Abstract Wikipedia/Wikifunctions logo concept/Proposal 17

Shah-Quinn Wikifunctions logo proposal.svg
  • The zig zag shape references three different manifestations of functions:
    • electronic circuits (as the symbol for a resistor); mathematical functions (as a line graph); Wikifunctions itself (as a W).
  • Like Wikidata's logo, the shape is composed of red, green and blue parallel lines. But instead of being straight, the lines are interwoven like threads in a loom (maybe a Jacquard loom 😊), just as Wikifunctions will interweave raw data from Wikidata to create a rich tapestry of output.
  • As a small bonus, this interweaving gives the W a crossed center, like in Wikipedia's wordmark.
  • Resembles the Whataburger logo.

VotingEdit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Voting has closed.

  •   Support Mahir256 (talk) 00:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support XanonymusX (talk) 02:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Callback to Wikidata, looks good, ++knots Arlo Barnes (talk) 03:21, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Enaldodiscussão 04:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Chaduvari (talk) 04:54, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support David1010 (talk) 06:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Diyot (talk) 07:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Bocardodarapti (talk) 08:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Jon Harald Søby (talk) 10:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support BSRF (talk) 10:44, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support GPSLeo (talk) 11:32, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Wikipedia W, colours and threads that look dynamic. Kpjas (talk) 11:48, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support I really enjoy the general idea and design though think that for smaller sizes a more simplified design would be needed. Nw520 (talk) 12:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Tgr (talk) 13:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Grtek (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support However, needs thinner lines for smaller sized, IMHO. Ain92 (talk) 18:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support I like it! Gopico (talk) 18:42, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Pennenetui3000 (talk) 20:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Koreanovsky (Ča–Kaj–Što?!) 23:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Renders decently at small scales. Interweaving languages symbolism. Anon423 (talk) 02:47, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Qwertic (talk) 10:30, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 14:46, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support the best. Themanwithnowifi (talk) 14:32, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Greatder (talk) 06:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Cemal (talk) 07:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support as proposer 😊—Neil Shah-Quinn (talk) 08:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support nice looking Hoseina051311 (talk) 12:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Asartea Talk (Enwiki Talk (preferred)) 16:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support nicely representing WorldWideWiki interaction --YaganZ (talk) 00:55, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support {{u|Sdkb}}talk 01:37, 6 March 2021 (UTC)+[]
  •   Support Tiputini
  •   Support KaMan (talk) 11:31, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Qh13 (talk) 17:29, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support --Nicolabel (talk) 22:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support This looks so nice and is very clever! Bearloga (talk) 22:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Daniel Mietchen (talk) 03:19, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Ebe123 (Communication | Activity report) 06:55, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Vincent Simar (talk) 21:14, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Also close to the Wonder Woman logo (which even has a tiny lambda peeking out). But no surprise that Diana Prince is a secret fan. –SJ talk  00:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support This looks very much like "Wikifunctions" to me, it's an appealing mix of Wikidata, functions and Wikipedia. It does look different enough from other outside logos in my opnion.--Pharos (talk) 01:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Palnatoke (talk) 06:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Ash Crow (talk) 09:39, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support abián 12:38, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Amir (talk) 13:34, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:19, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Csisc (talk) 17:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support the wub "?!" 18:25, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Kvardek du (talk) 12:27, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Skimel (talk) 19:37, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Ата (talk) 06:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support --Itamar Bet (talk) 07:50, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support SCardenas (WMF) (talk) 17:36, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Quiddity (talk) 17:44, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Matma Rex (talk) 18:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Incorporating the W (Wiki) into the graph signals in different Wikimedia colours is an excellent fusion. UOzurumba (WMF) (talk) 20:20, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.