維基鑑定

這是成立新的維基媒體基金會姊妹計劃的提案。
Wikidentify
提案狀態
狀態	已拒絕
原因	This can be done by Wikidata, once phab:T154426 is resolved.--GZWDer (talk) 06:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
提案詳情
計劃描述	identify objects on earth
是否為多語言wiki？	one mulitilingual wiki
預期語言數量	many
感興趣的參與者
	See below.
	v; t; e;

This page is a translated version of the page Wikidentify and the translation is 100% complete.

维基鉴定（或称之反面维基百科）可能将成为一个新计划，它的目的是识别地球上的东西，就像生物学上的zh:生物检索表那样。有许多并行的方式可以用来标识事物。通过维基数据，你最终可以定位到维基百科条目。你可以通过重组、剔除这些特型来组成新的特性。

使用示例

你选择黄色、柴油、排除卡车，你就可以得到一个复合这三个属性的车。
你设定高度、地理位置、选择生长在阴凉地的树木标签，就可以得到合适的物种列表。
你设定重量、颜色和其他一些物种特点就可以得到结果，比如一棵果树的果实。
你设定音量、国家、你看到的其他一些标签、有几个螺旋桨，就可以得到特定的飞机。
等等……

提案人

Conny (talk)

待选名稱

Wikidentification – All other WMF projects are nouns.

域名

http://wikidentify.org (for transfer)

郵件列表鏈接

not yet

模型

just in head
(http://ec2-54-234-76-44.compute-1.amazonaws.com/ (as long as running) I’m working on an identification key system running on Wikibase, the Mediawiki extension is here: LifeWeb.—LivingShadow (talk) 13:15, 19 August 2013 (UTC)) - has problems. Is there a possibility to rerun? Conny (talk) 10:00, 28 November 2013 (UTC).[reply]

感興趣的人

Conny (talk)
Harald Krichel (talk)
Gregor Hagedorn
Emw (talk)
Arnaugir (talk)
Nick1372 (talk)
Andreas Plank (talk)
ProtossPylon (talk)
--Seonookim (talk) 06:15, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
--Natuur12 (talk) 14:38, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wolf Lambert (talk) 12:31, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Bothvar (talk) 01:15, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Interested in the functionality, not necessarily through a new project. Daniel Mietchen (talk)
Hkjacksonhk 08:02, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting concept. Abyssal (talk) 16:29, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is concept interesting... --►Cekli 829 08:06, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
very interesting Miguel2706 (talk) 00:09, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Coldbolt (talk) 16:15, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds quite interessting. MGChecker (talk)

反对的人

This sounds like something to be implemented in WikiData; we don't need another sister project. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:33, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe sounds, but is more complex (just take the GUI). There are thinkings from experts necessary I think. Conny (talk) 13:40, 1 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]
I agree with Chris that this should be seen as a WikiData tool. I support its creation, but I don't see the need for a separate wiki for that. --Piotrus (talk) 03:57, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hm ok, maybe a seperate skin for Wikidentify is enough, if there is a way to integrate special needs like Klaas mentioned. Hope you opposers read discussion from specialists f. e. in german wikipedia (linked) and support overload of data for items to identify then. Maybe not everyone is interested in Wikidentify, but so this people maybe become the information overload in Wikidata... Thanks, Conny (talk) 09:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Klaas|Z4␟V: 09:13, 18 August 2013 (UTC) Agree with Chris. Great task for an advanced tool in WikiData perhaps even a special namespace there, I suggest to move this proposal to a suitable team of developers there.[reply]
Wikidata will be doing this. comment on why this project would be needed in addition to the current plans for Wikidata because I fail to see the need for this in addition to the current plans. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:06, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose based on current scope. It makes sense to create dichotomous key to identify biological species but adding others into the scope makes it a bit too broad. (Ok, I can see that niche audiences like aviation fans would potentially treat this site as the go-to source to identify aircraft types but I want to see more listed in the proposal on how to carry out its goal.) OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 19:18, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This would be a great add-on to Wikidata, but it's hard to see how a separate project is needed. -- Ypnypn (talk) 18:04, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I hope that Wikidata will offer such a tool, eventually. — Ivan Shmakov (d ▞ c) 09:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
As proposed, I don't see a use for this. Sven Manguard (talk) 22:50, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Completely duplicate with query feature of Wikidata.--GZWDer (talk) 14:04, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]