Abstract Wikipedia/Wikifunctions logo concept/Proposal 13

Logo's idea is to incorporate some of the known coding symbology, in this case the curly brackets and semi-colon
Thought was used to make sure that logo remain legible when reduced to smaller sizes
Meant to be as simple as possible without much clutter

Voting edit

Voting has closed.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Support Shizhao (talk) 02:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very C-like, but it's very recognizable and straightforward. Luk3 (talk) 02:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Chaddy (talk) 03:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Juan90264 (talk) 03:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support —〚 Arronwan 〛 03:52, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Abuluntu (👨🏼‍💻💬) 07:09, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Betseg (talk) 07:45, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Vojtasafr (talk) 08:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Teseo (talk) 08:36, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Anntinomy (talk) 08:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poul G (talk) 08:43, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 09:43, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jon Harald Søby (talk) 10:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it because it's simple and culturally independent. Other logos are either latin-greek or too complex. Unfortunatelly this one has been rendered with the title of the project underneath, which impairs its visual comparison to other options. Solstag (talk) 11:09, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pablussky (talk) 11:23, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Peter Bowman (talk) 11:48, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nw520 (talk) 12:07, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --- Vajotwo (post) 12:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support JSoos (talk) 13:30, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sacamol (talk) 14:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palu (talk) 14:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice invertion and love the miniture also Zblace (talk) 17:07, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ain92 (talk) 18:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Koreanovsky (Ča–Kaj–Što?!) 18:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ToprakM ^✉ 19:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nclm (talk) 21:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Danapit (talk) 21:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ivanics (talk) 01:01, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Neat design!! It can represent PHP, CSS, javascript... Serg!o (talk) 01:36, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm a fan of understatement. Anon423 (talk) 02:43, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pewdiepie12321 (talk) 09:13, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dorades (talk) 09:15, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gopico (talk) 09:21, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support BEST ONE BY FAR! Neat symbolism, hidden curly brackets, a semicolon, everything looks great! Love it :D ActuallyNeverHappened02 (talk) 14:34, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hydriz (talk) 03:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Aqetz (talk) 05:10, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Theo Oppewal (talk) 07:45, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Renvoy (talk) 11:03, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Eavq (talk) 11:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support 이강철 (talk) 15:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good simplicity. Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 20:03, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Monirec (talk) 08:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is my LaTeX idea: our function language. Giacomo Alessandroni ^{let's talk!} 19:04, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Grüße vom Sänger ♫^(Reden) Hold the election 20:48, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -sasha- (talk) 13:32, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ashok Talk 14:04, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes! Quite unique says alot. Em-mustapha ^{User | talk} 00:02, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support John Samuel 07:41, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Aca (talk) 16:25, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Abzp (talk) 21:11, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nicolabel (talk) 22:38, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 08:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support β₁₆ - (talk) 09:10, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeedous (talk) 10:52, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wiki13 (talk) 11:01, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Artrixs (talk) 11:12, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wikipeter-HH (talk) 14:18, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support LydiaPintscher (talk) 17:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Recognisable but still simple Husky (talk) 18:56, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Epìdosis 19:17, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support WikiLuke (talk) 21:32, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lokal_Profil (talk) 22:49, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Mietchen (talk) 03:39, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 06:17, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support josecurioso ❯❯❯ Tell me! 00:04, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support this is closer to the better Abubakar A Gwanki (talk) 00:32, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the simplicity and the coding symbols. TiagoLubiana (talk) 01:35, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Peacearth (talk) at 03:14, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support This would be my first choice as it matches with name of wiki plus if the wiki is about functions what can be better than semicolon (ofcourse I'm not undermining any other programming language but ; is kind of famous). ‐‐1997kB (talk) 03:59, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support NaufalF (talk) 04:47, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support LaMagiaaa (talk) 06:01, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support KirkLU (talk) 07:50, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — putnik 08:24, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support KPFC 💬 09:35, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ash Crow (talk) 09:37, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sunny00217 09:51, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Knudmoeller (talk) 10:36, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support OwenBlacker (Talk) 10:51, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sillyfolkboy (talk) 12:13, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 13:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — WikiLucas (🖋️) 17:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Deansfa (talk) 18:04, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 19:30, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Connor Hiddleson (talk) 19:59, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support power~enwiki (talk) 22:45, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 00:39, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adamant.pwn (talk) 01:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support DSwissK | 💬 10:01, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pepe piton (talk) 00:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support FiliP ██ 06:24, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Runner1928 (talk) 21:22, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Camelia (talk) 21:36, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Shani Evenstein. 10:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Csisc (talk) 17:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support the wub "?!" 18:23, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Syadthabigo (talk) 02:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bastenbas (talk) 06:10, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Arianit (talk) 18:09, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mastrocom (talk) 20:02, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thiemo Kreuz (WMDE) (talk) 16:37, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although not all languages are C-like (although a clear majority are), I think that those who care about code and coding will understand instantly what it's talking about. SteveBaker (talk) 18:41, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.