Meta:Requests for checkuser/Ajraddatz
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.
- Ajraddatz (talk • contribs • deleted user contributions • logs • block log • abuse log • CentralAuth • stalktoy) Bureaucrats: user rights management.
- Ending 21:03, 14 April 2016 (UTC), if policy requirements are met.
Hello everyone,
I am very active in dealing with cross-wiki abuse and spam, and having access to local CU on Meta would make that work easier for me. All new accounts are created on Meta, like loginwiki, but here I can also load my personal js files and thus streamline my work and let me spend less time clicking buttons. I would also be able to respond to the few Meta cases that arise. For those of you who don't know me, I have been a steward and local admin here since 2014. See Stewards/CheckUser statistics for loginwiki for some indication of how active I would be with these permissions on Meta, and User:Barras/CU for a comparison with existing Meta CUs. Thanks, Ajraddatz (talk) 21:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Just a note of clarification; while I am requesting local CU in part to deal with cross-wiki abuse, I am also active on Meta as an admin and community member, and would be using these rights to deal with local spam and abuse as well. My statement was weighed towards the cross-wiki work, since that would be the majority of what I use the bit for here (as it is with all of the local CUs right now), but I'm not just applying for this as an extension of my steward access. As always, questions/comments/concerns are more than welcome and I'd be glad to clarify or give examples for anything I've said here. Ajraddatz (talk) 19:48, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support, active enough, trusted and I believe that another (active) checkuser would be fine. Érico (talk) 22:14, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support Trusted user. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 22:35, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Rschen7754 00:12, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Yes, we need to CU Ajraddatz, I think he is a LTA...--Stemoc 00:32, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support. Matiia (talk) 00:42, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support. Active and clueful admin, suitable for the role. RadiX∞ 01:06, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support eurodyne (talk) 05:27, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support -FASTILY 06:31, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support Absolutely, great candidate.--Syum90 (talk) 06:42, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support Good addition to the team. QuiteUnusual (talk) 07:33, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support --rxy (talk) 09:16, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 11:55, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support. --Stang 13:04, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Stryn (talk) 13:13, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:16, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support--Vituzzu (talk) 20:01, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support trusted and clueful user. —Ah3kal (talk) 20:09, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support Glaisher (talk) 11:59, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support Courcelles 20:47, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Ochilov (talk) 12:43, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support Can be trusted with the tools. Sam Sailor (talk) 00:41, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support--Bowleerin (talk) 12:26, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support --TBhagat (talk) 16:10, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support --GeorgeBarnick (talk) 18:24, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 22:43, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Defender (talk) 23:06, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the support everyone. I'll try to use the extra rights well. Ajraddatz (talk) 18:31, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
- Done - Policy requirements are met: 26 support votes with 100% support obtained for the course of at least one week. NDA is also signed. Ajraddatz is our newest CheckUser. —MarcoAurelio 18:24, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above request page is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Comments about this page should be made in Meta:Babel or Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat.