I think it's a great solution for global patrollers and some cross-wiki; as they can use their custom signatures when talking for other people. Thingofme (talk) 08:40, 14 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
We already have global user pages that autotransclude to local wiki rights ? How much does this really add on top of that ? —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 09:21, 14 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This is a global signature, not a global userpage. We have used a global userpage already, but no global signature (with some language variants) Thingofme (talk) 11:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I know, but why do they NEED it ? or do they just like it ? It doesn't seem essential for communication at least. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 15:44, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@TheDJ: seems like a nice-to-have. Many users customize their signature, and also edit on many projects; having to copy/paste their custom signature to each project can be annoying. For many, they will probably just break things with this - for example by not using the cannoical namesapce names for "User" / "User talk" in such a global signature when updating it from a local project in another language. — xaosfluxTalk 20:24, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose per many comments from last year's Wishlist. Not a priority, and can introduce policy violations when different wikis have different rules around signatures. — Bilorv (talk) 11:25, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support When a wiki identifies it has policy objections, an option to disable global signs could be provided for an interface admin — DaxServer (t · c) 21:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support * Pppery * it has begun 18:42, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Strong support Just fix this lack-of-support of global settings. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
22:33, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Oppose per the reasons presented last year. PorkchopGMX (on the go) (talk) 17:57, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Neutral per Porkchop 21:24, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
