Meta:Requests for oversight/Elton

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Elton edit

Not ending before 9 March 2024 20:10 (UTC)

(Minimum 25 support votes are required)

Hello. I would like to request the local oversight permission at Meta-Wiki. I'm active in global patrolling and countervandalism related duties and regularly come across material that falls under the oversight policy. There is also an issue with global suppression of accounts via CentralAuth preventing the hiding of problematic edits and log entries of such accounts without OS rights due to the way MediaWiki handles it (sysop-level RevDel and suppression cannot coexist). There is a (somewhat bad) workaround I often use for this, but the inability to hide abuse filter log entries remains, and I prefer to do things the "proper" way. With the resignation of MarcoAurelio and the removal of -revi for inactivity, Meta is currently down to 3 (three) oversighters. There may not be an immediate need for another oversighter, but we should aim to not have possible problems with regards to availability or with delays in the processing of local suppression. As a steward (since 2017, formerly Defender), I already have access to everything oversighted and the suppression log, so I'm actually asking for permission to use oversight tools here outside of urgent emergencies, since I'm interested to help in this area. Thank you for your time and consideration. — Elton (talk) 20:10, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support
  1. Support Support LGTM and we could use some oversighters now that we have lost two. EPIC (talk) 20:14, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Support sure: candidate competence and given reasons leave no doubt. M/ (talk) 20:20, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Support No issues. Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 20:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Support No concerns. ~ Yahya (talkcontribs) 20:35, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 21:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Support --TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 21:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support Support More oversighters can't be a bad thing. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 21:53, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support Support Why not? ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 22:45, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support No doubts. --Stïnger (会話) 23:11, 2 March 2024 (UTC).[reply]
  10. Support Support --1108-Kiju/Talk 02:53, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support Support --Syunsyunminmin 🗨️talk 05:25, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support Support hope to see a quicker response from the team. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:28, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support Support --Johannnes89 (talk) 06:49, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support Support - no concerns, would also be happy to see non-stewards run for meta functionary roles to distribute the permissions a bit. – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:08, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support SupportMdsShakil (talk) 18:16, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support Support--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 18:24, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support Support Jianhui67 talkcontribs 18:27, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support Support --V0lkanic (talk) 14:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support Support--Vituzzu (talk) 14:12, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support SupportAmmarpad (talk) 16:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support Support, no concerns here. Codename Noreste 🤔 talk 06:02, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support Support. —— Eric LiuTalk 08:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support SupportDreamRimmer (talk) 13:56, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support Support -Fastily 23:51, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support Support --Hoo man (talk) 17:34, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose
Neutral

Done. 25 supports, 100% approval. — xaosflux Talk 03:53, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above request page is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Comments about this page should be made in Meta:Babel or Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat.