Meta:Requests for adminship/PiRSquared17

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

PiRSquared17 edit

PiRSquared17 (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)
Ending 2 April 2013 19:14 UTC

Dear community, I would like to nominate PiRSquared17 (also known as huh on IRC) as an administrator. He is currently a very active contributor here on Meta, especially in the area of translations. As such, he has already been entrusted with the translation admin rights, and he quite often helps new users on such and other questions here. He has been a temporary administrator at the beginning of the year in order to help with the (translations of) CentralNotices for the stewards election. In addition, he is generally active with clean-up and maintenance tasks, which quite often require him to make an {{editprotected}} request. For all these reasons, I think it would be useful and beneficial for him and for Meta if he got admin rights. — He is a global sysop, but not a local sysop anywhere, however this isn't an obstacle per se anymore with the latest change in the policy. He accepted to be nominated on his talk page.

Candidate acceptance: I accept this nomination, as I did on my talk page. πr² (t • c) 19:16, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support as nominator. --MF-W 19:14, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
For sure. Mathonius (talk) 19:15, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rs chen 7754 20:11, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Of course Vogone talk 20:25, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Since he became a global sysop, he's been one of the most active and trusted.--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:55, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes please :) Legoktm (talk) 04:50, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support QuiteUnusual (talk) 08:39, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support should be useful. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 08:42, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 13:28, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trijnstel_talk 19:01, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, regards --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 19:02, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support, do not expect any problems with this user.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:00, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LlamaAl (talk) 21:33, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure. Good luck. Érico Wouters ^msg 21:35, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Lukas²³ (talk) 22:51, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support About time! I come across a lot of pages tagged by PiRsquad for deletion. He cleans up a lot, his help is very appreciated. I hope he keeps up. Theo10011 (talk) 09:26, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:21, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:12, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{@ L C S}˲» 23:47, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course! Global sysops page says : "...[they] are highly trusted users". ^[1] So.... Benoit Rochon (talk) 17:39, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Finally. And no silly rule to get in the way this time! Ajraddatz (Talk) 22:37, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Good candidate and trusted user. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 05:51, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
support —DerHexer (Talk) 13:58, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --cyrfaw (talk) 09:11, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Osiris (talk) 16:09, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alan Lorenzo ^(talk) 11:22, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Closing as successful, clear consensus to promote. Thehelpfulone 19:18, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]