User talk:Chalk19

Welcome to Meta!

Hello, Chalk19. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum if you need help with something (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!

-- Meta-Wiki Welcome (talk) 10:05, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Closure of requests under SRCU

Under which policy, you think your closure is good? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:12, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Ιs this a joke, or something, Liuxinyu970226? 'Cause is a rather bad one. ——Chalk19 (talk) 07:25, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Joke? What's that? {{StewardsList}} listed you? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:29, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

• For the record: [1]. ——Chalk19 (talk) 06:28, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Γκαίτε

Των βουνών οι κορφές

Μέσα στην σκοτεινιά βαθιά κοιμούνται,

Οι κοιλάδες σιωπηλές

Με την καταχνιά φιλιούνται.

Ο δρόμος δεν σηκώνει σκόνη,

Δεν τρέμει το φύλλωμα δασύ…

Μην περιμένεις άλλο

Γίνε διαχειριστής κι εσύ!

Είδες. Για σένα γράφτηκε. Μην καθυστερείς. Κρίμα που δεν μπορώ να σε προτείνω εγώ ο ίδιος.--2A02:587:8007:1300:F11B:6BD6:23CC:AFD4 15:21, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Για την ακρίβεια είναι (πολύ) ελεύθερη απόδοση του Λέρμοντοφ στο παρακάτω ποίημα του Γκαίτε:

Über allen Gipfeln

Ist Ruh,

In allen Wipfeln

Spürest du

Kaum einen Hauch;

Die Vögelein schweigen

im Walde.

Warte nur, balde

Ruhest du auch.

Είναι ουσιαστικά ένα νέο ποίημα. ——Chalk19 (talk) 21:20, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Ουσιαστικά είναι μια αναγκαιότητα. Πρέπει να γίνεις και να είσαι απέναντί μου. Εσένα θέλω να πολεμώ κι όχι κομπλεξικούς. Την αγάπη μου.--2A02:587:8019:4200:4990:E4DF:14B8:A302 10:09, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Καλά Χριστούγεννα

Σήμερα δεν θέλω να σε βρίσω, επειδή είναι μία άγια ημέρα. Χρόνια πολλά φίλτατε!--Τσακαλάρωφ (talk) 10:36, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Related to your comment

Hello! I see you pinged me. I think you deleted it for a reason. I'm not sure why, but I hope my answer helps you and I can help you.

As you probably already know, Wikimedia has so many LTAs and bad users. It is impossible to know all malicious users. Therefore, if you can properly present as much information as possible and connectivity to users who have been previously abused(checkuser info, etc.. not just users), it will help to understand the exact situation. If you wish to investigate further with other users, please leave a request at any time with sufficient information. Of course, the checkuser tool is quite limited, and sometimes it's also useless.. :( If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me. Thank you and I hope you stay safe. --Sotiale (talk) 06:43, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

@Sotiale: I had second thoughts and I came to the conclusion that in this case, as you generally comment above, a CU would be useless. I found evidence that the suspicious account with the Spanish name, even if it is not a case of a new disguise of Yannis Livadas (Γιάννης Λειβαδάς) who appeared in order to support keeping "his" article @el/WP and not have it deleted, it is someone who has professional relationtioship with him. So, anyway or another there is COI and the account is either a sock- or a meatpuppet. Thanks for sharing your thoughts with me, and take care. ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 10:17, 6 June 2020 (UTC)