Küresel yasaklama

This page is a translated version of the page Global bans and the translation is 25% complete.
Other languages:
Afrikaans • ‎Bahasa Indonesia • ‎Deutsch • ‎Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ • ‎English • ‎Esperanto • ‎Kiswahili • ‎Lëtzebuergesch • ‎Nederlands • ‎Tiếng Việt • ‎Türkçe • ‎Zazaki • ‎azərbaycanca • ‎català • ‎dansk • ‎español • ‎français • ‎italiano • ‎magyar • ‎occitan • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎română • ‎slovenščina • ‎suomi • ‎svenska • ‎Ελληνικά • ‎български • ‎македонски • ‎русский • ‎العربية • ‎سنڌي • ‎فارسی • ‎मराठी • ‎हिन्दी • ‎ગુજરાતી • ‎中文 • ‎日本語 • ‎한국어

Bir küresel yasak, tüm Wikimedia projelerinde düzenleme veya diğer erişim ayrıcalıklarının (örneğin, Special:EmailUser nın kullanılması) resmi bir iptalidir. Küresel bir yasağın amacı, bir sorun topluluk tarafından daha az kısıtlayıcı yollarla ele alınamadığında ve dolayısıyla genellikle kalıcı olduğunda, bunun Wikimedia projelerine zarar vermesini önlemektir. Küresel bir yasak, bir ceza biçimi olmadığı gibi, bir soğuma süresi sağlamayı da amaçlamaz. Küresel bir yasak, geniş ve net bir topluluk konsensüsünü yansıtır.

Global bans are exclusively applied where multiple independent communities have previously elected to ban a user for a pattern of abuse. Wikimedia projects are entirely self-governing. Typically, good faith is assumed when a user chooses to become a member of a new community, regardless of his/her history on other projects. Consequently, global bans are not a possibility where a user is only temporarily blocked, or only banned on a single project. Please remember, global bans are intentionally very infrequent.

Küresel yasaklar, IP adreslerinin veya aralıklarının Meta hariç hiçbir Wikimedia Projesini düzenlemesini önlemek için kullanılan küresel engelleme ile karıştırılmamalıdır.

Küresel yasaklamalara yönelik ölçütler

Küresel yasaklama sadece aşağıdaki ölçütlerin tamamı karşılandığında düşünülmelidir:

  1. Kullanıcı, yalnızca vandalizm veya spam olmayan, devam eden bir çapraz wiki kötüye kullanımı modeli gösterir. Tartışmasız çapraz-wiki vandalizmi veya spam vakaları için küresel bir yasak gerekli değildir, çünkü bunlar küresel bir engelleme veya kilitleme ile halledilebilir. (bir kahya tarafından kapsamlı bir tartışmaya ihtiyaç duyulmadan da yapılabilir). Kahya istekleri/Küresel sayfasına bakabilirsiniz.
  2. Kullanıcı, projelere uygun katılım konusunda dikkatlice bilgilendirilmiş ve herhangi bir sorunu düzeltme fırsatı bulmuştur. Bu projeler, misyonları ve kapsamlarıyla tutarlı kabul edilebilir uygulamaları ve davranışları kullanıcıya açıklamak için iyi niyetle bir girişim sergilemiş olmalıdır. Bu kriter, kullanıcıların kendilerinden ne beklendiğini makul bir şekilde bildiklerini, endişelerini uygun şekilde ele almak için bolca fırsata sahip olduklarını ve projelere uygun şekilde katılmamayı seçtiklerini göstermektedir.
  3. Kullanıcı, iki veya daha fazla projede süresiz olarak engellenir veya yasaklanır. Bu engeller veya yasaklar, kullanıcının yerel yıkıcı davranışlarına dayanmalıdır. İstekler; yerel düzenlemeleri olmayan kullanıcılar için önleyici engellemeler, hesap güvenliği sorunu veya sorunlu kullanıcı adına dayanan engellemeler için istenmemelidir.

Merely meeting the above minimum criteria does not mean that a global ban is required. Past reasons for requesting a global ban have included:

  • Harassing or threatening contributors to the projects, on- or off-wiki.
  • Serious on-wiki fraud or identity theft that is not simple abuse of multiple accounts.
  • Inappropriate use of user rights with access to private information, such as CheckUser or Oversight.
  • Violations of the privacy policy or other official Wikimedia policies.
  • Persistent cross-wiki copyright violation

Relation to local policy

This policy is meant to complement existing policies and procedures for all projects, not act as a replacement. All governance of the dispute resolution process remains the responsibility of each individual community, and this process is not a venue for entertaining proposals to ban or block a user on a single project.

Relation to the Terms of Use

The Wikimedia Terms of Use, which apply equally to all users of the projects, specifically refer to this policy and supports banning users violating either the terms themselves or any mandatory community policies and guidelines. As the service provider of Wikimedia websites, the Foundation has and continues to support community consensus relating to blocking and banning decisions.

Obtaining consensus for a global ban

 
A simplified workflow.

Consensus for a global ban is conducted through the requests for comment process on Meta. A global ban request must only be accepted when a user presents a clear and current danger to all Wikimedia communities, a decision is backed by a broad and clear consensus that fairly represents the vast majority of Wikimedia projects, and careful consideration of concerns and possible consequences are evident in the decision. In order to initiate a discussion on whether harm to all communities is evident and merits a global ban, please do the following:

  1. Confirm that the user satisfies all criteria for global bans prior to opening a request for comment.
  2. File a new request for comment on Meta. The title should have the username of the user nominated for a global ban. The nominator must impartially document the significant incidences that satisfy all criteria for global bans. The nominator must also attempt to show that the user's decision not to participate appropriately presents a current danger to all Wikimedia communities.
  3. Inform the user about the discussion on all wikis where they are active. If the user nominated for a global ban is blocked on Meta, a temporary unblock may be considered to allow participation in the discussion.
  4. Inform the community on all wikis where the user has edited about the discussion through a prominent public venue. Be sure to stay neutral in your communications and avoid any defamatory, inaccurate, or exaggerated commentary.

A nomination that fails to correctly follow the above steps is invalid, and may be speedily closed. In addition, to make a nomination valid, the nominator must:

  1. have a Wikimedia account; and
  2. be registered for more than six months before making the request; and
  3. have at least 500 edits globally (on all Wikimedia wikis).

Once a valid request for comment has developed a broad and clear consensus, an uninvolved and impartial steward may close the discussion. Discussion should be open for at least two weeks, but no more than one month. Stewards may extend the discussion in exceptional circumstances. Requests can be closed without extensive discussion when frivolous. Requests can be closed after an extensive discussion when no consensus is likely to be reached.

Multilingualism in discussion

Please be aware that the discussion can and should be conducted in the relevant language or languages of any projects where the user has been active. Wikimedia projects exist in hundreds of languages, and thus a wide variety of communities should be afforded the ability to participate in global discussions regardless of their fluency in any second language. In cases where there are no human translators available, machine translation may function as a substitute for communication between communities.

Implementing a global ban

A global ban formally revokes some or all privileges at all Wikimedia projects, regardless of whether accounts are attached through the unified login system. Any attempt to circumvent an active global ban constitutes a violation of the Terms of Use, regardless of accounts used. Accordingly, local communities where the user is blocked or active should be informed in a prominent public venue about the decision. Stewards may also choose to respond to requests to globally lock proven alternate accounts of a globally banned user.

If the consensus requires steward action, a request should be made to the stewards. Please provide a link to the relevant discussion in your request; otherwise it will be rejected for lack of consensus.

Overturning a global ban decision

Discussion to overturn a global ban decision is conducted through the request for comment process on Meta, in order to include the widest possible audience. A request must follow the same consensus process for requesting a ban, described above.

Ayrıca bakınız