Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Encuesta sobre los deseos de la comunidad 2015/Páginas especiales

< Community Wishlist Survey 2015
This page is a translated version of the page Community Wishlist Survey 2015/Special pages and the translation is 100% complete.
Other languages:

Mejorar Special:Log

Esta es una colección de solicitudes para mejorar la habilidad de buscar acciones registradas:

MER-C (talk) 21:37, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Earlier discussion and endorsements
  Endorsed The log could also benefit from the same date filtering improvements proposed at #Improve date range searches on Special:Contributions. the wub "?!" 01:12, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Votos

  1.   Support Jenks24 (talk) 10:49, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Support as proposer. The last item on that list is now in code review, by the way. MER-C (talk) 10:52, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Support yes please! This, that and the other (talk) 13:19, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Support BethNaught (talk) 17:42, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Support --MGChecker (talk) 19:36, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Support --Grind24 (talk) 20:42, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Support. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 21:24, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Support. Will permit a number of useful searches that now are almost impossible. DGG (talk) 02:25, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9.   Support. John Vandenberg (talk) 02:56, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10.   Support Risker (talk) 04:18, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11.   Support --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:29, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12.   Support --g (talk) 14:54, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  13.   Support Matiia (talk) 15:09, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  14.   Support Matěj Suchánek (talk) 18:07, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  15.   Support --Usien6 (talk) 21:05, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  16.   Support Graham87 (talk) 11:47, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  17.   Support Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 13:05, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  18.   Support — NickK (talk) 15:27, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  19.   Support Rzuwig► 11:00, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  20.   Support SantiLak (talk) 10:49, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  21.   Support Bináris tell me 19:03, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  22.   Support J36miles (talk) 00:33, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Normalizar las páginas especiales para los borrados, restauraciones y traslados en lote

Actualmente, no hay una forma «fija» masiva de borrar, restaurar o mover un rango de páginas o subpáginas.

Frecuentemente los administradores en proyectos como Wikisource, por ejemplo, deben afrontar la tarea de borrar docenas, si no es que cientos, de páginas o subpáginas. Esto se debe en parte a nuevas verificaciones de derechos de autor. También se da el caso inverso en el que deben restaurar un rango de páinas cuando información nueva invalida las afirmaciones usadas para justificar un borrado anterior. En otros momentos, un cambio en el archivo fuente usado anteriormente para transcribir y transcluir una serie de páginas se vuelve problemático porque el contenido existente ya no se alinea con la paginación del archivo fuente modificado. Para no zumbar listando todos los escenarios posibles que requieren tales funciones masivas (o en «lote»), baste decir que existe la necesidad por este tipo de herramienta y que esta herramienta debería estar disponible para todos los que posean los accesos apropiados.

Si todas las personas autorizadas para borrar o mover páginas sin dejar una redirección pueden realizar estas funciones fácilmente, entonces todos los que colaboran con los proyectos correspondientes de Wikisource definitivamente se beneficiarán. Wikilibros y la Wikiversidad también podrían encontrar que estas funciones serían útiles.

Actualmente Special:Nuke está limitada a las páginas creadas recientemente o a las páginas creadas por un único usuario activo. Esto no ayuda cuando es necesario modificar proyectos que han permanecido estáticos por meses o años y que han recibido colaboraciones de múltiples editores. Cuando surge una situación que requiere una de estas acciones masivas, la solicitud se documenta lo mejor que se puede y se espera a que alguna de las pocas personas capaces de ejecutarlas usando secuencias de comandos, Python, tool-labs, wmfLabs o herramientas parecidas pueda darle su atención. No es justo cargar consistentemente estas tareas al mismo conjunto reducido de individuos y tampoco es eficiente que los colaboradores deban esperar hasta que se puedan trasladar 100 páginas individualmente en vez de moverlas simultáneamente con un solo proceso.

  • La solución optima sería diseñar un página especial fácil de usar para borrar páginas de forma masiva (y restaurarlas) y otra página especial para realizar traslados masivos que pueda trabajar con rangos o valores iniciales como parte de la instalación estándar de la aplicación central de MediaWiki.
  • La siguiente mejor opción sería tener una forma de lograr lo mismo usando secuencias de comandos o accesorios localmente y preferiblemente sin requerir recursos «externos» como «labs» o «tools» para ejecutar el proceso.

Ambas opciones parecen plausibles juzgando por lo que puedo ver en el accesorio Twinkle (ver w:MediaWiki:Gadget-twinklebatchdelete.js, w:MediaWiki:Gadget-twinklebatchundelete.js y w:MediaWiki:Gadget-twinklebatchprotect.js entre sus componentes)

Gracias de antemano por cualquier consideración. -- George Orwell III (talk) 02:23, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Earlier discussion and endorsements
The gadget works for me after the fix which was suggested on Phabricator is applied. Does it still not work for you after clearing the cache? --Glaisher (talk) 16:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  Endorsed your optimal solution -- this is something that should be in core MediaWiki. MER-C (talk) 16:53, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Votos

  1.   Support Should be an easy project, with significant win especially for projects using subpages in content namespace. John Vandenberg (talk) 01:50, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Support --YodinT 02:13, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Support – Would seem to be an obvious benefit to Admins, who currently have to use third-party tools to achieve the same result. IJBall (talk) 03:50, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Support Risker (talk) 04:20, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Support - Whaledad (talk) 15:31, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Support - Even for users - Stunteltje (talk) 16:39, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Support I think that this task is a benefit for sysops. --Urbanecm (talk) 17:41, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Support MER-C (talk) 20:20, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9.   Support — George Orwell III (talk) 23:29, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10.   Support Popcorndude (talk) 03:46, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11.   Support Yes please. I use AutoWikiBrouwser for batch deletions and moves, but I do not know a way of fast undeletion of files. I was once undeleting 300 pages from an encyclopedia deleted by mistake by other admin who agreed to a "mistake" refused to undelete them. It was quite painful and time consuming. --Jarekt (talk) 04:51, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12.   Support Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 13:07, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  13.   Support--Manlleus (talk) 15:45, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  14.   Support —Beleg Tâl (talk) 16:48, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  15.   Support SantiLak (talk) 10:49, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Comment: (Support) -- AshLin (talk) 18:55, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Community_Wishlist_Survey_2015/Special_pages/es&oldid=26128354"