Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat/Archives/2015-06

Interwiki map update request

  Resolved. Updated

I have made a update request at Talk:Interwiki map#Requests for updates (ISO639-3). Please someone look at it. Thanks. --fryed-peach (talk) 15:13, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

  Done @fryed-peach. —MarcoAurelio 21:01, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Thank you! --fryed-peach (talk) 02:48, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Request for CentralNotice banner

Hi all! I would some help to create a CentralNotice banner for the Wiki loves Earth in Bulgaria 2015 contest as it already started and only 2 or 3 countries start the contest in June.

  • text (Bulgarian):

Фотоконкурс Уики обича Земята: Споделете уникални снимки от природното богатство на България, помогнете на Уикипедия и спечелете страхотни награди!

  • text (English):

Wiki Loves Earth photo contest: Upload photos of natural heritage sites in Algeria to help Wikipedia and win fantastic prizes!

--Vodnokon4e (talk) 22:22, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Please ignore the request. The campaign has already started in Bulgaria and we managed it by local MediaWiki Sitenotice.--Vodnokon4e (talk) 06:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Revert translation

Please revert this to last revision by Stryn. Thanks in advance.--Grind24 (talk) 12:33, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Done by Matiia, btw you can do it by yourself as well. --Stryn (talk) 15:47, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Request for CentralNotice banner

  Resolved. Campaign created and activated. Sponsors reminded to give us a couple of days next time they request a banner.

Hi all! I would some help to create a CentralNotice banner to support the 1st project contest among Argentina volunteers and editors.

This is the campaigns:

    • link:
    • Starting immediately until July 1st, 2015
    • logged-in
    • only in Argentina, only in Spanish projects.
    • text1: ¿Querés impulsar los proyectos Wikimedia y tenés una buena idea para compartir? ¿Necesitás ayuda para materializarla?
    • text2: ¡Wikimedia Argentina te invita a participar en la primera convocatoria de proyectos de la organización! ¡Sumate!

--Anna Torres (WMAR) (talk) 16:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Buenas Anna. No es la primera vez que desde Wikimedia Argentina se nos pide que activemos banners de manera inmediata o con un margen de tiempo excesivamente corto. Existen muchos otros banners activos durante todo el año, sobre todo mientras dura la campaña de recaudación de fondos, que necesitan ser coordinados conjuntamente con las nuevas solicitudes para el sistema rote los anuncios y todos ellos puedan gozar de una visibilidad razonable y cumplir su cometido; y esa es la razón de la existencia de CentralNotice/Calendar. Voy a tratar de ocuparme de esta petición (tardaré sobre una hora), pero por favor os pediría que para la próxima nos diéseis unos pocos días de margen entre que se hace la solicitud y el plazo en que el banner ha de ser activado para evitar tener que coordinarse a la carrera. Muchas gracias por vuestra comprensión. Un saludo. —MarcoAurelio 21:30, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
  Hecho. Comenzará a las 00:00 (UTC) horas del día 3 de junio de 2015. —MarcoAurelio 21:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Estimado MarcoAurelio, mis más sinceras disculpas! Para nada queremos dar la impresión que estamos presionando. La próxima vez sí, lo pediremos con tiempo para evitarles un problema. Acepta de nuevo mis disculpas --Anna Torres (WMAR) (talk) 13:18, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Muchas gracias, Anna. ¿Se ve bien el banner? Un saludo. —MarcoAurelio 23:04, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Kolonel Zeiksnor

Can an admin please put an end to Kolonel Zeiksnor his disruptive behavior? Kolonel Zeiksnor is the sockpuppet of a nl-wiki based LTA named Die vandaal. His presence here at meta is disruptive since he used meta as a venue to trol members of the Dutch Wikipedia and Wikimedia Belgium. For example, supporting a gift away nomination of the person who's privacy he once violated and supporting the nominations of others who had to deal with him in the past at the Dutch Wikipedia because he kept evading his block. This kind of behavior is intimidating and should not be tolerated. See also Grants talk:PEG/WM BE/Wiki Loves Art 2016 and especially the latest comments by DerekvG and Romaine. He is disrupting the grant request just like he disrupted the community at WMBE-wiki. Meta is not the venue to game the system so you can disrupt the people who dealt with abuse in the past from there. This person operates cross wiki and manages to disrupt but not cross the border every time so he can get away with it. Natuur12 (talk) 11:30, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

See also the status of his global account. Already blocked at the NL Wikimedia Wiki, Fr.Wiki and Natuur12 (talk) 11:39, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I see that he has been blocked at those wikis, though says for trolling and sockpuppetry. My review of the edits on meta see that he is being a PITA though they are not at a block stage. I have left a note for the user as a first point of contact.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:53, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Notice: I've posted a global lock request on Steward requests/Global, as I believe the case is of cross-wiki relevance and does need steward attention. Personally, I respectfully disagree with billinghurst's assessment of this not being at a block stage. --Dry Martini (talk) 09:11, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
At this point of time the request is effective. This a different wiki, this is Meta, so we need to be robust to criticism and allow a point of view to be spoken, whether we like or agree with it. It is how it is said that is pertinent. Of course we will not allow harassment or personal/malicious attacks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:48, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Well, this really is a complicated case but without all the background it might not be exactly clear why Kolonel Zeiksnor is a problem. What he does is harassment because he trolls and disrupt people cross wiki. This case involves privacy violations, talking slander, following certain editors, trolling and off wiki harassment. Every wiki he comes he keeps balancing on the edge of what might be acceptable if you don't look at the cross wiki pattern it seems acceptable. But the people who are the victims are the same. Natuur12 (talk) 11:24, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Personal attacks by Guy Macon

@Guy Macon: I'm not sure if this is the right venue for this here but could someone please ask Guy Macon to stop following me around and attempting to derail every conversation I am in by spamming personal attacks directed at me. I also can't notify him of the discussion because he has told me not to post on his page after I asked him twice to stop derailing discussion and making personal attacks. Reguyla (talk) 11:23, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

After being blocked from editing (there were legitimate differences of opinion about the original block) Reguyla (then known as Kumioko) was banned from the English Wikipedia for sockpuppetry, ban evasion, and harassment. As one editor pointed out:
"It is simply not the case that Kumioko evaded the ban because the ban was an impediment to editing. They evaded the ban to hassle and taunt other editors ostensibly as a form of protest against the ban. As multiple editors have noted (e.g. Beeblebrox, MarnetteD, Hasteur, etc.) we are not looking at a momentary outburst or some invective on a talk page. We are looking at hundreds of messages left with dozens of alternate accounts on wikipedia and over email. They included trenchant criticism of Wikipedias power structure, childish name calling, harassment and boasts about disrupting wikipedia until Kumioko got their way. Arguments attempting to diminish the significance of these messages are completely unconvincing to me. First, the semantic difference between an account/IP address used to evade a block and a "sock" is pretty unimportant. Kumioko identified themselves clearly when saying "Babybrox you are nothing but a corrupt, vile piece of trash." or "If you want me to stop, just unblock me. Nothing else has worked and my bahn will never be effective so if you want me to quit posting you might want to give it a try." or "as long as there are mindless and abusive editors like you, Wikipedia will continue to be a septic cesspool of assholery. Keep up the bad work knucklehead. So what do you think the FU means huh?", so it's somehow better? Never mind that socking would work against Kumioko's self-identified ends because the purpose of the messages were to threaten that disruption and nonsense would continue until they were unblocked. Second, the messages themselves were incessant and noisome."[1]
Kumioko's ban has been reviewed several times, and the conclusion of the community was that, whatever the merits of the original block, Kumioko's post-block behavior fully justified an indefinite ban:
Even on Wikipediocracy (hardly a hotbed of support for Wikipedia admin's actions), where Kumioko wrote
"I just thought I would let you know that I have been banned from Wikipedia. I figured that should make some of you very happy and I figured this would get opened so I wanted to be the one to do it. I have seen this coming for a while due to my stance on Arbcom and policy violating Admins. I have been creating accounts since september in anticipation. They just blocked about 60, but thats only the last few days. All I wanted to do was help the project and they threw me out so now I will be the most prolific vandal, troll and sockmaster in Wikipedia history. Free Kumioko!"[2]
He got responses such as
"Kumioko, I and others have tried to advise you to do other things for a long time. Please consider whether all of us are your enemies or rather that we wish you well. Please take a vacation from Wikipedia and the internet."
"For your own sanity, let go. Move on. Turn the other cheek. Get a fucking life. Drop it."
"So vandalism/trolling/acting like a three-year-old makes you some kind of hero fighting against the system does it? Pathetic..."
"Why don't you just find some other way to spend your life, Kumioko? "
"No offense, Kumioko, but you're a pretty shitty sockmaster."
"60+ checkuser confirmed accounts. That's pathetic, Kumioko. Get a life."
"Long story shortened for anyone who doesn't know... Kumioko started his downward spiral after being prevented from doing automated/bot tasks. Some of the Bot approvals threads where his competance is questioned were mildly amusing. Rather than doing something else, or you know, becoming competant, he instead chose to bitch and moan and whine and *snore*.... And ended up banned. Easily avoidable. Just dont be an arse when you have nothing to contribute."
"Are you sure you're an adult? Because this is some of the most immature bullshit and self-obsessive twattishness I've seen from anyone - ever."
And now he is posting his grievances on multiple locations on Meta, including repeated attempts to hijack a discussion I was having about WMF spending[3][4][5][6][7][8][9] and, of course, trying to bully me into accepting his hijacking with bogus complaints such as this one. BTW, I hear that boomerangs are very nice in situations such as this. :) --Guy Macon (talk) 21:42, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello to both of you, I don't think this is a right place to report drama, I think both of you can talk this out on user talkpage. Thank you.--AldNonymousBicara? 10:03, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
@Guy Macon: I am not sure of the pertinence or relevance of Reguyla's previous life or block has to the discussion. You need to get a proper life if you have time to spend and paste those sorts of references. I ask that you both review your approaches to each other's interaction and maybe purposefully steer clear of each other's conversations. Generally in cases like this there is responsibility on both sides and we would like for you to take personal responsibility for your words and their location.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:24, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Please note that it wasn't me who filed a complaint here, that there is nothing wrong with posting a rebuttal against the false accusations made concerning me, and that including links to evidence is a good thing, not a bad thing. Also note that the most or all of the comments I have made about this anywhere on meta were in response to Reguyla [A] Attempting to hijack my conversation about WMF finances and [B] direct responses in the multiple places where he has accused me. BHillinghurst, I thank you for your concern about whether I have a "proper life", but my choices as to how and where to spend my time are my own, and I do not require assistance. --Guy Macon (talk) 20:19, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
When someone is here complaining about personal attacks and you dig up a whole swathe of irrelevant links about a person's background at another wiki, and at an external site, don't you think that reinforces their point rather than supports your case? Reguyla's background and history at another wiki is known here, and hasn't been hidden. His approach to addressing issues on certain pages at this wiki is also known and it is what it is, and has been for an extended period of time.

At this wiki you both need to co-exist and show tolerance to each other's point of view. We need users here to show maturity and to express their opinion and to let other have theirs without being harassed, whether you like/dislike/agree/disagree. So how about you both learn some tolerance and stop irritating each other.  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:33, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

First, I am not trying to Hijack any discussions. My comment was a statement that I think if the WMF was going to spend a bunch of money they should do it smartly and address the real problems , which are cultural and societal within the projects rather than throw money at IT fixes that don't address the real problems....and then continue to wonder why editors and readers are down across the WMF supported sites.
I also just wanted to clear up I am not posting my grievances on multiple venues. I commented in several discussions about different subjects. It is in fact Guy Macon who is running around dropping unrelated links in multiple discussions because he has a grudge against me for some reason. I stopped posting on his talk page as he requested and I would be happy to leave him alone if he extends the same courtesy. He already has ENWP to vent his dislike and spread lies about me where I cannot reply, he doesn't need to do it here too. Reguyla (talk) 13:51, 8 June 2015 (UTC)


No action for a long time. It looks like more admins should add the page to their WL :P --Base (talk) 18:53, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Request for CentralNotice banner for Wiki Loves Food photo contest in India

Wiki Loves Food

Hi, requesting for a Central Notice banner for Wiki Loves Food photo contest in all language Wikimedia projects in India.

This is the campaign:

  • link:
  • image: File:Wlf logo 2015.png
  • dates: Until 15th June, 2015 starting immediately.
  • projects: all
  • language: en, hi, bn, mr, te, ta, ml, kn, or, ur, sa, kn, pa, gu, ne, as
  • both anonymous and logged in
  • Geolocated to: IN (India)
  • text (English)(en): Wiki Loves Food - Wikipedia Photo Contest. Upload pictures of Indian Food and win prizes
  • text (Kannada)(kn): ವಿಕಿ ಲವ್ಸ್ ಫುಡ್ - ವಿಕಿ ಫೋಟೋ ಸರ್ಧೆ. ಭಾರತೀಯ ತಿಂಡಿತಿನಿಸುಗಳ ಛಾಯಾಚಿತ್ರ ಅಪ್ಲೋಡ್ ಮಾಡಿ ಮತ್ತು ಬಹುಮಾನ ಗೆಲ್ಲಿ
  • text (Malayalam) (ml): വിക്കി ഭക്ഷണചിത്രങ്ങളെ സ്നേഹിയ്ക്കുന്നു- വിക്കിപീഡിയ ഫോട്ടോ മത്സരം. ഇന്ത്യന്‍ ഭക്ഷണവിഭവങ്ങളുടെ ഫോട്ടോ അപ്ലോഡ് ചെയ്ത് സമ്മാനം നേടൂ
  • text (Punjabi)(pa): ਵਿਕੀ ਲਵਜ਼ ਫ਼ੂਡ - ਵਿਕੀਪੀਡੀਆ ਫ਼ੋਟੋ ਮੁਕਾਬਲਾ। ਭਾਰਤੀ ਖਾਣੇ ਦੀਆਂ ਫ਼ੋਟੋਆਂ ਅਪਲੋਡ ਕਰੋ ਅਤੇ ਇਨਾਮ ਜਿੱਤੋ |
  • text (Odia) (or): ଉଇକି ଲଭ୍‌ସ ଫୁଡ଼ - ଉଇକିପିଡ଼ିଆ ଫଟୋ ପ୍ରତିଯୋଗିତା । ଭାରତୀୟ ରାନ୍ଧଣାର ଫଟୋ ଅପଲୋଡ଼ କରନ୍ତୁ ଓ ପୁରସ୍କାର ଜିତନ୍ତୁ
  • text (Hindi) (hi): विकी लव्ज़ फ़ूड - विकिपीडिया फ़ोटो प्रतियोगिता। भारती आहार की तस्वीरें अपलोड करें और पुरस्कार जीतें |
  • text (Urdu) (ur): ویکی لوز فوڈ - ویکیپیڈیا فوٹو مقابلہ - بھارتی پکوان کی تصاویر اپلوڈ کیجیے اور انعام جیتیے۔
  • text (Telugu) (te): వికీ లవ్స్ ఫుడ్ - వికీపీడియా ఛాయాచిత్ర పోటీ. భారతీయ ఆహారానికి సంబంధించిన ఛాయాచిత్రాలు ఎక్కించండి, బహుమతులు గెలుచుకోండి.
  • text (Sanskrit) (sa): काम्यते खाद्यं विक्या । विकिपीडिय़ा-चित्रप्रतियोगिता | स्थापयतु विकिपीडिया-मध्ये भारतीयानि खाद्यानि | प्राप्यन्तां पुरस्काराः अनेके |
  • text (Tamil) (ta): விக்கி விரும்புதே உணவை - விக்கிப்பீடியா புகைப்படப் போட்டி. இந்திய உணவுகள் குறித்த படங்களைப் பதிவேற்றி பரிசுகளை வெல்லுங்கள்.
  • text (Marathi) (mr): विकी चे खाद्य प्रेम : विकिपीडिया फोटो स्पर्धा, भारतीय खाद्यापादार्थाच्या संचिका चढावा आणि बक्षिसे जिंका
  • text (Bengali) (bn): উইকি লাভস্‌ ফুড- উইকিপিডিয়া ফটোগ্রাফী প্রতিযোগিতা। ভারতীয় খাবারের ছবি তুলে আপলোড করুন এবং পুরস্কার জিতে নিন

--Ravi (talk) 10:55, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

  In progress--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 15:46, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
I have made the changes, could someone more familiar with CN review and enable this? . @Glaisher:--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 17:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
I've made some changes to it and asked Shanmugamp7 to enable it once he checks it. --Glaisher (talk) 05:21, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Ravi, We have updated the text into two lines as single line campaign had some UI issues. Can you check the translations here also update the urudu translation--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 17:32, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
The campaign is enabled now, let us know if you see anything wrong--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 17:38, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
@Shanmugam Could you update the text for Malayalam (ml) as: "വിക്കി ഭക്ഷണചിത്രങ്ങളെ സ്നേഹിക്കുന്നു - വിക്കിപീഡിയ ഛായാഗ്രഹണ മത്സരം. ഇന്ത്യന്‍ ഭക്ഷണവിഭവങ്ങളുടെ ചിത്രമെടുത്ത് അപ്‌ലോഡ് ചെയ്ത് സമ്മാനം നേടൂ."
Thanks--Praveen:talk 16:18, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
  Done--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 08:06, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello folks. I'd like to chime in here after the fact, and make a minor request. This particular campaign was set at 'high' priority (it used to be weightage I think???). As you know india is a huge country, at high priority this particular campaign has possibly hundred(s) of millions of viewers. We might not get a true idea of the scale of viewership this might be getting. Also, we might be crossing into the territory of banner fatigue- which I think everyone wanted to avoid when central notice was created. In case I missed something recent, or if the priority is different from viewership somehow - please correct me. As a request, can stewards or admins making campaigns for india see to set the priority/weightage lower (around norma)l or set traffic limit. Thanks. Theo10011 (talk) 20:34, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

If I'm not mistaken, banner priorities work like this: if there is a banner with lower priority, then it is not shown at all. At that time there were other banners with high priority. As setting it to normal priority would cause this banner to be not shown at all, I asked Shanmugamp7 to set it to high priority. As there is no conflicting banner now, I've lowered the priority to normal and also set traffic limit to 60% of total views. (Either way, the campaign would end tomorrow). Using lower proportions for traffic might be something to do in the future for these types of campaigns. Regards, --Glaisher (talk) 11:54, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
I see. Thanks for the explanation Glaisher. I haven't been keeping up with the developments around here (CN didn't even have a log from when I remember.....), I understand better now. I just wanted to make that minor point for stewards/admins familiar with central notice to be careful with campaigns in countries like India, they have a huge viewership - arguably one of the largest for the english language versions (and its bound to be the single largest in the future) - it might get to be too much if overused and have less of an impact. It's a good thing to keep in mind for future. Thanks again. Regards. Theo10011 (talk) 20:22, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Removal of global bot status

When will the results? - Steward requests/Bot status#Removal of global bot status --6AND5 (talk) 09:12, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Meta:Requests for comment/Bureaucrat removal of permissions

I've opened this RfC to ask if Meta-Wiki bureaucrats should be able to continue removing advanced permissions such as administrator and or bureaucrat. —MarcoAurelio 16:30, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Request for CentralNotice banner


Hi all! I would some help to create a CentralNotice banner for the contest planned by Wikimedia Argentina.

--Giselle Bordoy WMAR (talk) 14:52, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

I'll take care of this. —MarcoAurelio 11:06, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  Done - previewMarcoAurelio 11:20, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Main Page in Hindi

moved from SN by --MF-W 22:02, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

For Hindi language "Main Page" is going to "मुखपृष्ठ". Where it is showing Marathi language which uses same script. Earlier we used to use the work "मुख्य पृष्ठ" for Main Page but now it is "मुखपृष्ठ" everywhere. On wikidata, Wikimedia Commons it is corrected. I want it should be corrected here too. Since Hindi and Marathi language both are sharing same name for Main Page and if we click on Main Page then it will go to "मुखपृष्ठ" for both languages. So, these things should be done here:

For more understating you can follow d:Wikidata:मुखपृष्ठ or commons:मुखपृष्ठ.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 18:51, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

You are talking about meta-wiki? Right? Ruslik (talk) 19:51, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I am talking about meta-wiki.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 09:46, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
@संजीव कुमार: Which page at meta are you wishing to be edited? Normally such edits are not undertaken by stewards but by meta administrators and the means to get a change made is to edit the talk page of the page needing changing, explicitly state the change required and add the template {{edit protected}} as an alert. Probably worthwhile trying that approach first.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:50, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
I wrote the steps explicitly. And writing again:

मुखपृष्ठ is the Marathi and Hindi name for Main Page.

This is same as it is on wikidata. I was not aware, where this thing should be posted so, I posted it here.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 13:26, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
I'm gonna leave this to meta sysop who can understand Hindi and Marathi language. If noone from among meta sysop can handle this, I will action this 2-6 days from now.--AldNonymousBicara? 13:32, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
I just notice this now those 2 pages have same name with same spelling, is it fine just adding (mr)/(hi) as suffix to differentiate?--AldNonymousBicara? 12:09, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

I also asked you to add suffix (hi)/(mr). but we have to add it for both languages. And Main Page should be like "indistinguible" page which have 2 links. Or, if you can change the move permission of those pages, then I can do this job.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 19:12, 25 June 2015 (UTC)


Hey, this user was blocked indefinitely in 28 March 2011 because of "Abusing multiple accounts: CU-block -using socks to impersonate fawiki admin" and after three years and this promise this user got unblocked in 25 July 2014 [10]. But He used User:Zack90 when (s)he was blocked (Special:Diff/3276089) and voted for Mjbmr adminship after unblock (Special:PermaLink/12061240) which is obviously violation of sockpuppet policy (User:Zack90 is sock of Mjbmr w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mjbmr/Archive). Amir (talk) 16:39, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

So you suggest us to block a sock based on enwiki's inconclusive CU results? That would mean we act like enwiki and block the user per DUCK-test. That's something we will hardly do here, especially without any hard evidence. -Barras talk 12:08, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Furthermore, blocks are usually used as preventative measurement and not punitive as it would most like be here the case. -Barras talk 12:13, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Probably we can do a xwiki Checkuser to find more evidences if it is true. Also @Mjbmr: for his statement. By the way, this user may be a meatpuppet (this still violates the sock policy).--GZWDer (talk) 15:26, 28 June 2015 (UTC)


...can be deleted, as the file is no longer functional and has been deleted on en:. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 14:44, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

  Done--Vituzzu (talk) 15:17, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Template:Authority control

How an we fix the unresolved issue discussed here? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:30, 29 June 2015 (UTC)