First of all thank you for all the work in preparation of translation of SWViewer and SWViewer/header.
I am just opening this thread to track translation progress. I see that you guys are fixing little issues. Please ping me once the page is actually ready and have no issues left, so that I can announce it at various places to get translators.
I have also added you two to SWViewer/members, in case you don't want feel free to remove yourself.
Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Type
Feature
Setup
unknown
What about adding a feature where could be reported dubious edits and dubious newly-created pages (if an user si unsure whether a certain edit or newly-created page is vandalism or not, other users could verify those edits and pages)?
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Type
Feature
Setup
unknown
Enable patrolling of the displayed edit/diff. This should be available only for patrollers (if not possible, add an option to disable it i.e. remove the button). Maybe a button for this action can be placed at the 1st position (as most of the edits are usually fine). Here's a link to the API reference: MediaWiki API help: action=patrol
Latest comment: 3 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion
Type
Other
Setup
unknown
Recently I made an improvement to config.json, preventing users from being pinged, but today someone reported that they got pinged, so I guess my change hasn't been processed yet. My question is: when will SWViewer load the new config?
defaultRollbackPrefix — is parameter for custom rollback: default prefix + custom reason. But here was used normal rollback. String is configured by the MediaWiki, not SWViewer.—Iluvatar (talk) 11:59, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
I see, so apparently both use the same string, but the MediaWiki rollback suppresses the ping. Otherwise I would have received pings from those. So I think this is an issue with SWViewer. --bdijkstra (talk) 12:52, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
This isn't about user A receiving a ping when user B reverts their edit, this is about user C receiving a ping when user B reverts an edit by user A to the last revision by user C. In my notification settings, I have mention pings turned on, but I haven't received this kind of ping in ages, except recently with SWViewer. Presumably this user had the same experience. --bdijkstra (talk) 16:54, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
[BUG]: Report function adds improper newline before report
Latest comment: 7 months ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Type
Bug
Setup
unknown
See diff on English Wikipedia: it's a list, so a blank line in between the list items ends the list and starts a new one, instead of adding an item to the list. This is minor, but it'd be nice if it was fixed. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 05:06, 23 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Tol Seems no issues and these are unbulleted list after all and I think some noticeboard prefer newline and that's why it was added. (Don't remember exactly which require it). ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
@1997kB, this is per English Wikipedia's w:en:WP:LISTGAP guideline section and for accessibility in general; this is problematic because it creates a new list instead of adding another item to the existing list. Would there be any way to change this just for English Wikipedia? Tol (talk | contribs) @ 00:11, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Type
Suggestion
Setup
unknown
Hello! I feel like SWViewer shouldn't show edits to Custom Javascript and CSS pages since the majority of users can't do anything to them and it requires them to be an interface administrator. Including them in the SWViewer feed feels rather pointless if the majority of users can't do anything about them even if they're vandalism.
Well I knew that all userpages had an associated talk page, but I didn't know that CSS and JS pages had one, I didn't even know you could edit them. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#654515:47, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
[FEATURE]: Remove edits that have already been reverted from the queue
Latest comment: 1 year ago6 comments5 people in discussion
Type
Feature
Setup
unknown
I wish SWViewer could be able to remove from the queue edits that have already been rolled back by other good-faith users or bots, so as not to stumble upon irrelevant cases of vandalism.
That's not entirely correct. If you enable "live updates" in the recent changes list and filter for "latest revision" vandalism (enwiki example), it does this just fine, so it's not just possible but rather already implemented in production somewhere. ToBeFree (talk) 20:45, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
No. Only edits removes from queue, which was reverted by another user via SWV. Also old edits are removes when gets a new edit event on same page. Sry for my English. Iluvatar (talk) 14:04, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
I tried updating the config page a few times, but the updated edit summary is not showing, unless it’s related to the console or it’s something else that needs to be updated? Tropicalkitty (talk) 23:51, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
I'd suggest a similar feature like this, can we provide the level of warnings that user received close to their edits like Huggle? Lemonaka (talk) 04:37, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Type
Bug
Setup
Latest version of Opera GX
As the title states, the talk doesn't seem to function on the Opera GX internet browser in that you are unable to send any messages. YOu can type a message and see others' messages, hwoever you can't send any yourself no matter what (clicking the send button doesn't work and neither does hitting enter). Works fine in Google Chrome
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Type
Feature
Setup
unknown
It can be easy to "get lost" in the stream. Can we implement a popup that notifies you to take a break after a certain (programmable) amount of time has passed? This feature is becoming increasingly common in certain websites/apps and I believe it helps with mental health. Having a way to artificially slow down the stream could also be helpful. Personally speaking, it generates anxiety for me.
Sakura emad, I suppose in a typical sleep function you'd get something like this: get all edits from the stream in that moment, sleep for 5 seconds, get all edits that happened during those 5 seconds up until that moment, sleep for 5 seconds, get all edits... While what I'm mostly after is: Get precisely 1 edit, sleep for 5 seconds, get 1 edit that is known that it isn't acted upon by anyone at the time shown, sleep for 5 seconds, get 1 edit that is known that... — Klein Muçi (talk) 09:40, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
[MINOR FEATURE]: Custom reverts should remember old given reasons (at least in the same session)
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Type
Minor feature
Setup
unknown
Usually I tend to use only 2-3 general reasons on custom reverts. If they can be remembered and autosuggested in a dropdown menu it could save me a lot of hassle.
Latest comment: 7 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Type
Suggestion
Setup
unknown
When tagging a page on any wiki for deletion, SWViewer gives the user a bunch of set reasons for the tagging. Often, though, it would be quite helpful and convenient if it allowed entering a reason manually instead of having to "edit" the page to do so. Similar to how undoing with reason works, I think this will be useful.
I'd love for this feature to be implemented. Many times I'm forced to give "empty page" as a delete reason when pages are very short but not empty because "very short page" doesn't exist as a reason on its own for many projects. - Klein Muçi (talk) 15:31, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Type
Addition
Setup
unknown
Edits' and days' limits check for local edits on local projects. Currently there is no way to put a limit for global edits or global days since an account was created. This edit (and the subsequent conversation that issues) may provide more information about why such a change may be needed.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Type
Addition
Setup
unknown
As a user I rely heavily on tooltips everywhere to understand what button does what. Currently SWViewer is well-supported in that direction beside only a few that are missing. The presets' chevron, plus, pencil and bin have no tooltip provided. The small icons at the bottom beside "Connected to stream" have no tooltips either, making it hard for me to understand what each of them means.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Type
Addition
Setup
unknown
There are many occasions when I've wanted to skip edits from a certain domain, for example, Wiktionary, all languages included. Currently there is no way how to achieve this.
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Type
Bug
Setup
unknown
Scenario: Edit limit=100; Days limit=5 - User X has more than 5 days of experience but less than 100 edits. Their edits are shown. They shouldn't be. This already happened here (check bottom) and it seems like a problem that is shared with all SWViewer preferences (check "Language set" doesn't work when "small wikis" and/or "additional wikis" are enabled" bug above).
Yes. I was the "affected" user. Of course we could resolve the problem via Wikivoyage's talk page, but @Klein Muçi at first reverted my edits as they were showing as new (or can one say sus?). I haven't made 100 edits to en:wikivoyage, that is correct, but my first edit - even beyond the User and talk namespaces - was definitely more than five days old. Through this bug/mistake, my edits showed up and were reverted as I only made some minuscule edits including changing a population number (like vandals seemingly do?)... ObersterGenosse (talk) 20:21, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Type
Suggestion
Setup
unknown
Global Rollbacker have the ability to mark rollbacks as botedits. This is quite helpful to not spam watchlists. I want to suggest to mark rollbacks with no reason (“r”) for all projects automatically (maybe after activating it in the settings) as bot edits. Or implement another button for Markbotedit-rollback with a new shortcut.
Latest comment: 11 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Type
Bug
Setup
Brave Browser, Windows 10
When I use a hotkey, I never know whether SWViewer will respond to it. Why? For example, if I press O, sometimes SWViewer opens the diff in another tab, sometimes not.
Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Type
Suggestion
Setup
unknown
If I want to report a VOA to GSR, I have to click the delete button to check if this wiki is a GS wiki. I hope to add a sign indicating GS/NonGS wiki after the wikiname, which is convenient for SWMT members.
Strong support that would be very nice for dewiki, because there edits need to be reviewed / patrolled to be displayed so the button is used very often. TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 18:10, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Type
Feature
Setup
unknown
The smaller a change (e.g. only whitespace, comma or such), the harder it is to find it in the diff view. The background colour should gradually intensify with decreasing amount of changed characters, so small changes are more visible.
Strong oppose. Justman got his rights removed on dewiki for multiple policy violations and didn't got them back until now. There were and are still problems with his vandalism reports and reverts. His last request to get the rights back was rejected 2024. TenWhile610:27, 11 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Type
Bug
Setup
This is irrelevant
I recently got a message saying "Rollback error: Edits is already undid." This is incorrect English grammar. It should read "Rollback error: The edit(s) have already been undone.", "Rollback error: The edit(s) are already undone", or some variation of such.
Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Type
Addition
Setup
unknown
Add the {{uw-tpv}} or the one for meta, not sure which that is user warning template (which is for refactoring/deleting other's talk page comments) to the list of warning templates.
Latest comment: 3 hours ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Type
Bug
Setup
Not relevant, but I use Microsoft Edge Version 131.0.2903.63 (Official build) (arm64) on my Mac with Apple Silicon.
Today, I thanked an IP user (en:Special:Redirect/logid/166012876) via SWV on the Enwiki. I think the ability to thank IPs on SWV should be removed, because IPs cannot receive thanks (per en:H:THANKS#Details_and_limitations). Perhaps this should be brought to phab as well, because IPs shouldn't receive thanks anyways? Thanks,