support
Submitted through the google doc by a user who wishes to remain anonymous! Jalexander--WMF 19:02, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Of course! AutomaticStrikeout 22:54, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Does some great article work. J36miles (talk) 18:45, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Who else has done more for the baseball project? Has me beat by a mile here. Wizardman 03:26, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Creates really high quality and niche articles. Essential to the project. And pleasant too! The Rambling Man (talk) 17:38, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. A very good editor. Gandydancer (talk) 00:42, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Secret account 07:19, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. While I couldn't be less interested in his favourite subject matter, Muboshgu has contributed high-quality content across the board. A vital contributor. GRAPPLE X 19:36, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated by: JohnCD (talk) 19:40, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
Many people will not have met this user, but any admin who works the speedy-deletion queue will know that, day after day, Mean as custard painstakingly filters the sludge that comes through the New Pages pipe and tags the spam for deletion. From the "cheap Louis Vuitton handbag" spambots to the "we have always out performed expectations and brought happiness to everyone" builders, the "top-notch public relations firm" that "specializes in diverse innovative management and marketing solutions" and the providers of "high quality gentle dental care in warm, friendly environment", Mean as custard has got their number. This is the sort of unglamorous behind-the-scenes work that gets little recognition but is essential to Wikipedia's survival.


Support


Nominated by: Peter cohen (talk) 23:20, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
Andreas has a history of content writing as evidenced on his page and has received barnstars from many people. However, his most important work is in the area of governance and in working to ensure that problematic practices in Wikimedia organisations can be identified and improved.
Support


Nominated by: Philosopher Let us reason together. 00:41, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
For his continued contributions to the English Wikipedia by way of Commons. He has taken a great many photographs (see his userpage) and made a great many maps, such as File:ElectoralCollege2012.svg, for use on the 'pedia.


Support
Sure, we don't recognize our friends over at the Commons enough. Let's change that. Go Phightins! 04:02, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated by: Thine Antique Pen (talk) 20:36, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
Demiurge1000 frequently works in many areas of Wikipedia. This includes copy-editing, dealing with BLP violations, and also running an adoption program. Along with this, Demiurge1000 has 2 FAs, 12 GAs, and eight DYKs.


Support


Nominated by: Cyclopiatalk 20:38, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
For fighting the uphill battle for a constructive approach at building the sum of all human knowledge. Dream Focus recognizes that problems are solved by improvement, not by destruction. He is one of the few working and arguing to rescue the work of other editors at WP:ARS and WP:AFD. In a Wikipedia which seems more bent on shooting articles first and ask questions later and that is sadly driving new contributors away, people like Dream Focus deserve praise. And a gift  .


Support


Nominated by: LadyofShalott 00:11, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
Mandarax works tirelessly in the background to help things run smoothly and is always friendly and helpful to other editors. His great number of edits reflects his helping to keep things clean and organized. LadyofShalott 00:11, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support edit


Nominated by: 7&6=thirteen () 21:09, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
He works his rear off for the project, and produces great quality and quantity. He is collegial and supportive of other users and the encyclopedia. He exemplifies the best of us, and does so in a quiet way.


Support


Nominated by: Tiyang (talk) 12:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
His edit history speaks for itself - well over 100000 edits. Respectfully,
Support


Nominated by: Lova Falk talk 18:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
Does such a great job, and has been doing such a great job, for such a long time.
Support


Nominated by: --Penbat (talk) 20:04, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
He has done a huge amount of work in the last few years mainly on psychology articles and some sociology & philosophy. His work is meticulously well cited. He has managed to make many major improvements to tough and neglected psychology articles varying from everyday concepts to advanced academic theory. He often manages to add serious meat to poorly cited articles.


Support


Nominated by: TheSpecialUser TSU 11:07, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
110K+ edits of which 53% (60K) are to main space! Loads of DYKs; around 220, 4 GAs and 2 FAs. This doesn't include all the tireless work they have been doing here. I truly believe that this rare editor deserves at least a t-shirt. TheSpecialUser TSU 11:07, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support


Nominated by: TheSpecialUser TSU 10:56, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
Crisco has been doing amazing job. Along with 52K+ edits, he has 400 DYKs, 54 GAs, 11 FAs and 5 FLs. I think this sums up pretty well why he is an awesome editor. TheSpecialUser TSU 10:56, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Support


Nominated by: Tito Dutta (talk) 18:36, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
Dwaipayanc (talk contribs count logs page moves block log CA email)
Most of the editors have been nominated above are admins. Dwaipayan(c) is not an admin. He has been editing since 2006. Very helpful editor and regularly offers help to new editors. He has some 24,000 edits. But, that does not show his contribution. He regularly makes major changes in article (copyediting the whole article, writing a long article) in single edits. --Tito Dutta (talk) 18:36, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Support


Nominated by: LadyofShalott 16:51, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
I think he's probably single-handedly responsible for most of the completed persondata boxes that we have.


Support


Nominated by: Anonymous User

Why is this user awesome?
Significant contributions to literature articles.


Support
Submitted through the google doc by a user who wishes to remain anonymous. Jalexander--WMF 04:51, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated by:  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
Easily one of the best photographers we have on the project, with something like 200 FPs (his user page says 274; these are mostly of birds, but also including landscapes, architecture, minerals, and mammals). He has also written articles on math-related subjects.


Support


Nominated by: Legoktm (talk) 07:14, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
Ori spends his time making the software that powers Wikipedia a better editing environment. He's also part of the E3 team that is working to improve Wikipedia, and then deals with the ensuing complaints. Most recently he pushed forward the issue of dropping the "my" prefix from the personal tools.

He's also extremely helpful to any user who might have questions and suggestions, and will go the extra distance to see them through the end of the process.
Support


Nominated by: v/r - TP 21:12, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
Besides being a sysop, oversighter, and checkuser, Ponyo has essentially taken on the highest load of work on the Unblock ticket request system. She keeps the new requests cleared so users have a prompt response from an administrator and has closed 1008 tickets at the time of this posting which means among a list of 79 registered administrators, she alone has pulled 1/5th of the total workflow since the system launched in March 2011. She is also a member of OTRS and I imagine she has done as much work there. Between OTRS and UTRS, Ponyo constantly deals with disgruntled folks and is the face of Wikipedia and our administrators to them. She definitely deserves at least a t-shirt.


Support

  1. --v/r - TP 21:12, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Of course --Tito Dutta (talk) 23:45, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oh, yeah. - Sitush (talk) 00:42, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. She rocks. The Interior (Talk) 00:45, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Well deserved. ϢereSpielChequers 01:52, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Sure. AutomaticStrikeout (TC) 06:06, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Begoontalk 14:47, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Absofrigginlutely. --j⚛e deckertalk 05:38, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Absolutely. Torreslfchero (talk) 15:28, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10. excellent hard worker. 71.185.82.233 (talk) 19:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) I moved this from a second nomination that someone made lower in the article. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:19, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Shower with t-shirts I agree with this- Ponyo is a hard worker! Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:19, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated by: Anthonyhcole (talk) 23:59, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
Patient, wise, fair, visionary, prolific, accomplished editor, organiser, admin and sometimes arbitrator. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 23:59, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Support


Nominated by: David1217 What I've done 04:42, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
One of Wikipedia's hardest-working admins, he consistently deals with the good, the bad, and the ugly of Wikipedia's new pages.


Support


Nominated by: -— Isarra 21:15, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
BECAUSE HE IS.

But seriously, Matma Rex has been a wonderful force behind the scenes with MediaWiki, working a volunteer to improve general interface things and in particular move to clean up involved code, as well as helping immensely toward acclimating potential new contributors to the MediaWiki codebase - I know I probably would have gotten fed up and left had it not been for him, and he is always ready to help in #mediawiki with even the most basic questions.

He is also, it would seem, one of plwp's administrators who is happy to work behind the scenes on anything technical, be it abusefilter or debugging for the one person still using windows 98 and IE6 or whatever it was, and also explaining new changes and keeping the local populace from panicking - something that is always needed regardless of the project.

I wish I could say more, but this is all I've seen of him, though it has all been lovely.


Support

  1. Sure Per nom! --Tito Dutta (contact) 06:27, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Sure thing - if you want some work on a MediaWiki extension or general technical stuff, the user is a great and keen help. Plus a pretty reasonable bot operator + a voice of reason in discussion. aegis maelstrom δ 14:11, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated by: JohnCD (talk) 22:12, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
Her comments at deletion discussions are always level-headed and constructive: better yet, she saves articles by going out and digging up sources. The best sort of article rescuer. JohnCD (talk) 22:12, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Support


Nominated by: Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:55, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
I'm nominating Chiswick for several reasons. Not only is he an incredibly hard worker, but he always puts a lot of thought into the AfDs that he has contributed to. With almost 20,000 edits and at least 60 pages that he has created himself, he's long overdue for a t-shirt to symbolize his awesomeness!Tokyogirl79 (talk) 15:51, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Support


MichaelQSchmidt (aka Schmidt) edit

Nominated by: Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:30, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
If anything, Schmidt deserves a shirt for every day of the year! Not only has he made 42,624 edits so far, he's created 69 articles, and helps coordinate WP:FILM. A look through his edits will show how much work he's put into Wikipedia, especially to film related articles.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 15:51, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Support

  1. --v/r - TP 23:50, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I've come across Michael many times on wiki, he's a great asset to the pedia. ϢereSpielChequers 23:00, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. MQS is great. In fact, he deserves his own article--perhaps. Drmies (talk) 16:21, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. You didn't always feel that way Drmies [13] and even disagreed with me back when I was known as User:Pharmboy, forcing me to correct you a bit ;-) Fortunately MQS is a very forgiving individual, which is yet one more reason to give him a shirt. Dennis Brown - © Join WER 16:47, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. I remember Schmidts' deligent and tireless work during the early days of the Article Rescue Squad. Buster Seven Talk 05:47, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Yes, he should get a shirt.--The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 05:04, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. SupportChed :  ?  22:14, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Belated support: Count me. TitoDutta 17:52, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated by: David1217 What I've done 02:00, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
TTO maintains Twinkle, one of Wikipedia's most useful tools.


Support


Nominated by: Anonymous User

Why is this user awesome?
A fine sysop, I'm surprised Bwilkins was not yet nominated.


Support
Submitted through the google doc by a user who wishes to remain anonymous! Jalexander--WMF 00:24, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated by: Buster Seven Talk 06:20, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
G-fan is a user that recently increased his involvement w/WP and is doing great work at many venues. Converses with new editors in a positive way and can be stern with problem editors. BTW...the fact that he nominated me for a shirt has nothing to do with this nomination. Well.....almost nothing. ```Buster Seven Talk 06:20, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Support


Nominated by: GRAPPLE X 12:29, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?

Besides contributing masses of quality articles to the project (here's a handy list), Ruby is also an enthusiastic reviewer of other editors' work, a vital but thankless career path that keeps this place running nicely. Being a machine and all, she's turned out significantly more GA reviews than she has requested, which is no easy task. I'd say a t-shirt is in order at the vey least. GRAPPLE X 12:29, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Support


Nominated by: SatuSuro 10:01, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? Stays with it despite the conditions that would daunt the faint hearted... a very valuable stayer - not enough around...

Support


Nominated by:  –
 – Gareth Griffith-Jones |The Welsh Buzzard| 12:29, 3 January 2013 (UTC) Why is this user awesome? [reply]

  • An ever-industrious editor, Martin is able to be the most helpful of my many, British-Wikipedian friends. For me, a constant source of inspiration, wit and guidance. Humour is as natural to him as breathing is to the rest of us. But, when a serious matter occurs, he has the canny knack of "hitting the spot" dead on. When I feel low, it is to Martin Evans that I always turnTemplate:Spaced ndashGareth Griffith-Jones[[User talk:Gareth Griffith-Jones|Template:Spaced ndashThe Welsh]]Buzzard

Support


Nominated by: — Coren (talk) 00:05, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? Antandrus has been with us since the Elder Days of 2004, and has been one of the keystones of Wikipedia's coverage of music and music theory. He's also served us as one of the most respected and dedicated administrators of the project, combining his contribution to the substance with stalwart defence of the project. He may be an unsung hero, but he shouldn't be an unclothed hero! — Coren (talk) 00:05, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support


Nominated by: Gtwfan52 (talk) 03:37, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
Buster is one of the driving forces in the editor retention project, and in all ways works toward being as helpful and collaborative as one can possibly be. He is an asset to the community.


Support


Nominated by: Anthonyhcole (talk) 02:28, 4 January 2013 (UTC) Why is this user awesome? A major contributor to policy and omnipotent, omnipresent defender of the standard of our content, especially health-related content. Very wise. No exaggeration: without her, this encyclopedia would be visibly diminished. Support[reply]


Nominated by: David1217 What I've done 04:12, 30 December 2012 (UTC) Why is this user awesome? Fluffernutter is a great user who always is a reasonable voice in a discussion. In addition, she has the hats of admin and oversighter—where she deals with the worst stuff on Wikipedia that needs to be hidden. And she's got a sandwich for a username! Support[reply]


Nominated by: Lova Falk talk 16:26, 31 December 2012 (UTC) Why is this user awesome? An editor with people skills and a great sense of humor - and who knows what he is writing about. Support[reply]


Nominated by: Pine 20:39, 2 January 2013 (UTC) Why is this user awesome? Helpful and nice user, goes above and beyond the call of duty![reply]

  1. Support --Pine 20:39, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support for services to the back of the queue at NPP ϢereSpielChequers 13:30, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - per WSC, Dragonfly handles some of the worst stuff at NPP and is invaluable there. Thehelpfulone 13:13, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated by: Djembayz (talk) 04:22, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
This editor's substantive articles of professional quality have greatly improved the coverage of the Indigenous peoples of North America. As Steve Jobs said,

I found that there were these incredibly great people at doing certain things, and that you couldn't replace one of these people with 50 average people. They could just do things that no number of average people could do.

A t-shirt or other gift would be a good start for recognizing this sort of expert editor.


Support


Nominated by: ϢereSpielChequers 23:31, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
As well as contributing several good articles, including The Cats of Ulthar, Canadian Paul is one of the team who keep on top of our death anomalies, sorting out articles where we are saying that someone is alive but one or more other languages of Wikipedia say they are dead. ϢereSpielChequers 23:31, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Support


Nominated by: ϢereSpielChequers 11:25, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
DQ is a very helpful Wikipedian, he's run bot runs for me and done lots of work combating sockpuppetry ϢereSpielChequers 11:25, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support

  1. In addition to the DQ bots, he is also a dev on the ACC tool and helped create and is a dev for the UTRS tool.--v/r - TP 21:13, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. You know what, DQ works his tail off in ways that most people don't realize. Running CU doesn't make contrib entries, so it gets overlooked but I know from experience that ever since he received the CU bit, he had to hit the ground running, at full speed, and he has done it with style. At SPI, he has been really thoughtful in explaining why he can't run a CU, patient in working with clerks and has stepped up to the plate to help keep the place from being overrun with socks. I would agree that a t-shirt has been well earned. Dennis Brown - © Join WER 23:18, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. DeltaQuad was one of the other admins who helped close this nightmare, and his work on that was exceptional. Obvious support. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:51, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Pine 18:16, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Of course. Torreslfchero (talk) 15:28, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Amazing user and check user. Vacationnine 23:26, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support For ACC and CU works! --Tito Dutta (contact) 06:26, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated by: T.I.M(Contact) 21:49, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
An awesome, long term editor and admin who is bold, helpful, constructive and very active! Definitely deserves that little something extra for his great history of contributions.
Support

  1. I was going to nominate Reaper, but you beat me to it. Other than blowing up the wiki, he's a good guy. ;^) David1217 What I've done 00:07, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I coaxed the adding of Reaper to the stocks, which he took in the best of spirits with never a complaint. Reaper does a lot of stuff behind the scenes that makes the place run smoother, plus a lot of hard work at SPI that is easy to miss. Calm, collected and always setting a good example, a t-shirt has been well earned. Dennis Brown - © Join WER 18:49, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Certainly. AutomaticStrikeout (TC) 18:10, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Very helpful and great admin. Torreslfchero (talk) 15:29, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Webclient101talk 07:22, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
7. 100% yes. -- LuK3 (Talk) 03:38, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated by: Anthonyhcole (talk) 00:02, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
Intelligent, perspicacious, hard-working, fair, compassionate (did I say intelligent?) arbitrator.


Support


Nominated by: Anthonyhcole (talk) 00:11, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
Upholder of quality on all topic areas, a fine editor, indefatigable protector of medical content.


Support

A bunny of Caerbannog, methinks. Kablammo (talk) 02:11, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated by: Bence (talk) 22:13, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? Raystorm is an awesome new member of the Affiliations Committee , and apparently also has time to edit a number of Wikipedias, she deserves some shirts! –Bence (talk) 22:13, 4 January 2013 (UTC) Support[reply]


Nominated by: — Ched :  ?  20:29, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? From editing articles, to helping others with the mop, to assisting people with name changes and other 'crat duties, 28Bytes is one of the most helpful, and active Wikipedians around. He researches before jumping to conclusions, and he always treats other people fairly. A truly top-notch person. — Ched :  ?  20:29, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support

ps: Precious words of reason and moderation with right bite --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:59, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated by: Pine 23:37, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome? This user absolutely lives up to his name by being helpful and polite. He's one of the IRC superops and I've also seen him doing good work on Meta and making useful comments on Wikimedia-l.

  1. Support --Pine 23:37, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Tito Dutta (talk) 03:43, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Yup. Personal capacity, not staff. -Philippe (talk) 19:15, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support - A wonderful Wikipedian, reminding me so often why the community works - because they care about helping others. James F. (talk) 02:00, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support great user, wonderful knowledge and dedication to the projects. Snowolf How can I help? 03:01, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support very helpful :P Legoktm (talk) 06:55, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support the giving of a Tshirt to this good natured and helpful editor. Dennis Brown - © Join WER 13:24, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support Incredibly helpful. Also per James F. YuviPanda (talk) 20:29, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Strong support THO is amazing and he's gonna make a fine economist :) Almonroth 22:23, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support SarahStierch (talk) 01:04, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support --Ganímedes (talk) 13:01, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated by: Yoninah (talk) 15:26, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
For 10 years now, IZAK has made his mark on virtually every page under WikiProject Judaism, opening new topics, adding hard-to-find sources, encouraging other writers to improve pages, fine-tuning category pages, and, most of all, clarifying and defending the tenets of mainstream Judaism on countless AFD discussion pages. IZAK deserves a t-shirt and more for his dedication and consistent input, with the goal of building Wikipedia into a great encyclopedia.


Support