Krd
- for older messages see archive
Hello
editHello, please do not remove the "User OTRS" template I'm on the team, but I changed my name from"شيماء" To "Ajwaan". Greetings. Ajwaan (talk) 20:58, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
- Please remove it from your user page, as you are not a member of the VRT. --Krd 08:01, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
- I sent you an email a while ago, so please deal with it because it matters.Ajwaan (talk) 12:31, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
- Please send it again. --Krd 12:34, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
- I sent you an email a while ago, so please deal with it because it matters.Ajwaan (talk) 12:31, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
VRT Recruits
edithello @Krd-san, i was about to apply for Volunteer Response Team, to work on ckb related matters or any thing else that i can. but i couldn't find the language on queue list. does it means i am not eligible to apply for VRT? 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 12:12, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- Dear Sakura emad. We currently don't have any special queues for ckb language, and I think we don't receive many request in this language. Do you think there is a need to offer to write in this language to the Volunteer Support Team? --Krd 15:54, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- i as an admin thought it would be necessary to Apply and response to any current/future matters. i've been told "please do apply even if you have experience that's not listed above!", is there anything for me to do? 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 21:47, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- This is true so far. You can apply at any time, and advise in which existing fields you want to help, or which new fields you would like to introduce. What does not work is to say "Here I am, now please assign me a task.", because this is not the way our volunteer culture is. As said we currently don't have any ckb related matters as suggested. --Krd 06:48, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- i understand thank you. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 16:09, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- This is true so far. You can apply at any time, and advise in which existing fields you want to help, or which new fields you would like to introduce. What does not work is to say "Here I am, now please assign me a task.", because this is not the way our volunteer culture is. As said we currently don't have any ckb related matters as suggested. --Krd 06:48, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- i as an admin thought it would be necessary to Apply and response to any current/future matters. i've been told "please do apply even if you have experience that's not listed above!", is there anything for me to do? 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 21:47, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
About global VRT permissions
editHello @Krd, I see that you have requested the removal of my VRT rights, and it has been done,
May I know why?
greetings User:Dezedien (talk) 09:05, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Please contact: volunteers-vrt@wikimedia.org --Krd 16:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi. I have access to VRT, and I saw the existence of the global authorization (which for some reason I did not receive), and I thought that perhaps for documentation purposes I should receive the authorization. I submitted a request, and was told that only VRT administrators request permission changes. Can you ask them to give me the permission? Thanks! Neriah - 💬 - 15:43, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- The global group is for permissions agents only, which you are not. --Krd 16:43, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hi. I have access to VRT, and I saw the existence of the global authorization (which for some reason I did not receive), and I thought that perhaps for documentation purposes I should receive the authorization. I submitted a request, and was told that only VRT administrators request permission changes. Can you ask them to give me the permission? Thanks! Neriah - 💬 - 15:43, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Ticket#2023030310009348
editHi dear. Please checking Ticket:2023030310009348 and answer. Tnx MehdiTalk 08:33, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- This is an important issue for me and I am waiting for an answer.--MehdiTalk 20:21, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- You can have a repetition of the previous answer immediately, or a qualified reevaluation after it's time. Please advise. --Krd 04:13, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- I want to know on what basis you found me unqualified when I don't have a bad record in this specialty? This is an insult to me.--MehdiTalk 05:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- You can have a repetition of the previous answer immediately, or a qualified reevaluation after it's time. Please advise. --Krd 04:13, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
VRT request
editI applied to be a VRT volunteer, but I saw you removed my application. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 08:39, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Correct. Krd 08:43, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Please advise if there is anything missing. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 08:47, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Please check your e-mail. Krd 08:49, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- I appreciate your response and will reapply after gaining some more experience. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 08:56, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Please check your e-mail. Krd 08:49, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Please advise if there is anything missing. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 08:47, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
YGM
editHello, Krd. Check your email—you've got mail! You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template. |
- FlightTime (open channel) 01:35, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Krdbot malfunction at SRP
editHello, Krd. I just thought that you should know about Special:Diff/25347576, which seemed to be an error by your bot. Thanks! Sdrqaz (talk) 14:14, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing out! Bug is now fixed. --Krd 16:13, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
VRT Access
editDear Krd, I received a notification regarding account closure on VRT. I am still active and logged in few days back if i remember correctly. Can we activate it again if possible. Thankyou. signed, 511KeV (talk) 08:09, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- Dear 511KeV, please see Volunteer Response Team/Activity policy and please let me know what you think. Krd 09:02, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Question re: streamlining
editHi, Krd - VRT's "canned" response after receiving an image license should be automated at the time of upload to eliminate that step. IOW, the process submits to VRT the name and location of the uploaded image at the same time it generates the ticket sent to us. It would make things far more efficient. If it cannot be automated, we could at least advise the uploader to include that info with their license release instead of adding that extra step. Atsme📞📧 19:41, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. I cannot follow. What exactly should be automated? Krd 19:46, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Apologies for the tardy response. What I am suggesting would take place at the VRTS release generator where the user chooses if they are either the copyright holder or represent the copyright holder (I think it's JavaScript). When they click on one of the 2 choices, they are asked to provide more information. Can we, at that point, simply add another box that requests the url of the image? I'm not a tech, but isn't that license information the info we get in the queue? If not, can it be added to whatever process sends us the information so that we don't have to take that extra step each time? Atsme📞📧 14:05, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- This question should go to the maintainer of the release generator. I'd also appreciate if we received only tickets that contain a link to the file. Krd 14:10, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Apologies for the tardy response. What I am suggesting would take place at the VRTS release generator where the user chooses if they are either the copyright holder or represent the copyright holder (I think it's JavaScript). When they click on one of the 2 choices, they are asked to provide more information. Can we, at that point, simply add another box that requests the url of the image? I'm not a tech, but isn't that license information the info we get in the queue? If not, can it be added to whatever process sends us the information so that we don't have to take that extra step each time? Atsme📞📧 14:05, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
VRT request
editGood day KRD, I was trying to add some VRT templates to files and was met with an error messages saying "you do not have rights for this function" (paraphrased) I know when you asked if I'd like to return, I said sure but en only, but can you bump up my access, same as my first run, if it's different from my current access. Thanx, - FlightTime (open channel) 16:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Why don't we discuss VRT only issue on VRT wiki? Krd 16:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Check your email
editHello, Krd. Check your email—you've got mail! You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template. |
--— Osama Eid (talk) 11:06, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. Your request has already been declined by other admins. Please stop asking. Krd 11:25, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your prompt response. However, I would like to express my concern that my previous requests may not have been seen by other supervisors. My continued persistence in seeking reconsideration underscores my profound remorse and underscores my earnest desire for another opportunity. I am pleading for just one chance to demonstrate my commitment to adhering to WikiCommons' policies.
- I sincerely hope you will reconsider my request and review my email. I am fully prepared to engage in discussions or provide any evidence necessary to illustrate my unwavering dedication to complying with WikiCommons' policies. Please, I need help. — Osama Eid (talk) 21:33, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Rauf Quliyev (hərbçi)
editHello. You deleted the file "Baş_leytenant_Rauf_Quliyev.jpg" that I uploaded due to the reason "No license since July 13, 2024" This file was received from the relatives of the deceased, was processed by me, restored and uploaded to Wikipedia. I want to restore this file, this file has not been used anywhere before. Please help me restore this file or show me the right way to upload a photo so that it does not contradict the site rules. Thank you
https://az.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rauf_Quliyev_(h%C9%99rb%C3%A7i)&action=history Ağaxanov Şamil (talk) 13:30, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
File verification
editDear Krd, I'm writing to address a recent issue involving a photo that was mistakenly removed from Wikimedia Commons out of concern for its license: File:Virginio Simonelli shot by Marco Melfi.jpg. It is a photo of Italian singer-songwriter Virginio Simonelli shot by the Italian photographer Marco Melfi, and also uploaded on Wikimedia by Marco himself.
I've been updating Virginio's Wikipedia for many years, as a fan. One day, I complimented Marco Melfi on a photoshoot he did of Virginio and I mentioned that his Wikipedia page has a very old picture, the one that appears now on the page. Marco saw that very low quality photo, and disliked it so much that he offered to upload one of his photos as replacement. He considered it a homage, and he did so immediately. Indeed, he used his personal mail to create the account "Marco Duck", and you can easily check that if you contact him on that mail. After that, I happily used his beautiful photo on Virginio's Wiki page. Despite Marco flagging the file as 'his own work', it still got tagged as missing permission by Gbawden, back on September 25th. I hadn't noticed that, but Marco immediately contacted me for help, because when user Gbawden did that, Marco received an automatic mail from Wikimedia that asked him to confirm his identity by sending a mail to the OTRS/VRT-volunteers. I told him he should send an email in which he stated that it's him and then wait for your reply. Now it's almost a week later and yet the file still doesn't appear to be verified. I am wondering, did you guys receive the correct e-mail from Marco? Or Marco didn't give you enough information to confirm his identity? Should I tell him to send another mail, and in that case, what does he have to write for it to be okay? Or the email Marco sent was okay and we just have to wait? Please let me know! Marco only speaks job-related intermediate English and does not understand the full Wikipedia system, so I'm trying to help him figure it all out. It's a shame to lose such a beautiful photo for a mistake.
Thank you for your understanding and cooperation! Ravenlions (talk) 15:17, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's impossible to answer the question. Did they get a ticket number in reply? If not, let them send the permission again. Krd 17:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Typo
editHi @Krd. I didn't realise User:Krd/inactive users is entirely moderated by the bot. I tried fixing a typo but the bot reverted it. Perhaps consider fixing the spelling wherever the data comes from. Change "Translation" to "Translation" in the section heading. Kind regards, ─ Aafī on Mobile (talk) 12:12, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Krd 14:35, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Ticket 2015021810018158
editHallo Krd, ich steh' gerade auf'm Schlauch, irgendwo gibt's doch so eine Seite, wo man Fragen zu Tickets an VRT stellen kann -- und ich finde sie einfach nicht wieder. Ich finde nur eine Seite, wo Ihr Admins nach Sprachen geordnet aufgelistet seid, daher schreibe ich Dich jetzt einfach mal direkt an.
Es geht um dieses Bild. Da steht als Urheber "Michael Bader", als Fotograf unten in den Exif-Daten dagegen "Stefan Mays". Das kann ja nun zumindest nach deutschem Urheberrecht nicht sein. Was besagt denn das Ticket, kannst Du das mal überprüfen?
Der Artikel, für den das Foto gedacht war, existiert übrigens längst nicht mehr. Ich habe den nicht selber gesehen, aber nach der LD zu urteilen, muss das wohl ein ziemlicher PR-Artikel gewesen sein. Grüße, --2003:C0:8F23:6B00:D1CE:83C:1FBC:D772 22:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Ups, das geht gleich noch weiter. Als diese beiden Fotos 1 2 gemacht wurden - nach Angabe 2013 - war der Abgebildete schon fast 20 Jahre tot. Ob der Enkel wohl wirklich der Fotograf war? --2003:C0:8F23:6B00:D1CE:83C:1FBC:D772 22:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hallo. Du suchst: c:com:VRT/Noticeboard. Das Ticket ist nach heutigem Standard ungültig, und ich habe die Datei entsprechend markiert. --Krd 03:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Request for information on deleting my user page
editBonjour Krd,
Je me permets de vous contacter suite à la suppression de ma page utilisateur intitulée "User:N. LA LÉGENDE" le 12 décembre 2024, pour la raison mentionnée : "Spam, Out of project scope".
Je souhaiterais comprendre plus précisément en quoi ma page ne respectait pas les règles de la plateforme. Mon intention n’était pas de violer les politiques du site, mais simplement de partager mon parcours et mes projets.
Serait-il possible de me guider pour que je puisse recréer une page conforme aux attentes du projet ? Je suis prêt à apporter les ajustements nécessaires pour que tout soit en règle.
Merci d’avance pour votre aide et votre retour.
Cordialement, N. LA LÉGENDE
- @Yann: Please comment. --Krd 07:45, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- @N. LA LÉGENDE: Bonjour, Wikimedia n'est un réseau social, et ce n'est pas la place pour faire votre promotion. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:11, 13 December 2024 (UTC)