Meta:Requests for bureaucratship/MF-Warburg

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

MF-Warburg

MF-Warburg (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)

Hi all,
I would like to candidate as a bureaucrat mainly because many current bureaucrats are rather inactive on the requests to crats here; e.g. today, we already lost two bureaucrats because of inactivity, and two are listed for removal. Especially Meta:Changing username often has a backlog, and it would also be useful to be able to rename people as part of "global" rename requests which appear on SRUC. But of course I would also attend to closing rights requests when I have not participated in them. I meet the requirements of having 150 edits/log actions in the last 6 months, and am a sysop already for longer than than time (since Nov. 2012). --MF-W 21:12, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I'm more than happy to endorse that request, meta needs some more/active crats! -Barras talk 21:14, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support, we do need some more active crats on meta and MF-Warburg is certainly a good candidate. Trijnstel_talk 21:15, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kolega2357 (talk) 21:21, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Da biste dobili hitnu. Vogone talk 21:22, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sim. Il ist molto di'ak! PiRSquared17 (talk) 21:29, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support, yes, meta needs more involvement. --M/ (talk) 21:58, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course! Ajraddatz (Talk) 22:01, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Sa vh ^ñ 22:16, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support, for reasons already stated. --Varnent (talk)^(COI) 22:47, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support why not? --Rs chen 7754 23:52, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support MBisanz ^talk 02:20, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Stryn (talk) 06:22, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Of course. Aber naturlich! Mathonius (talk) 07:25, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support by Revi^{^Discuss}_{SUL Info} at 07:56, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 08:38, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Glaisher [talk] 09:29, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:33, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --IW 19:03, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Blargh, -Mh7kJ (talk) 19:29, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Defender (talk) 19:51, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clear consensus to promote with sufficient crat endorsements (myself excluded). Welcome to the cabal! Thehelpfulone 21:12, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]