Meta:Requests for checkuser/Ajraddatz

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

AjraddatzEdit

Hello everyone,

I am very active in dealing with cross-wiki abuse and spam, and having access to local CU on Meta would make that work easier for me. All new accounts are created on Meta, like loginwiki, but here I can also load my personal js files and thus streamline my work and let me spend less time clicking buttons. I would also be able to respond to the few Meta cases that arise. For those of you who don't know me, I have been a steward and local admin here since 2014. See Stewards/CheckUser statistics for loginwiki for some indication of how active I would be with these permissions on Meta, and User:Barras/CU for a comparison with existing Meta CUs. Thanks, Ajraddatz (talk) 21:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Just a note of clarification; while I am requesting local CU in part to deal with cross-wiki abuse, I am also active on Meta as an admin and community member, and would be using these rights to deal with local spam and abuse as well. My statement was weighed towards the cross-wiki work, since that would be the majority of what I use the bit for here (as it is with all of the local CUs right now), but I'm not just applying for this as an extension of my steward access. As always, questions/comments/concerns are more than welcome and I'd be glad to clarify or give examples for anything I've said here. Ajraddatz (talk) 19:48, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
  1. Support Support, active enough, trusted and I believe that another (active) checkuser would be fine. Érico (talk) 22:14, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
  2. Support Support Trusted user. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 22:35, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
  3. Support Support --Rschen7754 00:12, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
  4. Support Support --Yes, we need to CU Ajraddatz, I think he is a LTA...--Stemoc 00:32, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
  5. Support Support. Matiia (talk) 00:42, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
  6. Support Support. Active and clueful admin, suitable for the role. RadiX 01:06, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
  7. Support Support eurodyne (talk) 05:27, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
  8. Support Support -FASTILY 06:31, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
  9. Support Support Absolutely, great candidate.--Syum90 (talk) 06:42, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
  10. Support Support Good addition to the team. QuiteUnusual (talk) 07:33, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
  11. Support Support --rxy (talk) 09:16, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
  12. Support Support --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 11:55, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
  13. Support Support. --Stang 13:04, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
  14. Support Support --Stryn (talk) 13:13, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
  15. Support Support --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:16, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
  16. Support Support--Vituzzu (talk) 20:01, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
  17. Support Support trusted and clueful user. —Ah3kal (talk) 20:09, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
  18. Support Support Glaisher (talk) 11:59, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
  19. Support Support Courcelles 20:47, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
  20. Support Support --Ochilov (talk) 12:43, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
  21. Support Support Can be trusted with the tools. Sam Sailor (talk) 00:41, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
  22. Support Support--Bowleerin (talk) 12:26, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
  23. Support Support --TBhagat (talk) 16:10, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
  24. Support Support --GeorgeBarnick (talk) 18:24, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
  25. Support SupportTeles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 22:43, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
  26. Support Support --Defender (talk) 23:06, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the support everyone. I'll try to use the extra rights well. Ajraddatz (talk) 18:31, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - Policy requirements are met: 26 support votes with 100% support obtained for the course of at least one week. NDA is also signed. Ajraddatz is our newest CheckUser. —MarcoAurelio 18:24, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

The above request page is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Comments about this page should be made in Meta:Babel or Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat.