MediaWiki talk:Gadget-markAdmins-data.json/Archives/2021
Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in 2021, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion or the archives index. |
Edit request
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add Uncitoyen to regular sysops. -- CptViraj (talk) 06:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Done. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 13:04, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- @MarcoAurelio: Can you please remove Pmlineditor from Stewards who aren't local sysop? Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 15:40, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Done. Matiia (talk) 15:42, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Gracias. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Please remove MoiraMoira from Global sysops who aren't local sysop. Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 08:57, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- ^ Also Vogone, Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 11:44, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Done both. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:53, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Gracias. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Done. Matiia (talk) 15:42, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- @MarcoAurelio: Can you please remove Pmlineditor from Stewards who aren't local sysop? Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 15:40, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Sgd. —Hasley 19:26, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Ah3kal
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please remove Ah3kal from Global sysops who aren't local sysop. Meiræ 22:58, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- {[done}} thanks — billinghurst sDrewth 05:00, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Sgd. —Hasley 19:27, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Edit request
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Matiia is no longer a steward. Thanks. Sgd. —Hasley 19:25, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- Done per special:diff/21005839. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:37, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Sgd. —Hasley 22:45, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Ombuds updates
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hello, can someone update page from User:MrJaroslavik/1.js? While ProtoplasmaKid isn't promoted yet, i think he can be added as he will be promoted soon.Thank you, --MrJaroslavik (talk) 19:42, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- ComparePages Noted, though I will comfortably wait until it occurs. Time frame? — billinghurst sDrewth 22:30, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, there is an announcement Ombuds 2021. @MrJaroslavik: are those coming off the commission, happy to be removed early? — billinghurst sDrewth 22:35, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- This change is not urgent, but gadget is "confused" :),--MrJaroslavik (talk) 22:45, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Partly done in Special:Diff/21010592. ProtoplasmaKid will be added once his NDA and 2FA status is confirmed. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:56, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- ProtoplasmaKid have been promoted.--MrJaroslavik (talk) 20:39, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Partly done in Special:Diff/21010592. ProtoplasmaKid will be added once his NDA and 2FA status is confirmed. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:56, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- This change is not urgent, but gadget is "confused" :),--MrJaroslavik (talk) 22:45, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, there is an announcement Ombuds 2021. @MrJaroslavik: are those coming off the commission, happy to be removed early? — billinghurst sDrewth 22:35, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: CptViraj (talk) 17:38, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Holder
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
@Holder: (thx for service) resigned from global sysopship today see. Since Holder isn't a Meta admin, it can be removed from the list. --Uncitoyentalk 12:32, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Also please add Uncitoyen to GSs.--MrJaroslavik (talk) 08:46, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Also add me to GS. Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 09:16, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Done x3 --DannyS712 (talk) 22:10, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: CptViraj (talk) 17:38, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Edit request
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please remove User:Krd from stewards. Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 18:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- Already done. — xaosflux Talk 15:36, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Also remove User:Esteban16 from GS. -- CptViraj (talk) 16:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Also remove User:~riley from GS. -- CptViraj (talk) 12:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Done all done. — xaosflux Talk 15:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: CptViraj (talk) 17:38, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Int admins
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hello, what about interface administrators? :) There is function for IA, bot only one is listed,--MrJaroslavik (talk) 16:04, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
If you want add them, you can copy code from User:MrJaroslavik/1.js (changes from previous section included),--MrJaroslavik (talk) 16:25, 31 January 2021 (UTC)- I will support this as sensible, raising a EP to raise attention, as I want some consensus before adding. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:42, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Why? What about them? What is the value in their addition? What are you achieving? — billinghurst sDrewth 23:24, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Because there is one. Or you can just remove this one user :).--MrJaroslavik (talk) 03:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- I will propose we add all or we remove that one. Anyway they aren't that active here. My 2 cents. It's odd that we leave it, this I agree with @MrJaroslavik. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Because there is one. Or you can just remove this one user :).--MrJaroslavik (talk) 03:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Why? What about them? What is the value in their addition? What are you achieving? — billinghurst sDrewth 23:24, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- I will support this as sensible, raising a EP to raise attention, as I want some consensus before adding. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:42, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Partially done. I've added all of the non-admins int-admins to the list. Admins that also happen to be int-admins aren't really needed as int-admin is 'shall issue' to any admin that wants it. — xaosflux Talk 15:12, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Samuel (WMF)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hello, please remove User:Samuel (WMF) from WMF T&S section here, thanks >> [1] << --MrJaroslavik (talk) 20:44, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done. Sgd. —Hasley 01:37, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
A question
{{edit protected}} I'm not sure about that, but can we add them to this list? MusikBot II is indefinite limited admin and DAlangi (WMF), Ottomata, Mforns (WMF) are temporary sysops appointed by WMF decree. Also ever Abuse filter also discussed? Since there is no sign next to their usernames even they have the sysop rights, I thought ask directly in this page. Regards. --Uncitoyentalk 22:57, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
1234qwer1234qwer4
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
1234qwer1234qwer4 is a new Meta admin per this RfA. Regards. --Uncitoyentalk 21:31, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- Done. Sgd. —Hasley 22:54, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Sgd. —Hasley 23:01, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Remove Willie Robert
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
No longer a temporary sysop per User talk:Willie Robert#Limited adminship granted. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:28, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Done --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:41, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: कन्हाई प्रसाद चौरसिया (talk) 11:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Interface admins
Any reason why we only add non-sysop or WMF-appointed interface admins? Special:ListUsers/interface-admin shows quite a number of unmarked interface administrators. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:15, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Just as a note, this was already discussed at #Int admins. Sgd. —Hasley 14:23, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link. I don't understand @Xaosflux's point though: Why should we mark non-sysop interface administrators bot not ones that are also sysops? To know if a user can edit a script page, the information whether they are a sysop is irrelevant. If one wants a script page deleted, they would be looking for users that are in both groups. The script is not about sysops getting interface admin, but about users looking for members of specific user groups. Note also that all interface admins are marked in the most widely used equivalent user script at enwiki, though different wikis may have different practices, of course. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 15:46, 29 September 2021 (UTC)- If you need to go find an intadmin+admin, just go to the very short list at Special:ListUsers/interface-admin - trying to hover everyone and hope they might be one is very inefficient. — xaosflux Talk 17:49, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- What's the point in this script at all then? And why wouldn't the same apply to non-sysop interface admins? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:53, 29 September 2021 (UTC) - @Xaosflux ping. Also, this script is not about hovering (that would be navpopups) but about seeing the user rights directly. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 23:07, 8 October 2021 (UTC)- Oh yea. this is about adding (I) after people for example, again not really needed, int-admins don't have any special "social status", we flag the non-sysop ones to make it clear what they may have been up to as opposed to something a GIE may have done - if you actually want to hunt down an int-admin, see the link above. — xaosflux Talk 23:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- What's the point in this script at all then? And why wouldn't the same apply to non-sysop interface admins? ~~~~
- If you need to go find an intadmin+admin, just go to the very short list at Special:ListUsers/interface-admin - trying to hover everyone and hope they might be one is very inefficient. — xaosflux Talk 17:49, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link. I don't understand @Xaosflux's point though: Why should we mark non-sysop interface administrators bot not ones that are also sysops? To know if a user can edit a script page, the information whether they are a sysop is irrelevant. If one wants a script page deleted, they would be looking for users that are in both groups. The script is not about sysops getting interface admin, but about users looking for members of specific user groups. Note also that all interface admins are marked in the most widely used equivalent user script at enwiki, though different wikis may have different practices, of course. ~~~~