Open main menu

Afrikaans | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Boarisch | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | བོད་ཡིག | bosanski | català | کوردی | corsu | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | ދިވެހިބަސް | Ελληνικά | emiliàn e rumagnòl | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | Nordfriisk | Frysk | galego | Alemannisch | ગુજરાતી | עברית | हिन्दी | Fiji Hindi | hrvatski | magyar | հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Ido | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | ភាសាខ្មែរ | 한국어 | kar | kurdî | Limburgs | lietuvių | Minangkabau | македонски | മലയാളം | молдовеняскэ | Bahasa Melayu | မြန်မာဘာသာ | مازِرونی | Napulitano | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | Kapampangan | polski | português | پښتو | Runa Simi | română | русский | sicilianu | سنڌي | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | Soomaaliga | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ślůnski | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkmençe | Tagalog | Türkçe | татарча/tatarça | ⵜⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵜ  | українська | اردو | oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча | Tiếng Việt | 吴语 | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/-

Contents

Welcome to Meta!Edit

Hello, Nostal. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum if you need help with something (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!

-- Meta-Wiki Welcome (talk) 22:02, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

User pageEdit

Hi. I removed the admin template from your user page. From what I can see you are not an admin here. -- Tegel (Talk) 00:21, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

SignatureEdit

Could you fix your signature as well? As it is now the text after your signature becomes small. It seems like you forgot to add </sup> in the end of the signature. -- Tegel (Talk) 00:33, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
The only signature I can use is this one ►Thundra2000 19:14, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
And please make the proper edit on my User:Page and edit my signatures (properly).
Thank you.
Thundra2000 19:14, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Meta. Please add your signature to Special:Preferences and check "Wikitext signature". Then ~~~~ will generate your personal signature. If you don't want to use four tildes for whatever reason, you should add five tildes to the end of your sig so it adds a timestamp (using just four adds this automatically too). Additionally, it would be nice if you would indent your posts with colons at the beginning of the lines. Regards, PiRSquared17 (talk) 02:31, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Thundra2000 19:14, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
I won't "gay" as a synonym for "bad" since you insist that it's "offense".
Why do you people keep on telling me about the sandbox I don't care or the five (5) letter tide.
Okay I'm just using the current 2 functioning signatures if I can't access my other ones I'll delete them.
I don't like the four tides because it has no theme but the customized signatures you can basically do anything its almost limitless.
I've also tooken habits from Tegel such as replying on my User:Talk Page
Thank you.
Thundra2000 19:14, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Please, instead of using <br />, you can just prefix every line with a colon or use two newlines (i.e., a blank line between two lines of text). Also, please note that Meta is not a social network. We are here to help the Wikimedia movement, not just to design fun signatures. I have signed your guestbook as you requested, but I think guestbooks are not part of the scope of Meta-Wiki. PiRSquared17 (talk) 17:30, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Thundra2000 19:14, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
I don't care I'm not using the four letter tide/five letter tide or whatever your asking I'm using my own signature its my choice and stop telling me what to do your not the boss of me you rights or superiority over me if you continue doing this I will see that your account is disabled wiki-wide, do you understand?
Thundra2000 19:14, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Sorry if I annoyed you. I was just trying to help. PiRSquared17 (talk) 17:39, 18 February 2014 (UTC)


I'm really sorry too I should of listened to your suggestion and I shouldn't freaked out too.
Thundra2000 19:14, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

BlockedEdit


Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 22:19, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
--02:04, 20 February 2014 (UTC)Nostal

Unblock request declined

This blocked user has had his or her unblock request reviewed by one or more administrators, who has/have reviewed and declined this request.
Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request reason: Okay what? and why?.....(why are my signatures/signature's/signatures'/signature(s) disabled as well?)
Decline reason: Disruptive editing, no indication that such will change. Come back and ask again in 2015  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:06, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

English | español | français | magyar | italiano | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | 中文 | edit


--02:04, 20 February 2014 (UTC)Nostal

Unblock request declined

This blocked user has had his or her unblock request reviewed by one or more administrators, who has/have reviewed and declined this request.
Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request reason: Okay to suggest me doing one "disruptive edit" (which was me accidentally using the wrong signatures/signature's/signatures'/signatures's/signature(s)/signature(s)') I meant to use my signature to tell the user (I told the user not to vandalize talk pages/page's/pages'/pages's/page(s)/page(s)' 'cause a wikipedian friend told me he was vandalizing articles/article's/articles'/article(s)/article(s)') And the ban/block reason said: "Vandalism-only account" even though my "disruptive edit" would be considered only count of "vandalism" not several or multiple counts and what do they mean by 'Vandalism-only'?
Decline reason: Come back in 2015

English | español | français | magyar | italiano | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | 中文 | edit


Unblock request declined

This blocked user has had his or her unblock request reviewed by one or more administrators, who has/have reviewed and declined this request.
Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request reason: Hello why are you ignoring me?
Decline reason: Come back in 2015

English | español | français | magyar | italiano | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | 中文 | edit


Unblock request declined

This blocked user has had his or her unblock request reviewed by one or more administrators, who has/have reviewed and declined this request.
Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request reason: Still no response? and Tegel is accusing a new user of being my sock please tell him to stop
Decline reason: Come back in 2015

English | español | français | magyar | italiano | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | 中文 | edit


Unblock request declined

This blocked user has had his or her unblock request reviewed by one or more administrators, who has/have reviewed and declined this request.
Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request reason: If your just gonna ignore me then habitually block me
Decline reason: Come back in 2015

English | español | français | magyar | italiano | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | 中文 | edit


Unblock request declined

This blocked user has had his or her unblock request reviewed by one or more administrators, who has/have reviewed and declined this request.
Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request reason: A new user has access of the account and the previous user: no longer is in control. I have token the Nostal mantle. And will do good edits and good edits only
Decline reason: Come back in 2015

English | español | français | magyar | italiano | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | 中文 | edit

Making him wait till 2015 seems kinda harsh... Leucosticte (talk) 09:08, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

The user abused, and continued to abuse. This is a working wiki, we are not inhibiting editing at the content wikis.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:55, 2 March 2014 (UTC)


The previous user with access of this account (Nostal) has continued vandalism and broken many rules, anyways he had given up his account rights and has passed the Nostal mantle on to me I will use this account properly and do constructive edits only. And I don't see why I have to come back a year later eventhough this account is perfect for me to use I don't want to use a different account or create another account. --23:29, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Nostal

please tell me once and for all, have you seen this? --Goldenburg111 23:31, 5 March 2014 (UTC)


I haven't "this" until now. --23:38, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Nostal

If the user has given the password to someone else the account is compromised and will remain blocked. -- Tegel (Talk) 23:55, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Okay the previous owner has revoked his account access and given it to me. I personally know the previous owner and there account wasn't "compromised", but tell me if you're keeping the account blocked, if you aren't keeping it blocked I'd be happy to do use-full(constructive) edits, and last of all I don't want to create other account because this account has perfect free range access.
--Treevax 00:21, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Nostal

A compromised account is one which has been used by someone other than its main user (usually the person who created it, but some exceptions). We will certainly not unblock an account that is being used by multiple people and has been compromised. Sorry. PiRSquared17 (talk) 00:30, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

The account is currently being used by one person (editor) not multiple editors. If this account won't be unblocked I'll be forced to create another account. Bye. --00:49, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Nostal

So nobody else knows the password to it? PiRSquared17 (talk) 00:59, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Yes so nobody else knows the password to the account(not even the original account owner). --01:10, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Nostal

Just to add I temporarily thought I could be unblocked but I think its obvious that I must create an account to continue my Wiki Experience.--01:32, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Nostal

That would be considered block evasion. What would you do on Meta if unblocked? PiRSquared17 (talk) 01:59, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


Well I'm the only one on earth that knows the password to the account, no one else knows the password and how is that block evasion? I didn't create the account I'm the second person to take the Nostal mantle and I didn't even contribute with the account (outside of talk page access)
If Meta-Wiki Unblocked the account I'd proudly create help articles, I want this account mainly because of its free range access and there is so much you can with the account. --20:42, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, think for a minute. You got blocked, and you created another account to bypass your block. That's block evasion and sockpuppetry. Yes! I connected the dots! --Goldenburg111 20:45, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


Goldenburg111 You're not an administrator or any type of authority whatsoever so please leave this to admins and don't get an attitude with me again. --20:49, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Nostal
Local admins think I'm the only on earth that knows the password to the account, its not being used by multiple editors only one (1) editor so its not "compromised", and when/if the account is unblocked I'll create help articles. OMG I solved the f^ck!ng mystery P.S. I would also be an lawyer in the Meta-Wiki investigations.
--21:01, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Nostal

hi, no need for f^cking here... Please, why did someone confiscate your account then? --Goldenburg111 21:09, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


Okay why do you keep on re-associating with that link?, what do you mean by "why did someone confiscate your account then?"?, and don't curse on my talk page again. --21:12, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Nostal

Okay, I DIDN'T associate that link here, okay? And, I was not cursing, you were cursing here... Using f^ck, I was trying to tell you no cursing around. Since it's annoying for me... --Goldenburg111 21:14, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


Are you the link as some sort evidence against or for me? I censored my cursing (you can censor your cursing as well) I'd be happy to sow all evidence linking or director to this account (weather its against or for me) --21:19, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Nostal

Why are you such a Dragon Ball fan? --Goldenburg111 21:21, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


I'm not even a "dragon ball fan" the previous owner is a dragon ball fan, what is this question for?
I'm afraid I'm going to have to ask to you to stop posting on my talk page.
--21:24, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Nostal

SoEdit

Well we've reached our epic conclusion there's a few questions and doors left open such as my block. There is still no reason to keep the account blocked even though I'm the only person in the world that knows the password, there is still just one (1) person using it so its not "compromised" I have proper care and will do good and nothing but good this account has done so much and is able to do so much.
It's your move admins
--21:40, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Nostal

Hello?Edit

Are you still here? --Goldenburg111 00:54, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

I forgot about the wikias, and I'm not going to be here anymore.

Hell I'm deleting all of my email notifications from here.

Treevax 22:38, 4 May 2014 (UTC)Nostal

Good! Your still here! So: Do you have a wikia account? --Goldenburg111 22:47, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Nostal".