Meta:Requests for adminship/Daimona Eaytoy

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Daimona Eaytoy edit

Daimona Eaytoy (talk • contribs • deleted user contributions • logs • block log • abuse log • CentralAuth • stalktoy) Bureaucrats: user rights management.

Not ending before 15 July 2023 16:52 (UTC)

With global abuse filters now being enabled everywhere, including itwiki (my home wiki), I would like to be able to edit them, so as to avoid any false positives that will arise. I am an AFH since 2018 (meaning I can already see, but not edit, global filters), have been an AFM for 1 year in 2022-23, and have just applied for renewal. However, Abuse filter maintainers states that «is only to be used for non-controversial maintenance, or by request of the local community». I wouldn't confidently interpret this as meaning that edits to global filters are OK, even if requested by a local community. I am therefore applying for adminship so as to make sure that any functional changes to global filters would be done legitimately. However, I should also note that minor changes to global filters is all I'm applying for. Currently, I can't dedicate my time to other administrator tasks, including larger changes to global filters, or the creation of new filters. I'm not saying I will never ever do anything other than smaller filter changes, just that it's highly unlikely and I don't want to set false expectations. I hope this is OK for the community. Thank you, --Daimona Eaytoy (Talk) 16:52, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Melos (talk) 16:57, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support User is trusted and helpful. While is contributions on meta.wiki is obviously not impressive, his technical skills are definitely bullet-proof and his aid has been appreciated both on mediawiki wiki and in his home wiki, where he has IA and A flags. --M/ (talk) 17:00, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per M/ --Johannnes89 (talk) 18:05, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support thanks for volunteering--Sakretsu (炸裂) 18:14, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Trusted user, but activity on Meta is really low --Ameisenigel (talk) 18:29, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--doramiso-meta (talk) 07:55, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 11:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --V0lkanic (talk) 00:36, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support no concerns. – Ajraddatz (talk) 04:57, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 00:23, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question: I'm not sure I understand the last part right: are you asking for limited or for regular adminship here? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 23:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@1234qwer1234qwer4: Thanks, that's a good question. This is a request for regular adminship. I did consider applying for limited adminship instead, but I was confused by the Italian translation of Meta:Administrators#Limited_administrator_status, which at first glance made it look like only time limits were possible, and not scope limit. That's why I applied for regular adminship with the note about scope. I didn't want to cancel and restart the RfA with a different scope once it was ongoing, but I would also be OK with limited adminship, yes. --Daimona Eaytoy (Talk) 12:45, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Chqaz (talk) 05:07, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LR0725 [ Talk | Contribs ] 05:42, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trusted user. AlPaD (talk) 07:08, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tmv (talk) 01:30, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Perfectly reasonable request, support. Leaderboard (talk) 08:26, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:58, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above request page is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Comments about this page should be made in Meta:Babel or Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat.