Wiki Mûi-thé Ki-kim-hōe soán-kí/2022/Koaⁿ-hong cho͘-chit ê Hun-sek Úi-oân-hōe tē-khu tāi-piáu/A-chiu Thài-phêng-iûⁿ Tiong-sim (ESEAP)
Chit ê ia̍h-bīn thê-kiong A-chiu Thài-phêng-iûⁿ Tiong-sim (ESEAP) lāi ê cho͘-chit chi̍t-ê khong-kan lâi chham-ú 2022 nî Wiki Mûi-thé Ki-kim-hōe Táng-sū soán-kí Hun-sek Úi-oân-hōe
Chit pái ê soán-kí thêng-su, Ūn-tōng ê Chhek-lio̍k kap Tī-lí thoân-tūi ē lâi tàu-saⁿ-kāng.
Ramzy kap Vivien ē hū-chek liân-lo̍k A-chiu Thài-phêng-iûⁿ Tiong-sim (ESEAP) lāi ê só͘-ū koaⁿ-hong cho͘-chit, thê-kiong siong-koan ê chu-sìn kap pang-bâng.
Lōe-iông
The affiliate organizations voted in this election in July to shortlist six candidates from the candidate pool. Each affiliate organization was allowed one vote. This selection used the Single Transferable Vote method. Affiliate organizations discussed the candidates the affiliate organization wanted to select. Candidates ranked candidates in order of preference.
The Affiliate Representatives were able to ask questions for the candidates to answer. Candidates published answers starting on June 24.
To assist with this selection process, an Analysis Committee was be formed.
Analysis Committee
The Analysis Committee was formed from the affiliates during late April and May. The Analysis Committee was planned to be composed of 9 representatives of affiliates (including all chapters, user groups, and thematic groups) from regions across the movement. One each from:
- CEE (Central & Eastern Europe);
- ESEAP (East and Southeast Asia, and the Pacific region);
- Sub-saharan Africa;
- Latin America and the Caribbean;
- MENA (Middle East and North Africa);
- North America (USA and Canada);
- Northern and Western Europe;
- South Asia;
- plus one for thematic affiliates.
There was no representative from the Northern and Western Europe or South Asia.
The selection process to form the Analysis Committee was defined by the affiliates, with support of the Elections Committee and the Movement Strategy and Governance team as needed.
The Analysis Committee evaluated the candidates against the skills and diversity, equity and inclusion criteria shared by the Board of Trustees. The Analysis Committee used the statements the candidates answered on their application to rate the candidates. The Analysis Committee rated candidates with a gold/silver/bronze framework. This rating was used to provide input to the affiliate organizations when they planned their vote. The details of the evaluation of each candidate will not be shared.
After the six candidates were selected during the affiliate organization voting process, the ratings of each selected candidate were published to inform the community vote. This process aims to find the best balance between sharing useful information and minimizing unnecessary exposure of candidates.
Selected committee members
| Region | Representative |
|---|---|
| CEE (Central & Eastern Europe) | Mehman97 (talk • meta edits • global user summary • CA) |
| ESEAP (East, Southeast Asia, and the Pacific) | GDHFang (talk • meta edits • global user summary • CA) |
| Sub-Saharan Africa | Dnshitobu (talk • meta edits • global user summary • CA) |
| Latin America and the Caribbean | Superzerocool (talk • meta edits • global user summary • CA) |
| MENA (Middle East and North Africa) | علاء (talk • meta edits • global user summary • CA) |
| North America | Megs (talk • meta edits • global user summary • CA) |
| Western & Northern Europe | |
| SAARC (South Asia) | |
| Thematic Affiliates | Joalpe (talk • meta edits • global user summary • CA) |
Process
The Analysis Committee worked from late May to mid-June. Details of their meetings and process can be found on the Analysis Committee Discussions.
The Board Selection Task Force and the Elections Committee developed a set of evaluation criteria for the Analysis Committee to evaluate candidates against. The Analysis Committee members assessed candidates individually. Only two Movement Strategy and Governance facilitators who supported the process had access to these individual scores.
Koat-tēng úi-oân-hōe sêng-oân ê thêng-su
Múi chi̍t-ê tē-khu ē ùi in khu lāi ēng kong-pêⁿ ê tâu-phiò lâi soán--chhut 1 ê úi-oân, chòe-āu cho͘ sêng chi̍t-ê chóng-kiōng ū 9 ê úi-oân ê Hun-sek Úi-oân-hōe.
|
Kah cheng-chìn tē-khu ê thêng-su kāng-khoán, siong-koan ê pān-hoat ài iû ē-kha pió lāi ê só͘-ū koaⁿ-hong cho͘-chit lâi kiōng-tông koat-tēng.
Chit-ê ia̍h-bīn sī ūi-tio̍h hō͘ chia-ê cho͘-chit lâi hia̍p-tiau só͘ siat--ê, chhiáⁿ ta̍k-ê kiōng-tông lâi pian-chip.
Tē-khu ê koaⁿ-hong cho͘-chit
| Koaⁿ-hong cho͘-chit | Koaⁿ-hong cho͘-chit tāi-piáu | Soat-bêng |
|---|---|---|
| Myanmar Wikimedia Community User Group | ||
| PhilWiki Community | ||
| Vietnam Wikimedians User Group | ||
| Wikimedia Australia | ||
| Wikimedia Community User Group Malaysia | ||
| Wikimedia Indonesia | ||
| Wikimedia Thailand | ||
| Wikimedia User Group of Aotearoa New Zealand | Giantflightlessbirds | The NZ group will withdraw from consideration, as we would rather see more diversity in the Analysis Committee. |
| Wikimedia Community User Group Hong Kong | ||
| Wikimedia Taiwan | ||
| Wikipedia Asian Month User Group | ||
| Paiwan Wikimedians User Group | iyumu | We are appreciated to get involved in this regional discussions/elections. We hope the ESEAP representative will support language diversity of the movement which can encourage more small communities to take part in. |
| 위키미디어 한국 (Wikimedia Korea) |
Siūⁿ beh chham-ú Hun-sek Úi-oân-hōe ê iōng-chiá
(Chū-ngó͘ thê-miâ, iah-sī keng-iû bó͘-mih lâng tông-ì liáu-āu lâi thê-miâ i)
Please sign your username along with the affiliate name, and your view below to indicate whether you support the candidacy of GDHFang:
- Athikhun.suw (talk) 10:25, 18 May 2022 (UTC) (WMTH)
Support —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 21:43, 18 May 2022 (UTC)- Support Endorsed on behalf of WMHKG. Michael (WMHKG) (talk) 02:18, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support. As a member who has been involved in the Wikimedia movement, she/he is a right candidate to represent ESEAP community in the Analysis Committee. Rachmat (WMID) (talk) 04:05, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support. Wikimedia Australia (WMAU) thanks User:GDHFang (Wikimedia Taiwan) for being willing to serve on the Analysis Committee, and we support her as the ESEAP nomination. AmandaSLawrence (talk) 02:39, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
