Meta

Steward requests/Global

< Steward requests(Redirected from Srg)
← Requests and proposals Steward requests (Global) latest archive→
Shortcut:
SRG
This page hosts requests for global (un)blocks, (un)locks and hidings.

If you are here because you have been blocked by a global block, please see Global blocks/FAQ for more information about global block and routes to appeal.

Note: (un)blocks apply to IP addresses; and (un)locks apply to global accounts.


Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests for global (un)block

  Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.
Please also review Global blocking. Only IP addresses can be globally blocked at this moment. Please see #Requests for global (un)lock and (un)hiding if your request involves an account.
Global blocks don't affect Meta-Wiki, so if your IP address is blocked, you can still appeal here. IP addresses that cause disruption on Meta should be reported at Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat instead of here so that they can be blocked locally.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You know the IP address(es) you wish to have globally blocked or unblocked.
  2. For blocks, the global blocking criteria are met.
  3. For unblocks, your request addresses the original reason for blocking the IP, if any.

To make a request for the address(es) to be blocked or unblocked

Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain why the address(es) should be blocked/unblocked.
=== Global block/unblock for [[Special:Contributions/Some IP address|Some IP address]] ===
{{Status}} <!-- Do not remove this template -->
* {{Luxotool|IP address}}
Description, evidence, diffs, etc. --~~~~
When requesting that your IP be unblocked, note that stewards need to know your IP address to even consider a request.
To find your IP, please visit https://www.whatismyip.com/
You are not required to disclose your IP in public - you may make requests privately to any steward on IRC or by email at: stewards wikimedia org

Global block for GRP

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. GRP. --Mtarch11 (talk) 03:08, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
+4 --Mtarch11 (talk) 07:17, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
+1 --Mtarch11 (talk) 03:44, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
+1 --Mtarch11 (talk) 03:16, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Suggest block:

  • 154.160.25.217 block compromised/OP March & May 2021
  • 175.176.40.245 problematic through May 2021

xwiki, maybe block each for 3 months; others are day events only  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:54, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block and lock for lock evasion by JackTheWorld0

Status:    In progress

Global lock evasion by JackTheWorld0 on Wikimedia Commons. ---- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 14:04, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Multiple of these are day issues, and no evidence of extended abuse; the /36 has good edits and should not be blocked at that level. I recommend and   Support the blocking of range 2601:49:4200:d000::/64 as it does have a history, suggest three months.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:02, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 186.84.89.135

Status:    In progress
Long term cross-wiki abuse. --SCP-2000 07:20, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
dynamic-ip-1868489135.cable.net.co though is showing signs of abuse over a couple of months. Block for a few months seems worthwhile.  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:50, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 80.89.73.1

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. Banned by the Wikimedia Foundation. --Ferien (talk) 16:20, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Not certain that there is a long term issue with the IP address. Not certain that a block will do anything.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 5.77.74.29

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. --𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 21:37, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Not certain that we have clear evidence of sustained abuse from IP address, seems like 18 hour stretch only.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:46, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 162.12.206.5

Status:    In progress
Open proxy (VPN). --Y-route (talk) 12:06, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
162.12.206.0/23 xwiki-contribs • ST • IP info • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • ipchecker is Serverion, a webhost range populated with many VPN. At least 162.12.206.5 to 162.12.206.12 are Proton VPN. MarioGom (talk) 21:44, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The /23 shows a range of good edits, so blocking this without clear signs of ongoing abuse seems not recommended. Would recommend no action unless necessary, and maybe local action as required, not global blocks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:07, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 5.77.64.0/19

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. --𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 08:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
I found multiple IPs with this and ended up with a /19 range as well; however, I'm not sure if all the edits are LTA only. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:43, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 107.150.94.0

Status:    In progress
Open proxy, belongs to NordVPN. Subnet blocked a year by me on svwp. --EPIC (talk) 20:02, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Fixed range. It's the /24, not /16. Example of NordVPN node in the range (107.150.94.3, spur) and a Surfshark one (107.150.94.11, spur). MarioGom (talk) 14:45, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Not seeing evidence of crosswiki abuse of the range in GUC. Suggest to leave to local wikis to manage.  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:18, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 148.3.14.104

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse by adding unsourced or blatantly wrong information, especially in articles about dead or disappeared people. Example: [1]. --Sjö (talk) 05:43, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 2A02:1811:5275:D00:2471:5C0B:6930:5351

Status:    In progress
Cross-wiki spam. --Mtarch11 (talk) 05:55, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 87.27.98.147

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. --𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 18:36, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Long term xwiki editing of film and related articles. Many of these edits are unreverted. Doesn't seem obvious that this person is that fluent in that diversity of languages, so it would seem unhelpful. Has anyone reached out to this person in an attempt to direct their editing?  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:32, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 5.189.204.22

Status:    In progress
Open proxy. -- Y-route (talk) 02:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
5.189.204.0/24 xwiki-contribs • ST • IP info • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • ipchecker belongs to G-Core Labs, which hosts a lot of VPN services. Almost every GCORE range is blocked on enwiki. MarioGom (talk) 07:31, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
5.189.204.54 free-nl8.server AS199524 GCORE, LU 5.189.204.0/24
5.189.204.22 free.ds AS199524 GCORE, LU 5.189.204.0/24
Issue seems contained to one IP in range and jaWP and WD for two days. Unreverted edits at both those wikis. Seems that local management would be better.  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:35, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 146.70.0.0/16

Status:    In progress

This /16 range belongs to M247 and hosts a high amount of VPN servers. Whois data may be a bit confusing, since this is divided in /24 subranges for different countries, like 146.70.8.0/24, 146.70.9.0/24, ..., 146.70.39.0/24. It seems to be a recent assignment, so bots are missing it. --MarioGom (talk) 07:39, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

@MarioGom: So what is the problem? We don't block VPNs for being VPNs.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:52, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
@Billinghurst: Cross-wiki vandalism and LTA. You can check the cross-wiki contributions and blocks. Quite a few individual IPs and /24 subranges have recently been blocked globally or locally. Since VPN services allow to easily change exit servers and M247 ranges host thousands of exit servers, these vandals and LTA just jump to the next server once blocked. It is a matter of time that all active M247 ranges get blocked, so why not be done with the /16 now instead of gradually blocking it over the next few months? Just for reference, here's some other M247 ranges containing VPN servers that are currently globally blocked:

--MarioGom (talk) 08:21, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

@MarioGom: Your provided list more demonstrates the futility of placing the blocks if they can hop to all of those places. Blocking good editors is not the way to manage an LTA. VPNs are not open proxies, and they are no different to dynamic IP addresses, so we need a more mature approach to our responses. LTAs can and should be managd by other means.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
From an anti-abuse perspective, I see no meaningful difference to an open proxy. They are anonymising proxies that allow users to rapidly hop between IPs and ranges, hence making CU pretty useless. Blablubbs|talk 20:14, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
@Blablubbs: What the wikis individually do with these is their business as they have a closer capacity to look at and evaluate the consequences of their blocks. There should be a clear issue of unresolvable problems for a global block and steward actions.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 92.0.21.71

Status:    In progress
Cross wiki vandal Hoyanova (talk) 12:01, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Many of these edits still stand, and they are not obviously vandalism, simpleWP edits were accurate. Not certain that xwiki vandal is completely accurate  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 81.82.250.131

Status:    In progress

Schoolblock requested due to long-term cross-wiki abuse (spanning several years and multiple Wikis) Kashmiri (talk) 13:52, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Think that local management would be better. The GUC history does not look horrid.  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:43, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 202.155.238.152

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. Cross-wiki abuse. --Xiplus (talk) 10:34, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  Support seems to be nothing except bad edits for months.  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:07, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 78.77.0.0/16 and 78.79.0.0/16

Status:    In progress

The same user as Special:Contributions/217.213.64.0/18 which previously have been vandalisming cross-wiki (primarily on svwiki (1) (2) and enwiki (1) (2)), are now using these subnets instead. Maol (talk) 10:54, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

@Maol: Seems a huge call to block two /16 of a major provider mobileonline.telia.com for a single user at two large wikis that can manage themselves.  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:05, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 179.6.47.173

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. Open proxy. -- JavaHurricane 13:07, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Doesn't show in OP checkers, though seems that it may be that as repeated abuse a month apart.  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:09, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 31.125.215.135

Status:    In progress
Lock evasion: LouisPhilippeCharles. --Darubrub (Inform me) 14:02, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  Support blocked at numbers of wikis, known problem user who doesn't follow consensus.  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:12, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 219.100.28.199

Status:    In progress
Open proxy. --Y-route (talk) 04:31, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
@Y-route: I believe that these additions here are not the best way to handle this issue. Please alert the jaWP and Wikidata communities to these edits, and seek their help in blocking and most especially in the resolution of the edits. Managing these at a global level for local issues is not the best way.  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 185.104.195.180 / 185.104.195.24

Status:    In progress
Cross wiki abuse. Open proxyserver. Hoyanova (talk) 06:34, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
  Support the blocking of at least 2 IPs, most definitely looks compromised; and would support the blocking of the /24 as indications that it is most likely more widely problematic.  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:31, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 212.247.11.153

Status:    In progress
Cross-wiki abuse. Vandalism-only-IP. --EstrellaSuecia (talk) 10:49, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
  Support IP address was abused 2005 to 2007 then stopped. It started again in 2021. I see no real harm in blocking the IP and possible benefit.  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:42, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 93.73.116.143

Status:    In progress
Spam / spambot. --𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 22:44, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
@NickK: this IP has edits on ukWP that are not reverted. Are those edits beneficial? Or should the IP address be blocked as recommended?  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:47, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 154.28.188.0/24

Status:    In progress

Cross-wiki vandalism. This range is from Zenmate/Cyberghost VPN (see whois: ZenGuard GMBH). 154.28.188.207 is already globally blocked, the /24 is blocked in enwiki. --MarioGom (talk) 12:24, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

There seem to be good edits in the range, including many current edits, https://guc.toolforge.org/?isPrefixPattern=1&by=date&user=154.28.188  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:54, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
@Billinghurst: Sure, but does it matter? It's an leaky webhost/open proxy and it has been abused. Affected users can request exception from IP-block. EstrellaSuecia (talk) 11:34, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
What is the purpose of global blocks? If you have it managed at your wiki and it impacts your wiki, why do more? How much collateral damage? So what sort of blocks are you recommending? Soft or hard? What time period? What are we gaining? We should do the minimum necessary, not the maximum. We should not be stopping good edits wherever possible.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:35, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 49.216.131.2

Status:    Not done
Long term abuse: Xayahrainie43. Per en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Xayahrainie43/Archive#05_June_2021. --SCP-2000 06:33, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Withdrawn as stopped. --SCP-2000 03:47, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 150.242.228.52

Status:    In progress
Long term cross-wiki abuse. --SCP-2000 10:22, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
  Support a block on the IP address and suggest for a year, definite long term aspects to this vandalism.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:14, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 197.210.0.0/18

Status:    In progress
Cross-wiki abuse since April. Most of edits were Vandalism. --SCP-2000 14:23, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
There are good editors in the /18 AS29465 VCG-AS, NG . Seeing good edits at Commons and metawiki, so cannot endorse this request.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:35, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Since most of edits were vandalism, the global block is still recommended for prevent vandalism in multiple wikis. Stewards can whitelist the global block in individual wikis for avoid collateral damage. If global block this IP range is unnecessary, I recommended Stewards can block following IP ranges:
Thanks. SCP-2000 08:47, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
@SCP-2000: That is not the /18, only one of those ranges is in the /18, two in the next /18, one on the last of the 4th /18, so you are covering the whole /16. If I was an editor in that range, I would be affronted if I got blocked on that sort of wide range just to stop some minor vandalism that is easily identified and managed. And stewards should not be having to pick through wikis then go and whitelist ranges, especially as that is not clearly within the scope of their duties. If needed we can generate an abuse filter that watches the /16 for small and medium wikis, and leave the large wikis to manage themselves and to make their own decisions. We should be looking for the least possible impact, not using the sledgehammer.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:42, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 217.171.65.148

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. --𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 17:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 41.113.0.0/17

Status:    In progress
Global lock evasion and crosswiki abuse by Naledi Mathatho. ---- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 23:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: There is not a lot of abuse evident on that /17, is it creations or evasions. Seems to me that Commons and other larger wikis can manage that themselves, Blocking a /17 from being able to edit the African language wikis doesn't seem a good idea. Noting that mw has blockedit, and I have just blocked the range at Commons.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:39, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block for 46.222.159.126

Status:    Not done
Cross-wiki abuse. --Tiger- (talk) 23:35, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Short term issue; has stopped please resurrect request when there is a persistent problem.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:41, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Global block/unblock for Special:Contributions/74.104.137.109

Status:    In progress

Please see Special:Diff/21581230 Account/IPv4/IPv6 (n:User:June 8, 2021, n:User:74.104.137.109, n:User:2600:387:5:805:0:0:0:44) used for vandalism. --acagastya 02:36, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

  Support block, evidence of ongoing xwiki abuse for one month, so please give a medium length block.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:43, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Requests for global (un)lock and (un)hiding

  Note that global blocking currently only applies to IPs, due to a technical limitation. If you wish to request a named account for global [un]locking, please request a global [un]lock here instead. Be sure to follow the instructions below:
  • Your request might be rejected if your request doesn't include the necessary information.
  • Warning! This page is publicly viewable. If the account name is grossly insulting or contains personal information please contact a steward privately in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect or email your request to the stewards OTRS queue at stewards wikimedia org (direct wiki interface) but do not post it here. Thanks.
  • Warning! This is not the place to ask for locks based on your opinion that someone is disruptive. Global locks are used exclusively against vandalism and spam, not because of content disputes, not because you think that someone deserves to be globally blocked. In such cases, you should ask for local blocks at appropriate places.
  • If you are globally locked, you should appeal your lock to stewards wikimedia.org.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting that a global account be (un)locked, please be sure that:

  1. You have evidence of cross-wiki disruption from the account(s).
  2. You can show that it is not feasible to use local-only blocks or other measures like page protection to combat the disruption.
  3. You have considered making the request in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect, especially for account names which will be hidden, or for urgent requests.
To make a request for an account to be locked or unlocked
Copy one of the codes below to the bottom of this section and explain why the account(s) should be locked/unlocked.
=== Global lock/unlock for Foo ===
{{status}} <!-- do not remove this template -->
* {{LockHide|username}}
* {{LockHide|username|hidename=1}} <!-- if you do not want the name to be visible on this page -->
*...
Reasons, etc. --~~~~

For many accounts: 

=== Global lock for spambots/vandals ===
{{status}} <!-- do not remove this template -->
{{MultiLock|username|username2|username3}}
{{MultiLock|username|username2|username3|hidename=1}} <!-- if you do not want the names to be visible on this page -->
*...
Reasons, etc, --~~~~

Global lock for KIENGIR

Status:    In progress

KIENGIR was community-banned from English Wikipedia [2]. He has used his Hungarian Wikipedia user page to attack en.wki editors:

In this extensive rant, KIENGIR attacks myself, Cealicuca, Robert McClenon, Boynamedsue, Azure94, Rsk6400, Robby.is.on, David Eppstein, Indybeetle, Deepfriedokra, RandomCanadian, Obenritter, Cullen328, Arminden, Elvisisalive95, Biruitorul, Power~enwiki, and Schierbecker, many of them at great length.

I do not believe that it is the purpose of Wikipedia user pages to make personal attacks against editors, especially when they are editors of another wiki, and do not necessarily read the language the attacks are written in and would not necessarily know about them if they weren't pointed out to them. This kind of sub rosa personal attacks are contrary to the spirit of Wikipedia. KIENGIR should be locked and prevented from editing in any WMF project.

Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:24, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is being discussed on en.wiki ANI. [3] Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
I made a correction. KIENGIR's rant was written on his hu.wiki user page, but in English, not in Hungarian. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:56, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Hu.wiki admin Pallerti asked KIENGIR for his take on his en.wiki block. This was his response, translated with Google Translate:
Hello,
yes i see they started the nefarious witch hunt again but the joke about it is that a notorious sock puppet king (Iaaasi) started this when he reported me maybe a week on the english wiki but he did it after he wrote me a private email that how unfair that they were banned because then you could work with me and my edits were helpful and sympathize with me. Then after a while, hiding behind his usual IP address, he confused him with the ANI report (split personality, he's banned from everywhere, that's why I answered him openly, but he always comes back like a sock puppet in a double role, interestingly not). examined ...). That’s when I noticed that a completely new editor there, he started macerating my user page, even though I didn’t break any rules with it (that’s the point, I was banned by sympathy voting because it could only be, since I didn’t break a single rule, but those who worked hard on they disappeared, they just didn't like me to prove it, etc.), and I predicted to Szilas that I was going to write an informative summary of this event, but if that wasn't enough, as soon as I wrote it, I also informed Him about it, as a very important case study is the double standard of how organized groups try to manipulate and apply the rules by double standard.
I’m not afraid of the public, but they are very, since they organized themselves against me with surreptitious correspondence and tried to jump in (the source comes from an editor who has tried to block me several years since I appeared, mainly because he didn’t like my objectivity and professionalism on a historical issue, but he could only fight this insidiously now, with various tricks, guides, jumps, etc.), but there was no way to achieve this, you see, it was not enough for them to be eliminated from there by conceptual methods, they are not left alone here either. What you are asking for is exactly the content they want to remove from my user page here (and even since I wrote this, several additional events have even doubled what I mentioned, which is extremely sad and supports the double standard I wanted to point to) , this is the most concise summary, even if a few diffs would lead too far. The case is complicated, intricate, so it’s an ideally concise summary you’d like, I don’t think it would be feasible, you’d rather ask if you’re more interested in something in detail. By the way, one of the (main) colossals has already launched the global block request, proving his boundless benevolence, but I am no longer surprised by this, and even the many nonsense they are trying to figure out or beat me right now (I can respond separately). I say even in this situation I smile more, human evil really has no limit ...
A word like a hundred, run through my user page and ask calmly, I will answer as soon as I can, but be prepared that, as you can see in this report, with a full arsenal of people trying to falsify or misinterpret what happened, one goal to get everything out of me because my insight and summary of the phenomenon I just became the victim of (too much a step before I investigated things with an admin on the top forum of the wiki there) but it doesn't matter, this is also described or included in the relevant diff (and by wanting to remove it, it justifies me, because if there was a problem with me, it would be my writing that is proof of my own stupidity, which should just be advertised as a bad example). Hello (KIENGIR debate 13 June 2021, 00:10 (CEST))
posted by Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:27, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Kasra.9nor

Status:    In progress
Lock evasion: Rezadelavari. --Darubrub (Inform me) 12:24, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Mohadic

Status:    In progress
Lock evasion: Rezadelavari. --Darubrub (Inform me) 12:24, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Paweł Strzelecki

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. (see also Talk:Steward requests/Global#caught sock puppets.). --~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:53, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Nguyễn Phúc Vy sock

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. Blocked at viwp. Lệ Xuân (talk) 08:42, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Morellan682

Status:    In progress

Long term abuse - User:Brendan John Williams --SHB2000 (talk | contibs | en.wikivoyage | w:User:SHB2000) 00:06, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Noname JR and his sockpuppets

Status:    In progress

Lock all:

Global lock for Hongkonger500

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse: Kapol6360. --SCP-2000 08:51, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  • +1. --SCP-2000 08:24, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Highlandhd

Status:    In progress
Cross-wiki abuse. Block/lock evasion. Missing accounts from w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jagdeep singh bittu/Archive; rest is locked. --~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:34, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for JuanMa Albornoz

Status:    In progress
Crosswiki spam. ---- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 11:39, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for cross-wiki abuse and LTA sock

Status:    In progress

Lock all:

Same user of Special:CentralAuth/Jessechi.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 12:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Otyko

Status:    In progress
Cross-wiki abuse.笹目ヤヤ 04:56, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Прахов

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. Global lock evasion by Валко. ---- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 17:36, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Husbonian

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. -- JavaHurricane 17:32, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for LetsBob

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. LoganTheWatermelon. Compare Special:CentralAuth/BobTheBuilder6969666 and related socks. -- JavaHurricane 02:26, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock and block for MariyumShaik

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. The user keeps uploading copyrighted photos to commons and uses them in fake articles about the "actors" of "films" on different Wikipedias. Cross-wiki abuse/spam--PotsdamLamb (talk) 20:56, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for JAHANZAIBARIF

Status:    In progress
Cross-wiki abuse. creating non-notable articles and keeps recreating them. See statement admitting it [here]. --PotsdamLamb (talk) 22:24, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Ilucainnawasaer

Status:    In progress

cross-wiki abuse. out of scope. See w:ja:User talk:No1lovesu and w:yue:Talk:2(already deleted). These messages (written in Chinese) are not about Wikimedia Projects and aggressive language to No1lovesu. --郊外生活Kogaiseikatsu (talk,contribs) 15:46, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

zh:LTA:冏 H78c67c (talk) 15:55, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Lemoncolorgrass

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. Cross-wiki abuse. Spam / spambot. --Leaderboard (talk) 17:33, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for LTA Hoa112008 sock

Status:    In progress

Uncovered at commons:Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Hoa112008 DMacks (talk) 19:00, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Other one. At this point they won't stop socking. MarioJump83! 01:33, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for MelRob22

Status:    In progress
Spammer. According to emails and conversations received by checkusers, the editor works at a publicity company very potentially related to Lucamoreira. Now they is creating puppets. Edmond Dantès d'un message? 20:52, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Surajit Biswas (Bir)

Status:    In progress
Spam / spambot. -- HurricaneEdgar 08:21, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Sneed feed

Status:    In progress
Cross-wiki abuse. --Aeschylus (talk) 11:58, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Skyscraper Enthusiast 12345

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. ---- LuK3 (Talk) 13:18, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Retsinakanister

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. Risto hot sir. --ミラP@Miraclepine 02:27, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Logogresta

Status:    In progress
Lock evasion: Zaid Zayd. --Darubrub (Inform me) 13:32, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
  Comment If possible, can you lock all of their socks, if not already done please? PotsdamLamb (talk) 16:02, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Aaush raj

Status:    In progress
Cross-wiki abuse. Spam / spambot. Stopped editing a while ago, but requesting because the first (to which the second one is very likely related) and the third account were editing the page simple:Health, which is persistently abused, possibly by related users (Uttamwiki23 (talk · contribs) from there is already locked). --~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:25, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Sahil Sankaliya

Status:    In progress
Cross-wiki abuse. Spam / spambot. In addition, also edited on simple:Health and likely a sockpuppet. --~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:44, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for סַמוּר and others

Status:    In progress

Lock all:

Long-term abuse, and sock of User:若松慶一郎,User:A good Wikipedian from Osaka and others.--Daraku K. (talk) 06:01, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for 特別 言論統制フィルター

Status:    In progress
Long term abuse and cross wiki abuse. --Tmv (talk) 10:14, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for NDBTK

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. See also w:ja:LTA:NDBTK or copycat. --しみはる君 (talk) 11:28, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Nbhure00

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. See also Locked user's sockpuppet: User:Nbckfkh (w:ja:LTA:KFKH) . --しみはる君 (talk) 11:28, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for 7しち サブサブ垢

Status:    In progress
Lock evasion: User:7しち and User:7しち サブ垢 . --しみはる君 (talk) 11:28, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Glennett584

Status:    In progress

Long term abuse - Telstra/Brendan John Williams --SHB2000 (talk | contibs | en.wikivoyage | w:User:SHB2000) 11:53, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock/unlock for Can Genç Arturo Ungaro

Status:    In progress
Arturo LTA. --Elli (talk) 16:23, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Username1971202178

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. Denisgezmis. --Aeschylus (talk) 00:55, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for 千村狐免

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. zh:LTA:千村狐免. --銀河市長 (talk) 09:12, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Yeissensura

Status:    In progress
Spam / spambot. -- JavaHurricane 12:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Bowlkev

Status:    In progress
Spam / spambot. --EstrellaSuecia (talk) 18:41, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for INPJR111

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. Spam / spambot. ASIANPOPCHANNEL. --MarioJump83! 02:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Amwanzia

Status:    In progress
Crosswiki spam. ---- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 13:12, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. Abusive username. --Aeschylus (talk) 21:56, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Hehhehdhd

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. Rrtttq. --LuchoCR (talk) 04:51, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock

Status:    In progress

Lock all:

Offensive and abusive name.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 09:22, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for CyclonicStorm2k

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. sock creating by Hoa112008 LTA. --HurricaneEdgar (talk) 09:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. --Ferien (talk) 11:57, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Rajbhai7

Status:    In progress
Global lock evasion. Mahin330BD. --Ferien (talk) 12:27, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Legrondb8 / Drosthak

Status:    In progress

Global lock

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. --IBC MAST (talk) 18:07, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for User:Itsyourimran

Status:    In progress
Obvious socks of globally locked editor User:Abdullahalimran001. Compare, for example, en:special:permalink/1003577431 to wikidata:Special:AbuseLog/16629414. The master is too old for CU on English Wikipedia, but these two accounts are confirmed to each other. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:10, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for KelvinLudwig02

Status:    In progress

Spam-Only Account (Spambot). —AlvaroMolina (✉ - ✔) 02:26, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for CentralAuth/AlvaFiorillo2

Status:    In progress

Lock all:

Spambot, involved in spamming/doxxing multiple times on-enwn. See also: special:diff/21586012. --acagastya 02:39, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for 米記123 sock(s)

Status:    In progress

Girlie-Days (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date • CA • ST • lwcheckuser)

Global lock for Ёбаный калмык

Status:    In progress
Long-term abuse. --Mtarch11 (talk) 03:24, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for Yaddievibes

Status:    In progress
Crosswiki spam. ---- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 03:41, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Global lock for 影武者(Nipponese Dog Calvero)

Status:    In progress

--Lanwi1(talk) 04:05, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

See also

Cooperation requests for:comments (local) (global) · translation

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Global&oldid=21587617"