Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Meta:Requests for checkuser/Superpes15

< Meta:Requests for checkuser
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.


Superpes15 edit

Not ending before 10 October 2023 14:20 (UTC)

Hi everyone, I mainly work in fighting LTAs/spambot and I think that local CU on metawiki would be very useful to me. While itwiki is my homewiki, I'm mainly active on meta at present, for my work as a steward. To give an example of the usefulness of the tool: it often happens that spambots and LTAs act locally from different proxies than the one of registration and switch between more users and proxies, and imho the tool would give an extra hand in discovering them, in addition to LWCU, which I already use a lot but which only shows registration data. I'd also help with any local CU requests and I'd be, as I have always tried to be, careful about the policies and limits of use of the CU. As I have always said, I really don't like collecting flags, I only ask when I think there's a real need. Obviously, I would have no problem resigning if it was no longer necessary, or in the event that the flag is no longer used. Thanks you for your attention and for leaving a comment below (regardless of whether it's a criticism, a constructive opinion or a vote) :) Ciao! --Superpes15 (talk) 14:20, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support
  1. Support Support reasonable, trusted (steward) --TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 14:57, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Support trusted and active --Ameisenigel (talk) 15:17, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Support Syunsyunminmin 🗨️talk 15:43, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Support --Novak Watchmen (talk) 17:20, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Support, technically skilled, trusted and helpful. --M/ (talk) 18:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Support Reasonable request, obviously trusted and well capable for using tools. —MdsShakil (talk) 19:20, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support Support yes please - XXBlackburnXx (talk) 19:39, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support Support trusted, LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 19:57, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support Support. --Mykola 20:00, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Johannnes89 (talk) 20:21, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support Support why not? --Tmv (talk) 22:34, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support Support – Ajraddatz (talk) 22:57, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support Support --Mtarch11 (talk) 01:43, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support Support -LR0725 [ Talk | Contribs ] 02:58, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support Support —DerHexer (Talk) 06:36, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support Support Trusted. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 08:38, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support Support --Victor Trevor (talk) 20:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support Support No concerns. --Uncitoyentalk 18:23, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support Support Trusted, active, usecase makes sense => clear support. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 18:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support Support -FASTILY 10:56, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support Support --V0lkanic (talk) 11:43, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support Support--Quinlan83 (talk) 22:33, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support Support trusted --Civvì (talk) 13:57, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support Support -- EN-Jungwon 14:54, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support Support —-Wim b 08:26, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose
Neutral
  1. @Superpes15:, you already are allowed to use CU on Meta for cross-wiki purposes as per the MSR. Your statement implies that it isn't allowed - what am I missing? Leaderboard (talk) 12:16, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi @Leaderboard:, yep I understand your thought, actually also CheckUser policy says that stewards can use the flag for cross-wiki vandalism purpose but we, as stewards, usually don't grant ourselves permissions when there are active local users with the same permission and avoid to do so (limiting the case to emergencies). Routine use of this kind could also be a reason of concern for local CU. Also, as specified in that policy, checks involving local vandals cannot be performed, and I'd like to use CU for local requests and vandal as well, as explained in the statement. I'm asking for a local permission, in fact, because it's something I plan to do both alongside and apart from stewardship and this flag would be used even if I, just for example, decide not to participate in the confirmations. Thanks :) Superpes15 (talk) 13:13, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done meets the required number of support votes and % support per WM:CU. — xaosflux Talk 13:56, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meta:Requests_for_checkuser/Superpes15&oldid=25733001"