Stewards/Confirm/2017/Melos

Melos

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: it, scn, en
Personal info: Unfortunately I'm quite busy in real life. I leave to decide the community if my "5" action are useful yet for the project. Thank you --Melos (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

বাংলা:

ভাষা: it, scn, en
ব্যক্তিগত তথ্যাদি: translation needed

Deutsch:

Sprachen: it, scn, en
Informationen zur Person: Unglücklicherweise bin ich ziemlich beschäftigt im Realleben. Ich überlasse es der Community zu entscheiden, ob meine "5" Aktionen noch für das Projekt nützlich sind. Danke --Melos (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

español:

Idiomas: it, scn, en
Información personal: translation needed

italiano:

Lingue: it, scn, en
Informazioni personali: translation needed

Nederlands:

Taalvaardigheid: it, scn, en
Persoonlijke informatie: translation needed

русский:

Языки: it, scn, en
Личная информация: translation needed

Comments about Melos

Remove 5 edits on Meta since the last confirmations, and mostly active in March (around the last elections) and November and December (did a few LTA CU checks and multilocks to "prepare" for these elections). --Rs chen 7754 14:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Unfortunately seems to have vanished. Thanks for the past service. --Vogone (talk) 14:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Not active enough and unfortunately did not create statement on time. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I personally think any number of good actions is better than 0. --Vituzzu (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Not active enough. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove inactivity...re-apply when you can be active again--Ste moc 14:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Unfortunately it has not been active in recent months. There is no use for it to remain steward. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
~~{{Remove}} 5 steward actions are too few. --Gce (talk) 16:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)~~ After watched that I changed idea, I thought that he literally did 5 steward actions, but this was not the case so I'm removing my vote. --Gce (talk) 22:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Not active.—Ah3kal (talk) 17:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pracchia-78 (talk) 19:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per lack of activity. -FASTILY 19:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral due to inactivity; doesn't seem to have time to do the job justice now. Miniapolis 20:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Rschen7754 --DCB (talk) 21:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove quite inactive. Thanks for your past work though. – Ajraddatz (talk) 22:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove too inactive. Iazyges (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. With your limited activity it is impossible to effectively remain up to date on steward matters. Sa vh ^ñ 00:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bjarlin (talk) 00:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC) I'm seeing around 50 steward actions in Novembre/Decembre which is helping out other stewards and is not little. Can't find the problem here, not that inactive. So let's see.[reply]
Remove - Not active on Wikiversity since 2011! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 04:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Samuele2002 (talk) 06:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Aplasia (talk) 08:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Good user, but not very active. --Umberto NURS (msg) 11:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (@Rschen7754: "did a few LTA CU checks and multilocks to "prepare" for these elections", ehm, what happened to assume good faith? ;-)--Shivanarayana (talk) 11:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I find your activity way too low, but wish to thank you for your past service regardless of the outcome. — TBloemink _talk 13:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for honestly stating that you are not as active as you wanted to. If you feel you are no longer able to stay active, you can resign or not apply for re-election next year — NickK (talk) 14:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Not active in his Steward functions--Leon saudanha (talk) 14:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Vito.--Syum90 (talk) 18:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Vituzzu. --Phyrexian ɸ 06:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nothing against Melos but I would expect to be more active as steward. --НУРшЯGIO^{(beware of the moose)} 17:22, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral as Umberto NURS leaning weak keep. Melos is clueful user and I'm sure that he can be put up to date quickly, however your activity is rather low. I'd be happy to see you confirmed if you think you can have some more time for stewardrying. It's sad to see the 'old guys' depart for me. Thanks. —Marco Aurelio 22:08, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Krd 11:48, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:04, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Vito. Matanya (talk) 18:16, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 5 is more than 0. --თოგო ^(D) 21:33, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Vito, Thogo, and the current policy regarding confirmations. As a steward, I have not lost trust in Melos, albeit we all may want to consider revising the minimal activity levels. -- Avi (talk) 05:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Vito --.snoopy. ✉ 10:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on fellow steward comment, inactivity card can only be played once — billinghurst sDrewth 12:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Vito--Rodrigodacuna (talk) 15:11, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Archenzo (talk) 16:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Civvì (talk) 20:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral — Ping08 (talk) 20:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ruthven (talk) 20:41, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elwood (talk) 20:41, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep "uan is megl che zero".--Dome ^{A disposizione!} 23:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Gridditsch (talk) 09:00, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Vituzzu --Ask21 (talk) 11:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Plagiat (talk) 19:40, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Lepido (talk) 23:23, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —An Macanese 15:15, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral hope you will become more active this year. Natuur12 (talk) 22:15, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
* Neutral --Elmie (talk) 17:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC) 5 edits is a very low level...maybe you get some more time in the futre[reply]
Neutral Lepricavark (talk) 19:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Demart81 (Qualcuno mi cerca?) 20:31, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Few is always better than nothing--L736E ^{tell me} 21:32, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:54, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geoide (talk) 17:45, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per above. Alan ^(talk) 19:27, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Minoo (talk) 18:23, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:25, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Polite and helpful. --pegasovagante (tell me) 10:33, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Remove Not active enough. Ofek j (talk) 18:26, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep per Avi. Experience and familiarity and trust with the issues is valuable. Quiddity (talk) 21:58, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Not active enough. --Uğurkent^talk 18:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I have no concerns about the activity level, we all have obligations outside the project and I am not concerned about their ability to serve or judgment. Mifter (talk) 02:02, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep, per Vituzzu and MA. RadiX ∞ 03:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep activity levels vary over time and we'd all love for Melos to be active more consistently but they're still a net positive with no concerns outside of activity levels, so I think the community benefit from Melos' continued work as a steward. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep "Any number of good actions is better than 0." per Vituzzu and much more than 5 per Gce. --.js^{[democracy needed]} 13:47, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]