Meta:Requests for adminship/1997kB

1997kB

1997kB (talk • contribs • deleted user contributions • logs • block log • abuse log • CentralAuth • stalktoy) Bureaucrats: user rights management.

Ending 22 November 2019 01:56 (UTC)

Hello everyone, I am 1997kB. I am a native Hindi and advanced English speaker. I mainly contribute on the English Wikipedia and Wikidata (where I'm a sysop). I am also a global renamer and rollbacker. Being a renamer, I usually spend time on Meta-wiki and also patrol recent changes. My main reason for requesting is to help in stopping vandalism and LTAs. Apart from that I also monitor spam addition reports by COIbot and can help there too.

If anyone have any questions or concerns, feel free to ask. Thank you for your consideration! ‐‐1997kB (talk) 01:56, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support I'm in strong support. 1997kB is highly experienced, trustworthy, responsible, and knows when to act and when to stop and ask for input. They’re an administrator on Wikidata, and a trusted user on many other projects. I have no doubt they will be beneficial to Meta-Wiki in an administrative capacity. Thank you for volunteering, Vermont (talk) 02:01, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support -MrJaroslavik (talk) 02:45, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Completely agreed with Vermont above. No concerns here. To me, 1997kB is a suitable candidate. I really appreciate their contributions and wish them all the best for this RFA. Namaste! Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:37, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support simply —Eihel (talk) 05:59, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. 1997kB has been doing very good work on many projects and here on meta. I think he will be a reliable admin so I strongly support this request.--BRP^ever 07:29, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support per Vermont. We need more active, competent and experienced admins here to counter attacks by vandals and LTAs. Masum Reza^☎ 08:15, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes quite active and competent. – Ammarpad (talk) 16:34, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Novak Watchmen (talk) 16:36, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Of course! —Sgd. Hasley 16:37, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for helping. --Sotiale (talk) 16:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support good user.--Turkmen ^talk 17:24, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 02:47, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support -J. Ansari Talk 16:22, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support - competent and well trusted. Good communication skills too. Thanks for volunteering. --Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:49, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support per others. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:36, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support good candidate. – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:03, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. -- Несмир Кудилович (разговор) 16:05, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks fine from my eyes. Leaderboard (talk) 19:55, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Vermont and Tulsi Bhagat. FitIndia ^{Talk Commons} 16:21, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support without doubt --94rain ^Talk 00:18, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? Murbaut (talk) 04:22, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Matiia (talk) 22:50, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]