Ookuninusi
Welcome to Meta!
editHello, Ookuninusi. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum if you need help with something (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!
Discussion, not voting
editIt is a discussion, a debate of a sort, where people express arguments with their opinions. Please do not remove other persons comments. Thanks in advance. -- Nesmir Kudilovič (razgovor) 21:12, nedjelja, 17. prosinca 2017. (SEV)
I will go further: You are hereby warned that if you modify anyone else's comments again, even to add or remove an icon, I will block you as a disruptive, single-issue account. If you want to remain involved in this discussion, please be very aware of this. StevenJ81 (talk) 22:58, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Stop with removing other person's comments --НиколаБ (talk) 20:36, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- @НиколаБ and Zoranzoki21: Ookuninusi did not edit those remarks, I did. I did so because they are rude and disrespectful. And as Meta administrator with particular responsibility for pages within the "Requests for new languages" area, it is within my authority to do that.
- Still, if you wish to make the point that I reverted Ookuninusi for removing comments, fine. I will leave your comments alone hereafter. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:42, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- But noone must not to remove comments. It's not offensive. Is that clear? Zoranzoki21 (talk) 05:19, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Nemaš ti, ni bilo ko drugi, pravo da briše i menja tuđe komentare. Tim pre jer ono glasanje možeš da okačiš mačku o rep, ono je čisto izjašnjavanje, a s obzirom da skoro niko nije napisao ni jedan normalan argument ni za ni protiv, teško da će jezička komisija uopšte obratiti pažnju na isto. A što se tiče citiranja odlomaka iz Gorskog Vijenca, onakvu glupost može da napiše samo neko ko nikada u životu nije pročitao ni Gorski Vijenac, ni biografiju Petra Petrovića Njegoša (jer ne postoji ekavska verzija Gorskog Vijenca). I ne znam da li ti je poznato da je Vuk Karadžić koji je reformisao srpski jezik koristio ijekavicu, a da je njegov ijekavski prevod Biblije na srpski jezik i dan danas jedini koji SPC zvanično priznaje. Dakle, pre nego što napišeš nešto dobro razmisli o tome šta pišeš, čisto da se ne blamiraš (ovo ti dođe kao neki prijateljski savet). A što se crnogorskog jezika na vikipediji tiče, sa tim nemam problem, ali uz uslov da tu stranicu uređuju oni koji zaista taj jezik smatraju svojim maternjim i žele da ga unaprede i predstave internet zajednici na najbolji mogući način. A svi oni (a značajan im je broj) koji su tamo glasali za opciju da uz ironične komentare protiv srpskog jezika, ne da nisu za vikipediju, nego nisu ni za štalu. Ovo je enciklopedija i trebalo bi da se "tučemo" argumentima, a ne jeftinim političkim i nacionalističkim sranjima. Toliko od mene. Sve najbolje --НиколаБ (talk) 00:26, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
- Nema potrebe da se ponavljam. Ako će je uređivati takvi kao ti onda alal vera. Uzgred Njegoš je sam sebe nazivao tako kako je nazivao, a Gorski Vijenac pročitaj, neće da ti škodi. I svoj dnevnopolitički govor sa sve četnicima i posrbicama ostavi za kafanu gde mu je i mesto. Ovde prednost ipak imaju oni sa više od četiri razreda osnovne škole, dragi kolega. --НиколаБ (talk) 01:21, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
As an ORES fan, I must point that edits like this, are under criteria that will give you -10 points, because you made a very very large "block" of comments that without polish, thus a resourceful bot will simply revert your further comments as no construction. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 15:34, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Response from Evertype
editIt isn't his place to judge the Montenegrins' opinions. So please do not hurt him, can you? --36.102.227.22 23:24, 4 November 2018 (UTC)